Sunday, May 3, 2026

The Race To Bankruptcy Court: Where The Nation's Wealth and Economic Power Is Moving To

We are going to take a little break from the past five posts which showed the disgusting waste of taxpayer wealth that is criminally siphoned off from Medicaid, Covid, and other government programs. Instead, we will update some of the latest news and probabilities on what states and cities are likely to go bankrupt first.

As always, our top state governments that we think are nearing bankruptcy include New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and California. Our top major cities we think are rapidly approaching bankruptcy include New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco.

Before reviewing the latest news and seeing which state or city is making the best progress towards government bankruptcy, let’s review how these cities and states got themselves into this financial death spiral position to begin with:
  • A government entity keeps expanding its budget, eventually putting pressure on the tax revenue stream it receives.
  • At some point, rather than cut government spending or make its programs more efficient financially, the politicians in charge raise taxes to meet the ever growing government expenditures.
  • The raising of taxes causes some residents and businesses to leave the city or state for less tax burdensome areas, reducing the tax base and reducing the revenue stream.
  • Rather than cut expenses and become more efficient to match the reduced tax revenue stream, politicians in the above cities or states raise the tax burden even more.
  • This causes more residents and businesses to flee the city or state, further reducing the tax base and tax revenue stream.
  • At some point politicians panic and raise taxes more and start cutting vital government services (e.g. police, fire, education) in order to try and balance government spending against the shrinking tax base and revenue stream.
  • The reduction in quality of government services in particular and quality of life in general drives more residents and businesses out of the area.
  • Eventually, the expenses, costs and financial liabilities outstrip the reduced tax stream and bankruptcy occurs.
Okay, that's the process, let's look at the mounting evidence across the country on how this is playing out.

Today’s discussion  will be based on a recent analysis by the American Legislative Exchange  Council (ALEC) that was published in its annual, ”Rich States, Poor States”  publication. The ALEC looks at official IRS data to  track how wealth is being redistributed and moving around the country by citizens. 

Remember, as listed above,  it is our contention  that people and  businesses are moving out of high tax, high business regulation, high cost of  living and high crime states and cities to other areas in the country that offer a more economical and better quality of life.  We have  discussed many times on  how many of the businesses moving around the country are some of the Fortune 500 giants of industry so it is a pretty much proven fact that bigger, wealthier companies are moving.

But what about our contention that individual citizens are also moving? Are these movers also the wealthier and better off families and individuals  or are the less wealthy,  the less  well off citizens moving? Obviously, if a  state or city is losing population  like we have shown, it may not be as bad if the less wealthy are moving out since the impact on the tax base would not be as great. The ALEC  analysis allows us to  explore that concept.

1)The “Rich States, Poor States”  methodology ranks all  50 states on their economic competitiveness using  IRS data at the county level. Thus, the approach does not measure headcount moving around but how much Adjusted Gross Income (AGI), as reported on their IRS tax forms, is moving, i.e. are poorer people moving or richer people moving? They looked at all 2,135 counties across the country.

2)The analysis found results that are consistent with our past discussions: not only are people moving out of the states and cities listed above that are heading towards bankruptcy but they are taking billions of dollars of taxable income with them  when they move.

3)Not surprising, the counties losing the most AGI are located mostly in the states listed above that are our top candidates to go bankrupt pretty soon:

  • Cook County (home county of Chicago, one of our prime city candidates to  go bankrupt) was the county that lost the most AGI in the analysis timeframe, $4.3 billion.

  • Right behind Cook County was Los Angeles County which  lost almost as  much in AGI as Cook County, $4.2 billion.

  • In third place was New York County in New York City which lost over $2.5 billion.

  • New  York County was followed by two California counties, Santa Clara County and San Francisco county.

  • Rounding out the top six losers of AGI was another NYC  county, Queens County.

  • Two other counties, Alameda County in California and Bronx County in  NYC also  made the top 15 AGI loser list.

In total, New York placed three counties in the top 15 list of losers of AGI and California had four counties in the top 15 list.

4)Over half  of the 15 counties across the country that were top AGI losers were in  the three states we view as the most likely to go bankrupt as their tax base  shrinks over  time:  Illinois, New York, and California. Thus, not only are people fleeing  from these states  they are taking  billions  and billions of taxable income with them. 

5)The government watchdog organization, OpenTheBooks, looked at the data and had the following  conclusion:  “Income loss at this scale has real implications. Counties losing billions in AGI face shrinking tax bases, increased pressure on public services where they may be most needed and reduced long-term economic resilience.” 

6)Their conclusion  is perfectly consistent with what we  have been discussing for the past year or so: certain cities and certain state governments are in a financial death spiral because of  the path  outlined above that drove tax paying businesses and residents to other areas.  At some point, the tax stream will become too small to support an ever growing  city or state government bureaucracy and the  implosion into bankruptcy has to  occur.

7) Conversely, where are all of these people moving to and taking their AGI with them? The  ALEC analysis looked at the other end of the spectrum to answer that question:

  • Eight out of the top 15 counties that gained the most AGI in  the analysis period were in  Florida with Palm  Beach County in Florida the clear winner, gaining about $3 billion in AGI.

  • Texas was the second biggest winner with four  of its counties making the top 15 AGI gainer list.

  • One county each in Nevada, South Carolina, and Arizona rounded out the top 15 AGI gainers.

It is probably not a coincidence that Florida, Texas,  and Nevada do not have a state income tax, allowing people to keep more of their hard earned income. Conversely, California has a state income tax that starts with the first dollar earned and by the time a  single  tax  filer gets to $360,000 the state income tax marginal  rate is already over 10%. The top rate is a whopping 13.3%.  No wonder people are leaving the state for states that do not tax income.

But this is  just the income tax factor. The Wallethub website looked at the TOTAL tax burden  by state and found that our top state candidates to go bankrupt are high on the list of highest tax burdens:

  • New York has the second highest tax burden trailing only Hawaii.

  • Illinois has the  sixth highest tax burden.

  • New Jersey has the  eighth highest tax burden.

  • California has the eleventh highest tax  burden.

  • Meanwhile, Florida has the fourth lightest total tax burden and Texas has the 15th lightest tax burden.


More proof data, more information  that some cities and states around the country are in dire shape and in a financial death spiral.  Businesses leaving,  taking jobs, revenue, and economic  juice with them. Residents leaving, taking tax revenue and economic buying power with them. It is no longer a question of if, it is a question of when and which city or state goes bust first.


**********************

If you agree that we need to deseat every member of Congress for their lack of success and accomplishment, then please consider going to the following petition link to help the cause:


https://www.change.org/p/deseat-congress-reset-freedom



**********************


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

Saturday, May 2, 2026

The Race To Bankruptcy Court: Seattle Says Good Bye To Escaping Taxpayers, Ex-Californians Get Wealthier, and Seems Everyone Is Going To Florida

 We are going to take a little break from  the past five posts which showed the disgusting waste of taxpayer wealth that is  criminally siphoned off from Medicaid,  Covid, and other government programs.  Instead, we will update some of the latest news and probabilities on what states and  cities are likely to  go bankrupt first.

As always, our top state governments that we think are nearing bankruptcy include New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and California. Our top major cities we think are rapidly approaching bankruptcy include New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco.

Before reviewing the latest news and seeing which state or city is making the best progress towards government bankruptcy, let’s review how these cities and states got themselves into this financial death spiral position to begin with:


  • A government entity keeps expanding its budget, eventually putting pressure on the tax revenue stream it receives.

  • At some point, rather than cut government spending or make its programs more efficient financially, the politicians in charge raise taxes to meet the ever growing government expenditures.

  • The raising of taxes causes some residents and businesses to leave the city or state for less tax burdensome areas, reducing the tax base and reducing the revenue stream.

  • Rather than cut expenses and become more efficient to match the reduced tax revenue stream, politicians in the above cities or states raise the tax burden even more.

  • This causes more residents and businesses to flee the city or state, further reducing the tax base and tax revenue stream.

  • At some point politicians panic and raise taxes more and start cutting vital government services (e.g. police, fire, education) in order to try and balance government spending against the shrinking tax base and revenue stream.

  • The reduction in quality of government services in particular and quality of life in general drives more residents and businesses out of the area.

  • Eventually, the expenses, costs and financial liabilities outstrip the reduced tax stream and bankruptcy occurs.


Okay, that's the process, let's look at the mounting evidence across the country on how this is playing out.


1)Let’s start with a few simple statistics from the Heritage Foundation:


  • Two million more people have left California and New York state than moved into those states between 2020 and 2023.

  • No-income tax Florida gained a net new residents totaling 820,000 during that time frame.

  • That positive net migration was bigger than any other state’s gain.

  • Of the 782 businesses that fled New York City and  New York state during that time, 341 of them ended up in no-income tax Florida.

  • These 341 businesses that went to no-income  tax Florida included Wall Street type financial companies (e.g. Wells Fargo, Apollo Global Management, and Elliott Management) and  small businesses such as plumbers, restaurant owners, and consultants.

  • No-income tax Palm Beach County in Florida has branded itself as “Wall  Street South,”  given how many financial firms,  bankers, and  investment  pros have  relocated  there.

  • Vanderbilt University is building a new business school in West Palm Beach to serve the ever growing financial community there.


The  lesson that the Heritage Foundation drew from  this information is simple:  keep taxes low, reduce business regulations to  the bare  essentials, keep the government out of the free market operations and businesses and people from states that do  not follow those three principles will bring their jobs, their wealth, and economic growth to you. 


That lesson has apparently not been  taught to the cities and states  listed above,  the candidates most likely to go bankrupt pretty soon.


2)We have talked a lot about why businesses leave states like California and New York. The heavier tax burden and the over regulating of business activities eventually cause business owners to reevaluate where they should be located to maximize their business  operations and profits, not a complicated process.  But what happens when  individual  citizens  decide to pick up and leave high tax states and cities,  high crime states and cities, what benefit do they get if any?


A recent analysis by the California Policy Lab may have  the answer to that question:


  • Their analysis found that individuals that leave California dramatically improve their financial well being besides escaping high crime rates, dense traffic problems, high  homelessness rates, high housing rates, high gas prices, high utility prices, and high tax  burdens.

  • On average, those moving out of California save an  average of $672 a month on housing expenses alone which  they consider to be rent or mortgage payments, utilities, property taxes and  homeowners insurance.

  • This comes out to savings of about $8,000 a year.

  • The median home prices that these relocating residents would experience on average is a whopping $398,000 lower than  if they had stayed in  California.

  • According to the Lab analysis, those that relocated out of California are 48% more  likely to own their own home relative to “similar Californians who stayed in the state.” 

  • According to Evan White, executive director of the California Policy Lab at UC Berkeley: “The price tag has gone up on the California Dream, and many families are leaving the state for more affordable places. The difference these moves make is stark. Their destination neighborhoods are half as expensive and they end up much more likely to own a home within just a few years.”

  • More from the Policy Lab analysis: “Between 2020 and 2025, 42 states sent fewer people to California than they did before the pandemic”


The data and information is right out in the open for the politicians to see, be they from California, New York, or the other states  and cities approaching bankruptcy: people and businesses want to be free. They want to be free to keep their hard earned wealth and be free to not be oppressed by crime, or over regulation by the government that should be serving them, not using them as a tax farm.  


So far, with very few exceptions, those politicians  do not get it. And their inaction and ignorance of the financial and economic realities will  accelerate the  financial death  spiral  their government entities are probably already in.


3)We have not talked often about the city of Seattle being a prime candidate for winning the race to bankruptcy court. Not that they are not headed down the same path but the other cities mentioned above have a large  lead.


But that does not mean  Seattle is out of the race. As we pointed out a few months ago, the city is in  much the same financial straits as the other more favored cities to  go bankrupt first:


  • According to FBI data  analyzed by Security.org, Seattle ranks fourth of   major U.S. cities for total crime rate with a  crime rate of 5,7822 per 100,000 residents.

  • This city crime rate is almost 173% higher than the national average.

  • The Seattle area’s property tax burden is ranked tenth highest among 215 U.S. metro areas according to Attom, a  provider of property and real estate data.

  • Property taxes in the Seattle area have gone up 57% in the past ten years.

  • The average property tax bill in 2024 in the Seattle area was  $7,508, 80% higher than  the national  average.

  • The current total  sales tax rate in the city of Seattle is a whopping 10.35%,  over 37% higher than the  national average.


More details  on  our Seattle analysis can  be  read at:


https://loathemygovernment.blogspot.com/2026/01/seattle-enters-race-to-city-government.html


And our position has gotten  even stronger  regarding the financial death spiral for  the  city, given a recent and insanely stupid comment from the current mayor of  the city:


  • Katie Wilson is the current  socialist/communist mayor of Seattle.

  • The city has seen its share of businesses and wealthy citizens leaving the city including Starbucks and Amazon founder, Jeff  Bezos.

  • Jon Scholes, president of the Downtown Seattle Association, summed up the Seattle out-migration of businesses and residents quite nicely: "This is a city where everything costs more. We have some of the most expensive housing, we have some of the most expensive food, we have some of the most expensive Ubers, and we should be looking at the set of regulations and taxes that have been put in place over the last decade. Are those helping things? Are they making this city more affordable or not?"

  • But apparently Katie Wilson does not  think this is a problem, given her condescending reply to  a question that was recently posed to  her very explicitly, asking her if she  is concerned that billionaires, millionaires, and  businesses are leaving town.

  • Her response:  "I think the claims that millionaires are going to leave our state are like super overblown. And the ones that leave, like, bye,"


Nice reaction, telling those that pay the major portion of the city’s taxes and power the local  economy, just waving them off and saying “Bye”? My gosh, how ignorant of reality can  one be? 


At least the governor of New York state, Kathy Hochul, finally realized that billionaires and millionaires are saying “Bye”  to New York’s high cost of living and high taxation, helping to create the financial death  spiral  that New York City and state face. Obviously,  Katie Wilson learned nothing from Hochul's epiphany.


The reaction to Wilson’s  casual disregard for the major taxpayers in her city was swift and  accurate and fierce:


  • Keving Rpoberts of the Heritage Foundation: What do socialists think happens when the most productive, highest revenue driving members of their tax base leave their jurisdictions?" 

  • Danile Di Martino of the  Manhattan Institute: "Socialists are driven by hate for the rich, not concern for the poor." 

  • Comedian Tim Young: "This is the reaction of a spoiled child whose parents paid her bills up until the point that she became mayor… She has no grasp of reality or economics. Seattle is extra cooked."

  • Washington state Republican Party: "This clip will live in infamy, Seattle Katie Wilson is not only unfit to be mayor, she lacks grace and gratitude. Perhaps, she's the one who should leave Seattle."

  • And  possibly the best comment of all  from the End Wokeness X  account: "Mayor Wilson seems to welcome the idea of a wealth exodus from Seattle. This is the FA part. FO coming soon."


Such a smug, condescending response to those leaving the city, those that pay the some of the highest taxes to support her administration and the  city government. Her actual smugness and idiocy can be viewed at the  following link:


https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/seattle-millionaires-fleeing


That will do it for today: Californians who flee get richer, Florida wins when  New York politicians are economically ignorant, and the Seattle mayor says “Bye” to the financial security of her city.


**********************

If you agree that we need to deseat every member of Congress for their lack of success and accomplishment, then please consider going to the following petition link to help the cause:


https://www.change.org/p/deseat-congress-reset-freedom



**********************


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at: