Showing posts with label J.P Pritzker. Show all posts
Showing posts with label J.P Pritzker. Show all posts

Saturday, May 23, 2026

The Race To Bankruptcy Court: Florida Kicks Illinois's Financial Butt and California Has Mega Budget Problems

Let’s return to one of the hottest topics we have been covering over the past few years, coverage that has intensified recently: which major city or state government will get to bankruptcy court first? Our primary cities it he race to bankruptcy include New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and newcomer, Seattle. The state governments that we think are soon heading into bankruptcy include New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and California with Washington state a newcomer to the race.

Before reviewing the latest news and seeing which state or city is making the best progress towards government bankruptcy, let’s review how these cities and states got themselves into this financial death spiral position to begin with:

  • A government entity keeps expanding its budget, eventually putting pressure on the tax revenue stream it receives.
  • At some point, rather than cut government spending or make its programs more efficient financially, the politicians in charge raise taxes to meet the ever growing government expenditures.
  • The raising of taxes causes some residents and businesses to leave the city or state for less tax burdensome areas, reducing the tax base and reducing the revenue stream.
  • Rather than cut expenses and become more efficient to match the reduced tax revenue stream, politicians in the above cities or states raise the tax burden even more.
  • This causes more residents and businesses to flee the city or state, further reducing the tax base and tax revenue stream.
  • At some point politicians panic and raise taxes more and start cutting vital government services (e.g. police, fire, education) in order to try and balance government spending against the shrinking tax base and revenue stream.
  • The reduction in quality of government services in particular and quality of life in general drives more residents and businesses out of the area.
  • Eventually, the expenses, costs and financial liabilities outstrip the reduced tax stream and bankruptcy occurs.
Okay that’s the process, now lets check the progress some of the above listed government entities are making to achieve this bankruptcy goal against this process:


1)The following statistics come from a tweet by the Rush Limbaugh News account so judge their accuracy accordingly. However, other data sources verify these general trends and realities. The format is positioned as a “scoreboard:”


Florida under Governor Ron Desantis:

  • Lowest crime rate in the state in 50 years.
  • #1 in state economic growth three years in a row.
  • $10 billion in tax relief since 2019.
  • Paid down 50% of existing state government debt.
  • 3.7 million new businesses created.
  • Working to eliminate or significantly reduce residential and business property taxes
Illinois under Governor JB Pritzker:

  • $145 billion in pension debt, highest in the country.
  • $3.2 pending budget deficit in 2026.
  • Budget deficit is predicted to grow to $5.2 billion by 2029.
  • Oversaw $5.2 billion in fraudulent unemployment benefit payments.
  • Ranked 50th out of 50 states for financial transparency.
  • 7 straight years of illegal financial reporting delays
The tweet summed up the difference between a state in a robust growth mode and a state racing towards bankruptcy court: “DeSantis asks: how do we put more money in your pocket?? Pritzker asks: how do we balance our books? That's the difference between a conservative and a Democrat.”


Note: The tweet did not mention that Florida does not have a state income tax while Illinois has a state income tax north of 4% and Florida does not have an estate tax while Illinois does, more reason why residents are fleeing Illinois.


2)Let’s head out to California and see how that state’s budget and fiscal woes are coming along:

  • Governor Gavin Newsom recently bragged that the state government budget had been balanced and there was “zero structural deficit through July 2028."
  • Sounds good but smart people looked at the state's economic situation and said things are not that rosy.
  • According to Rachel Ehler of the state’s Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO): “Despite these booming revenues, the state’s underlying fiscal condition, in our assessment, is not sound. We continue to have a structural deficit.”
  • She claims that structural budget deficits still exist for the next two fiscal years.
  • She went on: “Really, the only way the budget proposal before you is balanced is by relying on reserves.”
  • In other words, the budget is balanced only because money had to be taken out of basically a rainy day fund, a fund that will deplete at some point in time.The real budget deficit could be as high as $16.9 billion according to the LAO.
  • And these budget deficits are still around despite record revenue growth, i.e. state government expenses are growing faster than robust revenue growth.
  • The California Budget and Policy Center chimed in with the opinion that structural budget deficits are still going to come true "without additional action.”
The bottom line is that the California state budget situation either has to see massive cuts in spending or more taxation. In either case, less government spending or more taxation or both, businesses and residents will continue to leave under these conditions, taking their tax base and economic power  with them.

3)As we have discussed, one of the most inane tax ideas that might happen in California, is a one time 5% tax on the wealth of billionaires living in the state. This tax is supposed to be one time and generate $100 billion.

Also, as we have discussed, billionaires have already started to leave the state for more tax friendly states like Texas and Florida, states that not only do not have a state income tax but also have absolutely no plans to tax wealth. These fleeing California billionaires are not only taking the theoretical wealth tax revenue with them but are also taking any current taxes they are paying the state government, a double whammy to the state budget.

The National Taxpayers Union Foundation recently had some interesting, and distressing views, on the California wealth tax:
  • The Foundation analysis noted that billionaires have already left the state in anticipation of a wealth tax including Larry Page, Sergey Brin, Peter Thiel, and David Sacks.
  • It is estimated that fleeing billionaires have already taken $700 billion of wealth out of state and a hefty amount of now missing state income tax.
  • The analysis estimated that before the exodus is down, a trillion may have left the state.
  • But apparently the $100 billion upside wealth tax revenue was based on the number of billionaires and their wealth before the exodus began so the $100 billion estimate might already be way too high.
  • The proposed wealth tax is currently expected to be retroactive, i.e. anyone living in the state as of January 1, 2026, would be subjected to the tax even if they moved before the tax was enacted into law.
  • However, the Foundation points out that this maneuver is likely to be viewed as a violation of the Due Process tenet in the Constitution so that even if a billionaire leaves after the January 1, 2026 deadline the state of California probably has no way to go get them.
  • The Foundation analysis pointed out that California, according to IRS data, lost a net 1.6 million residents over the past few years, taking about $12.7 billion of state and local tax revenue with them so the exodus is well underway and does not include just billionaires.
  • As we have proposed, the state government of California is in a financial death spiral: the state politicians refuse to axe government programs or make them more efficient, they are raiding rainy day funds to balance the short term budget, and they do not understand that the state is losing residents and businesses because of higher and higher taxes and lower and lower quality of life.
  • The Foundation's analysis summed up the feeble financial situation in the state quite nicely: “Seventeenth-century French finance minister Jean-Baptiste Colbert is supposed to have defined taxation as “the art of plucking the goose so as to obtain the greatest amount of feathers with the least amount of hissing.” Thus far, this proposed tax [wealth tax] is succeeding in maximizing only the hissing, with no feathers at all to show for it.”
That will do it for today: life is good in Florida, life is going south so to speak in Illinois, and California has some serious financial problems that a rainy day fund can keep under wraps for just a little while.


**********************

If you agree that we need to deseat every member of Congress for their lack of success and accomplishment, then please consider going to the following petition link to

help the cause:


https://www.change.org/p/deseat-congress-reset-freedom



**********************


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

Friday, February 27, 2026

The Race To Bankruptcy Court: The Bears Likely Fleeing Chicago, Chicago Goes Bankrupt In About Decade, and Palantir Flees To Florida

 It seems we are in a little bit of a rut in that we seem to be getting overwhelmed with news about our choice for states and major cities that are likely to go bankrupt relatively soon. As always, our top state governments that we think are nearing bankruptcy include New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and California. Our top major cities we think are rapidly approaching bankruptcy include New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco.

Before reviewing the latest news and seeing which state or city is  making the best progress towards government bankruptcy, let’s review how these cities and states got themselves into this financial death spiral  position to  begin with:

  • A government entity keeps expanding its budget, eventually putting pressure on the tax revenue stream it receives.

  • At some  point, rather than cut government spending or make its programs more efficient financially, the politicians in charge raise taxes  to meet the ever growing government expenditures.

  • The raising of taxes causes some residents and businesses to leave the city or state for less tax burdensome areas, reducing the tax base and  reducing  the revenue stream.

  • Rather than cut expenses and become more efficient to match the reduced tax revenue stream, politicians in the above cities or states raise the tax burden even  more.

  • This causes more residents and businesses to flee the city or state, further reducing the tax base and tax revenue stream.

  • At some point politicians panic and raise taxes more and start cutting vital government services (e.g. police, fire, education) in order to try and balance government spending against the shrinking tax base and  revenue stream.

  • The reduction in quality of government services in particular and quality of life in general  drives more residents and businesses out of the area.

  • Eventually, the expenses, costs and financial liabilities outstrip the reduced tax stream and bankruptcy occurs.

Okay that’s the process, now lets check the progress some of  the above listed government  entities are making to  achieve this bankruptcy goal:

1)Business and residents have been fleeing Chicago for a while now due to high taxes, high crime rates, faulty management skills of the politicians running the city government, etc. Major companies that have made major moves out of Chicago  include Boeing, Citadel Financial, Tyson Foods,  Caterpillar, and others. The CEO of Citadel, Ken Griffin, told the Wall Street Journal that his co-workers feared getting mugged and attacked on the streets of Chicago which was a driving force for the relocation to Florida.

Consider the following numbers:

  • According to the Illinois Policy Institute, during the tenure of the current state governor, J.B. Pritzker, there have been 49 state tax hikes since 2019. 

  • These tax hikes have  raised the average resident tax burden by 44%.

  • The state has  lost at least ten major corporate headquarters in the past six years.

  • Since 2019, the state GDP has  grown at only about one third the rate of  the national  GDP growth.

But it is not just residents and businesses leaving the city:

  • The Chicago Bears have called Chicago their home for over 100 years, beginning back in 1920.

  • An  original NFL franchise, the words “Bears” and "Chicago" have  been inseparable for so  long.

  • But now there  is a good chance that even the town’s  historic NFL franchise has  had  enough of the city and are  seriously considering leaving the city, and the state, and heading to a new home in  northern Indiana.

  • Despite negotiations directly with the state’s governor, J.B. Pritzker, it looks like the Bears are leaving.

  • Indiana politicians are moving quickly to put a package together that will steal the Bears away while Illinois and Chicago politicians have dithered for years without coming up with a good plan to keep the Bears in the city.

When you lose a 100 year institution like the Bears leaving the city and state, when residents and businesses cannot wait to leave the city of Chicago and the state of Illinois, you have a strong case for either Chicago or Illinois governments entering bankruptcy pretty soon.

2)The Chicago Contrarian website recently published an in-depth article and  analysis on the financial disaster that is the Chicago city government. But the big news is that they not only outlined the dire financial situation of the city but also forecasted when the city would actually go bankrupt:


  • The opening paragraph of the  article summed up the situation quite nicely by claiming “It’s only a matter  of time” before the city’s revenues cannot pay off the city’s expenses and financial obligations.

  • The article maintains that the previous mayor’s  administration of Lori Lightfoot heavily contributed to the  financial mess but that local politicians set Chicago off on a financial death spiral long before she came along.

  • The theory is that local politicians sold off the financial future of Chicago by lavishing lucrative salary, pension, and benefit programs on city union workers in exchange for their votes.

  • In order to  finance the city’s massive pension fund liabilities for retired and future retired city employees as well as operate the city on a day to  day basis,, the city has to fund those pension obligations and current expenses off of a shrinking tax base.

  • Unfortunately, over time the city’s politicians have underfunded those future pension liabilities with the police, fire, and  municipal workers pension funds currently funded at less than 30% of what they will need to pay out over time.

  • These low funding levels to cover future pension  liabilities are at about the same  level Detroit had before it  went bankrupt.

  • In the Contrarian  article, the point is  made that the city is not allowed to cut benefit levels because that is prohibited by the Illinois Constitution.

  • In fact, things are already so  bad that the city is actually borrowing money to pay for current financial obligations while at the same time increasing those future costs of servicing the money it  is  borrowing today.

  • So  a shrinking tax base  which  leads to  shrinking tax revenue streams with growing pension and other employee obligations that cannot be  legally reduced and you have a vicious financial death spiral.

  • In fact, the article, using the city’s own actuarial analyses, predicts that the city will  go bankrupt in 7 to 12 years

  • But the state politicians in Illinois have passed legislation that does not allow Chicago or any other state city to declare bankruptcy.

  • Thus, it is unknown  territory of what happens when Chicago can no longer  fund its current  operating city expenses and its pension and other union benefits which makes it bankrupt but cannot legally be bankrupt, quite the conundrum.


Thus, what happens when the city is out of money and cannot legally go bankrupt:


  • One option would be to  drastically cut government services (fire, police education, etc.) but that option would drive more residents and businesses out  of the city further reducing an already dwindling tax base.

  • The city could raise property tax rates and other taxes but that would also drive people out of  the city and further reduce the tax revenue stream.

  • The city or a judge could force the  state government to  change the law and allow the city to declare bankruptcy and then go through a judicial process to fix the financial  situation which would obviously involve slashing benefits and salaries of union workers  and city retirees which would have catastrophic political impacts on  the Democrats ruling the state and city.

  • It could hope to  get a bailout from the Federal government which is highly unlikely since those people  living outside of Illinois are not going to allow their tax dollars to go to bail out a failed  political problem in Chicago.


Get the popcorn because it is  going to be a wild ride since in as early as seven years the city will  go bankrupt in reality but not  legally, it will  not have enough  revenue to pay its  expenses and  financial  obligations but will have to anyway, what a mess.


The bigger question  now becomes whether Mamdani in New York City, Karen  Bass in Los Angeles or any number of other cities (Portland and Seattle) can beat that seven year window  to bankruptcy court.


The  entire Contrarian  article can  be  viewed at the following  link:


https://www.chicagocontrarian.com/blog/when-is-chicago-going-bankrupt#:~:text=Bankruptcy%20isn't%20legal%20%E2%80%94%20yet&text=And%20Illinois%2C%20in%20its%20infinite,Assembly%20passes%20legislation%20authorizing%20it.


3)One last example  of what is going on in cities and states across  the country that are facing a financial death spiral:


  • Palantir is a major AI  technology company.

  • It recently announced that it  is moving its corporate base to the state of Florida which is one of the least burdensome tax states and one of the most welcoming states of businesses.

  • The company had escaped from the high tax/high regulation state of California in 2020, taking its high salary and high tax paying employees with them, giving that state another blow of an exiting company.

  • They moved to Denver but have now fled that state for Florida where taxes and business regulation are lower.

  • The company is  valued at $300 billion so this move to Florida is a pretty big deal.


Florida and other states continue to gather up residents and businesses that are leaving the high tax/high business regulation states like our prime candidates to go  bankrupt: New York,  New Jersey, California,  and Illinois.  At some point the financial bastions of these states, e.g. Silicon Valley in California, Wall Street in New York, Chicago Bears in  Chicago, etc., get hollowed out and the functions they once owned get reincarnated in other states.


**********************

If you agree that we need to deseat every member of Congress for their lack of success and accomplishment, then please consider going to the following petition link to help the cause:


https://www.change.org/p/deseat-congress-reset-freedom



**********************


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at: