Sunday, December 13, 2020

The 2020 Election, Part 11: The First Invalid Election In Our History?

I have voted in every Presidential election for a lot of decades. I have never voted for a Republican for President and thus, I did not vote for Donald Trump either time. 

Thus, I think I can say without much bias that this just completed Presidential election is shaping up to be a disgrace to democracy given the highly likely ways it was corrupted, manipulated, and outright fixed by so many people and entities across the country. Ballots were lost, ballots were found in garbage cans, computers were hacked, computers suspiciously moved votes from one candidate to another, ballots showed up in polling places with no chain of command security protocols followed. Politicians announced results days before the voting took place.

I am sure some of the potential incidents of voter fraud and cheating were incorrect. But I am sitting on almost 200 news reports of, call them, “voting irregularities,” enough to convince me that this was the most dishonest, poorly handled, and obscene election that abuses the First Amendment rights and “one person, one vote” tenet that is basic to our democracy.

Over the next few days I will be pulling out a lot of those 200 news reports and briefly discussing what allegedly happened. I can not say all of these news reports are true and I cannot say all of these news reports are false. 

But when people are arrested, when people admit on video that they cheated, when there are videos made of people delivering box loads of videos in the middle of the night, I think the evidence is pretty clear that the corruption in this election was real and widespread.

I am not to drawing any conclusions but consider the following reality: the voting locales where most of the corruption occurred was almost ALL in Democratic party controlled areas: Democratically controlled cities, Democratically controlled counties, and Democratically controlled states and happened only in states that were considered “swing state” in the election, in other words, the states that could go either way and a nudge here or a nudge there, from a voting corruption perspective could make all the difference.

The first 121 documented incidents of voting irregularities can be found at:











Each of these incidents are sourced by the organization that reported the voting fraud. I am not going to do a deep dive into each story but by providing the source, you can follow up and decide for yourself whether or not the voting fraud and corruption allegation is legit.

122) American Truth Today - At an official hearing in front of the Michigan state senate, a whistleblower claims to have seen a white van pull up to the TCF voting center in Detroit at 3:30 in the morning with 50,000 or so ballots: “I was there at approximately 3:00 to 3:30 AM. And I saw the huge dump of ballots that were delivered to the counting hall. I noticed that the city of Detroit Clerk’s Office it was their emblem on the white van that showed up with the ballots. Janice Winfrey‘s name was on there and a number presumably for Janet Winfrey’s office. I estimated that it was over 50 boxes that I counted. And I estimated that over a thousand ballots could have fitted in each of the large boxes. There was no chain of custody. There was no accountability. There was no transparency. Nobody knew where these ballots had been. They said they had to be turned in at 8 PM. They showed up approximately at 3:30 AM. So, 7 to 7.5 hours is a long time for these ballots to be kind of in limbo not with anyone knowing where they are.”


123) Judicial Watch - A recent study by the Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI) has found that there are many noncitizens and illegal immigrants included in North Carolina voter lists and jury pools:
  • Their analysis shows that such people existed dating back to at least 2012.
  • Working with the Voter Integrity Project, they concluded that these findings show the lack of “political will” of government officials when it comes to clean and accurate voting lists.
  • The research found that in one county alone, Wayne County, in a three year time frame, 6,000 potential state jurors got out of jury duty by telling the court they were not U.S. citizens.
  • Since jury pool candidates are selected from voting lists that the state maintains, that means that at a bare minimum there were at least 6,000 invalid voters on the voting lists in just a single North Carolina county.
  • Further research found that some of those self identified non-citizens had actually voted in previous elections.
Why is this important? Dale L. Wilcox, the executive director and general counsel of IRLI, explains: “It is evidence of the larger crisis of noncitizen voting on the national level. Every vote by a legal or illegal alien cancels out the vote of an American citizen. It is a violation of the core principles of our constitutional republic. If we, as a nation, cannot remedy the problem of election fraud, then we have surrendered the right to choose our representatives and will instead live under the permanent rule of unaccountable political elites.”

124) Patriot Viral News - We have previously made the observation, based on the mainstream’s non reaction to the rampant voting irregularities, that they may turn out to be accomplices to the whole sordid affair. As an example, consider the hypocrisy of CNN:
  • CNN in 2020 has basically ignored the details and many instances of voter fraud or sought to spin the instances as no big deal.
  • But four short years ago, it was warning that “voting fraud is a national security risk.”
What is the difference? Back in 2016, CNN’s favorite candidate, Hillary Clinton, did not win so there must be foul play afoot even though not even Hillary, who has blamed everyone and everything for her defeat, never brought up election fraud as a culprit. In 2020, their favorite candidate, Joe Biden, wins so massive voting irregularities are no big deal. The bigger issue perhaps is that CNN actually has favorite candidates, enough so that they biased their reporting to support that favorite candidate, a violation of basic journalism tenets.

125) Epoch Times - An election supervisor in Coffee County,Georgia has posted a number of videos online where he demonstrates how one could manipulate the Dominion voting processes and vote counts:
  • The process is called an “adjudication” process. 
  • The process allows the operator to add vote marks to a scanned ballot as well as invalidate vote marks already on the ballot.
  • The process does have a valid use in that it could be used to fill in bubbles on ballots that were not perfect.
  • The elections official, Misty Martin, shows that the system can be used to adjust not just one or two ballots at a time but ALL ballots, some ballots, blank ballots, etc., giving the operator of the software to do anything they wanted to any number of ballots.
  • And it appears that a larger than expected number of ballots were adjudicated in Georgia than would could reasonably be expected.
  • The videos were posted online by a local news site, whose publisher Robert Preston concluded: “According to our election folks, this Dominion system is flawed, not secure, and open to manipulation if someone were so inclined.” 
  • In Fulton County alone over 106,000 ballots went through the adjudication process by the day after the election but it is unknown how many of those 106,000 ballots were actually adjusted.
  • Since about half a million votes were cast in the county, that means about 20% of those votes were sent through the Dominion voting system, a suspiciously high number.
  • Given that Trump lost the state by only 12,000 or so votes, putting over 100,000 ballots through the review process, a process that can be easily abused, in a single county is highly suspicious.
  • Election officials claim that every ballot was examined by a panel of poll watchers which seems impossible if over 100,000 ballots went through the process within a day or so, no way every ballot was examined and reviewed by a panel.
  • Back to the software itself, according to the videos, the software can be accessed by any Dominion operator and can be done without any type of review process being involved.
  • Also, Ms. Martin claims that a Dominion operator can make any changes to any votes they want and not leave any trace which ballots were changed.

126) Freedom Headlines - As we have previously discussed, there appears to have been some serious voting process irregularities in Georgia where poll watchers and others were sent home because of a bogus water pipe leak story. But after everyone had left, videos show four people taking suitcases out from under tables, taking out what appears to be ballots and running them through the voting tabulators in the absence of any oversight or accountability.

Now, one of the woman who allegedly was involved in the secret ballot counting refuses to answer questions on her questionable behavior and claimed that “I need an attorney:"
  • That woman, Ruby Freeman, had initially agreed to be interviewed by journalist Carolyn Ryan but backed out of that opportunity to explain what was going on.
  • But she decided she needed to seek legal counsel.
  • “I won’t be able to be interviewed. This is bigger than me. I need an attorney. Thanks. Much Luv to you and your team.”
“Bigger than me.” Does not sound good for voting integrity.


127) Epoch Times - For those who do not believe that voting fraud occurred in Georgia, go to the following link to get an almost minute by minute account via official election videos of how these mystery suitcases of ballots got into the ballot counting process, were hidden all day, and how they were then included in the counting process, sometimes multiple times, after all observers had been send home:


128) Biz Pac Review - A 20 year veteran of working for Georgia elections, Susan Voyles, told a Georgia Senate Judiciary committee hearing that Dominion technical experts had “operated remotely” on her team’s ballot marking instruments and poll pads after the poll workers had some technical problems.

But a Dominion representative has publicly stated that Dominion workers could not have done that since the election machines are not connected to the Internet. Yet Voyles described to the committee how she and her team were able to obtain remote technical assistance from Dominion just as one would do for their phone or computer: “The best way I can explain it to you, when something happens with my phone — I have an iPhone — or something happens with my Apple computer where I need additional assistance with that, I call up Apple, and I say this is what’s happening. And they say do I have permission to take over your computer, and of course I give them the permission to do that because I want them fixed. That’s the exact same thing. I had to give them permission to take over my poll pad so that they could reprogram it.”

So who do you believe, a veteran poll worker who is testifying under oath or a public relations employee who denies what the poll worker experienced was impossible? Her testimony can be viewed in the following video:


129) Red Right Times - We have already approached the long shot possibility that the Chinese Communist government had a dastardly hand in the voting irregularities in that they financed the parent company of Dominion Voting Systems. But another video has arisen that purports to show American ballots being printed in China. Not saying this is true, not saying this is legit, but it is a fragment of information to be put aside in case other Chinese developments happen:


130) David Harris Jr. - Apparently Federal agents raided a residential home in Arizona a couple of days after election day. Their target was a man suspected of stealing voting information by hacking into voting computers. 

The agents confiscated 8 hard drives, 3 computers and a bag of USB memory sticks. They were seeking evidence that Elliot Kerwin committed a cyber attack and stolen voter data.

This is interesting since Arizona is one of a handful of states that have suffered through a series of suspicious and possibly illegal voting instances. Could this raid almost immediately after the election be related to the irregularities or did the alleged hack have nothing to do with the election itself or election results?

According to the search warrant, agents were specifically looking for:
  1. Login credentials and accounts.
  2. Voter registration records and information, including protected voters’ information.
  3. The transfer, sharing or dissemination of voter registration records and information, including protected voters’ information.
  4. Unauthorized access to the office’s website and computer systems.
  5. Attempts or threats to damage computer systems.
A lot of unanswered questions, a lot of suspicion regarding the stealing of an election. And even if his alleged hacking objective had nothing to do with voting fraud, it possibly indicates how insecure the voting processes are in Arizona.

131) Freedom Journalist - The Gateway Pundit did an interesting analysis using official Michigan government voting data and came up with a miraculous finding:
  • 566,958 people in Wayne County, Michigan voted via the mail in the Presidential election.
  • Remember that Wayne County has been the scene of fake ballots being delivered in the early morning hours after Election Day, poll watchers being blocked from observing the vote counting process, and whistle blowers discussing the illegal voting processes they observed.
  • The Gateway Pundit took those official, published lists of mail-in voters, a list that included voters’ names, home address and their birth date. and ran it against a list of dead people they purchased from the Lorton Services company.
  • Their list comparison showed that 2,060 dead people in just one Michigan county had submitted a mail-in/absentee ballot for the election.
Total incompetence of Michigan voting officials who did not try to keep their voting rolls clear of dead voters or a systematic approach to corrupt and influence the election? In either case, it calls into question of how fouled up the Michigan voting process was.

132) Washington Times - Democracy Institute Director, Patrick Basham, conclude from his extensive statistical analysis that a series of “statistically implausible” events connected to the election regarding Biden’s state by state voting results make his election win highly unlikely:
  • According to Mr. Basham: “Everything suddenly went very strange in the middle of the night,” Mr. Basham said regarding President Trump’s performance, which up until then was tracking with “a dozen or more of these [non-polling] metrics … [that] have a 100% accuracy rate in terms of predicting the winner of the presidential election.”
  • For example, Biden under performed along those metrics everywhere in the country except where he suspiciously over performed in select counties and states that were strategic to winning the election: “That could happen. It’s just very, very unusual. And if this was an exceptional election as some people assert, and that’s why the numbers seems strange, then you would expect it to be — [to] have a uniformity to that exceptionalism. So Joe Biden would have increased his support not just in key precincts in key cities in key swing states and nowhere else, but he would have had a sort of uniform victory. He was the challenger. … And yet, he has done very poorly in most of the country except where it absolutely mattered.”
  • The metric he examined and which had been infallible in previous elections included [party registration trends, individual donation levels, voter enthusiasm, polls, Google Searches, and other measure: “So if we are to accept that Biden won against the trend of all these non-polling metrics, it not only means that one of these metrics was inaccurate this time for the first time ever, it means that each one of these metrics was wrong for the first time and at the same time as all of the others.” [my bold face emphasis.]
  • One of the anomalies was that ballot rejection rates went from double-digits in the primaries to “less than 1 percent, often very close to zero” on Election Day but only in certain strategic precincts.
Again, Biden could have won honestly and all of these voting irregularities, though statistically improbable, could have miraculously come together to give him the win. But let’s face it, the realities of ballots secretly getting delivered in the middle of the night, voting machines taking Trump votes and switching them to Biden votes, suitcases of ballots being counted after the poll watchers were sent home, whistle blowers coming forward all over the country, etc., etc., etc., certainly line up more his victory being statistically impossible than a legal and legit victory.

These are the next 11 (of 132) instances of voting fraud so far that have been alleged and reported that we have included in this summary set of posts. Again, some may not be true. But it is highly unlikely that all of them are empty, sour grapes of the losing side. The corruption is too wide, too consistent, too focused, and too overwhelming, as previous posts have shown. 

And if true, many bad people have corrupted and damaged a fundamental right of freedom, the ability to have their vote counted and counted equally with other legally cast votes. Anything short of this high standard is wrong, dangerous, and treasonous. More to come.

Note: So far we have discussed only 132 instances of shaky voting procedures and, as we discussed previously, we are sitting on close to 200 cases of alleged and probable fraud, we just have not gotten to these other instances yet.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

https://www.amazon.com/Love-My-Country-Loathe-Government/dp/1604942789/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=love+my+country%2C+loathe+my+government&qid=1607716020&sr=8-1

Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)