October, 2015, Part 3, I Am A Global Warming Doubter and A Believer In Science:

Every month we have enough material to return to a continuing theme in this blog, namely that “I am a global warming doubter AND a believer in science.” This became of interest because of people like Al Gore who fanatically and verbosely claimed that you had to be an idiot to not believe in man made global warming. It has been my life belief that anyone that is that loud and that obnoxious is hiding something, that rather than argue facts and reality it is better to beat down and insult anyone who disagrees.

As we have dove into the whole issue of man made global warming, or its new rebranded title of climate change, we found that Al Gore and people like him were guilty of a number of things:

• Ignoring science and realities that did not support their opinions and positions.
• Rather than have an adult conversation about climate, these types of advocates like Gore sank to the level of insulting those who dared look at ALL science by calling them a variety of names including racists, homophobes, terrorists, flat earth believers, and other slanderous names.
• Continuing to insist that politicians step up their intrusions into our lives with higher taxes, more regulations, and more control on our freedoms and standards of living based on a shaky theory at best.

To see the past posts and the multitude of evidence that we have compiled that showed it is perfectly okay to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, enter the phrase "global warming doubter” in the search box above or go through the monthly historical post listed on the right side of this page.

Thus, let’s see the latest facts and science that prove you can be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, regardless of what Al Gore proclaims.

1) As we have mentioned any number of times in this global warming series of posts over the years, the science is not settled when it comes to man made global warming and climate change impacts. Just this week we have talked about how the CERN Institute and a Nobel Laureate have disputed this “science is settled” deception from the likes of Al Gore, Barack, Obama and others.

Today, let’s add another noted scientist to that array of scientist that say not so fast, the science is not settled. Consider the following facts as it relates to a world famous scientist:

• Dr. Freeman Dyson is supposedly one of the world’s most renowned and famous theoretical physicists.
• He has worked at the Institute For Advanced Study with Einstein.
• He has been an advisor to the U.S. Federal government on a whole range of different science based issues. 
• In his opinion, Obama has backed the “wrong side” in the climate change “war.”
• Dyson claims that the climate forecasting models used by certain climate scientists are getting worse over time in predicting climate realities and that carbon dioxide does far more good than harm.
• In a recent interview conducted by writer Andrew Orlowski of The Register, Dyson “expressed his despair at the current scientific obsession with climate change which he says is “not a scientific mystery but a human mystery. How does it happen that a whole generation of scientific experts is blind to the obvious facts.”"

There you have it, another scientist that says it is okay to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science because man made global warming and climate change are not the reality of our times.

2) One nasty habit that global warming advocates have is that whenever something bad happens in the world, they somehow try to connect it to global warming. A typhoon in the Pacific - must be global warming even though there have been typhoons in the Pacific since the beginning of time. Forest fires in Canada - must be global warming even though there have been forest fires in Canada since the beginning of time. 

Never mind that they almost always have no data, no studies, or no proof that this is a true causal relationship, they just assume that bad news = man made global warming. Science and facts be damned.

And now the advocates have moved from blaming ordinary natural events on global warming to blaming political events on global warming. National Security Advisor Susan Rice recently gave a speech where she suggested that climate change was at least partially responsible for the civil war and refugee crisis in Syria.

In her opinion: “In the years prior to civil war breaking out in Syria, that country also experienced its worst drought on record. Farming families moved en masse into urban centers, increasing political unrest and further priming the country for conflict.”

Let’s step back and analyze her position:

• First of all, she is not a scientist. She is a political appointee. She has no credibility in predicting cause and effect when it comes to climate science. 
• To many Americans, she was a blatant liar in telling the world via five Sunday morning TV news shows that some obscure video caused the death of four Americans at the terrorist attack on our consulate at Benghazi. We now know that the whole video story was a cover up to protect Obama’s re-election rhetoric. Liar than, liar now?
• She presents no scientific evidence that this cause and effect actually happened. 

Maybe some other factors were involved such as the Asaad family oppressing large segments of the Syrian populations for many decades, the chemical warfare that Asaad waged on the rebels, the crackdown on freedom protests, the fight for control of oil and natural gas transportation in the entire Middle East, the rise of ISIS once Obama abandoned Iraq, the centuries long fight of Shiite vs. Sunni Muslims in the Middle East, etc. 

Pure speculation and fear mongering on her part. Did I mention that she is not a scientist? In our first point above, Dr. Freeman Dyson, world renowned scientist says Obama is on the wrong side of the whole global warming debate. So who to believe: a real life scientist or a political appointee with no climate science background.

But no need to answer that question since Rice goes on in the same speech to completely kill her credibility, stating that: “Consider the impacts—to the global economy and to our shared security—when rising seas begin to swallow nations whole,” and that we will see rising sea levels of “as much as 20 feet.” Even most of the global warming advocate scientists do not predict that sea levels will go up anywhere near that high. 

And since the polar ice caps continue to expand and thus, reducing the possibility of any ocean rises in the near future, this is nothing more than speculative fear mongering backed up by NO facts.

3) Consider a recent scientific finding of epic proportions that was recently reviewed in the Canadian Free Press:

As world leaders get ready to head to Paris for the latest pact on cutting CO2 emissions, it has emerged that there isn’t as much urgency about the matter as had been thought. A team of top-level atmospheric chemistry boffins from France and Germany say they have identified a new process by which vast amounts of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are emitted into the atmosphere from the sea – a process which was unknown until now, meaning that existing climate models do not take account of it. The effect of VOCs in the air is to cool the climate down, and thus climate models used today predict more warming than can actually be expected. Indeed, global temperatures have actually been stable for more than fifteen years, a circumstance which was not predicted by climate models and which climate science is still struggling to assimilate.—Lewis Page, The Register, 30 September 2015

Much like Susan Rice, I am not a climate scientist. However, this discovery appears to be very significant in many ways but one that stands out relative to being a global warming doubter and believer in science: This phenomenon was never incorporated into any of the now defunct and failed climate forecast models over the years simply because no one knew about it.

Since VOCs reportedly cool the earth, is it not important to include them in any climate model in order to get a more accurate reading of what the future might hold? If this discovery holds, it should greatly mitigate the forecasted disasters that climate scientists’ forecast models tried to predict since it now appears the oceans of the world are producing an effect to cool the earth.

This is just another example showing that no matter how strongly a scientist or politician or a political appointee advocates for man made global warming and climate change, the reality is that they know very little about what is really going on. If they did know, then VOCs would be part of the discussion but it is not since no one knew about them until recently. Thus, doubting anything in this field of massive ignorance is not a bad thing to do.

That will do it for today. A recent discovery (VOCs) might prove why the doom and gloom climate forecasts models were always dreadfully inaccurate, why political appointees need to shut up when discussing climate change since they have zero background and credibility in the area, and another world renowned scientist comes down on the side of how rational it is to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science. More good stuff tomorrow.


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:

Term Limits Now: http://www.howmuchworsecoulditget.com
http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org
http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w