Showing posts with label pensions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pensions. Show all posts

Saturday, March 21, 2026

The Race To Bankruptcy Court - Hochul's Ridiculous and Tone Deaf Request, New York City Gets a Credit Downgrade, and Chicago Is Still Going Bankrupt

 It seems we are in a little bit of a rut in that we seem to be getting overwhelmed with news about our choice for states and major cities that are likely to go bankrupt relatively soon. As always, our top state governments that we think are nearing bankruptcy include New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and California. Our top major cities we think are rapidly approaching bankruptcy include New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco.


Before reviewing the latest news and seeing which state or city is making the best progress towards government bankruptcy, let’s review how these cities and states got themselves into this financial death spiral position to begin with:

  • A government entity keeps expanding its budget, eventually putting pressure on the tax revenue stream it receives.

  • At some point, rather than cut government spending or make its programs more efficient financially, the politicians in charge raise taxes to meet the ever growing government expenditures.

  • The raising of taxes causes some residents and businesses to leave the city or state for less tax burdensome areas, reducing the tax base and reducing the revenue stream.

  • Rather than cut expenses and become more efficient to match the reduced tax revenue stream, politicians in the above cities or states raise the tax burden even more.

  • This causes more residents and businesses to flee the city or state, further reducing the tax base and tax revenue stream.

  • At some point politicians panic and raise taxes more and start cutting vital government services (e.g. police, fire, education) in order to try and balance government spending against the shrinking tax base and revenue stream.

  • The reduction in quality of government services in particular and quality of life in general drives more residents and businesses out of the area.

  • Eventually, the expenses, costs and financial liabilities outstrip the reduced tax stream and bankruptcy occurs.

Okay that’s the process, now lets check the progress some of the above listed government entities are making to achieve this bankruptcy goal  against this process:


1)The following  discussion point proves that some cities and states are definitely going  to  go  bankrupt pretty soon because politicians are ignorant of economic realities and really and just plain stupid when  it comes to  common sense. But before we explore one of the most inane recent reactions to the financial  death spiral one state finds itself in, consider a little  history and background:


  • Back in 2022, the New York Post reported on some incredibly stupid comments made by the governor of New  York, Kathy Hochul.

  • Hochul is a Democrat and  told state Republican  voters back in  2022 that they should “Just jump on a bus and head down to Florida where you belong. You are not New Yorkers.”

  • Yes, the top political  official in the state told about half  of her state’s constituents, about 5.4 million  Republican voters, that they should just leave and not come back, likely one of the  most insensitive and  disgusting comments  ever made by a sitting politician.

  • The Post reported at the time that the state government of New York was staring at a five year anticipated budget gap of $14 billion and yet she told a large portion of the state’s taxpayers to leave town.

  • Of course,  back in 2022, many of  the state’s residents and businesses had already taken her advice, driven out by high taxes, high crime rates, and high business regulation, since over the preceding ten years, 1.5 million New York  residents had already left the state with 350,000 leaving during the year long pandemic epidemic.

  • At the  time of  her  comments, she was proposing a record high state government budget of  $220 billion making the out immigration of residents and  their tax  dollars even more financially dangerous.

  • In 2022 when the Post reported on Hochul’s comments, New York  City by itself had lost 300,000 jobs during the previous two years.

  • Opinion  polls conducted at that time showed that the number one reason people were leaving the state was overwhelmingly associated with high taxes.,

  • And finally  the Post article reported that an IRS analysis of those people  leaving New  York had an average income of over $100,000, i.e.  the highest paying taxpayers were the  ones getting out of the state.


So, four years ago the governor of a state with a record setting budget and record setting budget deficits told millions  of taxpayers, and some of its highest paying taxpayers, to go away and not come back. An elected official, who is supposed to  equally represent every citizen in their domain, told half of them to go  to hell, they were  not welcome in  their home state.


So Hochul sets the stage with her insensitive and despicable comments in 2022 for the following reality


  • A recent New York Post article covered some recent Hocul comments where she said  that New York must win back the high earning taxpayers that fled to Florida.

  • Yes, four years after she told millions of state residents to “just leave,” she finally realized, duh!, that they took a lot of tax revenue with them and that she created a financial  crisis in New York.

  • Rather than reduce government spending  to  match the reduced New York state government tax base, she insists that more tax dollars,  this time by former  state residents  coming back to the state to pay high taxes,  is the remedy.

  • Her out of touch with reality statements to that effect include: “I need people of high net worth to support the generous social programs that we want to have in our state. There are some patriotic millionaires who stepped up. OK! Cut me the checks. But if you want to be supportive, maybe the first step should be to go down to Palm Beach and see who we can bring back home. Because our tax base has been eroded.” 


Can  a politician  be any more  out  of  touch with reality than Hochul? She does not want people  to  come back to  a better life that she created in the state. She blatantly just wants them back  to pay for her government programs, i.e. “CUT ME THE CHECKS!” Don’t come back for a better life for you and your family  or your business, just come back to fix the tax  base that I helped  erode by telling  over 5 million taxpayers to  leave the state.


But her behavior is  completely consistent  \with the process described above of how a state goes bankrupt: raise taxes and drive out residents and businesses who do  not want to pay high taxes, do not make government smaller or more efficient due to  the the smaller tax base, raise taxes to overcome the reduced tax base which drives out more residents and businesses, etc. Hochul made the process even worse when she actually told residents to  get  out of town, her stupidity is amazing.


This reinforces our belief that New York state will be  the first state government to go  bankrupt, a process that is accelerating, a reality the governor finally realizes is happening. Unfortunately her  solution is ridiculous and shallow: why would people who left a bad  situation voluntarily return to that same situation?


2)In recent  posts we have  also reiterated our belief that New York City will be  the next major American  city to go bankrupt. The current mayor, Zohran  Mamdani, has decided that reducing city government  expenses or making government programs more efficient is not fun, he  would rather raise taxes.


As we discussed, he faces a $5.4 short term  budget shortfall. He wants Hochul and the state government to raise taxes on the wealthy living in the city and if that does not happen he threatens to  raise property taxes on everyone by almost 10%. He recently proposed a drastic raise of the  city death tax to  50% while at the  same  time lowering the tax threshold by about 90% to $750,000.


So consider  the following  realities:


  • A wealthy person  living in the city is probably going to  get out of the city if their income tax gets raised again and their lifelong work savings get decimated by Mamdani’s changes to the  death tax.

  • All types of  people, wealthy or not, will consider getting out of the city if their already high property taxes are raised another 10% or  so.


Thus, the tax base continues to erode and thousands of other New York City residents will  follow the  hundreds of thousands of other residents who have already fled the city. And apparently Mamdani has no  intention of trimming back  his record-setting city budget to  cope with the reduced tax base, a formula for bankruptcy as outlined above.


But we have discussed all of this already in previous posts. The new news is that  the financial rating company, Moodys, has downgraded the city’s credit viability from stable  to  negative. The  company cited budget shortfalls, government  inefficiencies, and  reduced financial flexibility as the budget goes up while the tax base goes down. This downgrade  could cause it to be more expensive for the city to raise capital in the future and scare away investors who can invest their wealth with safer options.


Whether this is a wake up call for Mamdani remains to  be  seen. However, denying the reality just makes it quicker for the city to go bankrupt as not only do  residents and businesses flee the city but investors do  also.


3)And while we now believe that New York City will go bankrupt next, the city of Chicago has not given up on that race to bankruptcy court:


  • Chicago city officials predict that the city is facing a short term financial  deficit of $150 million while  also facing billions of dollars in unfunded liabilities into the future.

  • One of the reasons for the deficits is that a whopping 40% of the city’s tax revenues goes to just paying pension obligations and debt service on city bonds before a single  dollar is  spent on roads, schools, emergency services, etc.

  • The current mayor, Brandon Johnson FINALLY realized the financial plight when he recently said the city was “at a crossroads” and had to “essentially do  more with less” from a financial health basis.

  • However, rather than get the city’s  financials in order and in line with the reducing tax steam, he went shallow and just blamed Trump.

  • Austin Berg of the Illinois Policy Institute summarized the situation: “The solution set is always the same: Stop making bad decisions, and you have to put a structure in place to make better decisions. So, the bad decisions are things like taking one-time revenues from federal COVID spending and putting it into operations. The bad decisions are borrowing for operations, which this latest bond issue just did. That’s a huge no-no and a red flag for investors.”

  • In  other words stop  with the  financial  gimmicks to balance the budget, they are temporary and make the long term financial situation even worse.


Much like Hochul, Johnson finally realized that maybe Chicago is looking at a catastrophic financial death spiral. But both blame others for their inactions to  fixing the problem. In New York,  it is the fault of the people that Hochul told to leave the state in 2022 and take their tax revenue with them.   In Chicago, it is Trump's fault that the city has such a large financial hole to  dig out of. 


In either case, their realizations do not change our view that New York state, New York City, and Chicago are still leading government candidates to reach bankruptcy court first.


**********************

If you agree that we need to deseat every member of Congress for their lack of success and accomplishment, then please consider going to the following petition link to help the cause:


https://www.change.org/p/deseat-congress-reset-freedom



**********************


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

Tuesday, November 19, 2019

November, 2019, Part 10, Political Class Insanity: Legal Idiocy From A Congressman, Pensions Funds' Dire Financial Straits and Hillary Clinton's Delusions

It is another month which means it is again time to review the latest political class insanity from Washington and around the world. Political class insanity takes many forms including the wasting of taxpayer wealth, criminal fraud within government programs, inane and stupid political quotes and actions, the inability to create and implement effective and efficient government programs, stupid and ill performing economic policies and strategies, and other forms of insanity that continue to evolve and surprise and shock us.

Let’s get started:

1) We will classify this first instance of political class insanity as “are you that stupid?” When prosecutors want to prosecute a potential criminal, they usually cannot rely on hearsay testimony and evidence. Why? Because the person giving the hearsay evidence could just be making it up for whatever reason they want. 

For example, let’s say I don’t like my neighbor so I am going to say my neighbor tortured and killed a dog. Police cannot find any evidence of the dead dog’s remains, there is no video proof of the torture, there is not a long record of animal abuse, no one reported a missing dog, etc. All the police have is my hearsay word that my neighbor is so evil that he killed a dog. This case would never see the light of day in a courtroom since there is no direct evidence.

But according to a current U.S.Congressman, hearsay evidence without any direct evidence is a pretty good deal:
  • According to Ryan Saavedra, writing for the Daily Wire website, a Democratic Congressman, commenting on the lack of hard proof that Trump committed any impeachment offense, said that “hearsay evidence can be much better evidence than direct evidence.” [my emphasis added.]
  • This is the nonsensical opinion of Democratic Congressman Mike Quigley relative to the impeachment witch hunt currently underway in D.C.
  • Specifically: “And, if gets to closed primer on hearsay, I think the American public needs to be reminded that countless people have been convicted on hearsay because the courts have routinely allowed and created, needed exceptions to hearsay. Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct … and it’s certainly valid in this instance.”
  • Hearsay evidence is NEVER better than direct evidence regardless of his stupid assumption on criminal acts and behavior.
  • In our dog example above, in Quigley’s world the word of an irate neighbor would be better than having video, forensic, or other direct proof that the neighbor killed the dog.
  • And why is hearsay evidence so much more “valid in this instance” vs. any other instance?
  • Fortunately, real Americans realize what stupidity this is and reacted accordingly: “Can you believe this insanity? ‘Hearsay can be much better evidence than DIRECT EVIDENCE’ according to Democrat Mike Quigley: "Are you fricken kidding me? 3rd and 4th party info better than hearing it yourself?”
  • “From a reliable 4th party source according to other Democrats like #FullOfSchiff the best evidence is (is) shit you just make up for political gain as that appears to be what they have been doing all along.”
  • "Uh?"
  • “So not only are the Democrats ADMITTING their entire impeachment sham is based off of hearsay, but now they're trying to defend it. What a joke!”
  • “Sounds exactly like what someone would say when they’re desperate and have no actual evidence…”
  • “Just want to add that these lawmakers who say “hearsay can be much better evidence than direct” are the same ones who want to subject you to a due process-less red flag system. I’m sure that will just stop with guns, right? You still cool with that?”
This kind of nonsense and stupidity would be funny if it was not so serious and dangerous to our democracy and liberties. In this Congressman’s eyes, if someone does not like you, that is reason enough to subject you to criminal investigations and punishment even though there is no actual direct evidence you did anything wrong. As someone who took an oath to uphold the laws of the land he plays fast and loose on what has been a historical and successful road map for justice.

2) We have previously discussed the horrid financial condition of many public servant pension and retirement programs that local and state politicians have grossly mismanaged over the years. These pension programs have been severely underfunded with future unfunded liabilities totalling billions and billions of dollars.

Eventually these unfunded liabilities will become due and there will not be enough money to fund them, resulted in some or all of the following consequences:
  • Pension and health benefits of public servant retirees will be drastically reduced.
  • Taxes of all citizens will be drastically raised to fund the shortfall, resulting in stunted economic growth and financial freedom.
  • Local and state governments will file for bankruptcy with unknown but certainly negative consequences.
How badly have politicians screwed up these funding policies? Consider some numbers from a recent Wall Street Journal article:
  • Current state and local government pension programs have about $4.4 TRILLION in assets to payout future liabilities.
  • That sounds like a lot of money until you find out that these programs actually have $8.6 TRILLION in future liabilities.
  • Thus, under current economic trends and assets, state and local government have just over half of the amount of wealth they need to keep their pension programs solvent.
  • And even these paltry numbers might be too rosy a picture since the average assumption across the country is that annual pension returns on investments will be about 7%, a very high and probably unrealistic assumption given that any future recessions could make the annual investment returns to be much less 7%.
The reason for this is very simple: politicians do not care about tomorrow or long term planning, they only care about their own, short term careers. Thus, rather than save for the future to fund these pension programs, politicians would rather spend that money today on wasteful programs and projects that help them get reelected over and over, the future welfare of government workers and their retirements be damned.

3) Margaret Thatcher was one of the most famous and strongest women leaders in the past fifty years. In fact, outside of possibly Mother Teresa, I cannot think of another woman who was as strong and as much of a leader than Thatcher in recent decades.

Compare Hatcher to Hillary Clinton:
  • Hillary protected, abetted, and defended a sexual predator husband for decades, a predator that allegedly groped, had sex with, and possibly raped an untold number of women over the years.
  • She publicly went after those alleged abused women to publicly discredit their stories of sexual harassment and abuse at the hands of husband Bill.
  • She used the the Clinton Foundation as a money laundering operation to enrich herself and her family. 
  • While a U.S. Senator, her legislative record is almost non-existent, since only three bills she was the sponsor of got enacted.
  • And those three bills were underwhelming: one sponsored bill renaming a post office in a New York town with less than 2,000 residents, sponsoring bill renaming a portion of a highway outside of Buffalo, New York and the third named an existing brick house in Troy, New York as a national historic site which honored a 19th century female union leader.
  • She was involved in so many scandals including, but not limited to, Whitewater, Vince Foster’s suspicious death, cattle futures fortune, White House furniture theft, Benghazi cover up, use of a private and illegal computer server in her home, etc.
  • She has been caught lying so many times including the reality that she did NOT land under sniper fire in Bosnia like she claimed, all of her grandparents were NOT immigrants like she claimed, she knew the Benghazi attacks were NOT caused by an obscure video like she claimed, etc.
We could go on but you get the idea. She has been a vindictive, lying, and ineffective first wife , Senator, and Secretary of State.

And yet despite all of this trash that has followed her or been caused by her, she has the nerve to bad mouth Margaret Thatcher:
  • In a recent interview she said that Thatcher did not even try to “make a positive difference” for women.
  • Clinton and her daughter, Chelsea Clinton, had recently released yet another book, called “The Book of Gutsy Women: Favorite Stories of Courage and Resilience,” and was being interviewed on BBC radio.
  • The book did not include Margaret Thatcher as one of her gutsy women because Thatcher did not meet the criteria of “knocking down barriers for others” and “did not make an effort to help other women.”
  • Specifically: “She does but she doesn’t fit the other part of the definition — in our opinion — which really is knocking down barriers for others and trying to make a positive difference. I think the record is mixed with her.
Seriously? One of the most successful and strongest political women in the past decades and Clinton does not think that Thatcher was gutsy enough to exist and thrive in a man dominated field? That she does not even make it into Clinton’s book of gutsy women? 

Unreal. Just another example of an American politician being so out of touch, being so petty, and so vain. It was not Thatcher’s job to open doors for other women, It was her job to serve her country and EVERY citizen in that country. She did it well, for a long time, and honorably. Given the list of Clinton’s misadventures listed above, Hilary Clinton is NOT the right person to judge Thatcher.
So today’s insanity includes a former first woman who has no concept of what honor is, politicians have no idea how to manage pension systems, and a politician who has no concept of basic legal principles.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:


http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org

http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w