February, 2019, Part 1,Political Class Insanity: Voter Fraud in Alabama and Climate Fraud In Washington

It is another month which means it is again time to review the latest political class insanity from Washington and around the world. Political class insanity takes many forms including the wasting of taxpayer wealth, criminal fraud within government programs, inane and stupid political quotes and actions, the inability to create and implement effective and efficient government programs, stupid and ill performing economic policies and strategies, and other forms of insanity that continue to evolve and surprise and shock us.

Let’s get started:

1) Many people in this country, almost always Democrats and liberals, like to assert that there is no voter fraud going on in this country. We have debunked that myth many times which you can check out in previous posts by entering “voter fraud” in the search box above. And to that list we can add another proven instance of voter fraud as reported in a recent Godfather Politics website article:

• Warner Todd Huston wrote on January 28, 2019 that the mayor of Gordon, Alabama was recently forced from office because of voter fraud.
• Not only was he removed from office but he was also convicted of voter fraud.
• Elbert Melton was convicted of falsifying ballots during his 2016 election which he won by a mere 16 votes.
• Specifically, he was charged and convicted of absentee ballot fraud and second degree theft of property.
• He apparently notarized absentee ballots while no witnesses were present and ballots that voters had not signed in his presence, violations of the state’s election code.

The good news is that this politician got caught committing voter fraud. The bad news is we have not idea how many other members of the political class get away with voter fraud every election. And it is probably a lot since the Heritage Foundation has compiled a database of over a thousand cases of proven voter fraud:

https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud?_ga=2.62073964.1367881169.1548688637-amp-_1afqOgYMK8dAHsT6hiDYA

As these cases become more and more prevalent and the government and politicians do little to stop it it, the integrity of our election system gets undermined and that threatens our freedoms.

2) Consider some failures when it comes to global warming/climate change predictions and forecasts that we have previously discussed [I have bold faced the fields of expertise that the following experts were from]:

• In 1970, high regarded biologist Paul Ehrlich predicted that "all important animal life in the sea will be extinct" in 10 years or so. 49 years later most important animal life is still with us.
• Also in 1970, Nobel laureate biology professor at Harvard, George Wald, forecasted that:“Civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.” 49 years later we are still hanging around.
• Also in 1970, Paul Ehrlich, also said that the world’s population would soon outstrip food supplies. 49 years later crop yields are as high as ever and the number of humans starving around has dropped significantly over the past decades.
• Ehrlich followed up on this starvation prediction when he claimed that, “The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next 10 years.” 49 years later people are still starving but nowhere close to the rate he predicted.
• In 1968 he predicted: “If I were a gambler, I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000.” Good thing that he did not lay down that bet since 19 years later England is still hanging around.
• Noted British science writer Nigel Calder warned in a July, 1975 International Wildlife article that, “The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for mankind.” So, as recently as about 44 years ago we were all going to die from an Ice Age, not global warming.
• Meteorologist C.C. Wallen claimed in 1975 in a Science News article that, “The cooling since 1940 has been large enough and consistent enough that it will not soon be reversed.” But according to other scientists it reversed a few years later when the exact opposite climate trend became popular, global warming.
• In 2000, British climate researcher David Viner told The Independent, a British newspaper, that in just “a few years” snow would become a “very rare and exciting event” in Britain and that “children just aren’t going to know what snow is...Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past.” In the next few years, Britain experienced some of its lowest temperatures and snowfall accumulations since records started being kept in 1914. Also, given that most of the U.S. Midwest is suffering through below zero temperatures, 19 years after Viner predicted the death of snow, I do not think they would agree with Viner either.
• Ecologist Kenneth Watt told a college audience in 1970: “The world has been chilling sharply for about 20 years. If present trends continue, the world will be about 4 degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990 but 11 degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.” But those predictions never came true.
• In 1970, Senator Gaylord Nelson of Wisconsin wrote in Look magazine: “Dr. S. Dillon Ripley, secretary of the Smithsonian (Institution), believes that in 25 years, somewhere between 75 and 80 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct.” Not even close 49 years later.
• In 2009, self proclaimed climate expert Al Gore predicted that there was an excellent chance that the North Pole would be melted within five years. Ten years later, the ice cap is still there, generating increment amounts of cold air as witnessed by the American living in the Midwest today.
• Scientist Harrison Brown predicted in 1970 that mankind would run out of copper shortly after the 2000 and that lead, zinc, gold and silver would be gone ten years earlier. 49 years later, these elements are still around and in good supply.
• In 1974 the U.S. Geological Survey said the country only had a 10 year supply of natural gas left even though according to the latest Federal government estimate, 45 years later, we had 2.47 quadrillion cubic feet of natural gas, which should last about a century.

Okay, we go through all that just to prove that highly educated. PhD experts in science, education, and the government have been hysterically wrong in their predictions when it comes to weather, climate, and other matters. Most of these people have advanced degrees in pertinent fields and a long list of research in those fields. And they still got it all wrong.

Which brings us to our new favorite political gaffe machine, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a newly elected Congresswoman who:

• Did not know the simple definition of the unemployment rate despite having a college economics degree.
• Did not know what the three branches of the U.S. government were despite being elected to Congress.
• Thought she had uncovered $26 TRILLION in Pentagon wasteful spending over a ten year period even though the ENTIRE Pentagon budget over that timeframe was far lower than $26 TRILLION, making wasteful spending of $26 TRILLION impossible.
• Thinks she can fund major socialism projects in this country by simply taxing high earners in this country at 70% when a simple math calculation or two easily shows this to be...impossible.

We could go on but you get the idea: this Congresswoman is quite ignorant about a lot of things. But this ignorance did not hinder her latest escapade:

• She recently proclaimed that the world will end in 12 years unless we aggressively wean ourselves off of carbon based fuels.
• This is similar to what Al Gore predicted back in 2006 when he claimed that there would be a global emergency in ten years time, a period that end three years ago with a whimper and not an emergency.
• As a result of her in-depth insight to the end of the world, Ocasio-Cortez wants to place the country on a crash course of decarbonization, a path that would cripple the economy, raise electricity and other energy source costs, and do absolutely nothing relative to the climate since the rest of the world, especially China and India, have no intentions of doing anything so stupid as what she proposes.
• Thus, even if she is right, executing her plan would be an exercise in futility and the degradation of our quality of life with no redeeming benefit given what the rest of the world is doing.

But seriously, if highly trained people with a lot of experience in the climate area never got a prediction right, what are the chances that a novice Congresswoman with no experience or expertise in the climate filed who lacks an appreciation of the failed climate forecasts that came before and who is not smart enough to realize that the U.S, is not the problem, is right in her prediction? If you think she is on to something, let me know and we can put down a little bet, payable in a little over twelve years! 

Alright, that gets us started with this month’s political class insanity. The reality of real voter fraud and the reality that Ocasio-Cortez usually speaks without thinking and without a cogent basis for her remarks, be it the structure of the U.S. government or predicting climate demise. More insanity to follow.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:


http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org
http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w

January, 2019, Part 2, I Am A Global Warming Doubter and A Believer In Science: Another Math Error, CNN Blames Hamburgers For Global Warming, and More Failures Of Global Warming Forecasts

Every month we have enough material to return to a continuing theme in this blog, namely that “I am a global warming doubter AND a believer in science.” This became of interest because of people like Al Gore who fanatically and verbosely claimed that you had to be an idiot to not believe in manmade global warming. It has been my life belief that anyone that is that loud and that obnoxious is hiding something, that rather than argue facts and reality it is better to beat down and insult anyone who disagrees.

As we have dove into the whole issue of man made global warming, or its new rebranded title of climate change, we found that Al Gore and people like him were guilty of a number of things:

• Ignoring science and realities that did not support their opinions and positions.
• Rather than have an adult conversation about climate, these types of advocates like Gore sank to the level of insulting those who dared look at ALL science by calling them a variety of names including racists, homophobes, terrorists, flat earth believers, and other slanderous names.
• Continuing to insist that politicians step up their intrusions into our lives with higher taxes, more regulations, and more control on our freedoms and standards of living based on a shaky theory at best.

\To see the past posts and the multitude of evidence that we have compiled that showed it is perfectly okay to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, enter the phrase "global warming doubter” in the search box above or go through the monthly historical post listed on the right side of this page.

Thus, let’s see the latest facts and science that prove you can be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, regardless of what Al Gore proclaim.

1) Global warming advocates like to claim that “the science is settled.” In other words, you are an idiot if you do not believe in global manmade global warming and climate change because science has already proven it to be true. Remember how for a while the advocates avowed that “97% of all scientists” claimed that humanity was the cause of global warming and climate change.

But their smugness started to fall apart when it was found that more than one major global warming university group had fudged the data to prove global warming when the underlying data did not prove their theories. Recently a similar data malfunction also arose that disproves a major recent global warming advocate study:

• Alicia F. Luke, writing for the Eagle Rising website on November 14, 2018, discussed the reality that global warming scientists had to admit that they made a major math error in a recently published global warming study.
• The study had concluded that the oceans were warming up much more dramatically than previously thought.
• But a noted man made global warming skeptic, Nic Lewis, published a paper which pointed out a major math error in the research.
• One of the researchers, Ralph Keeling of Scripps, graciously accepted the correction: “When we were confronted with his insight it became immediately clear there was an issue there. We’re grateful to have it be pointed out quickly so that we could correct it quickly” 
• Another researcher also recognized the major math error: “When we were confronted with his insight it became immediately clear there was an issue there,” study co-author Ralph Keeling told The San Diego Union-Tribune.
• Their research originally stated that the oceans had absorbed 60% more heat than previously believed.
• Twitter users had a field day with follow up comments: “Next time show your (math) work,” “So the science is settled but the math isn’t,” “Are these scientists involved in the Florida vote recounts?”

Another math “mistake” or just another attempt to bastardize the data to prove an unprovable myth? Let’s give them the benefit of the doubt and assume they made a major math error that invalidates their conclusions. But how did they miss a major error that someone outside of the research easily found? One would assume that their published research was peer reviewed so who were these peers and why did they miss this major error? 

And global warming advocates wonder why us doubters doubt their contentions and “findings.”

2) Not only do global warming advocates embarrass themselves when they intentionally or unintentionally skew data to fit their preconceived notions, these folks continue to embarrass themselves in so many other ways. Consider what CNN recently did to prove that they are also drinking the global warming Koolaid:

• In a recent news broadcast, CNN introduced a supposed “subject matter expert” to prove that manmade global warming was real, dangerous, and shortly would be fatal.
• Somehow though, rather than bring a climate scientist on air to prove their point they introduced Professor Andrea Dutton from the University of Florida who is a professor of, wait for it, geology.
• Yes, CNN somehow thought that a professor of geology would bring credibility to their stance that manmade global warming was real, unbelievable.
• But they outdid themselves a little later when they ran a news segment that proved that eating hamburgers causes global warming. 

How can we take global warming advocates seriously when they often do not take themselves seriously, whether it is saying a geology professor somehow is an expert on climate, hamburgers cause global warming, beavers cause global warming, and on and on and on.

3) Someone once said something like once your opponent starts calling you names, you have won the argument. In other words, they have run out of data,m logic, and knowledge to win their side of the argument so all they are left with is to start the name calling and insults (Anthony Watts saying: “when you resort to name calling, you've lost the argument.”)

Which according to a recent article on the Punching Bag Post website, that is exactly what former Governor Jerry Brown of California, a staunch believer in manmade global warming, called anyone who doubted this position: “Just recently, California’s outgoing Governor Jerry Brown has compared those who dare to hold opinions different from left-wing orthodoxy as modern-day Nazis. In other words, if you even express uncertainty about the claims of the global warming activists, you are the same as people who were hell-bent to build the 1000-year Reich on a genocidal campaign against the declared enemies of a malignant theoretical Arian state – Jews, Catholics, Africans and the disabled. You are the same as a regime that murdered millions of people. This demonizing of the perceived apostates was seen when New York Governor Andrew Cuomo declared that anyone who does not believe in the left’s global warming script is unwelcomed in his state.”

Thus, according to Anthony Watts, Brown and Cuomo and Gore and the rest of them have lost the argument. They lost the argument because their forecasts and data and logic has not stood the test of time, as a recent Heritage Foundation article pointed out:

• Back in 1970, almost fifty years ago, Harvard biologist George Wald predicted that: “Civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.” Fifty years later, civilization is still around.
• In 1977, 42 years ago, Obama’s future “energy czar” John Holdren co-wrote a book with Paul R.Ehrlich that forecasted by 2020, next year, there would the deaths of one billion humans from starvation, which is unlikely to happen next year.
• In 2006, Al Gore predicted that sea levels would rise 20 feet “in the near future.” The near future must be longer than 13 years since 13 years after his prediction the sea levels have risen about zero feet.
• At a big global warming conference in 2005, 14 years ago, a conference of global warming scientists and politicians warned that humanity had as little as 10 years before it would reach “the point of no return on global warming.” In other words, we should have reached the point of no return four years ago but that point has not yet materialized.
• That conference also grossly incorrectly predicted that humanity would be faced with “widespread agricultural failure,” “major droughts,” “increased disease,” “the death of forests,” and the “switching-off of the North Atlantic Gulf Stream,” among many other terrible calamities, none of which ever happened.

And yet even though all of these predictions have been busts, if anyone dares to question global warming advocates like Jerry Brown, they are Nazis. Makes no sense unless you keep the Watts quote in mind, calling someone a Nazi for questioning a failed theory makes that accuser the argument loser.

That will do it for this month’s global warming myth review: true non-believers are now Nazis, CNN embarrasses itself again, and more math hi jinks from global warming advocates.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:


http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org
http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w