Showing posts with label New York city Chicago. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New York city Chicago. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 1, 2026

The Race To Bankruptcy Court: New Jersey Has Structural Budget Problems, Money Magazine's Most Expensive States, and Even CNN Sees Disaster For Blue Cities

 It seems we are in a little bit of a rut in that we seem to be getting overwhelmed with news about our choice for states and major cities that are likely to go bankrupt relatively soon. As always, our top state governments that we think are nearing bankruptcy include New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and California. Our top major cities we think are rapidly approaching bankruptcy include New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco.


Before reviewing the latest news and seeing which state or city is making the best progress towards government bankruptcy, let’s review how these cities and states got themselves into this financial death spiral position to begin with:


  • A government entity keeps expanding its budget, eventually putting pressure on the tax revenue stream it receives.

  • At some point, rather than cut government spending or make its programs more efficient financially, the politicians in charge raise taxes to meet the ever growing government expenditures.

  • The raising of taxes causes some residents and businesses to leave the city or state for less tax burdensome areas, reducing the tax base and reducing the revenue stream.

  • Rather than cut expenses and become more efficient to match the reduced tax revenue stream, politicians in the above cities or states raise the tax burden even more.

  • This causes more residents and businesses to flee the city or state, further reducing the tax base and tax revenue stream.

  • At some point politicians panic and raise taxes more and start cutting vital government services (e.g. police, fire, education) in order to try and balance government spending against the shrinking tax base and revenue stream.

  • The reduction in quality of government services in particular and quality of life in general drives more residents and businesses out of the area.

  • Eventually, the expenses, costs and financial liabilities outstrip the reduced tax stream and bankruptcy occurs.


Okay that’s the process, now lets specifically check the progress on how some of the above listed government entities are making to achieve this bankruptcy goal  against this process:


1)Do not believe that states and cities are approaching bankruptcy? Consider the opinion of a CNN personality:


  • In a recent speech, CNN’s Fareed Zakaria put forth the proposition that certain liberal cities across the country have become prime examples of high taxes, runaway spending, inefficient government services, and quality of life issues.

  • His candidates for getting into deep financial trouble include New York City, Los Angeles, and Chicago, some of the same cities we have proposed are in a financial death spiral.

  • Specifically: “New York is really a prime example of a problem Democrats seem unwilling to confront. Blue cities are out of control, promising more, spending more, delivering less, and pushing off the fiscal problems to some future day.”

  • As an example, he pointed out that the city’s budget amount for rental assistance subsidies went from $263 million in 2020 to $1.34 billion in 2025, a five fold increase in five short years.

  • Los Angeles did not escape from his wrath since he pointed out that the city has spent billions of dollars on their massive homelessness problem and yet the  city’s homeless  population has grown 70% between 2015 and  2024.

  • He then moved to another favorite city of ours to go bankrupt, Chicago, where he pointed out that the city is run by a horribly unpopular mayor and the city's massive pension burden will bankrupt the city “sooner or later.”

  • His overall point is that the politicians operating these cities somehow constantly raise their city government budgets which require higher taxation but never resolve any problems which constantly grow despite  higher spending on  those problems.


Thus, the tax burden  goes up, the quality of city life goes down and the migration of residents and businesses out of these cities accelerates which means they take their taxable  income and wealth with them.


2)As we reviewed above, city and  state politicians always think that raising taxes will resolve everything. Rather than make government programs more efficient or downsize them, they allow the bloated government bureaucracies to  continue along with no changes and instead they raise taxes. As taxes get higher and  higher, residents and businesses flee to less burdensome locales.


Given that it is our opinion that New York,  New Jersey, California and Illinois are the states most likely to go bankrupt, a recent article by Money magazine showed why we might be on the money with those predictions:


  • Money magazine analyzed the average tax and living expense burden in each of the 50 states.

  • Not surprisingly New York was named as the fifth most expensive state to live in with high taxes across the board.

  • New Jersey was ranked as the fourth most expensive state to live in with high property and estate taxes.

  • And  not surprisingly, California was seen as the  most expensive state to live in with high  housing costs, high gasoline prices that include high state gas taxes, and high income taxes.

  • The only surprise was that Illinois did not make the  top ten of most expensive states to live in.


More  proof and  evidence of why people are moving out of these expensive  high tax states and why unless the size of government is reduced or made more efficient, these cities and states will continue to see their tax base dwindle and their financial death spiral  accelerate.


3)Speaking  of making government more efficient,  consider a case in  point for one of our candidates to go  bankrupt:


  • Phil Murphy is the  former governor of New Jersey.

  • In eight years he managed to increase  the state government  budget by a whopping 57% without really resolving any  issues facing the state’s taxpayers.

  • When  Murphy came into the office the state government budget was $37.4 billion but when he  left office eight years later the budget was $58.8  billion.

  • The new governor, Mikie Sherrill, recently had to go in front of the state legislature and explain that Murphy left her and the state with a $3 billion structural deficit and that the state government surplus will be gone within two years.

  • The New Jersey Business and Industry Association reported it clearly: Murphy's seven government budgets added a cumulative $5.5 billion in spending above his own initial budget proposals, ie. in underestimate what he needed to spend to keep the state government running.

  • Senate Republican  Michael Testa appears to understand the problem: "We have a $4 billion structural deficit. I don't envy Gov.-elect Sherrill at all. Eventually, we have to stop kicking the can down the road. Someone is going to have to tighten the belt."

  • Pew Charitable Trusts analysis shows that New Jersey has the worst long term structural deficit of any state in the union with expected state government tax revenue to  cover only 95.6% of anticipated expanse over the next 15 years,

  • In other words, the bills that are coming due for the state government cannot be  covered with the current tax structure unless other spending is reduced.

  • But as always it seems, Democrats in the  state government never learn, they want to raise taxes on millionaires, a move that has proven catastrophic when other states did the same thing: millionaires move to other less taxing areas and take their taxable income with them.

  • As another example of how the  state government  spending has exploded without a sound financial underpinning: over the past 20 years the state government budget has grown almost 140% while the annual state economic growth has been only 1% annually on  average.


While we have not  talked a lot about New Jersey lately, my home state by the way, as you see from  the above analyses, it has a serious economic and financial situation. And that situation is getting worse: massive government spending that will be hard to  politically reduce, given what voting blocs will be  against any reduction  in  their share of the taxpayer pie. Many of the economically ignorant politicians want to raise taxes on  the wealthy which we have  proven time and  time again that actually reduces the tax stream since millionaires move to  other states. 


That will  do it  for today: New York State and New York City are still our favored candidates to  go bankrupt first but New Jersey, California, and Illinois along with Chicago and Los Angeles are still  worthy race  opponents.


**********************

If you agree that we need to deseat every member of Congress for their lack of success and accomplishment, then please consider going to the following petition link to help the cause:


https://www.change.org/p/deseat-congress-reset-freedom



**********************


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:


Tuesday, March 3, 2026

The Race To Bankruptcy Court - New York City Tax Stream and Population Continue To Get Hollowed Out and Chicago Has Yet Another Financial Liability

It seems we are in a little bit of a rut in that we seem to be getting overwhelmed with news about our choice for states and major cities that are likely to go bankrupt relatively soon. As always, our top state governments that we think are nearing bankruptcy include New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and California. Our top major cities we think are rapidly approaching bankruptcy include New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco.

Before reviewing the latest news and seeing which state or city is making the best progress towards government bankruptcy, let’s review how these cities and states got themselves into this financial death spiral position to begin with:

  • A government entity keeps expanding its budget, eventually putting pressure on the tax revenue stream it receives.
  • At some point, rather than cut government spending or make its programs more efficient financially, the politicians in charge raise taxes to meet the ever growing government expenditures.
  • The raising of taxes causes some residents and businesses to leave the city or state for less tax burdensome areas, reducing the tax base and reducing the revenue stream.
  • Rather than cut expenses and become more efficient to match the reduced tax revenue stream, politicians in the above cities or states raise the tax burden even more.
  • This causes more residents and businesses to flee the city or state, further reducing the tax base and tax revenue stream.
  • At some point politicians panic and raise taxes more and start cutting vital government services (e.g. police, fire, education) in order to try and balance government spending against the shrinking tax base and revenue stream.
  • The reduction in quality of government services in particular and quality of life in general drives more residents and businesses out of the area.
  • Eventually, the expenses, costs and financial liabilities outstrip the reduced tax stream and bankruptcy occurs.
Okay that’s the process, now lets check the progress some of the above listed government entities are making to achieve this bankruptcy goal:

1)One of the major indicators that a city is heading towards bankruptcy, as listed above, is that residents and businesses leave that teetering state or city for other areas. The New York Post recently ran an article that highlighted how this is happening in New York state and its cities including New York City:
  • More than 125,000 New York residents have left the state and resettled in Florida over the past five years.
  • Those folks have taken about $14 billion worth of income with them that can no longer be taxed in the state of New York.
  • Over 41,000 of those migrating out of New York ended up in the greater Miami metro area, an area that has seen tremendous growth from out of state people moving in.
  • These numbers come from an analysis done by the Citizens Budget Commission (CBC).
  • Of the $14 billion that left the state, a whopping $10 billion is estimated to come from New York City residents hitting the road.
  • A CBC spokesperson cited affordability, quality of life, and safety from crime as primary drivers for those leaving for Florida.
  • The CBC also noted that the percentage of New York City residents who said life in the city was “good or excellent” dropped from 50% prior to the pandemic to 30% in 2025.
  • Not only does New York state and New York City lose the tax revenue stream from those leaving but overall economic growth is stunted as these mostly higher income folks that are leaving spend their wealth on restaurants, clothes, and other needs outside of the state and city.
  • About 26,000 of those people that left New York for Florida had incomes roughly three times the national average.
  • Since the top 1% of earners in New York City pay 40% of the state’s income tax, the loss of higher earning and higher taxed residents is particularly harmful to the tax base.
  • But those leaving New York City for Florida are not the only ones leaving the city and taking their tax dollars with them since 138,000 city residents have left the city for Long Island, taking over $11 billion in income from the city according to the CBC.
  • Another 120,000 former city residents of the city have moved to Westchester County, NY, Fairfield County in Connecticut, and Bergen County in New Jersey, taking another $11.7 billion in income with them.
  • The average income for these migrants was over $100,000.
  • In 2010, New York City was home to almost 13% of the country’s millionaires but by 2022 that percentage had dropped to under 9%.
Keep in mind that much of this migration of wealthier residents from the city and the state happened before the current administration of Mamdani took over city hall in New York City. And if the state legislature does not raise the income tax rate on wealthy city and state residents, Mamdani has threatened to raise the city tax burden even more across the city by raising the property taxes by over 9%.

Which, if that happens, the increased tax burden will drive more New Yorkers out of the city and further accelerate the city’s financial death spiral into bankruptcy. In our last post we came across a detailed analysis that forecasted Chicago will go bankrupt in 7-12 years. Given the out-migration of wealth and residents from New York City, it is still our contention that New York City will get to bankruptcy court faster than Chicago, given the above wealth migration trends.

2)Let’s take a look at another recent New York Post article that further reinforces the trend of city residents actually leaving the city or thinking about leaving, given the cost and quality of life issues in the city today:

  • According to a recent Marist opinion poll, one in three New York City residents plan on leaving the city and state within the next five years.
  • Reasons cited most often of those desiring to leave include the cost of living and declining quality of life.
  • 86% of those polled said the state is no longer affordable for the average family, up from 82% in 2025.
  • This desire of 33% of those polled planning on leaving the state is up from 27% that planned to leave 15 years ago.
  • According to the United Van Lines 2025 Movers study, more people moved out of New York and New Jersey than any other state.
  • 56% of those polled said they think New York is heading in the wrong direction.
More bad news for the city and state: not only are people already gone or are leaving, many claim that they also will be leaving shortly, hollowing out the tax base and the tax revenue stream, an omen of an impending financial death spiral.

3)Our strong candidate for going bankrupt is the city of Chicago. Our previous post explored that real possibility in depth, including an analysis that forecasted the city would go bankrupt within seven to twelve years, given the shrinking tax revenue base and the unfunded liabilities the city is committed to paying.

While the following financial it is pretty small int he big picture, it certainly does not impede the city’s drive to bankruptcy:
  • A city judge recently ruled that the revenue-strapped city of Chicago will have to refund $163 million to residents due to the fact the city had overcharged them on parking fines.
  • Another $94 million in uncollected fees and fines was also wiped out.
  • According to state law, there is a $250 cap that can be charged for illegally parked vehicles.
  • For years, the city of Chicago violated that state statute.
Again, these millions of dollars are relatively small compared to the billions and billions of dollars of future and current costs and liabilities the city will have to pay for. But this is just another example of bad financial mismanagement by the city’s political class, that is symptomatic of their larger financial incompetence that they have shown over the decades.

That will do it for today: lots of people and tax dollars have already left New York City, a lot of New York state and New York City residents say they are going to leave and take more tax dollars with them, and Chicago finds itself with even more liabilities that have to be paid.


**********************

If you agree that we need to deseat every member of Congress for their lack of success and accomplishment, then please consider going to the following petition link to help the cause:


https://www.change.org/p/deseat-congress-reset-freedom



**********************


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at: