Showing posts with label fec. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fec. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 8, 2022

February, 2022, Part 1, Political Class Insanity - Maxine Makes Her Daughter Rich, Whitmer Leaves Her Voters Behind, and Baltimore Schools Leave Their Kids Uneducated

 It is the beginning of another month which means it is time again to review the latest political class insanity from the American political class. Each month it takes us multiple posts to cover the wasteful spending, incompetent government organizations and employees, government programs that usually make a problem worse than resolving it, inane and idiotic politician comments, etc.

To review past posts on this insanity and idiocy, just click on the first few posts in each month listed to the right of this page. After reviewing just a handful of these insanity posts we think you will agree that we are currently being served by the worst set of American politicians ever to hold office in our entire history.


1) We have always wondered how Washington politicians retire from office much, much richer than when they were first elected to office. Their increase in wealth cannot be explained simply by their Congressional or Presidential salaries. 


But it is not just personal wealth that politicians increase while in office. Many of them also are able to increase the individual wealth of friends and family, as Congresswoman Maxine Walters seems to do so very well:


  • According to Federal Election Commission (FEC) reports, Congresswoman Walters has managed to divert huge campaign contribution funds to her daughter’s company, Progressive Connections, for almost two decades.

  • Since 2003, FEC reports show that Karen Walters’ company has gotten about $1.2 million in payments for campaign related services for her mother.

  • The $1.2 million was used for such activities as “slate mailer management,” campaign managing services, and payment to a musical band for a holiday event.

  • But her daughter is not the only family living high off of the Congresswoman’s political career.

  • According to a LA Times article back in 2004, other family members had received over $1 million over the previous eight years.


This type of payment arrangement is not unlawful under FEC guidelines if the family members are providing legitimate services and those services are not in excess of the fair market value of those services. It is unknown if that is the case in this situation but the rule should be changed so that no family members are allowed to provide any services to a politician's campaign unless they are doing it for free. Then there is no question of integrity and conflict of interest like Ms. Walters seems to have raised so many times over the past two decades.


2) We have not been a big fan of the Michigan governor, Gretchen Whitmer, and her handling of the covid pandemic in her state. She seems to have gone way overboard in her (mostly failed) dictatorial decrees that restricted the economic ability and individual freedom of her citizens. And despite her dictates, she violated those very same decrees any number of times:


  • She was seen without a mask in at least one social situation where her own rules dictated she should be wearing a mask.

  • She strongly restricted Michigan residents the right to travel out of state but then tried to sneak out of state to visit her dad in Florida, a direct violation of her own rules that she got caught on.

  • And at the height of her restrictions, her husband tried to coerce a marina owner to let him take his boat out when his wife had banned anyone else from taking their boats out.


And her disregard for her own citizens continues:


  • Back in November, when her state, Michigan, led the country in new covid virus cases, had its state hospitalization levels hit near pandemic highs, and faced a shortage of covid tests, the good governor jetted off to California to raise campaign money for her reelection from rich Hollywood types.

  • She raised hundreds of thousands of dollars from private California fundraisers while her state citizens were under a renewed covid siege.

  • A Hollywood soap opera producer, Colleen Bell, helped Whitmer raise $78,000 at one fundraiser in LA.

  • The next day she raised $88,650 at two other fundraisers.

  • Two days later she raised another $56,600 from two Silicon Valley fundraisers.

  • Back in Michigan, meanwhile, covid inflicted labor shortages resulted in severely delayed ambulance response times for emergencies in her home state.

  • At the same time she was frolicking in California, Michigan was incurring 10% of the nationwide new covid cases while accounting for only 3% of the country’s population.


So we are really talking about a losing situation from three perspectives:


  • Her dictator policies were total failures in protecting her citizens relative to the rest of the country.

  • She apparently cared more about fundraising than her suffering population who were in the midst of a covid resurgence despite her draconian, and failed, covid policies.

  • On a more general,  disgusting point, why should rich people in California be able to finance and influence an election halfway across the country in a state the most of them have probably never even been to?


This last point is a major point made in our book, “Love My Country, Loathe My Government.'' In a perfect world, no one in the country could contribute to any politician’s campaign unless that politician would represent them if elected.


Thus, only Michigan people should be allowed to contribute to a politician running for governor in Michigan. Conversely, no rich people in Michigan should be able to contribute to a California politician running for the U.S. Senate representing California. Disgusting that rich money from around the country can overwhelm the voices and welfare of local, ordinary citizens.


3) In total, all levels of government in this country spend about $124,000,000,000, $124 billion, in taxpayer money every a year on educating our kids. This comes out to about $22,000 per kid. That’s a lot of money in total and a lot of money per child. 


Keep those numbers in mind when we tell  you what the money is buying in the Baltimore school system:


  • A Balitomore city teacher has blown the whistle on the reality that 77% of high school kids in a Baltimore high school read at only an elementary school level. 

  • The Balitomore city school where this teacher works has an annual budget of a hefty $12 million but graduates only 61% of its students.

  • His/her conclusion: “Our children deserve better. They really do. As a whole, the system has failed them.”

  • These dismal results are not made available to the public, despite the fact that the public pays for the education of these kids, but this teacher found a way to get the results out.

  • Underneath that pathetic 77% number, test results showed that 71 high school students read at the kindergarten level, 88 students read at the first grade level, and 45 were reading at a second grade level

  • Only 1.9% read at their high school level.

  • According to the teacher, the kids are pushed through to the next grade even if they are dismal educational failures.


Pretty disgusting results form the education profession. Now, I would think, hope, that these results are an outlier and not indicative of all schools. But overall, it is no secret that we severely under-educated our kids vs. the rest of the world  when measured on standardized tests even though we pay far more per student to get these dismal results.


And I would bet that most of these kids that are underperforming are urban Afrcan-Amercan kids that will never attain their potential or escape poverty with this type of lowly education production. The brave teacher that spilled the beans sums up public government run schools perfectly: “It's heartbreaking. It's heartbreaking to see a child that, when you talk to them outside of the classroom setting, of what are your dreams? And they have these amazing dreams and hopes for the future. But then you realize that with the skills that they have, with the level that they're at, they're going to have to work a thousand times harder to achieve,” the teacher told Project Baltimore. “Our children need a future.”


Our children need a future and American taxpayers need a much better use of their education tax dollars. $124 billion a year has to be better spent than what we are getting from our government/public schools now.


That will do it for today: politicians make themselves rich AND their family members rich using taxpayer wealth, the Michigan governor continues to be a failure, and at least one Baltimore high school shows how poorly the American political class and the government schools they operate perform despite having over $124 billion to spend.


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

Please visit the following sites for freedom:


Friday, March 22, 2019

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Insanity, Part 5: Possible Campaign Law Violations, Possible Pay Law Violations and A Downward Favorability Trend

Over the past few months, New York City Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has established herself as a human gaffe machine. Her inability to do simple math, her outlandish ideas based on an alternative reality, her economic ignorance, and lack of common sense has resulted in an almost daily stream of idiocy, inane comments, and ridiculous ideas that have no basis in reality.

As a result, most of our recent political class insanity posts have almost always had an Ocasio-Cortez piece of insanity. Thus, we have decided to separately track her craziness and idiotic takes on economics, business, government, and whatever else on a regular basis under its own set of posts. She deserves to have a separate effort that captures all of the ridiculousness she espouses.

The original format we were going to use was to start with a set of her original inane ideas and just continue to build on that initial list as time goes by. But after just three summaries of her idiocy and stupid ideas it has become obvious that we cannot continually add to the existing set of ineptness, that list would get too large too quickly.

Thus, each new Ocasio-Cortez post will have only the latest gaffes out of her mouth. To review her previous idiocies just enter her last name in the search box above. The latest post can be accessed at:


Let’s get started:

1) While we may laugh or shake our head at some of the many inane and idiotic statements this Congresswoman makes, she may have gotten herself into some serious law breaking areas as reported by several news sources, actions that could eventually lead to jail time under campaign financing laws:
  • The National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC) has filed a formal FEC complaint that alleges campaign finance law breaking by Ocasio-Cortez.
  • Specifically, the NLPC complaint alleges that she and her top aide, Saikat Chakrabarti, operated an “elaborate scheme to avoid proper disclosure of campaign expenditures.”
  • Chakrabarti is a millionaire who is the founder of the Brand New Congress PAC and a group called “Justice Democrats.
  • The complaint demands that the FEC conduct an investigation into whether Chakrabarti channeled $885,000 from his two PACs into two shell companies he owned which may have allowed Ocasio-Cortez’s campaign to receive campaign donations that exceeded what was legal.
  • PACs are required by law to disclose how and when their campaign donations are spent but private companies are excluded from that requirement which may mean that the two shell companies were set up explicitly to hide and bypass the PAC disclosure requirements.
  • According to former FEC official, Adav Noti: “It does seem like there’s something amiss. One is the scam PAC possibility – they’re really just paying themselves and they’re concealing it by using the LLC. The other is that there’s actually another recipient, that the money is going to the LLC and then being disbursed in some other way that they want to conceal.”
  • Furthermore, “One possibility – a strong possibility, based on the description they put out – is they just got really bad legal advice that somehow said they had to to do this,” he continues. “But regardless, when they decided to use the PAC form, which they did, they subjected themselves to all the legal requirements that come with that.’
  • According to former FEC Commissioner Hans von Spakovsky: “If the facts as alleged are true, and a candidate had control over a PAC that was working to get that candidate elected, then that candidate is potentially in very big trouble and may have engaged in multiple violations of federal campaign finance law, including receiving excessive contributions.”
  • Thus, both Ocasio-Cortez and Chakrabarti could face jail time if they intentionally hid information about her campaign and the PACs to avoid campaign contribution limits.
  • In addition, it appears that both of them may not have informed the FEC that they both controlled the Justice Democrats group that was supporting her election campaign.
Great: stupid ideas and possible criminal activity to boot.

2) And campaign finance entanglements might not be the only illegal financial hanky panky she is covering up. She has also been accused of purposefully underpaying her staff members to avoid Federal laws that require transparency of higher paid government employees. Director Tom Anderson of the NLPC notes that this “an old trick some of the most corrupt members of Congress have used time and again.” 

But not surprising since Ocasio-Cortez’s boyfriend may or may not be an employee on her staff and she definitely hired Saikat Chakrabarti onto her Congressional staff. 

3) She has made stupid statements like claiming that the three branches of government were the Presidency The House, and the Senate. She has showed her economic ignorance by not knowing the definition of the unemployment rate despite having an economics degree. She misread a simple Pentagon audit report and then claimed that the Pentagon had wasted more money than it ever had in its total budget. She made the most insane statements and assertions which drove Amazon to shut down the growth plans it had in her Congressional district, robbing that district of untold billions of dollars in tax revenue and economic growth.

That’s the bad news. The good news is that people are finally realizing what a screw up she is, as measured by a recent Gallup poll:
  • The good news for her is that when she won her primary election, about half of U.S. adults had no opinion of her or were unfamiliar with her but two months later only 29% of those polled had that opinion, i.e. a lot more people know who she is.
  • The bad news though is that 41% now hold an unfavorable opinion of her while only 31% hold a favorable opinion of her.
  • That 41% is up a whopping 15 points from her 26% unfavorable rating from last fall.
  • Obviously she is trending in the wrong direction, probably because every time she opens her mouth she says something that is wrong, a lie, a crime, or is incoherent. Of course, it is not her fault, she blames Fox News and old white guys for her drop in favorability ratings.
  • Problem is that old white guys don't make up anywhere close to 41% of the population or the Gallup sample, the percentage of those polled that view her unfavorably. And again, with her and with a lot of her generation, it is never her/their fault, not a good trait you want in a politician or a person of influence.

That will it for today for Ocasio-Cortez insanity: possible multiple violations of campaign laws and a fading favorability rating. Not a good day for the Congresswoman from NYC.


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:


www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:


http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org

http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w





Sunday, March 4, 2018

Our Horribly Broken Election Process, Part 3 - The Second Half Of A Solution

We have never been big fans of any American politician in this blog. We find them either cowardly, stupid, or greedy and often criminals. The list of their transgressions in each of these categories probably numbers in the hundreds when you go back through our previous posts.

Probably their worst trait of all is that they rig the system to make themselves rich, comfortable, and often above the law. They give themselves high pay and great benefits. They are in session in Congress for less than half the year. They are given multi-week vacations that they try to call “recesses.” They find ways to do insider trading on stocks and companies based on non-public information relative to potential and real legislation. And they spend so much time doing this stuff for themselves that they never get around to resolving the major issues facing the American public.


Several days ago we did a post on one particularly egregious abuse of the system by politicians:

https://loathemygovernment.blogspot.com/2012/07/washington-corruption-train-keeps-on.html

Today, we are proposing a second set of basic changes that need to be made to our political processes that hopefully will get people in office that want to focus on resolving the big issues facing Americans today rather than have the existing types of politicians continue to remain in office where their only focus is self enrichment. The first set of changes can be accessed at:


https://loathemygovernment.blogspot.com/2018/03/our-horribly-broken-election-process.html

1) The Federal Election Commission is supposed to ensure that everyone complies with existing election laws. It is in reality a farce that serves as a facade to legitimate election practices but really is nothing more than an exercise in doing nothing. It is staffed by an equal number of Republican and Democratic political hacks so that if anyone on the FEC actually wanted to prosecute someone for violating election laws it would never have the majority of votes needed to proceed. 

Think about it: when was the last time you heard of the FEC successfully going after someone who violated election laws? Because you know for sure, given the lack of integrity and ethics within the current political class, these people are not morally or criminally pure.

Rather than appointing do nothing political yes men and women to the FEC, it needs to be staffed with experienced criminal prosecutors so that justice supersedes the political needs and wishes of those in office and in charge. Only then, when politics are taken out of the FEC staffing, will election laws actually mean something.

2) For Presidential debates, every candidate that has a mathematical chance of winning the Electoral College should be included in the debates. As we have often said, while there may be two political parties in this country, there is only one political class. While that political class has two wings, Democrats and Republicans, their aims are always the same: maintain power and continually stay in office to continually enrich themselves. Their different political stances are more marketing ploys than solutions. 

Thus, in the last Presidential election, the Libertarian Party and Green Party candidates should have been included in the debates. Not only would that provide a fresh dimension to the debates, it would have forced Trump and Clinton to actually present solutions to issues rather than just attack each other to satisfy their bases. The Greens and Libertarians would have brought real solutions to the table and who know, actually caused some voters to finally vote for someone outside of the current and ineffective political class caste.

3) If you live in Kansas and are a Democrat, your Presidential vote usually means nothing since the state overwhelmingly usually votes Republican. That means ALL of the Electoral College votes in that state become Republican, all citizen Democrat votes in that state become meaningless.

If you are a Republican in California, your Presidential vote usually means nothing since the state overwhelmingly votes Democrat. That means ALL of the Electoral College votes in that state become Democrat, all citizen Republican votes in that state become meaningless.

Thus, the solution becomes, and it is a solution that already exists in a handful of states, is that Electoral Votes in a state be somehow based on the number of votes for each Presidential candidate in that state. For example, if 35% of the voters in California voted for a Republican candidate, than 35% of the Electoral Votes in what state should be assigned to the Republican candidate. Similarly, in Kansas, if 35% of the votes were for the Democratic candidate, than 35% of the Electoral Votes in that state should be assigned to the Democratic candidate.

What happens now is that there really is no reason for a Democrat in Kansas or a Republican in California to vote for President. Their votes, under the current process, have no chance of making any difference. In addition, the candidates know that. Thus, a Democrat is rarely going to put any effort into the voters in Kansas since the payoff is likely nil. A Republican is rarely going to put any effort into the voters in California since the payoff is likely nil. 

Apportion Electoral votes on the percentage of voters who voted for each candidate in each state and no voter will be disenfranchised like they are now.

4) Most American workers are paid on some type of merit system. If an individual or their team or their company does better, that worker is usually rewarded. If they perform worse, than the rewards are less or non-existent. Only in Congress and the office of the President can you be a complete screw up and still get high salaries, rich benefits, and a slew of other benefits.

This has to end since if you have no skin in the game, i.e. as a politician you get rich regardless of how little you accomplish, then you tend to not focus on getting anything substantial accomplished. Thus, we need to implement an annual customer/voter satisfaction survey process that determines whether or not Washington politicians get highly rewarded for accomplishment or get punished with low rewards for being total screw ups. 

Besides determining whether or not survey voters, selected at random, think Congress and the President actually accomplished anything worthwhile, part of the survey would also be to measure and reward based on how civil and cooperative they were with each other. Given the poisonous atmosphere in Washington today it is not a surprise that nothing gets accomplished, given all of the name calling, slandering, and backstabbing. Make cooperation a major part of the pay determination and maybe, just maybe these people can start cooperating with each other rather than backstabbing each other to the country's detriment.

5) Once Presidents leave office , they now become multi millionaires, it is a fact of life. And yet, even though they get richer and richer, the American taxpayer must continue to pay for their security and pension and benefits even though they could easily pick all of those expenses from their personal wealth. Thus, as outlined in our book, “Love My Country, Loathe My Government,” once an ex-President's income or wealth exceeded a certain threshold, they would become responsible for their own security and retirement expenses, not the taxpayers.

While these government expenses savings would not do a lot of offset the Federal government’s $20 TRILLION national debt, it would be a nice symbolic and leadership effort to show that the American taxpayer does not have to pay for the expenses of an increasingly royalty class of wealthy ex-Presidents.

That will wrap up our second set of simple changes that would make our democracy more viable, our government more cost effective and most of all, our politicians more accountable to the people and not their personal enrichment. Today’s American politicians are an embarrassment to the country, our democracy, and the hard working Americans who make their luxurious lifestyles possible. It has to end.


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:


www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:


http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org

http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w




\

Sunday, February 25, 2018

Our Horribly Broken Election Process, Part 1 - An Example

We have never been big fans of any American politician in this blog. We find them either cowardly, stupid, or greedy and often criminals. The list of their transgressions in each of these categories probably numbers in the hundreds when you go back through our previous posts.

Probably their worst trait of all is that they rig the system to make themselves rich, comfortable, and often above the law. They give themselves high pay and great benefits. They are in session in Congress for less than half the year. They are given multi-week vacations that they try to call “recesses.” They find ways to do insider trading on stocks and companies based on non-public information relative to potential and real legislation. And they spend so much time doing this stuff for themselves that they never get around to resolving the major issues facing the American public.

The Tampa Bay times recently did a nice job researching and reporting on a very devious way that American politicians misuse and corrupt our political processes for their own good:
  • When an American politician runs for office, he or she establishes a campaign staff and funding process to collect campaign funds to be spent trying to get that politician elected to office.
  • Once the election is over, the campaign has to pay off any remaining debts incurred by the campaign using that donated money.
  • But what often happens that even after the debts are paid off, there is still campaign cash leftover.
  • Now in an honest and ethical political process, the politician should either have to give back, say on a prorated basis, any leftover donated funds that were no longer needed, or possibly donate those leftover funds to a worthy and recognized charity.
  • But we do not have either an honest and ethical political process or honest and ethical politicians since it appears they have written the game rules that allows them to keep using unused campaign money for their own good long after they are no longer in office, or in some case, after they have died.
  • That is the bottom line finding of the Tampa Bay Times report that was replete with many examples of this greed.
  • Although former Florida Congressman Mark Foley was drummed out of Congress over ten years ago for sending explicit sex text messages to teenage boys, in 2017 he used money from his old Congressional campaign fund to fund four dinners for himself in Palm Beach including a luncheon that cost his campaign fund $450.
  • Former Senator Jim Bunning paid his daughter $94,800 from his campaign fund in the fours years after he left office, stopping only when there were no longer any funds left to give to her.
  • Over the past year and a half, political consultant Dylan Beesley paid his consulting firm $100,000 from the campaign fund of Hawaiian Congressman Mark Takai for “consulting services” even though Congressman Takai has been dead for those past months.
  • Former Ohio Congressman Steve LaTourette has been out of Congress for over three years but he still treated himself to $4,555 worth of Ohio State football tickets using his leftover campaign funds.
  • In the six years since former Texas Congressman Jim Turner left office, he has paid his wife over $30,000 to handle his paperwork in addition to paying his father’s hardware company $9,600 to rent office space from his father with leftover campaign money.
  • Former South Carolina Congressman Robin Tallon left Congress in 1993, took his leftover $400,000 campaign slush fund and invested it so well that he grew it to $1 million; he then paid himself more than $31,000, paid his son $20,000 who was listed as his campaign manager even though Tallon was not running for office, he bought a $4,000 computer in 2007 (14 years after leaving Congress, a $2,300 computer in 2014, and a $900 iPad in 2017, all with money from that initial leftover $400,000 campaign fund.
  • But Tallon’s shenanigans get better since between 2007 and 2011 he paid $8,200 to an organization identified as only CCSC, which coincidentally looks very familiar to the housing development where he owns a 4,400 square foot home, Country Club of South Carolina, or CCSC.
  • According to the report, almost 40 former Congress people kept aides or campaign staff on payroll long after the person left office with a dozen of those 40 paying a politician's family members to stay on staff.
  • In fact, Bunning paid his daughter over $2,100 a month until the slush fund ran dry.
  • The former treasurer of New York Congressman Thomas Manton was still being paid two years after Manton died, not just two years after he left office.
  • Former Georgia Congressman Saxby Chambliss left office in January, 2015 but used leftover campaign funds to treat himself to five nights at the five star Williamsburg Inn six months later at a cost of $1,979.
  • The article reports, using actual FEC data, that about 100 former members of Congress have allowed their former campaign treasure chest to spend over $20 million after they left office over the past 23 years or so.
  • Other dubious expenses uncovered by the research included money spent on airline tickets, club memberships, cell phones, computers and other expenses.
Nasty, greedy stuff. And unnecessary since the Times report also singled out two good guys among this sea of selfish and greedy politicians. It cited former Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman and former Georgia Congressman Charlie Norwood both donated over 90% of their leftover campaign money to charity and shut down their campaign offices and operations within six months after leaving office. So it can be done. It just isn’t done.

The Times article did interview election experts and former FEC personnel. They were in general agreement that many for these expense fall outside of the law. But since the FEC is basically a toothless overlord, no one ever gets accused or prosecuted for abusing this leftover cash.

Again, just a symptom of a broken election process that allows useless, greedy, selfish people to not only get elected to office but profit handsomely from getting elected, both during their terms and long afterwards. And as we mentioned above all of this happens while no major issue facing the country EVER gets resolved.

We will follow up this discussion within a few days with a plan to rid the election process of embarrassments and affronts like this. The Founding Fathers never envisioned running for office as a self enrichment activity and that is the objective we should all be working on, getting people elected that want to fix what is broken rather than enrich their personal lives at the expense of taxpayers and the country.

In the meantime, we suggest you go to the following link where we previously discussed this topic relative to Evan Bayh, a former Indiana Senator who left office with $10 million left his campaign treasure chest:

https://loathemygovernment.blogspot.com/2014/06/june-2014-political-class-insanity-part_8.html

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:


www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:


http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org

http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w




\

Friday, May 11, 2012

Federal Government Programs Gone Wild - Unabated, Unrelenting, and Unproductive

We often talk about how incompetent the Federal government, and the political class that operates it, has become relative to the squandering of taxpayer wealth to waste and criminal fraud in the Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and other government social support programs. Conservative estimates put this annual waste at over $600 billion a year if you include the IRS incompetence in not collecting the hundreds of billions of dollars it should be collecting from tax evaders every year.

But government incompetence is wild and rampant throughout the entire Federal bureaucracy, not just in the social support programs listed above. The following examples of the unabated, unrelenting, and unproductive actions of our Federal organization also waste untold billions of dollars every year with no tangible assets or benefit in return:

- Reiterating data we have reported on before, Senator Tom Coburn, in an interview in the May 7, 2012 issue of Business Week, stated that the Federal government currently operates at least 47 distinct and independent job training programs for U.S. citizens across the Federal bureaucracy. These 47 programs, according to the Senator, cost the American taxpayer $19 billion a year, all but three of them are mostly duplicative of each other, and judging by the nation's high unemployment rate, do not seem to be very effective in the current configuration.

How much money could be saved by combining these 47 programs together, eliminating overhead and possibly focusing the government's job training effort in the process, hopefully resulting in better results?

- Apparently, the Federal government's flood insurance program needs to raise its rates in order to start paying off the $18 billion in debt that the program has run up over the years, according to a recent news article. More Federal government debt, more burdens on taxpayers.

Which raises the age old question again: why did the Federal government get into the flood insurance business in the first place? Why should most American taxpayers help pay for the bad decisions of a few other taxpayers who insanely insisted on building their homes in flood prone areas? Did someone actually think that this was a good idea and the government would not run up negative financial returns to support poor decisions on home location?

- Bernie Madoff, as most people know, operated one of the biggest Ponzi swindle schemes of all time until he was caught, tried, and convicted. In order to try and help the swindled investors get at least some of their money back, the Federal government set up a process to do just that.

According to an article in the May 7, 2012 issue of Business Week magazine, Irving Picard was named the trustee of this recovery effort and for the past few years has been supposedly trying to do just that: liquidating Madoff's firm and assets to repay victims of the Ponzi scheme. He has filed claims and lawsuits against investment funds, banks, individuals, and some of Madoff's clients themselves.

However, three years after the plot unraveled, this Federal government effort is still basically stuck in the starting blocks. Quoting from the article, "winding down the Madoff estate has cost more than Picard has handed out to customers, with total administrative spending as of March 31 at about $554 million." The article points out that Picard personally has been paid $5.1 million and his law firm has earned just over a quarter BILLLION dollars for their efforts.

Similar to the ill fated government flood insurance policy, who in the Federal government thought it was a good idea to set this gentleman up in such a lucrative deal that he and his law firm make more than the many victims of the Madoff scheme recover? Madness.

- The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is supposed to oversee the election processes in this country to ensure everyone is playing by the rules and the laws when it comes to elections and the related campaign fundraising and spending. A Business Week article also from May 7, 2012 reviewed how poorly this government program is working out.

The highlights of this embarrassment include the following:
  • Five of the six members of the commission are living on borrowed time since their terms were supposed to have ended already but their replacements have not been named.
  • One of the commissioners, Ellen Weintraub, should have been replaced five years ago.
  • The article concludes, probably correctly, that "the lack of fresh blood on the commission has rendered it nearly powerless" to oversee what is likely going to be the most expensive election season in the history of the country in 2012.
  • The commission consists of three Democrats and three Republicans and they have deadlocked along party lines 34 times since 2008 on whether or not to investigate potential wrongdoing on the part of politicians. As a result, nothing happens to investigate most potential wrongdoing.
  • On more than two dozen of the 34 times, The FEC's own legal staff recommended that an FEC investigation be started since there was enough data and evidence to suggest wrongdoing had actually happened.
  • Apparently, this gridlock situation has gotten worse over time, with one expert quoted as saying: "You've reached a real major shift here, when the commission can't even start investigations."
  • In 2007, the FEC handed down $4 million in fines for election wrongdoing. In 2009, 2010, and 2011, only $2 million in fines have been handed down in total over the three years. (I doubt it is because our political class got honest and legal all of a sudden.)
  • Despite a campaign promise to submit nominees for consideration during his 2008 Presidential campaign, the President only submitted one name so far in his term, which was later  withdrawn.
Great, we put together a massive Federal bureaucracy that is so ill defined and ill laid out that it does virtually nothing except eat up taxpayer money. It is certainly a sweet deal for the political class. They get to look like they care about clean elections, they then staff the oversight organization with their own types of people, making sure that the voting is balanced so that the political class rarely gets investigated.

A fox guarding the hen house situation if there ever was one. For this illusion of fairness and enforcement we probably pay billions of dollars every year.

The only solution to this problem was suggested by Step 8 from "Love My Country, Loathe My Government." This step would make the head of the FEC a nationally elected office that would be structured so that we get a seasoned prosecutor elected into place that knows how to go after law breakers rather than political cronies that get appointed into place and whose primary responsibility, it seems, is to protect, rather than prosecute, fellow party members.

- After more than forty years of a failedand expensive "war on drugs," one would have thought the political class would get the idea that maybe their heavy handed prevention tactics were not working. Maybe they would have figured out that certain types of people want to use certain types of drugs, whether such usage is legal or not. And given there is still a demand, some other people will find ways, legal or not, to supply and satisfy that demand.

But apparently forty years is not sufficient time to prove a failing government strategy is not working. A recent article from the New York Times, that was reprinted in the Tampa Bay Times, pointed out that U.S. military forces have again been deployed in another country to try and impede the flow of drugs to the U.S. This time, American troops have been deployed to Honduras.

According to the article, as the drug cartels distribution channels got squeezed and compromised in Mexico, the cartels simply just moved their operations to Honduras, which is now the the hub for 90% of the cocaine heading towards the United States. It appears we are in a never ending, costly and deadly, battle of Whack-A-Mole. As soon as one conduit for drugs is shut down in one country, another conduit comes to life in another country.

Rather than play decades of  Whack-A-Mole/Illegal Drug version and getting nowhere except to spend a lot of money, wouldn't it be a better and less expensive plan to play Treat-The-Addiction game? In this game, we allow people to do whatever they want to do their bodies but provide the addiction treatment resources for them to save themselves? It has to be cheaper and more effective than what we have been doing for over 40 years and getting nowhere.

- And in one of the silliest government actions of all time, the Obama administration is forcing U.S. electric ultillies across the country to shut down older, dirtier coal fired electric generating plants because of the potential ill effects on global warming. Sounds like a good idea, if you believe in global warming, but there is one really big problem.

According to the April 20, 2012 issue of Business Week magazine, coal exports from the U.S. to places like China and India have risen 57% since 2009. These countries are very busy operating and buidling coal fired electric plants in their own countries to keep up with their skyrocketing demand for electricity.

Thus, on one hand the Federal government is imposing hardships on U.S. utilities, businesses, and consumers by making electricity scarcer in this country while the potential positive impact on global warming by these domestic actions will be easily wiped out by U.S. coal being used in more and more dirty electric generation plants overseas. Makes you wonder if these Washington people ever think through a problem and the likely consequences of any of their actions. It does not appear that they do.

47 different, redundant Federal government training programs, a government program that encourages people to put their home where it is likely to sooner or later get flooded out, a criminal recovery program that is more expensive to operate than the money it recovers, an election oversight committee who oversees everything like a blind man in a tunnel at night, deploying U.S. military forces around the world to solve a problem that can only be solved within the U.S.'s borders, and finally, killing coal usage on one hand while letting it go wild on the other hand.

We are truly living in a world where it is "Federal Government Gone Wild." Unfortunately, we pay for the wild part with hard earned tax dollars and get nothing in return except wild stories of incompetence like those listed above.





We invite all readers of this blog to visit our new website, "The United States Of Purple," at:

http://www.unitedstatesofpurple.com/

The United States of Purple is a new grass roots approach to filling the office of President of The United States by focusing on the restoration of freedom in the United States, focusing on problem solving skills and results vs. personal political enrichment, and imposing term limits on all future Federal politicians. No more red states, no more blue states, just one United States Of America under the banner of Purple.

The United States Of Purple's website also provides you the formal opportunity to sign a petition to begin the process of implementing a Constitutional amendment to impose fixed term limits on all Federally elected politicians. Only by turning out the existing political class can we have a chance of addressing and finally resolving the major issues of or times.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at www.loathemygovernment.com. It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:


http://www.cato.org/
http://www.robertringer.com/
http://realpolichick.blogspot.com/
http://www.flipcongress2010.com/
http://www.reason.com/
http://www.repealamendment/

Monday, November 1, 2010

The Obscenity, Perversity, And Pervasiveness Of Election Campaign Spending

As the mid-term election campaign season mercifully draws to a close, I thought it would be a good time to do some accounting and show how much money as perverted and pervaded our election processes and provide some steps on how to end this obscenity of spending. Consider the following results:
  • A short article in the St. Petersburg Times last week estimated that about $2 billion will be spent on election efforts of those running for national office. This comes out, on average, of spending about $4 million for each Congressional seat that is up for grabs this election season. Thus, for every open Congressional seat that earns about $174,000 in salary a year, $4 million is spent to attain that position, a ratio of $23 spent for every dollar of salary.
  • This $2 billion estimate is only for Federal Congressional races, the article provided no estimates for the billions of dollars likely being spent on open local, county, and state political offices and for ballot initiatives. An estimate of that number comes form the Center For Responsive Politics. They estimate that both parties and their aligned advocacy groups will spend over $3.7 billion this year, nearly a billion dollars more than was spent in 2006.
  • A short article in the October 29, 2010 issue of The Week magazine, reported that the U.S. spends $1 billion a year on heart disease research, a disease that affects millions and millions of Americans, and $500 million a year for Alzheimer's disease research, of which one out of every three Americans over the age of 80 is likely to come down with. Thus, the money spent on these elections, according to the Center For Responsive Politics,  is more than what is spent in seven years for Alzheimer's disease research and almost four years for heart disease research, even though these two medical conditions are more likely to affect far more Americans than mudslinging political advertisements. Talk about screwed up priorities.
  • In Florida, a bitter campaign for Governor has been underway between Alex Sink and Rick Scott. According to an article in the October 28, 2010 edition of the St. Petersburg Times, the two candidates had already spent almost $55 million in their quest to be Governor. This is almost double what was spent in the last Governor race in 2006. The $55 million is $6 million more than what is spent on textbooks in the state's third largest school district since 2008. Since Florida has 67 counties, this amount is more than what was spent on school textbooks in each of 65 counties since 2008. Again, talk about screwed up priorities.
  • According to an article in the November 5, 2010 issue of The Week magazine, the biggest single contributor in this year's election campaign season has been the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) labor union. This is contrary to what many DDemocrats would want you to think, they wanted to give the impression that "corporate" and "foreign" money was overwhelming the election process, which it may well be doing but no more and probably less than what AFSCME is doing. That labor union had contributed a whopping $87.5 million to Democratic candidates in order to keep their labor friendly politicians in office.  
  • According to the same article, Meg Whitman, who is running for Governor of California, has spent more than $140 million of her own money to run for this office. I do not know what the salary is for the California Governor but I would bet it is substantially less than $140 million.
  • And finally, a short article from the November 5, 2010 issue of The Week magazine pulls this all together. According to the article, three Republican candidates, Meg Whitman in California, Rick Scott in Florida, and Linda McMahon in Connecticut, have collectively spent $243 million (almost a quarter of a billion dollars) of their own money for their campaigns. This is more than what the AFSCME union, the U.S. Chamber Of Commerce, and Karl Rove's American Crossroads group combined have contributed to various campaigns.
Obscene, perverted, and pervasive. You might be able to justify, to some degree, the obscene amounts of money being spent on these election campaigns if their advertising and strategies were to inform and educate, and contained some degree of civility. However, at least the campaigns ads I have seen, have not been anywhere close to these three characteristics. They have been mean spirited, degrading, and almost totally non-issue based. They usually are not about how much good a candidate can do but how bad things will be if the candidate's opponent gets elected. Misinformation is the coin of the political realm and lies are the currency.

It is obvious that we have allowed way too much power and freedom to migrate to our political class. Why else would someone spend $140 million of their own money to get elected or special interest groups contribute so much money that the pay back for a successful candidate is $1 for every $23 dollars spent for the vacant seat. (The payback for the loser who also spent millions of campaign dollars is even worse, they do not even get the $1).  The only other reason for the obscene amounts of money to be donated and spent is the desire of our politicians to control that power. Remember how numerous banks contributed millions of dollars in 2008 to the national conventions of the Demcorats' and Republicans' national conventions that summer, only to receive billions of taxpayer bailout money several months back in return later when those same politicians attending those conventions voted to approve those bailouts? The corporations and unions are investing in their futures when they invest these large amounts of money in political campaigns. It is what is right for these organizations, not what is right for the average voter and what is right for the country. Remember the old saying from Ralph Louis Mencken, "Every election is an advance auction of stolen goods." Unfortunately, those stolen goods are our tax dollars and the political class are the auctioneers.

How do we end this perversion, pervasiveness, and obscenity of campaign dollars? Consider a few steps from "Love My Country. Loathe My Government:
  • Step 6 - allow only individual citizens to contribute to election campaigns. The Bill of Rights and Founding Fathers provided the right for freedom of speech for individual Americans, not corporations, unions, PACs, etc. If only individual citizens could contribute to candidates' election campaigns, maybe those candidates would start listening to and performing for individual Americans, not the big money campaign donors.
  • Step 7 - do not allow campaign dollars to cross Congressional lines for House of Representative seats or state lines for Senate seats. For example, a person running for Congress in a Congressional district in Ohio would only be able to accept campaign donations from citizens living within that Congressional district. No funneling of national party money into local campaign races. Only the people living in that district should be able to affect the results, either by donating money or voting.
  • Step 8 - strengthen the Federal Elections Commission by staffing it with experienced law enforcement professionals and not career bureaucrats. I am sure that with billions of dollars flying around, there are certainly campaign finance laws being broken but since the Commission is staffed with equal numbers of Democrats and Republicans, no one is ever prosecuted for infractions.
  • Step 39 - institute term limits for all politicians, a step that would at least eliminate the edge that incumbents have in raising campaign cash and allow politicians to vote for what is good for the country and not their individual campaign donors since re-election would be banned.
  • Other - although not explicitly mentioned in the book but related to Step 7 above, another step that is needed is to restrict how leftover campaign funding is spent. Last week, news reports indicated that President Obama released $4 million from his leftover Presidential campaign fund to be used for support of Democrats running for Congress. We need a law that says once a campaign is over and the bills have been paid, those funds need to be liquidated, either by returning a pro-rated amount to the original contributors or giving the money to charities, e.g. Alzheimer's disease research! Those contributors expected the money to be used for his election, not to be funneled around the country to affect local elections. Dissolve these leftover pots of campaign money so that they do not poison future elections.
Government of the people, by the people, for the people. Nowhere in that great document where these words appear does it say of the PACs, by the unions, for the corporations. Time to bring campaign spending back under control and make the politcal class more responsive to the needs of Americans.




Our new book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at www.loathemygovernment.com. It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.


Please visit the following sites for freedom:


http://www.cato.org/
http://www.robertringer.com/
http://www.realpolichick.blogspot.com/
http://www.flipcongress2010.com/
http://www.reason.com/