Showing posts with label noaa. Show all posts
Showing posts with label noaa. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 8, 2023

February, 2023, Part 3, Political Class Insanity: Eric Adams Fails NYC, Joe Biden is a Liar AND A Hypocrite, and Global Warming Is Still A Myth

 It is the beginning of another month which means it is time again to review the latest political class insanity from the American political class. Each month it takes us multiple posts to cover the wasteful spending, incompetent government organizations and employees, government programs that usually make a problem worse than resolving it, inane and idiotic politician comments, etc.


To review past posts on this insanity and idiocy, just click on the first few posts in each month listed to the right of this page. After reviewing just a handful of these insanity posts we think you will agree that we are currently being served by the worst set of American politicians ever to hold office in our entire history.


1)Many times we have emphasized the reality that a very, very basic function of any government entity and the politicians that operate it is to protect the lives and property of the taxpayers they serve. No matter whatever else these politicians achieve, if they cannot protect then they are failures.


And the latest failure in this area has arisen in New York City:


  • Eric Adams is the current mayor of New York City.

  • In a recent interview on MSNBC Adams suggested that it would be a good idea if city business owners pay for private security to protect their business and employees in addition to paying taxes for police budgets.

  • The MSNBC presented the situation to the mayor: "We saw the front page of 'New York Post' here this morning, I'll hold it up, talking about how there are some here in the Bronx, shopkeepers, that there's a sense of feeling of the police aren't doing enough, that they are fed up with NYC crime," and followed that with: "Shop owners are hiring private guards to fight back. Is that a wise strategy?"

  • Adams responded: "No, it is a wise strategy because I say this over and over again, not only must the numbers reflect safety, but people must feel safe.”

  • This is not surprising since retail thefts are up 16% compared to theft stats in 2019 and assaults are up 18%.

  • But at the same time, in the face of rising crime, the number of criminal arrests is going down.


Rising crime, fewer arrests but I would bet that the tax burden on these city businesses has not gone down. Thus, Adams is a failure as he continues to NOT protect the property and lives of city businesses and residents.


2)A few posts ago we listed out a sample of the lies Joe Biden has tried to impose on the country over the years. The list stopped at 38 bold faced lies that came out of his mouth. 


And it turns out that Biden is not jst a liar, he is a very bold faced hypocrite also:


  • As most people know, Biden is in the  middle of a scandal where it has been found out that he illegally took classified documents out of government buildings and stored them in his office at the University of Pennsylvania, his Delaware home and his Delaware beach house.

  • He has taken a very nonchalant attitude, saying that one set of classified documents was found in his locked garage next to his Corvette, implying that if a locked garage was safe enough for his Corvette, having classified documents in the same garage was no big deal.

  • But back in 1977, Biden was a fierce opponent to a candidate, Ted Sorensen,  that then President, Jimmy Carter, had proposed as the CIA director.

  • The reason for Biden’s ardent opposition to a proposal, by a President from his own political party, is that Sorensen admitted to taking boxes of classified government documents to his home to work on a book he was writing about JFK, an administration Sorensen had worked for.

  • Biden also implied that Sorensen may have violated the Espionage Act of 1917, saying he had “carelessly” ignored the laws pertaining to  classified materials.

  • Carter ended up pulling the nomination even though the Washington Post had pointed out, at the time, out that Sorensen had not violated any laws or government procedures.

So 46 years ago, Senator Biden gets up into the face of a government employee that legally handled classified government information. But today, as President, he says the mishandling of classified government files is no big deal since they were in a locked garage, no foul, no harm. Super hypocrite in addition to be a super liar.

3)For decades many of us have had to be slammed for not believing the myth of  man made global warming. Much of that slamming came from politicians like Al  Gore, Barack Obama and others who insisted that only science that reinforced their fatalistic global warming predictions be considered even though much scientific research that debunked the whole global warming myth existed.

And people like Gore and Obama continued to preach man made global  warming, or their new marketing term, “climate change,” even though both of them had bought mansions at the beach, which raises the obvious hypocrisy: if man made global warming was a real thing, why would its big advocates buy million dollar mansions next to the oceans that were supposedly going to rise up and flood coastal zones? 

And as the decades passed, the dire predictions that global warming advocates had put forth never materialized. This caused them to move to the more nebulous concept of climate change, a shallow move to save their credibility. 

But the latest government data again proves that man made global warming, or its reinvented name, climate change, is still likely a bogus concept:

  • The government organization, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) recently reported that there has been no global  warming for the eighth year in a row.

  • Let me say that again for emphasis: there has been no global  warming for eight years in a row, certainly not what Gore and Obama and such predicted would happen.

  • Technically: “There has been no trend in the UAH global mean lower-troposphere temperature anomalies since September, 2014: 8 years 5 months and counting.”

Thus, the polar ice caps have not melted as Gore said was likely.

Enough political class insanity for today: global warming is still a myth according to the Federal  government, Joe Biden is not only a liar but also a hypocrite, and Eric Adams fails to execute a basic government function in NYC.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

Saturday, August 4, 2018

July, 2018, Part 2, I Am A Global Warming Doubter and A Believer In Science - The Facts Destroy The Myth

Note: Sorry, a little late in getting this July post out.

Every month we have enough material to return to a continuing theme in this blog, namely that “I am a global warming doubter AND a believer in science.” This became of interest because of people like Al Gore who fanatically and verbosely claimed that you had to be an idiot to not believe in manmade global warming. It has been my life belief that anyone that is that loud and that obnoxious is hiding something, that rather than argue facts and reality it is better to beat down and insult anyone who disagrees.

As we have dove into the whole issue of manmade global warming, or its new rebranded title of climate change, we found that Al Gore and people like him were guilty of a number of things:

  • Ignoring science and realities that did not support their opinions and positions.
  • Rather than have an adult conversation about climate, these types of advocates like Gore sank to the level of insulting those who dared look at ALL science by calling them a variety of names including racists, homophobes, terrorists, flat earth believers, and other slanderous names.
  • Continuing to insist that politicians step up their intrusions into our lives with higher taxes, more regulations, and more control on our freedoms and standards of living based on a shaky theory at best.
To see the past posts and the multitude of evidence that we have compiled that showed it is perfectly okay to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, enter the phrase "global warming doubter” in the search box above or go through the monthly historical post listed on the right side of this page.

Thus, let’s see the latest facts and science that prove you can be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, regardless of what Al Gore proclaims.

1) Liberals like Al Gore, Barack Obama, and others of their ilk are always telling us how important and vital it was to allow politicians and government bureaucrats to control your actions via high levels of taxation and regulations to prevent the fantasy of manmade climate change from killing off the human race.

But while it may be important to these types of folks, many of whom got rich by pushing the likely global warming/climate change fantasy, how do regular Americans feel about this issue:

  • A July 23, 2018 article on the Constitution website by Andrew West gives some insight to this question.
  • According to a recent Gallup poll, neither global warming or climate change even made a small blip when it comes to Gallup asking what is the most important problem facing the country today, when asked in an open ended question.
  • Americans are most concerned about economic issues, racism, poorly performing government functions, but global warming/climate change not so much.
Did not even make the list. Sorry Al and Barack, America is not just that much into you when it comes to manmade climate change.

2) Global warming advocates like to convince themselves and others that they have science on their side. But dozens and dozens of times we have expressed the view of scientists that dispute any and or global warming theories. To add to that overwhelming rebuttal today let’s discuss an article written for the Eagle Rising website by Roy W, Spencer, Ph.D:


  • Spencer is a Ph.D. meteorologist with 40 years of scientific experience.
  • The article starts with a referral to a global warming advocacy group who recently claimed that the current hot temperatures in the New York area prove global warming (hot temperatures in the middle of summer, horrors!).
  • Dr. Spencer decides to use actual data to disprove this assertion, using official Federal government/NOAA data, specifically the average maximum temperatures for every June since 1895:

Fig. 1. Average June maximum temperatures in New York state for every year from 1895 through 2017 (Source: NOAA)

  • As you can see, since the late 1800s, the average June maximum temps in New York are basically unchanged.
  • Note: preliminary data for 2018 shows no deviation from this flat trend line.
  • In addition, the hottest recorded temperature (109 degrees) in this scenario happened long before mankind’s accelerated use of carbon energy sources which are supposed to increase global warming: the hottest temperature occurred way back in July, 1926 while the coldest temp (-52 degrees) happened the midst of when global warming was supposedly revving up, February 18, 1979.
  • Current national temperatures look like the following where we see while the eastern part of the U.S. is hotter than normal, the western part is colder than normal, which is what happens with weather, not climate:



Fig. 2. 5-day forecast average temperature departures from average over North America from the GFS model (graphic courtesy of WeatherBell.com).










  • According, to Spencer: “As you can see, the excessive heat is regionally isolated, which is exactly what we expect for weather … not for climate change. See those colder-than-average areas? Why aren’t those being blamed on climate change, too? They look like they approximately cancel out the warm area over the Northeast U.S., which is often the case for weather (not climate change) variations.”
  • Spencer goes on to discuss the number of days with maximum temperatures above 100 degrees and 105 degrees since 1895:



Fig. 4. Yearly average number of days per U.S. station having at least 100 or 105 deg. high temperatures, 1895 through 2017.










  • As you can see, the number of very hot days has, if anything, been declining over time, not increasing, which is what global warming theory would have predicted.
  • Using official government data, global warming theory is a joke. Dr. Spencer sums it up nicely: “Am I claiming that there is no such thing as human-caused warming? No. I’m claiming that it is overblown. We already know the climate models (which are the basis for proposed changes in energy policy to get us away from fossil fuels) are producing generally twice as much warming of the atmosphere-ocean system as has been observed. The most recent energy budget analysis of surface and deep-ocean warming suggests that the climate system is only half as sensitive to our CO2 emissions as you are being told … maybe 1.5 deg. C of eventual warming from a doubling of atmospheric CO2. At 410 ppm, we are currently half way to doubling...And even THAT reduced estimate of future warming assumes ALL of the warming is human-caused! If a portion of recent warming is natural, the less the human-caused global warming problem becomes.”
That will do it for now. As you can see, using real data and real scientists again proves that you can be a global warming doubter AND a believer in science.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:



www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:


http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org

http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w

Friday, July 21, 2017

July, 2017, Part 3, I Am A Global Warming Doubter and A Believer In Science: NOAA Says No To More Storms, More Failed Predictions, and Solar Panels Are Bad,

Every month we have enough material to return to a continuing theme in this blog, namely that “I am a global warming doubter AND a believer in science.” This became of interest because of people like Al Gore who fanatically and verbosely claimed that you had to be an idiot to not believe in manmade global warming. It has been my life belief that anyone that is that loud and that obnoxious is hiding something, that rather than argue facts and reality it is better to beat down and insult anyone who disagrees

As we have dove into the whole issue of manmade global warming, or its new rebranded title of climate change, we found that Al Gore and people like him were guilty of a number of things:
  • Ignoring science and realities that did not support their opinions and positions.
  • Rather than have an adult conversation about climate, these types of advocates like Gore sank to the level of insulting those who dared look at ALL science by calling them a variety of names including racists, homophobes, terrorists, flat earth believers, and other slanderous names.
  • Continuing to insist that politicians step up their intrusions into our lives with higher taxes, more regulations, and more control of our freedoms and standards of living based on a shaky theory at best.
To see the past posts and the multitude of evidence that we have compiled that showed it is perfectly okay to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, enter the phrase "global warming doubter” in the search box above or go through the monthly historical posts listed on the right side of this page.

Thus, let’s see the latest facts and science that prove you can be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, regardless of what Al Gore proclaims.

1) Al Gore, Barack Obama, and other global warming advocates like to claim that man made global warming and climate change are causing all kinds of havoc with the environment. But we have shown that actual government data shows that hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, and such are at historical rates or even at lower than historical rates.

And the latest government data from NOAA confirms that this reality still probably holds true:
  • Kimberly J. Smith, writing for the Conservative Tribune website on April 5, 2017, discussed the reality that NOAA has officially come out to state that it is premature to link human activity to stronger storms, specifically hurricanes.
  • The NOAA report and research concluded: “It is premature to conclude that human activities — and particularly greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming — have already had a detectable impact on Atlantic hurricane or global tropical cyclone activity,” the NOAA’s Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory report said.
  • This finding supports the conclusions back in March, 2017 from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC - the primary United Nations climate change advoate organization) reported “no significant observed trends in global tropical cyclone frequency over the past century.”
Real data proving again that it is perfectly sane to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science. Especially when science and real data show that global warming should be doubted.

2) A June 29, 2017 article on the CSC Media Group's website by Michael Luckette gave a short but nice summary of some of the failed predictions that global warming advocates are produced over the years:
  • Al Gore predicted back in 2006 that within ten years there would be a “true planetary emergency: “Unless we act boldly and quickly to deal with the underlying causes of global warming, our world will undergo a string of terrible catastrophes,” 
  • Eleven years later that “true planetary emergency” is nowhere in sight.
  • In 2010, the Guardian newspaper of Britain reported that the United Nations was warning that humanity had as little as 8 years to avoid seeing a dangerous 2 degree Centigrade rise in the Earth’s temperature, a rise that never happened.
  • Three years ago and over 1,000 days ago France’s Foreign Minister, Laurent Fabius, warned everyone that: “we have 500 days to avoid climate chaos.”
At some point a sane person has to realize that when your theory on anything is ALWAYS wrong, maybe your theory is wrong, as illustrated in just the three examples listed above. 

But maybe that day of reckoning is finally dawning on global warming advocates, as illustrated in a research paper from a recent article in Nature Geoscience that admitted there have been: “differences in model and satellite tropospheric warming rates. In the early twenty-first century, satellite-derived tropospheric warming trends were generally smaller than trends estimated from a large multi-model ensemble.”

Maybe just maybe global warming advocates are having reality settle in and now we can have an adult conversation on global warming that looks at ALL of the science and ALL of the research and ALL of the data to try and figure out what is really going on, if anything.

3) One of the great options that is supposed to save humanity and the planet from global warming is solar energy. I am sure that all hard core global warming advocates are also big supporters of solar energy, their view likely being that solar is clean and non-polluting and not a contributor to CO2 levels in the atmosphere that cause global warming. Solar energy has a rep for being clean and safe, not like the use of those nasty fossil fuels.

But is solar energy really the savior of the environment and so pure and wonderful? Julie Kelly, writing for the National Review on June 28 2017, has a somewhat different view on solar energy:
  • A new research study by Environmental Progress (EP) warns that toxic waste from discarded solar panels now poses a global environmental threat. 
  • The Berkeley, California-based group, a geographic area certainly not famous for its conservative tenets, found that solar panels create 300 times more toxic waste per unit of energy than nuclear power plants. 
  • They also concluded that discarded solar panels, panels that contain high levels of dangerous elements such as lead, chromium, and cadmium, are piling up around the world, and that nothing is being done to limit their potential danger to the environment. 
  • Michael Shellenberger is the founder of EP: “We talk a lot about the dangers of nuclear waste, but that waste is carefully monitored, regulated, and disposed of. But we had no idea there would be so many panels — an enormous amount — that could cause this much ecological damage.”
  • EP researchers Jemin Desai and Mark Nelson found that scavengers in countries like India and China “burn the e-waste in order to salvage the valuable copper wires for resale. Since this process requires burning off plastic, the resulting smoke contains toxic fumes that are carcinogenic and teratogenic (birth defect-causing) when inhaled.” 
  • Japan is already scrambling for ways to reuse its mounting inventory of solar-panel waste, which is expected to exceed 10,000 tons by 2020 and grow by 700,000 to 800,000 tons per year by 2040.
  • There is a similar problem brewing in this country where we have more than 1.4 million solar energy installations, many of which are nearing the end of their life cycle.
So fixing one perceived environmental hazard might actually be creating another environmental hazard. 

Now, in the interest of balanced discussion, a spokesperson for the Solar Energy Industries Association, Dan Whitten, has come out to dispute EP’s research findings, claiming that solar panels are : “mainly made up of easy-to-recycle materials that can be successfully recovered and reused at the end of their useful life.” 

Mr. Whitten is not only fighting against these findings and pollution estimates about the end of solar panels, he also has to fight some estimates of the pollution caused by the creation of solar panels, as estimated from an Associated press investigation in 2013 that found:
  • From 2007 to 2011, solar panel manufacturing just in the state of California created more than 46.5 million pounds of sludge and contaminated water.
  • About 97% of this polluted sludge and water was stored in waste storage locations within the state but more than 1.4 million pounds were taken to 9 other states which required additional energy to be burned in the transportation of said sludge and water.
  • As the article concludes correctly, “There is nothing environmentally friendly about creating mountains of hazardous waste in an effort to reduce CO2 emissions.”
When analyzing a problem, you must look at the entire problem to fully understand not only the magnitude of the problem but the potential consequences of any solution you propose. Otherwise, you end up with the above situation, where the potential solution of one problem, man made global warming (assuming that is even a reality), creates another, equally bad or worst problem, massive environmental damage.

Three more examples proving that being a global warming doubter and a believer in sciences is a sane, rational person to be.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:


www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:


http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org

http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w








Sunday, June 4, 2017

June, 2017, Part 2, I Am A Global Warming Doubter and A Believer In Science: Look At The Numbers and Blow And Blow YourMind

Every month we have enough material to return to a continuing theme in this blog, namely that “I am a global warming doubter AND a believer in science.” This became of interest because of people like Al Gore who fanatically and verbosely claimed that you had to be an idiot to not believe in manmade global warming. It has been my life belief that anyone that is that loud and that obnoxious is hiding something, that rather than argue facts and reality it is better to beat down and insult anyone who disagrees

As we have dove into the whole issue of manmade global warming, or its new rebranded title of climate change, we found that Al Gore and people like him were guilty of a number of things:
  • Ignoring science and realities that did not support their opinions and positions.
  • Rather than have an adult conversation about climate, these types of advocates like Gore sank to the level of insulting those who dared look at ALL science by calling them a variety of names including racists, homophobes, terrorists, flat earth believers, and other slanderous names.
  • Continuing to insist that politicians step up their intrusions into our lives with higher taxes, more regulations, and more control of our freedoms and standards of living based on a shaky theory at best.
To see the past posts and the multitude of evidence that we have compiled that showed it is perfectly okay to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, enter the phrase "global warming doubter” in the search box above or go through the monthly historical posts listed on the right side of this page.

Thus, let’s see the latest facts and science that prove you can be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, regardless of what Al Gore proclaims.

1) A recent scare that global warming/climate change advocates tried to peddle was that manmade climate change was increasing the likelihood and severity of droughts. They would point to the massive drought that California has been experiencing the past few years as conclusive proof that manmade climate change was leading to devastating drought conditions. In fact, one advocate claimed that California had entered a permanent state of drought, again all caused by mankind’s energy foolishness.

But then it started to rain in California. It rained so much that construction of a new NFL stadium had to be significantly delayed because of the large amount of rain, causing the to be built stadium to be not available to host a Super Bowl a few years down the road. So much for a permanent drought condition, it is raining so much that building construction has had to be delayed.

But Philip Hodges, writing for the Eagle Rising website, outlined how little drought there actually is in the country today, as reported by USA Today:
  • Despite climate change advocates’ predictions of severe drought conditions, the U.S. drought situation is at a 17 year low.
  • The Federal government announced recently, via its U.S. Drought Monitor, that only 6.1% of the lower 48 states are in a drought condition today.
  • This is a record low in the history of the 17 year old Monitor, lower than the previous low of 7.7% way back in 2010.
  • According to meteorologist Brad Rippey of the U.S.Department of Agriculture: “Drought has certainly been disappearing at a rapid rate this spring.” 
  • California, which has been a multi year drought condition, has only 8% of its territory in a drought condition, close to the national average.
  • The record high for the Monitor was September, 2012 when 65.5% of the country was in a drought condition.
Another lie or misinformation from the climate change advocates. Five years after the Monitor showed that 65.5% of the country was in a drought condition, it is now a fraction of what it was back then despite who knows how much carbon mankind has thrown into the atmosphere since 2012.

Real data shows that the severe weather that was predicted, in this case prolonged and deadlier droughts, has not materialized as predicted. Just another grossly inaccurate prediction from the people that continue to say things without science, facts, or reality to back them up.

2) The article cited in the previous discussion went on to document how many other times that global warming/climate change advocates’ views and predictions of the world did not line up with the realities and data sets of the world including, citing Marc Morano of Climate Depot as his source:

Extreme Weather: Scientist to Congress in 2017: ‘No evidence’ that hurricanes, floods, droughts, tornadoes are increasing – Dr. Roger Pielke Jr. of University of Colorado

Tornadoes: NOAA Tornado data revealing 2016 as ‘one of the quietest years since records began in 1954’ and below average for 5th year in a row

Hurricanes: 1) Inconvenient NOAA report: ‘It is premature to conclude (AGW has) already had a detectable impact on’ hurricanes & 2) NOAA: U.S. Completes Record 11 Straight Years Without Major (Cat 3+) Hurricane Strike & 3) 30 peer-reviewed scientific papers reveal the lack of connection between hurricanes & ‘global warming’

Floods: ‘Floods are not increasing’: Dr. Roger Pielke Jr. slams ‘global warming’ link to floods and extreme weather – How does media ‘get away with this?’http://www.climatedepot.com/2016/08/23/floods-are-not-increasing-dr-roger-pielke-jr-slams-global-warming-link-to-floods-extreme-weather-how-does-media-get-away-with-this/ – Pielke Jr. on how extreme weather is NOT getting worse: ‘Flood disasters are sharply down. U.S. floods not increasing either.’ “Floods suck when they occur. The good news is U.S. flood damage is sharply down over 70 years,” Pielke explained.

Heavy Rains: 1000 year rainfall study suggests droughts and floods used to be longer, worsehttp://www.climatedepot.com/2016/05/13/1000-year-rainfall-study-suggests-droughts-and-floods-used-to-be-longer-worse/

Extreme weather used to be blamed on ‘global cooling’ in the 1970s and early 80s Flashback NOAA 1974: ‘Extreme weather events blamed on global cooling’ http://www.climatedepot.com/2016/09/08/flashback-noaa-1974-extreme-weather-events-blamed-on-global-cooling/ – NOAA October 1974: ‘Many climatologists have associated this drought and other recent weather anomalies with a global cooling trend and changes in atmospheric circulation which, if prolonged, pose serious threats to major food-producing regions of the world’

I love his last point where as recently as 1974 the Federal government was predicting a global cooling disaster in the making. Funny, how within just a few years the data showed the complete opposite, global warming. Nothing in Mother Nature changes that quickly.

Bottom line is that scientists, data, reality, and research contradict all of the natural disasters, droughts, hurricanes, etc. that were predicted to have occurred already that have not occurred.

3) The Independent Journal Review recently compiled a bunch of data charts from the past few years that showed that manmade global warming/climate change may actually be a myth, especially if you look at historical data, with historical data being over thousands and millions of years in order to get at the long term climate shifts of the earth. That article can be accessed at:


As you read the article and look at the charts, you will see the data indicates that in the history of the Earth, carbon dioxide levels have been much higher than they are today, high levels attained without the help of mankind. Earth's temperature has been much higher than it is today, high temps that were attained without the help of mankind. Hurricane volume and activity is down, contrary to what global warming advocates predicted. Tornado levels are down, contrary to what global warming advocates predicted. And on and on and on.

Data and reality are wonderful things. They actually show reality, not what politicians like Al Gore want reality to be. Which reminds me of an old saying: “There is nothing more devastating to an opinion than the right number.” And the numbers and trends illustrated in this article certainly should devastate many opinions of global warming advocates, assuming their minds are open enough to dump the hysteria and believe the numbers.

And even if mankind is changing the climate a substantial amount, what in the world makes anyone think that people like Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, and the rest of the inept people sitting in Congress and the Federal government can do anything about it efficiently, effectively, and constructively? As pointed out in the article, “Do government bureaucrats who can't even run Amtrak or the Post Office actually think they can control the weather like a thermostat?” Doubtful, very doubtful.

That will do it for today’s lesson in reality relative to climate: the numbers, history, and common sense do nothing to reinforce the concept that mankind is devastating the climate, it is plain as day for anyone without a closed mind or a mindless desire to follow what politicians tell us.


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:

http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org

http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w








Sunday, April 30, 2017

April, 2017, I am A Global Warming Doubter and A Believer In Science: Book Burning Congressmen, California Flooding, and More,

Every month we have enough material to return to a continuing theme in this blog, namely that “I am a global warming doubter AND a believer in science.” This became of interest because of people like Al Gore who fanatically and verbosely claimed that you had to be an idiot to not believe in manmade global warming. It has been my life belief that anyone that is that loud and that obnoxious is hiding something, that rather than argue facts and reality it is better to beat down and insult anyone who disagrees

As we have dove into the whole issue of manmade global warming, or its new rebranded title of climate change, we found that Al Gore and people like him were guilty of a number of things:
  • Ignoring science and realities that did not support their opinions and positions.
  • Rather than have an adult conversation about climate, these types of advocates like Gore sank to the level of insulting those who dared look at ALL science by calling them a variety of names including racists, homophobes, terrorists, flat earth believers, and other slanderous names.
  • Continuing to insist that politicians step up their intrusions into our lives with higher taxes, more regulations, and more control of our freedoms and standards of living based on a shaky theory at best.
To see the past posts and the multitude of evidence that we have compiled that showed it is perfectly okay to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, enter the phrase "global warming doubter” in the search box above or go through the monthly historical posts listed on the right side of this page.

Thus, let’s see the latest facts and science that prove you can be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, regardless of what Al Gore proclaims.

1) We have previously documented how major previous climate forecasts and predictions have gone spectacularly wrong despite “scientists “ swearing that they knew the future of climate. One such extensive review of past climate forecast failures can be accessed at:


Walter E. Williams, writing for the Heritage Foundation on April 26, 2017, recently did his own review, “Here’s How Wrong Past Environment Predictions Have Been:”
  • In 1970, high regarded biologist Paul Ehrlich predicted that "all important animal life in the sea will be extinct" in 10 years or so.
  • Also in 1970, Nobel laureate biology professor at Harvard, George Wald, forecasted that: “Civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.” 47 years later we are still hanging around.
  • Also in 1970, certainly a bad year for climate and weather predictions, Paul Ehrlich, also that the world’s population would soon outstrip food supplies.
  • He followed up on this starvation prediction when he claimed that, “The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next 10 years.” 47 years later people are still starving but nowhere close to the rate he predicted.
  • But he was even more wrong two years earlier when he said that, : “If I were a gambler, I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000.”
  • Nigel Calder warned in a July, 1975 International Wildlife article that, “The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for mankind.” So, as recently as about 40 years ago we were all going to die from an Ice Age, not global warming.
  • C.C.Wallen claimed in 1975 in a Science News article that, “The cooling since 1940 has been large enough and consistent enough that it will not soon be reversed.” But according to other scientists it reversed a few years later when the exact opposite climate trend became popular, global warming.
  • In 2000, British climate researcher David Viner told The Independent, a British newspaper, that in just “a few years” snow would become a “very rare and exciting event” in Britain and that “children just aren’t going to know what snow is...Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past.” In the next few years, Britain experienced some of its lowest temperatures and snowfall accumulations since records started being kept in 1914.
  • Let’s go back to the global cooling scare of the 1970s when ecologist Kenneth Watt told a college audience in 1970: “The world has been chilling sharply for about 20 years. If present trends continue, the world will be about 4 degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990 but 11 degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.”
  • Again back to 1970, Senator Gaylord Nelson of Wisconsin wrote in Look magazine: “Dr. S. Dillon Ripley, secretary of the Smithsonian (Institution), believes that in 25 years, somewhere between 75 and 80 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct.” Not even close.
  • Scientist Harrison Brown predicted in 1970 that mankind would run out of copper shortly after the 2000 and that lead, zinc, gold and silver would be gone ten years earlier.
  • The Federal government’s Department of the Interior predicted in 1939 that American oil supplies would run out by 1952 and in 1949 reminded everyone that the end of U.S. oil supplies was in sight, never accounting for the fracking technology that blows these expert views and predictions away.
  • But the government still insisted in making predictions when in 1974 the U.S. Geological Survey said the country only had a 10 year supply of natural gas left even though according to the latest Federal government estimate, 43 years later, we had 2.47 quadrillion cubic feet of natural gas, which should last about a century.
Obviously, not all of the failed predictions have to do with the climate, But all show that even if the “science is settled,” it really isn’t since the scientists and experts of the time and their advocates were insanely wrong about reality and their predictions. We see the same thing now with every single major, and most if not all minor, global warming forecasts being so far off target with the ensuing reality that they are laughable.

These facts, the unfulfilled historical predictions about ice ages, global warming, oil supplies, natural gas supplies, plant and animal extinction, etc. is why we have always called for a comprehensive review of ALL climate research, not the selective and often bogus research and science that people like Al Gore and Barack Obama have hyped over the years.

But in reality maybe it is not about being right and it is all about getting a political agenda passed, a hint of which we see from Senator Timothy Wirth in 1988 when he candidly stated: “We’ve got to … try to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong … we will be doing the right thing anyway in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.” 

“Even if the theory of global warming is wrong…” So, according to the good Senator, even if the theory and science of global warming is wrong, we should PRETEND it is right and tax Americans and American businesses, restrict freedoms and put forth onerous regulations for a known false reality. Only in Washington can you know something is wrong and go forth pretending it is reality. Insanity.

2) It seems that when dealing with global warming advocates that if they cannot beat you with real science and facts they they revert to a more primitive way of arguing, destroying the people daring to challenge their beliefs. That is exactly what three Congressional Democrats are trying to do with legislation, legislation that is on a par with book burning:
  • These global warming Congressional members are trying to block schools from using a book by climate scientists that challenge their beloved global warming theory.
  • They are calling alternative views by real scientists “inappropriate and “propaganda.”
  • Congressman Bobby Scott, the ranking Democrat on the Education and the Workforce Committee had this Orwellian view: “Public school classrooms are no place for anti-science propaganda, and I encourage every teacher to toss these materials in the recycling bin...Successful high school graduates are aware and engaged global citizens with an understanding of and appreciation for scientific fact.” 
  • He continued with this diatribe: “If the Heartland Institute and other climate deniers want to push a false agenda on global warming, our nation’s schools are an inappropriate place to drive that agenda.”
  • The three authors of the book that this idiot wants to ban are all Phds and have all taught science at the university level: Craig Idso, S. Fred Singer and Robert M. Carter, who died in 2016.
So who are going to believe, some Congressman from Virginia or three Phd scientists with university credentials?

So who are you going to believe, some Congressman from Virginia or the reality that all climate change and global warming models have been insanely inaccurate over the past two decades

So who are you going to believe, some Congressman from Virginia or the reality that Al Gore’s prediction in 2009 that the north pole ice cap could be gone by 2013 is insanely wrong?

So who are you going to believe, some Congressman from Virginia or the government whistleblower who claimed that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association, a Federal government agency intentionally mangled raw data to hide the twenty year “global warming pause,” especially since that whistleblower was John Bates, a principal scientist of the National Climatic Data Center who accused the NOAA of “flagrant manipulation of scientific integrity guidelines and scientific publication standards.”

We could go on and on about how global warming advocates have manipulated, ignored, and savagely attacked scientists, data, and research that was counter to their limited views. This action by elected officials is very scary though, it is reminiscent of Nazi book burning and other such attacks on truth and science. Kids in our schools should be taught how to think, not what to think. 

That is why presenting alternative views supported by good science is imperative in our educational processes. Failure to recognize that critical factor like these three Congressional buffoons is a disgrace to sound educational processes and the First Amendment.

3) Frank Vernuccio, writing for the Affluent Christian Investor website on April 7, 2017, gave a number of examples of how climate change and global warming advocates ignore facts and reality:
  • Global warming advocates in California have been harping on a supposed reality that California is now in a state of permanent drought as a result of manmade global warming.
  • However, the San Jose Mercury news recently reported that flooding is now a massive problem facing the state of California.
  • Flooding and permanent drought seem to be contrary situations.
  • According to the newspaper: “...164 percent of its historic average, a massive accumulation of new water… There is so much snow that the Squaw Valley ski resort, which has received 54 feet of snow so far this year, plans to stay open until July 4…So when is Gov. Jerry Brown going to rescind or amend the drought emergency order he signed in January 2014? He hasn’t said.”
  • But the governor is not likely to rescind or amend anything since as recently as this past January he state: “We can’t fall back and give in to the climate deniers. We’ve got the scientists, we’ve got the lawyers and we’re ready to fight.”
  • But Brown is not alone since in 2015, a U.S.News and World report article claimed that, “Climate change is linked to California’s drought…”
  • In 2015, Newsweek stated that, “With each passing year, human-caused global warming bullies California for more water. Each year, the heat squeezes more moisture from soils and ecosystems.”
  • Even Stanford got in on the permanent/global warming drought game: “[the drought conditions] ‘very likely’ linked to human-caused climate change, Stanford scientists write in a new research paper."
  • Even world famous scientist Barack Obama got his two cents in on the permanent global warming-caused California drought: “Droughts have obviously been a part of life out here in the West … scientific evidence shows that a changing climate is going to make them more intense.”
And yet, despite all of these climate “experts” in politics and news media, Obama, Brown, Newsweek, U.S. News and World Report, etc., the reality as recently reported by the news media is that there are now serious flooding conditions throughout the state and likely more to come, given how much snow precipitation has yet to melt in the mountains. 

Politicians doing science and scientists ignoring data, science and research that does not match their preconceived ideas, and future grant proposals, is no way to operate. How about we all sit down and look at ALL of the science and research and THEN decide what to do, if anything, relative to the earth’s climate? That is real science, not Al Gore science.


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:


www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:


http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org

http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w








Sunday, February 19, 2017

February, 2017, Part 2, I Am A Global Warming Doubter ands A Believer In Science: The Feds Fudge The Data, The UN Conspiracy, and More

Every month we have enough material to return to a continuing theme in this blog, namely that “I am a global warming doubter AND a believer in science.”This became of interest because of people like Al Gore who fanatically and verbosely claimed that you had to be an idiot to not believe in manmade global warming. It has been my life belief that anyone that is that loud and that obnoxious is hiding something, that rather than argue facts and reality it is better to beat down and insult anyone who disagrees

As we have dove into the whole issue of manmade global warming, or its new rebranded title of climate change, we found that Al Gore and people like him were guilty of a number of things:
  • Ignoring science and realities that did not support their opinions and positions.
  • Rather than have an adult conversation about climate, these types of advocates like Gore sank to the level of insulting those who dared look at ALL science by calling them a variety of names including racists, homophobes, terrorists, flat earth believers, and other slanderous names.
  • Continuing to insist that politicians step up their intrusions into our lives with higher taxes, more regulations, and more control of our freedoms and standards of living based on a shaky theory at best.
  • To see the past posts and the multitude of evidence that we have compiled that showed it is perfectly okay to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, enter the phrase "global warming doubter” in the search box above or go through the monthly historical posts listed on the right side of this page.
Thus, let’s see the latest facts and science that prove you can be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, regardless of what Al Gore proclaims.

1) Julie Kelly, writing for the National Review website on February 7, 2017, reported on some data hanky panky by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA):
  • Ms. Kelly writes that the NOAA “corrected” raw climate data that it did not like and then did not archive the changes they made to the raw data.
  • That is the claim of Dr. John Bates who used to lead the NOAA’s climate data records program for ten years.
  • This adjusted, or should we say bastardized data, was an important input to the UN’s Climate Change Conference back in 2015.
  • Dr. Bates claims that “the federal government’s top agency in charge of climate science published a flawed but widely accepted study that was meant to disprove the hiatus in global warming. Bates accuses the study’s lead author, NOAA official Tom Karl, of using unverified data sets, ignoring mandatory agency procedures, and failing to archive evidence — all in a “blatant attempt to intensify the impact” of the paper in advance of the conference.”
  • Coincidentally, the computer that was used to change the data and feed into the final report suffered “a complete failure” which means the original data and the analysis that was done to adjust the data cannot be recovered or replicated.
  • A Congressional committee has requested all relevant data from the NOAA but so far the agency has ignored the request.
And global warming advocates wonder why people like myself have doubts about their research, analysis, and conclusions. Tough to be trusting when time and time again the global warming advocates continue to adjust, manipulate, and screw around with data just to prove their preconceived notions and theories, hardly a scientific approach.

2) Sean Adl-Tabatabai, writing for the UK Telegraph on September 29, 2015, reported that a top climate scientist resigned his post after admitting that global warming was a big hoax:
  • Dr. Hal Lewis resigned from the University of California after being a member of the American Physical Society for 67 years.
  • In his resignation letter, Dr. Lewis claimed that the Society used to be a “much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the money flood.” 
  • He claims that global warming is a scam and that it has corrupted many, many scientists.
  • He called global warming “the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist. Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford’s book organizes the facts very well.) I don’t believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist.”
Strong words from a real scientist about what he considers a gigantic scam: corrupted, fraud, revulsion. That is why some of us are global warming doubters and a believer in science because real scientists also have their own valid doubts.

3) Derrick Willburn, writing for the Allen West website on February 11, 2017, discussed what is really behind the United Nation’s obsession with global warming, and climate change:
  • Christina Figueres is a Costa Rican-born diplomat who was nominated for Secretary General of the United Nations, was Vice-President of the Bureau of Climate Convention in 2008-2009, and the UN’s Climate Chief since 2010, was the Executive Secretary of the UN Framework on Climate Change (UNFCCC), and who is credited for what globalists view as a ‘successful conclusion’ to the Paris global warming talks last December.
  • Thus, Ms. Figueres has been in the center of UN climate control activities for a while.
  • At a recent Brussels news conference, she outright admitted in front of reporters and cameras that the theory of man-made global warming and climate control is basically only a front for the UN to destroy the economic principle and application of capitalism, it is not a noble effort to save the planet: “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution….This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history.”
  • According to the article: “And there it is. Straight from the mouth of the United Nation’s person who is most senior in charge of that body’s development of a multilateral agreement among nations to cut emissions and clean up our planet for future generations? What does changing the economic development model for the first time in human history have to do with carbon emissions and the use of plastics? Precious little.”
So much for saving the planet’s environment. This is a move by the world’s elite to control even more of our lives if Ms. Figueres’s own words are to be believed. It is these same elites that also control and manipulate the raw climate data (see above) that enables them to create the illusion of climate change disaster and the need to address it. 

Her words and intentions are a direct attack on the individual freedoms and prosperity that capitalism has provided us for over two hundred years. No other economic system has been so successful in lifting people out of poverty and into much better lives. However, it is a system that provides the maximum amount of freedom, a reality that ticks off the elite around the world that want to control more and more of our wealth, our lives, and our freedom.

4) One small ounce of reality before we close this discussion for this month. In early 2016, a group of global warming advocate scientists published a study in the Nature Climate Change Journal. Two of those scientists are quoted in the article with the following revelations:
  • John Fyfe is a Canadian climate scientist that has built climate prediction models over the years: “There is this mismatch between what the climate models are producing and what the observations are showing,. We can’t ignore it.”
  • Ed Hawkins, a British climate scientist and co-author of the article stated that: “Reality has deviated from our expectations – it is perfectly normal to try and understand this difference.” 
There you have it. Two climate scientists actually admitting that all of the climate prediction models have been failures, especially when it comes to utterly failing to predict the lack of temperature rise in the past two decades. Could it be that we really do not understand the changing of temperatures and climate? Which means why should we be making changes to our economic system and lifestyles when even global warming advocate scientists admit that they really do not have a handle on what is really going on? 

That will do it for today’s and this month’s global warming review. Scientists admit they do not have a handle on what is rally going on, a high level UN person admits openly that global warming scares are just a cover to wreck our economic system, a top scientists calls out his peers for selling out their integrity to the global warming clan, and the government continues to adjust data to fit a preconceived theory. More global warming hysterics likely next month.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:


www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:


http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org

http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w