Showing posts with label alec. Show all posts
Showing posts with label alec. Show all posts

Sunday, May 3, 2026

The Race To Bankruptcy Court: Where The Nation's Wealth and Economic Power Is Moving To

We are going to take a little break from the past five posts which showed the disgusting waste of taxpayer wealth that is criminally siphoned off from Medicaid, Covid, and other government programs. Instead, we will update some of the latest news and probabilities on what states and cities are likely to go bankrupt first.

As always, our top state governments that we think are nearing bankruptcy include New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and California. Our top major cities we think are rapidly approaching bankruptcy include New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco.

Before reviewing the latest news and seeing which state or city is making the best progress towards government bankruptcy, let’s review how these cities and states got themselves into this financial death spiral position to begin with:
  • A government entity keeps expanding its budget, eventually putting pressure on the tax revenue stream it receives.
  • At some point, rather than cut government spending or make its programs more efficient financially, the politicians in charge raise taxes to meet the ever growing government expenditures.
  • The raising of taxes causes some residents and businesses to leave the city or state for less tax burdensome areas, reducing the tax base and reducing the revenue stream.
  • Rather than cut expenses and become more efficient to match the reduced tax revenue stream, politicians in the above cities or states raise the tax burden even more.
  • This causes more residents and businesses to flee the city or state, further reducing the tax base and tax revenue stream.
  • At some point politicians panic and raise taxes more and start cutting vital government services (e.g. police, fire, education) in order to try and balance government spending against the shrinking tax base and revenue stream.
  • The reduction in quality of government services in particular and quality of life in general drives more residents and businesses out of the area.
  • Eventually, the expenses, costs and financial liabilities outstrip the reduced tax stream and bankruptcy occurs.
Okay, that's the process, let's look at the mounting evidence across the country on how this is playing out.

Today’s discussion  will be based on a recent analysis by the American Legislative Exchange  Council (ALEC) that was published in its annual, ”Rich States, Poor States”  publication. The ALEC looks at official IRS data to  track how wealth is being redistributed and moving around the country by citizens. 

Remember, as listed above,  it is our contention  that people and  businesses are moving out of high tax, high business regulation, high cost of  living and high crime states and cities to other areas in the country that offer a more economical and better quality of life.  We have  discussed many times on  how many of the businesses moving around the country are some of the Fortune 500 giants of industry so it is a pretty much proven fact that bigger, wealthier companies are moving.

But what about our contention that individual citizens are also moving? Are these movers also the wealthier and better off families and individuals  or are the less wealthy,  the less  well off citizens moving? Obviously, if a  state or city is losing population  like we have shown, it may not be as bad if the less wealthy are moving out since the impact on the tax base would not be as great. The ALEC  analysis allows us to  explore that concept.

1)The “Rich States, Poor States”  methodology ranks all  50 states on their economic competitiveness using  IRS data at the county level. Thus, the approach does not measure headcount moving around but how much Adjusted Gross Income (AGI), as reported on their IRS tax forms, is moving, i.e. are poorer people moving or richer people moving? They looked at all 2,135 counties across the country.

2)The analysis found results that are consistent with our past discussions: not only are people moving out of the states and cities listed above that are heading towards bankruptcy but they are taking billions of dollars of taxable income with them  when they move.

3)Not surprising, the counties losing the most AGI are located mostly in the states listed above that are our top candidates to go bankrupt pretty soon:

- Cook County (home county of Chicago, one of our prime city candidates to  go bankrupt) was the county that lost the most AGI in the analysis timeframe, $4.3 billion

- Right behind Cook County was Los Angeles County which  lost almost as  much in AGI as Cook  County, $4.2 billion.

- In third place was New York County in New York City which lost over $2.5 billion,

- New  York County was followed by two California counties, Santa Clara County and San Francisco county.

- Rounding out the top six losers of AGI was another NYC  county, Queens County

- Two other counties, Alameda County in California and Bronx County in NYC also  made

In total, New York placed three counties in the top 15 list of losers of AGI and California had four counties in the top 15 list.

4)Over half  of the 15 counties across the country that were top AGI losers were in  the three states we view as the most likely to go bankrupt as their tax base  shrinks over  time:  Illinois, New York, and California. Thus, not only are people fleeing  from these states  they are taking  billions  and billions of taxable income with them. 

5)The government watchdog organization, OpenTheBooks, looked at the data and had the following  conclusion:  “Income loss at this scale has real implications. Counties losing billions in AGI face shrinking tax bases, increased pressure on public services where they may be most needed and reduced long-term economic resilience.” 

6)Their conclusion  is perfectly consistent with what we  have been discussing for the past year or so: certain cities and certain state governments are in a financial death spiral because of  the path  outlined above that drove tax paying businesses and residents to other areas.  At some point, the tax stream will become too small to support an ever growing  city or state government bureaucracy and the  implosion into bankruptcy has to  occur.

7) Conversely, where are all of these people moving to and taking their AGI with them? The  ALEC analysis looked at the other end of the spectrum to answer that question:

- Eight out of the top 15 counties that gained the most AGI in the analysis period were in Florida with Palm Beach County in Florida the clear winner, gaining about $3 billion in AGI.

- Texas was the second biggest winner with four of its counties making the top 15 AGI gainer list.

- One county each in Nevada, South Carolina, and Arizona rounded out the top 15 AGI gainers.

It is probably not a coincidence that Florida, Texas,  and Nevada do not have a state income tax, allowing people to keep more of their hard earned income. Conversely, California has a state income tax that starts with the first dollar earned and by the time a  single  tax  filer gets to $360,000 the state income tax marginal  rate is already over 10%. The top rate is a whopping 13.3%.  No wonder people are leaving the state for states that do not tax income.

But this is  just the income tax factor. The Wallethub website looked at the TOTAL tax burden  by state and found that our top state candidates to go bankrupt are high on the list of highest tax burdens:

  • New York has the second highest tax burden

trailing only Hawaii.
  • Illinois has the  sixth highest tax burden.

  • New Jersey has the  eighth highest tax burden.

  • California has the eleventh highest tax  burden.

  • Meanwhile, Florida has the fourth lightest total tax burden and

Texas has the 15th lightest tax burden.


More proof data, more information  that some cities

and states around the country

are in dire shape and in a financial death spiral. 

Businesses leaving,  taking jobs,

revenue, and economic  juice with them.

Residents leaving, taking tax revenue and

economic buying power with them. It

is no longer a question of if, it is a

question of when and which city or state goes

bust first.


**********************

If you agree that we need to deseat every member of Congress for their lack of success and accomplishment, then please consider going to the following petition link to help the cause:


https://www.change.org/p/deseat-congress-reset-freedom



**********************


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

Thursday, October 1, 2020

October, 2020, By The Numbers: High Tax States = High Out Migration States, Low Tax States = HIgh In MIgration States

On a periodic basis we do some posts that fall under the theme of “by the numbers.” Rather than trust what the American political tells us about reality, we like to examine the real numbers and the real reality in the world to understand what is actually going on. Relying on politicians, and their cohorts in the media, to tell us what is reality is always a sucker bet. They have their own agendas and goals, usually centering around their needs and self-enrichment. So we need to look at the reality of the numbers to determine what is really going on.

Previous analyses of “by the numbers” can be accessed by entering the phrase in the search box above. This is the third and final post in this series where we look at the numbers to truly find out how good, not likely, or bad, most likely, the American political class is doing in managing our tax dollars, protecting our freedoms, and resolving major issues that affect all of us.

We have often discussed the reality that many big city residents are leaving their Democratic run cities for places that are safer and have a lower tax burden. While liberals and Democrats may deny this reality, the numbers do not lie. Let’s look at a set of numbers to verify this reality.

The numbers in this discussion come from the ALEC which has the following charter: “The American Legislative Exchange Council is America’s largest nonpartisan, voluntary membership organization of state legislators dedicated to the principles of limited government, free markets and federalism. Comprised of nearly one-quarter of the country’s state legislators and stakeholders from across the policy spectrum, ALEC members represent more than 60 million Americans and provide jobs to more than 30 million people in the United States.”

The ALEC does a lot of great analyses and research on what is really going on throughout the country. One set of numbers they track is the migration of state citizens into or out of each state over time. Their tracking horizon is ten years stretching from 2009 through year 2018. Some of their findings include the following info:
  • California has lost 811,801 residents in the ten years from 2009 thru 2018, making it the state with the third most exiting residents.
  • New York has lost 1,366,465 residents over the past ten years, making it the state with the most exiting residents.
  • New Jersey has lost 501,679 residents over the past ten years, making it the state with the fourth most exiting residents.
  • Illinois has lost 843,799 residents over the past ten years, making it the state with the second most exiting residents.
  • Connecticut has lost 193,944 residents over the past ten years, making it the state with the eighth most exiting residents.
What do these states have in common? They are consistently the five states that we have proven time and time again that have the best chance of being the first state government of going bankrupt. The state political class in each of these states has consistently raised spending which required raised taxes which led to more spending and more taxes. 

Finally, millions of residents in these states have decided that paying more and more in taxes and getting less and less in quality government services is not the way to live. As a result, more and more state residents are leaving the state, resulting in less and less tax revenue without the commiserate reduction in state government spending. This has required the state politicians to raise tax rates and introduce new taxes. This increase in taxation causes more state residents and businesses to leave which reduces the tax revenue stream and the financial death spiral is on.

Consider another set of related ALEC statistics and analyses:
  • California has the highest state income tax burden in the country.
  • New York has the second highest state income tax burden in the country.
  • New Jersey has the third highest state income tax burden in the country.
  • Illinois has the 34th highest tax burden in the country (but plans are afoot to raise the state income tax burden in the state).
  • Connecticut has the 15th highest tax burden in the country.
See the connection? Raise taxes, which reduces freedom, and eventually people are going to bail out, taking their wealth and tax revenue with them. The numbers do not lie.

But where are these people going? The ALEC analysis has the answer:
  • From 2009 to 2018, 1,1139,015 people moved into Florida, the state with the second highest in migration numbers over that time period.
  • From 2009 to 2018, 1,262,347 people moved into Texas, the state with the highest in migration numbers.
  • From 2009 to 2018, 472,668 people moved into North Carolina, the state with the third highest in migration numbers.
  • From 2009 to 2018, 385,647 people moved into Arizona, the state with the fourth highest in migration numbers.
Why these states? Consider the state income tax burden ratings from ALEC: 
  • Florida ranks last in state income tax burden since it has no state income tax.
  • Texas is tied with Florida for the last spot since it also has no state income tax burden.
  • North Carolina is the 21st best state income tax burden
  • Arizona is the 13th best state income tax burden.
High taxes, out migration, Low taxes, in migration. It is a simple formula, the numbers do not lie. In fact, another ALEC analysis found that the lower the tax burden in the state, the better the quality of state government services in the state, the exact opposite of what one would intuitively expect. 

One would think that the more you pay in taxes, the bigger and better the government services are. But the exact opposite is true. Seems the more money that politicians have, the more money they waste.

And yet in a recent post we discussed how the governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo, has stated that he will raise taxes on New York state residents. He is going this route despite the fact that:
  1. From 2009 to 2018, his state led the nation in people leaving for other locations to live, taking their wealth and tax money with them.
  2. The migration out of New York City and New York state has accelerated dramatically since the ALEC analysis was done, given the continued raising of state and city taxes and the crime and covid fallout that the state residents and businesses have had to endure.
  3. Moving companies working in New York City report that they cannot find enough moving vans fast enough to satisfy the demand of people moving out.
Combine this insanity with the Illinois insanity, where the state legislature is considering increasing the state income tax rates, and the result is obvious: the financial death spiral in these states will now accelerate even faster, resulting in fewer and lower quality government services, higher and higher taxation, and larger and larger out migration. And the state politicians still have no clue despite what the numbers and trends are telling them. Idiots.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:





Friday, December 23, 2016

December, 2016, Part 1, By The Numbers: Leaving Democratic States and Moving To Republican States

Before I start today’s post, let me reiterate my voting history like I have done many times in the past:
  • I have been a legally voting since the 1970s.
  • Since then, I have never voted for a Republican for President.
  • I have rarely voted for a Republican for national office over that time period.
  • I have never been a registered Republican voter.
Keep that in mind as you go through the following discussion. 

On a periodic basis we do some posts that fall under the theme of “by the numbers.” Rather than trust what the American political tells us about reality, we like to examine the real numbers and the real reality in the world to understand what is actually going on. Relying on politicians, and their cohorts in the media, to tell us what is reality is always a sucker bet. They have their own agendas and goals, usually centering around their needs and self-enrichment. So we need to look at the reality of the numbers to determine what is really going on.

Previous analyses of “by the numbers” can be accessed by entering the phrase in the search box above. This is the third and final post this month where we look at the numbers to truly find out how good, not likely, or bad, most likely, the American political class is doing in managing our tax dollars, protecting our freedoms, and resolving major issues that affect all of us. 

Benny Johnson, Jason Howerton, and Parker Lee, writing for the Independent Journal Review recently summarized what the economic conditions currently are in the states that heavily voted in favor of Democratic Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in last month’s Presidential election. Besides having the common characteristic of favoring Hillary over Trump, they also have the common characteristic of having some pretty lousy economic and out migration trends going on in their states. This conclusion is based on citing a Washington Times article by Stephen Moore.

Moore concludes from his analysis that the out migration from these Hillary strongholds is driven primarily by economic reasons including: “high tax rates; high welfare benefits; heavy regulation; environmental extremism; high minimum wages.” Amazingly, the ten states that Hillary Clinton won by the largest percentage margins saw a net loss in population from 2004 through 2014. California and New York by themselves saw a net loss of 2.75 million Americans over that ten year time frame.

As you go through the ten states economic profiles below, keep in mind that these states are almost always dominated by Democrats in elected office. Yes, occasionally, a Republican or two might get elected in these states, but for the most part these are strictly Democratic controlled and operated states. I am not saying there is a cause and effect of Democrats creating lousy economic conditions but the correlation, as you will see below is certainly quite strong.

1) Massachusetts - Between 2004 and 2014, Massachusetts lost 156,861 more residents than it gained. One reason for such a loss is that Massachusetts has a top business income tax of 8%, one of the highest overall property tax burdens in the country, and also has estate and inheritance taxes.

2 ) California - California has lost an amazing 1.3 net residents over the past decade despite having some of the richest people in the nation living in the state in Hollywood and Silicon Valley. Thus, something must not be right for the over 1 million people who decided to leave the state for a better life

3) Maryland - Maryland has lost a net 145,000 residents over the past decade, possibly caused by the reality that the state ranks 44th in economic outlook according to the in-depth analysis done by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), has a top personal income tax rate of 8.95%, and has the 13th highest business income tax rate. Over the past 47 years the state has had only two Republican governors.

4) New York - The ALEC ranks New York as dead last in its economic outlook ratings, a spot it has been “honored” with in six of the past seven years. It has some of the highest tax rates in the country and its net loss of population over the past ten years, 1.5 million people, is the largest loss of any other state in the union.

5) Rhode Island - The ALEC rates this state as 48th in economic performance and 35th in economic outlook. Rhode Island has a very high property tax rate and has had a net loss of 70,000 residents over the past decade, a lot considering how small the state’s population is to begin with.

6) New Jersey - My former home state has some of the highest tax rates, personal income tax, property tax, and business tax rates, in the country. The ALEC ranks the state as 48th relative to economic outlook and has had a net loss of about half a million residents since 2005.

7) Connecticut - HIgher than average tax rates and ranking 47th on ALEC’s economic outlook measure makes it no surprise this state has lost 153,000 residents in total over the past decade.

8) Vermont - The ALEC has Vermont ranked 49th in economic outlook, the state has the second highest personal income tax structure and has enacted many new tax changes that will make it more expensive to live in the state. No surprise, it has had a net loss of 9,000 residents over the past ten years.

9) Illinois - Possibly one of the biggest basket cases of all the states, given its incredibly high unfunded pension and retiree benefit liabilities for government workers, the state does have a reasonable income tax rate but higher than average business tax rates and high property taxes. As a result, it has had a net loss of 700,000 residents over the past ten years.

10) Hawaii - The ALEC found that Hawaii has the highest marginal personal income tax rates in the country and the highest sales tax rates in the country. Despite its beautiful weather, the state had a net loss of 36,000 residents since 2005.

Conversely, five states that the ALEC rank in the top 15 relative to having really good economic futures, Wyoming, Oklahoma, North Dakota, Tennessee, South Dakota and Idaho, have not only seen net gains in state populations over the past ten years but also had the highest percentage of voters that voted for Donald Trump. In fact, if you look at the ALEC table below which rank orders all 50 states relative to their economic outlook rankings, the top twenty states with the brightest futures are usually dominated by more conservative, Republican politicians.

Thus, is it any surprise that people are moving to states with lower taxes and brighter economic futures? Is it any surprise that states that are losing population are states with higher taxes and less bright economic futures? People who work hard for their money and their families realize that the best way to be happy is to keep as much as they earn and will make life decisions accordingly. 

And that more than any other reason is why an old, tired, same old Democratic politician, Hillary Clinton, lost an election to a non-politician with no Washington or international experience who was plagued by personal behavior problems and who was outspent by about a two to one margin. Freedom, the desire to keep what was earned, and to not be taxed to death is why people behave the way they do, whether it is choosing a place to live or who to vote for. The numbers do not lie.

More numbers tomorrow.


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:


www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:


http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org

http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w