January, 2020, Part 1, Why I Am A Global Warming Doubter and A Believer In Science: More Failed Global Warming Forecasts and Making Humanity Go Extinct Is the Solution

Every month we have enough material to return to a continuing theme in this blog, namely that “I am a global warming doubter AND a believer in science.” This became of interest because of people like Al Gore who fanatically and verbosely claimed that you had to be an idiot to not believe in manmade global warming. It has been my life belief that anyone that is that loud and that obnoxious is hiding something, that rather than argue facts and reality it is better to beat down and insult anyone who disagrees.

As we have dove into the whole issue of manmade global warming, or its new rebranded title of climate change, we found that Al Gore and people like him were guilty of a number of things:

• Ignoring science and realities that did not support their opinions and positions.
• Rather than have an adult conversation about climate, these types of advocates like Gore sank to the level of insulting those who dared look at ALL science by calling them a variety of names including racists, homophobes, terrorists, flat earth believers, and other slanderous names.
• Continuing to insist that politicians step up their intrusions into our lives with higher taxes, more regulations, and more control on our freedoms and standards of living based on a shaky theory at best.

To see the past posts and the multitude of evidence that we have compiled that showed it is perfectly okay to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, enter the phrase "global warming doubter” in the search box above or go through the monthly historical post listed on the right side of this page.

Thus, let’s see the latest facts and science that prove you can be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, regardless of what Al Gore proclaims.

1) One of the biggest fallacies we have said about global warming advocates is that they often just look at a small chunk of data or a chunk of time, ignoring the rest of the data that is available or ignoring much longer time frames to get a context for climate changes. As a result, they come to incorrect assumptions that result in incorrect forecasts which over time are always proven wrong.

This reality is discussed in the following video. The assumption of the video is that often global warming advocates do not look at long enough historic time periods. If they did, they would see that the Earth goes through cyclical periods of cooling and warming and that those cycles have nothing to do with mankind’s use of carbon fuels. Mother Nature self corrects when things get too hot or too cold, that is what the long term view of the data show, as explained in the following video:

https://freedomheadlines.com/freedom-wire/devastating-blow-to-global-warming-activists-heres-the-hard-evidence/

2) Speaking of incorrect climate forecasts:

• Ten years ago, workers at Glacier National Park posted signs in the park that said climate change would cause all of the park’s glaciers to melt by the year 2020.
• Whoops, as of 2020 the glaciers are still with us, another global warming forecast down the drain.
• According to a park spokesman, they are not giving up on their dire prediction of glacier demise.
• The park is taking down the old signs and putting up new signs that say “when the glaciers” disappear.
• This is an old global warming advocate trick approach, make bold predictions but do not put a timeline on on those predictions which means the prediction can never be wrong, the prediction has just not happened yet.
• This is probably a good strategy, i.e. never time bound your global warming predictions since in 1923 the news media reported that the glaciers would be nearly gone in just 25 years or 1948.
• In 1936 another news story proclaimed that the glaciers would be gone in another 25 year or 1961.
• Scientists back in the early 1950s said the glaciers would be gone in 50 years.
• In 2009, National Geographic magazine questioned whether the glaciers would still be around by 2020.
• And finally, a recent New York Times article said the glaciers would be gone by 2044

Are we seeing a trend here? Every time a global warming/glacier melting forecast is proven wrong, a new forecast just pushes the date out. This has been going on for almost 100 years and the glaciers are still here. Can you see why a global warming doubter is actually doubter? Forecasts are always wrong until we get to a point where forecasts have no dateline which means they can never be wrong, they just have not happened yet.

3) But the pitiful forecasting of glaciers’ demises is not the only major failure on global warming forecasting:

• In 2004, the Department of Defense told President Bush that by the year 2020 major cities in Europe would be under water from rising seas, which did not happen.
• They also told Bush that Britain would be suffering from a Siberian climate by 2020, which did not happen.
• They layered on top of these environmental predictions that by 2020 the world would be experiencing “nuclear conflict, mega-droughts, famine, and widespread rioting would erupt around the world,” which did not happen.
• We previously discussed the failed prediction of Al Gore that the Arctic would likely be ice free by the year 2013, which did not happen.
• Other failed climate predictions boldly said that there would be a new ice age by the year 2000...by the year 2020…by the year 2070 or snow would be a thing of the past by the year 2000 which is kind of against the new ice age prediction by the year 2000.

Again, the time is now right for a comprehensive, objective look at the environment and how humanity plays into the environment by looking at ALL of the science, research, and realities. Because looking just at a subset of science, research, and realities, which people like Al Gore have been doing for at least 100 years, has yielded a zero success rate at predicting what is going to happen. 

4) We have often talked about the many nonsensical ideas that global warming advocates have put forth. Presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren wants to place a carbon tax on everything. Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez want to implement a massive New Green Deal idiocy that would tax every American into oblivion and crash the economy. And they want to do this despite the failure of global warming advocates to ever get anything right from a reality and forecasting perspective.

And while these global warming advocate ideas and likely failed solutions are pretty insane, climate activist Les Knight of Portland has pushed way beyond these idiotic concepts:

• Knight’s solution is to get rid of the human race to save the planet.
• He claims that he has been pushing for this solution to Mother Nature’s problems long before the fad of climate change took hold.
• Specifically: “Fifty years ago, I concluded that the best thing for the planet would be a peaceful phase-out of human existence. We’re causing the extinction of hundreds of thousands of other species. With us gone, I believe ecosystems will be restored and there will be enough of everything. No more fighting over resources.” 
• To prove his commitment to this nonsense, he went out and got himself a vasectomy and not be able to contribute to the problem of humans’ existence.
• He created the Voluntary Human Extinction Project to help implement his plan to save the Earth by killing off humanity.Furthermore according to Knight: “If we go extinct, other species will have a chance to recover. I’ll never see the day when there are no humans on the planet, but I can imagine what a magnificent world it would be – provided we go soon enough.”

Wow, one of the more radical solutions to climate change. The fact that he did not make himself an example of human extinction by making himself extinct kind of destroys his credibility to some degree. The longer he exists the more natural resources he uses up which is against what he is advocating. So now we are in a hypocritical set of reasoning: we should all go extinct because I think it would be best for the planet, I just do not want the extinction to start with me. Insanity.

More failed forecasts and a touch of craziness, more reasons why I continue to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

https://www.amazon.com/Walter-Bruno-Korschek/e/B002KYU08Q/ref=dbs_a_mng_rwt_scns_share

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:


http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org
http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w