Showing posts with label farmville. Show all posts
Showing posts with label farmville. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Wastebook 2012, Wasteful Federal Government Spending, Part 1- Beefy Jerky Research, Sidewalks To Nowhere, Pet Toothpaste and More

It is no secret our country and our economy are in dire financial shape. Our national debt is now over $16 TRILLION, with over $5 TRILLION added to it in just the first three and a half years of the Obama administration. Many times we have documented and discussed the brutal inefficiency, waste, corruption, and criminal fraud involved when the Federal government is in charge of our tax dollars and wealth:
  • Medicare and Medicaid waste between $110 and $150 billion a year.
  • Social Security wastes over $100 billion a year.
  • The IRS fails to collect over $380 billion from tax evaders every year.
  • Federal food stamp and unemployment benefits easily waste over $20 billion every year.
  • The National Science Foundation uses its $8 billion budget every year to study such irrelevant topics like when did dogs become man’s best friend, creating a scale model of the 1964 New York World’s Fair, studying if online dating sites are racist, a study to determine if playing Farmville helps adults develop and maintain relationships, a study on why the same college basketball teams seem to dominate March Madness, etc. (see: http://loathemygovernment.blogspot.com/2011/06/national-science-foundation-wasting.html for more details.)
  • Corporate welfare programs give away billions of dollars every year of taxpayer wealth to major corporations that could survive quite nicely without them (see: http://loathemygovernment.blogspot.com/2012/07/mining-federal-treasury-corporate.html)
  • One of our sources tallied up the wasteful government spending on trivial efforts over the past ten years and came up with $1.2 TRILLION of taxpayer funds that have been totally wasted on minor efforts and studies. These programs included a study on why people cheat, lie and act rudely on local Virginia tennis courts, a study costing more than $600,000 that was spent on researching the sex lives of South African ground squirrels, and a $1,500,000 Federal program to promote silk production in Laos, just a small sampling of the waste. (see http://loathemygovernment.blogspot.com/2012/05/wasteful-government-spending-week.html)
  • The waste and inefficiency is so rampant that we have easily identified over $9 TRILLION of wealth savings that could be realized over the next decade if the Washington political class focused just on the major priorities, needs, and problems of our times. (see: http://loathemygovernment.blogspot.com/2012/02/united-states-of-purple-presidency-plan.html).
Unfortunately, no matter how bad our national debt gets, no matter how burdensome our outrageous high tax burden becomes, no matter how many times smart, intelligent Americans point out the thousands of sources of waste, our politicians never seem to get the message. Wasting taxpayer money seems to be a great thing to talk about but they do nothing to stop it since it might cost them a few votes in their never ending quest to stay in office.

How do we know they do not care or do not know how to stop the insane spending? Senator Tom Coburn has published his annual “Wastebook” for 2012, which again proves the idiotic Washington spending and waste goes on unabated. Today and tomorrow we will look at one hundred of the wasteful spending sources that the Senator has uncovered and written about, 50 today and 50 tomorrow.

The following day we will also review some of the insightful opinions of the Senator who may be one of the only politicians in Washington who understand that we cannot afford to keep wasting wealth like this and actually has the guts to stand up in the face of the waste onslaught. We will recommend several easy-to-understand steps that are needed to stop the insanity that the Senator has uncovered.

But let’s examine the first 50 instances of totally useless Federal spending and waste:

1) The NFL, NHL, and PGA all classify themselves as non-profit organizations. Taxpayers may be losing at least $89.9 million a year subsidizing these tax loopholes for professional sports leagues that generate billions of dollars
annually in profits, despite professional teams often being owned by billionaires who pay some of their players millions of dollars in salary.

2) Lax accounting and audit controls and mismanagement in the food stamp program results in billions of dollars annually being spent not on healthy meals for hungry kids and needy families but instead wasted on questionable or illegal expenditures, including Starbucks, alcohol, diapers, and guns.

3) The Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission voted again this year to keep the rarely used Lake Murray State Park Airport open. It is not needed to serve the local markets or citizens, it is kept open solely to receive $150,000 in Federal funds it can then transfer to other airports. The airport has just one landing per month, i.e. it is essentially unused by planes and used only to fulfill some silly Federal guideline to get taxpayer money it does not deserve.

4) A USAID development program in Morocco included pottery classes that was funded using American taxpayer wealth.

5) Despite skyrocketing national debt, the Federal government is spending $947,000 via NASA to study what food astronauts could eat on Mars, by simulating a
Mars outpost at a barren location in Hawaii. When and if this research might be needed is far, far off in the future if ever.

6) A $325,000 NSF grant was used to create a robot squirrel to study how squirrels and rattlesnakes interact. What makes this expenditure doubly bad is that apparently the American taxpayer has already funded a similar program in the past, making this study doubly unnecessary and wasteful.

7) USDA gave a $300,000 grant to a caviar producer in Idaho for marketing purposes. I wonder how big a market there is for caviar in Idaho, both from a production and consumption perspective?

8) The American taxpayer paid out $3.3 million to bail out a local Arkansas tourist boat company that was going out of business.

9) The Department of Transportation gave an Alaskan tribe millions to start a ferry business that competes with existing private ferry services. Apparently, these other businesses, who never asked for or received a government handout, are now struggling to survive in the face of this government subsidized ferry service.

10) The Department of Health and Human Services wastes $2 million annually in maintenance fees for grant accounts that are either expired or empty of funds, all because the Department never got around to closing out the unneeded accounts.

11) If the Treasury Department stopped producing pennies, it would save the American taxpayer $70 million a year since it now costs $0.024 to produce a $.01 penny.

12) $1.5 billion is spent every year, a total that is growing every year, for the Federal government program that provides free cell phones for people that qualify for Federal welfare programs.

13) State officials used a Federal stimulus grant to purchase massive, overpowered routers that are too big and unnecessary for rural schools, libraries, and government offices, wasting $24 million in the process.

14) The National Science Foundation spent $516,000 on a research program that created a computer game simulating a high school “Prom Night” and the week leading up to the prom night.

15) Paper and pulp companies are still taking advantage of a loophole, costing the American taxpayer $268 million a year, allowing these companies to cash in their black liquor byproduct as an alternative fuel under a tax credit intended for vehicular fuel alternatives, not paper production byproducts.

16) Beverly Hills sold part of its Federal Community Development Block Grant funds to a neighboring town for a discounted 70 cents on the dollar to get around Federal
requirements.

17) The Department Of Energy is still running a Cold War era nuclear nonproliferation program, at a cost of $15 million a year, that was established to recruit new scientists in Russia.

18) NASA has spent $1.6 million to develop a number of video games.

19) The Department of Agriculture spends $49,337 a year to have a Smokey The Bear hot air balloon at festivals and pubic events in the southwest United States but claims it does not have enough funds for more DC 10 tanker planes to fight forest fires.

20) The National Science Foundation (why does this organization’s name keep popping up when discussing waste?) spent $30,000 of taxpayer wealth on a study to see whether people can determine another person’s sexual orientation with just a glance.

21) Federal agencies could save billions every year if they did a better job pooling their procurements to leverage their buying power.

22) The National Endowment for the Arts spends $1 million a year to fund book clubs, movie screenings, theatrical productions, fishing lessons, and concerts.

23) Housing and Urban Development gave $505,000 to a pet shampoo company for machinery to make pet toothpaste and shampoo.

24) A business park in New York received $1.3 million of Federal funds to make a road for a Pepsico yogurt factory.

25) $350,000 was spent by the National Science Foundation (Again?!?) to study of how golfers can putt better if they envision the hole is bigger.

26) $13,000 of anti-obesity Federal funds were sent to Maine to pay for a giant graffiti mural focused on sustainability.

27) Federal taxpayer funds were used to rehabilitate a covered bridge in Ohio, a bridge that is not used by cars or tied to any walking or bike trail.

28) Medicare and the Veterans’ Administration pay for health care twice for veterans who have Medicare Advantage but still seek care from the VA, which cannot seek reimbursement from Medicare.

29) A Department of Transportation grant paid $142,419 to provide free bus rides during the 2012 Super Bowl in Indianapolis even though average prices for those Super Bowl tickets are around $3,000.

30) $57,000 of Federal education funds were misused in Texas to send fifth-grade boys to a movie theater to see “Red Tails” while girls were left behind.

31) The National Endowment for the Humanities funding paid $40,000 for a video game simulating Thoreau’s experience at Walden Pond.

32) $10,000 worth of Department of Transportation funds were used in Michigan to buy 400 talking urinal cakes to fight drunk driving. You cannot make this stuff up.

33) A cartooning school in Vermont received $220,000 of HUD funds to build a new center, though it has very few students and is unaccredited.

34) We have already covered this waste in a previous post, waste that totaled over $400 million. The State Department’s Iraq police training program has failed miserably, according the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction. No objectives were created, and classes did not help Iraqis at all. The State Department will hand over to the Iraqis several building projects that ended up being unnecessary.

35) $445,444 of NSF funds were spent on a musical about biodiversity and climate change. Reviews of the play said it was boring and needed improvement.

36) $35.6 million of Federal Transportation money will help build a trolley in St. Louis that has been called the “Streetcar Named No Desire” by one local. It duplicates
existing light rail and public transportation and thus, is unnecessary for the transportation needs of local residents.

37) Congress split a new line of Navy ships between two completely different designs, increasing costs and undermining the Navy’s capabilities, wasting $148 million in the process.

38) $67,926 of EPA funds went to an anti-trash poster contest for college students, with winners getting a paid trip to New York City. Did I mention that this poster contest was for college students? Unbelievable.

39) The city of Grants Pass, Oregon, will spend $388,000 in Federal funds to build just five bus shelters in its small bus system, a per shelter cost of $77,600 per BUS SHELTER. Makes you wonder if it is heated, has indoor plumbing, and a two car garage. I would bet that you might be able to get all those features in an actual home in Grants Pass, Oregon for the same cost, if not in their bus shelters.

40) Health and Human Services spent almost $100,000 to put together a YouTube video contest to promote eating fruits and vegetables.

41) Regional FEMA officials miscalculated renovation cost of two University of Iowa buildings by including unallowable costs, leading to unnecessary
replacement of the buildings at a cost of $75.4 million.

42) The Federal government gave out $150,000 to the Strong National Museum of Play to develop an exhibit on America’s games and puzzles.

43) $1.1 million of Department of Transportation funds were used for “sidewalks to nowhere” in Florida and Michigan. In Florida, the sidewalk was a “safe route to school” that was still unsafe. In Michigan, Federal requirements forced a county to make sidewalk ramps at an intersection without sidewalks.

44) NASA paid $771,000 for a knowledge management database that has never been used.

45)  The Alaska Railroad has received $38.8 million in Federal money for a tourist train to serve not the citizens of Alaska but tourists and cruise ship passengers.

46) The Agriculture Department spends about $1.5 million a year to help vineyards.

47) Medicaid providers who have unpaid taxes are still able to receive their full Medicaid reimbursements, costing taxpayers about $330 million a year due to these tax evading doctors.

48) The General Services Administration has been trying to build a $330 million court house in California for ten years even though the General Accounting Office has continually challenged the need for such a building.

49) The Department of Defense has spent $770,000 to research a new way to make beef jerky with processed meat. Other Federal money has been given to a number of beef jerky companies for other jerky projects. Has the word “jerky” ever had such a double meaning.

50) $7.3 million worth Department of Education dollars for School Improvement Grants in Washington hardly helped students, a study found, and funds were used for changes that could be made without additional funding.

Enough of this depressing material for now. We will review the other 50 waste examples tomorrow and provide a number of suggestions on how to get this fiasco under control. You know that your government has gone dysfunctional when it runs up TRILLIONS of dollars in debt but still continues to spend money on talking urinal cakes, beef jerky research, pet toothpaste subsidies, and other nonsense. Our political class has taken us down the rabbit hole of waste and has no clue or desire to get us out.

We invite all readers of this blog to visit our new website, "The United States Of Purple," at:

http://www.unitedstatesofpurple.com/

The United States of Purple is a new grass roots approach to filling the office of President of The United States by focusing on the restoration of freedom in the United States, focusing on problem solving skills and results vs. personal political enrichment, and imposing term limits on all future Federal politicians. No more red states, no more blue states, just one United States Of America under the banner of Purple.

The United States Of Purple's website also provides you the formal opportunity to sign a petition to begin the process of implementing a Constitutional amendment to impose fixed term limits on all Federally elected politicians. Only by turning out the existing political class can we have a chance of addressing and finally resolving the major issues of or times.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at www.loathemygovernment.com. It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:

http://www.cato.org/
http://www.robertringer.com/
http://realpolichick.blogspot.com/
http://www.flipcongress2010.com/
http://www.reason.com/
http://www.repealamendment/



Friday, May 25, 2012

Wasteful Government Spending Week - National Science Foundation and Farmville Research

Our focus this week has been on what we classify as "random wasteful spending." These instances occur throughout the Federal bureaucracy on a regular basis but usually happen only once on specific initiatives or projects. Examples we have already spoken about include:
  • $80 million that was spent to build a consulate building in Afghanistan that was abandoned before it was used since it was indefensible against attacks.
  • $300 million that was spent to build two Navy ships that were immediately scrapped before they were ever used.
  • $500 million that was spent in a program to train Iraqi police officers, a program that is likely to be shut down within a year of starting and be forever known as a failure.
  • $184 million that the TSA spend on airport security screening equipment that will never be used and will continue to cost over $2 million to store.
These programs are different from what we call "systemic wasteful spending." Systemic wasteful spending occurs every day of every year and includes the waste, inefficiencies, and criminal fraud that constant destroy taxpayer wealth in the Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamp, and unemployment insurance programs.

Today's discussion on government waste is sort of a hybrid between these two categories. The National Science Foundation (NSF) wastes millions of dollars every year on idiotic and useless research programs. Thus, this type of government waste is random in that the inane research programs vary year to year but systemic in that the NSF is around every year to approve these inane research programs.

We had previously covered the NSF waste but will review it below as a close to this week's tribute to wasteful government spending (http://loathemygovernment.blogspot.com/2011/06/national-science-foundation-wasting.html). While reading the following NSF disgraces, keep in mind that at the time of our original blog, the NSF had an annual budget of $6.9 billion. However, there was a move afoot last year to more than double that to $14 billion. It makes you wonder how this is possible, given the lackluster historic and current performance of the NSF.

According to an investigation by the Senate last year and it's final report, the NSF has spent taxpayer money on the following programs through the years:

- How to ride a bike.

- When did dogs become man's best friend?

- Are political views genetically determined?

- How to improve the quality of wine.

- Do boys like to play with trucks and girls like to play with dolls?

- How rumors get started.

- Do parents choose trendy baby names?

- When is the best time to buy a ticket to a sporting event?

- How much housework does a husband create for his wife?

- A virtual recreation of the 1964/1965 World's Fair.

- Sponsorship of a YouTube rap video.

- A review of event ticket prices on Stub Hub.

- What motivates people to make political donations.

- How politicians use the Internet.

- The impact of YouTube on the 2008 U.S. elections.

- A study to determine if playing Farmville helps adults develop and maintain relationships.

- A study on why the same college basketball teams seem to dominate March Madness.

- A study on whether or not online dating site users are racist in their dating habits.

In a time of record budget deficits and almost $16 TRILLION in national debt, do we really want to spend our limited taxpayer dollars on these kinds of research projects? In these days of  high gas prices, do we really want to spend our limited taxpayer dollars on Farmville research? In these days of terrorism, do we really want to spend our limited tax payer dollars on anything related to the 1964/1965 World's Fair?

Did neither the NSF Director or any of his 24 member Board know what was going on and what was being funded or did they actually think these were good expenditures? If they did not know what was going on, they should be fired for dereliction of duty. If they did know what was going on relative to these projects, they need to be fired for dereliction of duty and wasting taxpayer money.

But the insanity, incompetence, and waste does not stop with the stupid projects funded above. Misuse of Foundation funds and mismanagement of Foundation operations is also a big waste of taxpayer wealth:


- According to the Senate investigation, the NSF "lacks adequate oversight of its grant funding, which has led to significant mismanagement, fraud, and abuse."

- Internal reports and audits identified various types of mismanagement which resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars being lost to ineffective contracting.

- Rather than being the single government entity responsible for scientific research, the NSF is one of at least 15 Federal departments, 72 Federal agencies, and 12 independent Federal agencies that engage in research and development. These multiple agencies lead to extensive mismanagement, fraud, inefficiencies, and duplication.

- The Senate investigation into these multiple research agencies found there was at least $65 million wasted on low priority projects (see list above), $19 million lost to outright fraud, $1.2 billion wasted because of duplication, and another $1.9 billion wasted because of other forms of mismanagement.

- The Federal Office Of Inspector General (IG) found that the NSF does not have a good process or track record in overseeing how taxpayer money is spent by the grantees receiving it.

- The IG found that many NSF researchers and grantees fail to submit final and annual reports of progress as required, with a 2005 audit calculating that approximately 47% of the 151,000 required project reports were submitted late or never at all.

- Although the NSF has a policy that prevents a researcher getting new NSF funding if the previous project's final report has not been submitted, the audit found that almost 13% of researchers who did not submit a final report did indeed receive new grant money.

- The Inspector General  (IG) concluded that while the NSF has tried to improve its management processes, "the IG believes that grant oversight remains as an ongoing management challenge at NSF." In other words, it still stinks.

- Some NSF employees are spending more time searching the Internet for pornography on the job rather than actually doing their job. One senior NSF employee was found to have spent at least 331 days looking at pornography on his government computer and chatting online with nude or partially clad women.

- These pornography escapades by just this one NSF employee cost the American taxpayer between $13,800 and $58,000.

- In one year, ten NSF employees have had misconduct cases brought against them and seven of the ten were for pornography surfing on the job.

- The administrative misuse at the NSF has become so bad that the NSF Inspector General could not even estimate how much money was lost to these types of behavior.

- Not to be outdone by simple Internet pornography surfing, an NSF employee was fired when he organized a jello wrestling event at the NSF's Antarctic research station. These jello wrestling employees were supposed to be looking after the $451 million annual investment the NSF has in Antarctica.

- A pair of NSF employees who were romantically involved were found to have fraudulently run up $144,152 in expenses as a result of their 47 trips taken together.

- Audits found that millions of dollars were misspent on alcohol and other unauthorized, non-research costs.

- And the most damning opinion of all comes from a well know science policy analyst, Daniel Sarwwitz. He is quoted in the Senate report as saying: "The NSF and other civilian research agencies lack the attributes necessary for success, including a focused mission." Well said.

I do not know from the Senate report if anyone at the NSF was fired for this type of wasteful behavior and spending. However, given the recent firing of GSA employees for wasting $832,000 worth of taxpayer wealth on a Las Vegas party, one would hope that many NSF employees were fired for wasting millions of dollars on pornography, romantic trysts, and alcohol. If they have not been fired, they should have been fired since it appears that NSF personnel wastes far more than $832,000 every year, not just one time.

As we have stressed many times this week, not only should the offending and wasteful Federal employees be fired but the Congressional committee members who oversee the NSF should be removed from their committee posts and replaced with people that will not tolerate spending taxpayer money on Farmville, dating site, World's Fair, and other idiotic projects.

One of two things need to be done relative to this waste:

1) Totally eliminate the NSF, and the other Federal research programs that seem to accomplish very little, and return the wealth to the taxpayers. At $6.9 billion a year, every American household would theoretically receive about $60 every year to do with as the want. If the proposed budget went through and this dysfunctional organizations actually got its budget doubled, that $60 a year would turn into an annual windfall of about $120 for every American household. I am positive this approach would result in more positive good for the entire country and its economy than finding out if when dogs became man's best friend.

2) The second option is actually the adult, mature thing to do but I am not sure it is within the realm of possibility and ability of our political class. This country is facing some real and challenging problems, problems that have been with us for decades but seem beyond the reach, the ability, or the brain power of the political class to solve:
  • We have been losing the War On Drugs since the Nixon administration.
  • We have been without a national energy plan and strategy since the oil shocks and embargoes of the Nixon and Carter administrations.
  • We have had an under performing public education system and related processes since the problem was identified and studied early in the Reagan administration.
  • We have had an illegal immigration and leaky borders since at least the middle of the Reagan administration when Congress ordered the Defense Department to seal the border within 45 days (never quite finished that assignment, did we?).C
  • We have had the problem of ever escalating health care costs since who knows when, a problem that has and will be exacerbated by Obama Care if it is allowed to continue.
  • Our country and its citizens have grown steadily more unhealthy as most Americans continue to eat too much, eat too much of the wrong kind of food, do not exercise enough, smoke too much, and as the Baby Boomers mature into their Golden Years, the propensity and incidence of aging diseases (e.g. dementia, Parkinsons, cancers, etc.) become more and more prevalent.
Thus, this second option would put in place a set of strict rules, criteria, and review processes for all Federal research organizations but certainly the NSF, given its atrocious track record of bad priorities. No Federal research money would ever be granted for an research project unless you could draw a straight line from the potential findings of that research to helping finding solutions to any of the six major issues listed above.

If a proposed research grant in the future was to study how to improve wine, it would not even make it through the first review. Trying to find out how much housework a husband creates for his wife? Do not even bother sending in the grant paperwork since it has no direct connection to the six problems listed above.

Federal research should help citizens overcome the challenges in their lives whether it is with an under performing public education system, the unaffordability of health care insurance, etc. It should not be used to satisfy some private intellectual curiosity of some researcher, a curiosity that will have an extremely minimal impact on American families and businesses.

No more researching Farmville, no more researching World's Fair re-creations, no more researching kids' names. Either focus the attention or return the money to the taxpayers, its the only honorable thing to do. And if the Federal government is going to remain in the research business, find people, both administrators, employees, and Congressional members who will treat it like a well run business and not a cesspool of waste like it is now.



We invite all readers of this blog to visit our new website, "The United States Of Purple," at:

http://www.unitedstatesofpurple.com/

The United States of Purple is a new grass roots approach to filling the office of President of The United States by focusing on the restoration of freedom in the United States, focusing on problem solving skills and results vs. personal political enrichment, and imposing term limits on all future Federal politicians. No more red states, no more blue states, just one United States Of America under the banner of Purple.

The United States Of Purple's website also provides you the formal opportunity to sign a petition to begin the process of implementing a Constitutional amendment to impose fixed term limits on all Federally elected politicians. Only by turning out the existing political class can we have a chance of addressing and finally resolving the major issues of or times.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at www.loathemygovernment.com. It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.
Please visit the following sites for freedom:

http://www.cato.org/
http://www.robertringer.com/
http://realpolichick.blogspot.com/
http://www.flipcongress2010.com/
http://www.reason.com/
http://www.repealamendment/