November, 2017, I Am A Global Warming Doubter and A Believer In Science: Record Low Temps Possible, Brainwashing in California, and 400 Reasons NOT to Believe the Global Warming Myth

Every month we have enough material to return to a continuing theme in this blog, namely that “I am a global warming doubter AND a believer in science.” This became of interest because of people like Al Gore who fanatically and verbosely claimed that you had to be an idiot to not believe in manmade global warming. It has been my life belief that anyone that is that loud and that obnoxious is hiding something, that rather than argue facts and reality it is better to beat down and insult anyone who disagrees.

As we have dove into the whole issue of manmade global warming, or its new rebranded title of climate change, we found that Al Gore and people like him were guilty of a number of things:

• Ignoring science and realities that did not support their opinions and positions.
• Rather than have an adult conversation about climate, these types of advocates like Gore sank to the level of insulting those who dared look at ALL science by calling them a variety of names including racists, homophobes, terrorists, flat earth believers, and other slanderous names.
• Continuing to insist that politicians step up their intrusions into our lives with higher taxes, more regulations, and more control of our freedoms and standards of living based on a shaky theory at best.

To see the past posts and the multitude of evidence that we have compiled that showed it is perfectly okay to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, enter the phrase "global warming doubter” in the search box above or go through the monthly historical posts listed on the right side of this page.

Thus, let’s see the latest facts and science that prove you can be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, regardless of what Al Gore proclaims.

1) The proper use of science and the scientific method is to look at all possible data and information, look at these sources of information from a wide variety of angles, and then put together a logical hypotheses of reality that encompasses all possible variations and possibilities. The scientist is really a detective, sifting through potential clues, evaluating their merit, and finding an overarching connection between them to form a correct view of reality.

That is unless you live in California. According to the governor of California, if your view of manmade global warming does not agree with his, based on research and scientific reviews that you have come across, than you need to be brainwashed to ignore any piece of science and research that does not support the governor’s view, i.e. manmade global warming is killing the planet. That is apparently how science works in the head of current California governor, Jerry brown.

According to reporting from the Sacramento Bee newspaper, Brown was recently speaking at an event organized by the Vatican’s Pontifical Academy of Sciences when he opined: “The problem … is us. It’s our whole way of life. It’s our comfort … It’s the greed. It’s the indulgence. It’s the pattern. And it’s the inertia….At the highest circles, people still don’t get it,” he said. “It’s not just a light rinse” that’s required. “We need a total, I might say ‘brainwashing. We need to wash our brains out and see a very different kind of world.”

Of course, if you disagree with someone and who does not immediately call for that person to be brainwashed? The hell with science, the hell with reason, the hell with respecting the right of someone to hold a contrary position, let’s just brainwash them. This is the kind of dangerous nonsense that exists within the American political class today.

2) The Rightwise website recently reported on how “Global Warming Advocates Face Record Low Temps,” based on a recent Weather Channel forecast: “This is an important topic of discussion today because just recently the weather channel has informed the public that the country in many parts will be facing below-freezing weather conditions that could break records. The fact that we are getting weather this cold disrupts the global warming argument completely. Arguments for global warming are hard to corroborate when the temperatures are getting this low. The Weather Channel just made the following report, “An arctic blast will slide across parts of the Midwest and Northeast into the weekend,” stated the forecasting service. “Many cities in the Midwest and Northeast will see their coldest temperatures so far this season. Daily record lows could be threatened in some cities.””

"Daily record lows" does not seem like a warming trend.

3) The Tea Party Journal website recently updated some research they had conducted earlier in the year relative to global warming having not risen much at all over the past two decades or so:

• Earlier in the year, the Journal had identified 58 scientific research papers that were published in early 2017 and which all concluded that global warming, manmade or other, had not increased substantially for a long time.
• Since that early 2017 count the number of published research papers is now up to 400, all of which cast doubts on the myth of manmade global warming.
• In general, the hundreds of research papers concluded that: “Modern temperatures, sea levels, and extreme weather events are neither unusual nor unprecedented. Many regions of the Earth are cooler now than they have been for most of the last 10,000 years.”
• Many of the studies attributed climate change to natural influences including the sun (106 papers), cloud cover variations, oceanic atmospheric oscillations (37 papers), and other sources, concluding that any climate changes due to mankind would be difficult or impossible to even detect.
• Much of the research also concluded that advocating for renewable energy sources are often expensive, ineffective, and sometimes detrimental to the environment.
• At the same time, the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere, regardless of its source, has resulted in a greener planet and increased crop yields, helping to reduce famine and starvation.

Wow, 400 scientific efforts and research all concluding that man made global warming is either non-existent or impossible to detect, given the mighty forces of nature that have been driving the Earth's climate for millions of years. Below are some summary of results from some of the research papers: 

Li et al., 2017: “It has been widely suggested from both climate modeling and observation data that solar activity plays a key role in driving late Holocene climatic fluctuations by triggering global temperature variability and atmospheric dynamical circulation."

Yndestad and Solheim, 2017: “Periods with few sunspots are associated with low solar activity and cold climate periods. Periods with many sunspots are associated with high solar activity and warm climate periods.”

Tejedor et al., 2017: “The main driver of the large-scale character of the warm and cold episodes may be changes in the solar activity.”

Belolipetsky et al., 2017: “It is well known that most short term global temperature variability is due to the well-defined ENSO natural oscillation (e.g. El Nino, La Nina)”

Park et al., 2017: “According to our results, the central Mexican climate has been predominantly controlled by the combined influence of the 20-year Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and the 70-year Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO).”

Lim et al., 2017: “Our study demonstrated that flood frequency and climate changes at centennial-to-millennial time scales in South Korea have been coupled mainly with ENSO activity.”

Conroy et al., 2017: “20th century precipitation variability in southern Tibet falls within the range of natural variability in the last 4100 yr, and does not show a clear trend of increasing precipitation as projected by models.”

Verdon-Kidd et al., 2017: “Overall, the inter-annual and inter-decadal variability of rainfall and runoff observed in the modern record (Coefficient of Variation (CV) of 22% for rainfall, 42% for runoff) is similar to the variability experienced over the last 500 years (CV of 21% for rainfall and 36% for runoff).”

Viterito, 2017: “This yields a coefficient of determination of .662, indicating that HGFA [high geothermal flux area, i.e. volcanoes] seismicity accounts for roughly two-thirds of the variation in global temperatures since 1979.”

Huhtemaa and Helama, 2017: “[M]ore than half of the agricultural crises in the study region can be associated with cooling caused by volcanism.”

Blaauw, 2017: “This paper demonstrates that global warming can be explained without recourse to the greenhouse theory.”

Munshi, 2017: “…No evidence is found that changes in atmospheric CO2 are related to fossil fuel emissions at an annual time scale.”

Reinhart, 2017: “Our results permit to conclude that CO2 is a very weak greenhouse gas and cannot be accepted as the main driver of climate change.”

Blackall, 2017: “The science publication Nature Climate Change this year published a study demonstrating Earth this century warmed substantially less than computer-generated climate models predict. Unfortunately for public knowledge, such findings don’t appear in the news.”

Rosenblum and Eisenman, 2017: “Observations indicate that the Arctic sea ice cover is rapidly retreating while the Antarctic sea ice cover is steadily expanding. State-of-the-art climate models, by contrast, typically simulate a moderate decrease in both the Arctic and Antarctic sea ice covers.”

Janković and Shultz, 2017: “[A] preindustrial climate may remain a policy goal, but it is unachievable in reality.”

Heard et al., 2017: “While many modelled scenarios have been published claiming to show that a 100% renewable electricity system is achievable, there is no empirical or historical evidence that demonstrates that such systems are in fact feasible.”

Qiao et al., 2017: “BEVs [Battery Electric Vehicles] are designed to obtain more environmental benefits, but the energy consumption and GHG emissions of BEV production are much larger than those of ICEV [Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles] production in China.”

Frick et al., 2017: “Our results suggest that wind energy development may pose a substantial threat to migratory bats in North America.”

The Journal article points out that if you include the 500 papers in 2016 that pooh poohed the manmade global warming theory, then Jerry Brown certainly has a lot of brainwashing to do, given that 900 scientific papers hold a directly opposite point of view.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:

Term Limits Now: http://www.howmuchworsecoulditget.com
http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org
http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w

July 2014, I Am A Global Warming Doubter and A Beliver In Science, Update, Part 2

Starting yesterday, we are going to spend a few days going over a continuing theme in this blog, “I am a global warming doubter and a believer in science.” The justification for this series was the fact that I just got fed up being yelled at and called a whole slew of not nice names by people like Al Gore simply because I choose to look at the entire spectrum of global warming, and its rebranded them of climate change, rather than the rantings and ravings of people like Gore that look only at the science that supports their viewpoint and not at all science, both pro and con.

Rather than try to have an adult conversation, people like Al Gore have caused us doubters racists, homophobes, science illiterates, etc. We maintain that if you look at ALL of the climate science, you will see the fallacy and emptiness of Gore-like viewpoints and rantings. To do anything else would not be scientific, it would be scientific heresy.

To view the dozens of posts we have done in the past where we quote famous and credible scientists, cite credible and independent reports, and use logic to show that the global warming scare and climate change mania is probably just that, scare tactics and mania, put the following phrase, “I am a global warming doubter” in the search box above to get a complete list of previous related posts. If you are an Al Gore fan, a dare you to read all of the science put forth in these posts before you commence with the name calling again.

Let’s see what new science evidence has come about since our last update to the theme, I am a global warming doubter and a believer in science.”

1) Let’s follow up on a topic we discussed briefly yesterday, namely that the Antarctic ice cap recently set a record for having the largest size and coverage in the known history of the cap. Does not seem to jive with any global warming or climate change theory that Al Gore has ever spewed forth since measurements began in 1979, namely that ice caps are getting larger.

This record was recently discussed on the website: 

www.Wattsupwiththat.com

A July 29, 2014 article on that website by Harold Ambler cited tracking data and records from the university of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s “the Cryosphere Today. Their data und that in late June, 2014, sea ice surrounding had hit a new all-time record high for real coverage.

The new record anomaly, is 2.074 million square. According to the article, during the past 18 months, global sea ice "has seen its most robust 18-month period of the last 13 years, maintaining, on average, a positive anomaly for an 18-month period for the first time since 2001." Ambler also contends that according to tracking data and research South Pole's temperature has been dropping over the past 40 years. Again, realities that seem to be in conflict with anything al Gore has promised would happen as a result of mankind’s activities.

A graph over time of South Pole ice coverage since 1979 is listed here:








2) Let’s move from the South Pole to the Great Lakes to see how another global warming prediction is also not coming true. The following details were laid out in a June 30, 2014 article in the New York Times by Tom Blumer:

• According to the Blumer article a recent assertion that was printed at the National Wildlife Federation warned readers, in a section entitled "Threats from Global Warming," that "Lake Erie water levels, already below average, could drop 4-5 feet by the end of this century, significantly altering shoreline habitat." 
• A recent Huffington Post Canada Business article similarly asserted as a result of climate change that "the (Great Lakes) basin has experienced the longest extended period of lower water levels since the U.S. and Canada began tracking levels in 1918." 
• Julie Bosman, also recently writing for the New York Times. reported that: "The International Joint Commission, a group with members from the United States and Canada that advises on water resources, completed a five-year study in April 2013 concluding that water levels in the lakes were likely to drop even farther, in part because of the lack of precipitation in recent years brought on by climate change."
• These are the theories but what is turning out to be a reality is that according to Blumer, “after reaching historic lows in 2013, water levels in the Great Lakes are now abruptly on the rise, a development that has startled scientists and thrilled just about everybody with a stake in the waterfront, including owners of beach houses, retailers in tourist areas and dockmasters who run marinas on the lakeshore.”
• Lakes Michigan, Huron and Superior are at least a foot higher than they were a year ago, and they are expected to rise three more inches by the end of the summer. 
• Lake Ontario and Lake Erie are seven to nine inches higher than a year ago.
• Wow, another premise of global warming and climate change bites the dust in the face of a changing reality. Could it be that the lowering of the lakes over recent years was just part of a natural cycle of weather and climate that has nothing to do with Al Gore and his theories?
• The Blumer article goes on to quote an American who grew up near Lake Huron and who has memories of the same low Great Lake water level phenomenon when he was a kid, long before global warming or climate change should have been a factor.

So let’s review: in the mid-1970s we were told that a new ice age was imminent and that we had to take immediate action to prevent something that never happened. Then we were told that the earth was warming because of mankind’s actions and that we had to take immediate action to prevent a catastrophe but the earth naturally stopped warming 18 years ago. Then we were told that the water levels in the Great Lakes were dropping and would continue dropping because of global warming and climate change but now the waters are rising despite doing nothing about global warming and climate change.

Are we seeing a pattern here? Panic over nothing while debasing those that are getting a little tired of the Chicken Little behavior and the slander that comes with it.

3) Speaking of slander, the President recently continued that mode of attack on those that doubt global warming but believe in science when speaking at the University of California at Irvine. He called us “radical fringe” despite the proof of doubt we have been publishing from credible and nonpartisan sources over the past few years. 

But we probably should expect anything of higher quality of integrity from this President. Rather than sit down and discuss, analyze, compromise, test, etc. He would rather attack those that dare to disagree with him, whether it is on this topic or any other issue. 

The CERN Institute in Europe who dispelled the whole global warming theory three years ago is not the radical fringe. 

The following story about the gentleman who founded the Weather channel is not the radical fringe. 

The dozens, if no hundreds, of other scientists that we have discussed in this series of posts is not the radical fringe.

The Petition Project, which so far has gathered the signatures of 31,487 scientists, found that there is “no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate” is not the radical fringe.

But rather than engage them to come up with a solution that is based on all of the climate science not just the science he wants to believe, the President would rather ridicule and debase those that want to stay true to the scientific method of research and analysis.

Additionally, consider this: we have a political class and Federal government that cannot operate a postal system at a profit, cannot operate a train system at a profit (AMTRAK), cannot stop criminal elements from ripping off over a $100 billions a year from Federal welfare programs, cannot put up a simple and workable website at a reason cost for Obama Care, and fails at just about everything else it is involved in. Do we really think that these same politicians and bureaucrats would be able to fix Mother Nature in a timely, effective and efficient manner? Highly, highly doubtful. If you disagree, than I would classify you as a member of the radical fringe.

4) John Coleman was the founder of the Weather Channel. Thus, he is obviously more qualified to talk about climate than Al Gore, Barack Obama, or any other politician in Washington. It is his learned opinion that global warming and its new cousin climate change are shams and not based on valid scientific analysis and research.

Rather than have me try to explain his reasoning, I refer you to the following video at:

http://theblacksphere.net/2014/7/Video-Weather-Channel-Founder-Destroys-Climate-Change-Alarmists?utm_content=buffer468f3&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

At that site and video he will lay out his feelings and experiences and more amazingly, his passion for a healthy and vibrant earth. You can tell from his speaking that he wants to do the right thing for Mother nature but concludes, based on his experience and education, that what Al Gore et al want to do is not the right course of action.

5) One more quickie for today. We will wrap up this update on the series, “I am a global warming doubter and a believer in science” tomorrow. One of the more persistent fallacies that global warming advocate like Gore and Obama like to throw out goes something like: “97% of climate scientists agree that mankind’s activities are having a negative affect on global warming/climate change.” 

Wow, sounds impressive, sounds authoritative. 97% is an overwhelming consensus, it is us doubters that must be wrong. Except for the fact that the 97% estimate is probably a farce and a false number. It has been picked up in the mainstream media so often as a fact and has been spouted long and hard that would want to prove mankind’s impact on climate that many non-doubters accept it as reality.

In order to find out what the truth is, whether the 97% gospel is the reality of the debate today, the Friends of Science did an extensive, and I mean extensive review of the literature and research just to determine if 97% was accurate. Needles to say, they found it to be a wrong number, a public relations manufactured number for he global warming movement. Rther than me try to explaining their detailed analysis and multiple approaches to the question, please reference their paper at:

http://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/97_Consensus_Myth.pdf

Let’s call it a day and follow up tomorrow with more global warming/climate change doubts. Today we learned that:

• The South Pole ice cap recently hit a record size despite what global warming advocates told us to expect.
• The water levels in all Great Lakes are rising despite what global warming advocates told us to expect.
• Tens of thousands of real scientists looking at real data have their doubts about manmade global warming/climate change despite what global warming advocates told us to expect.
• The founder of the Weather Channel is also a global warming doubter.
• The widespread 97% global warming scientist number is a fallacy despite what global warming advocates told us to expect.

More to follow tomorrow.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:

Term Limits Now: http://www.howmuchworsecoulditget.com
http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.robertringer.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w

March, 2014 - I Am A Global Warming Doubter And A Believer In Science, Part 1

On a regular basis we revisit a recurring theme in this blog, “I am a global warming doubter and a believer in science.” The genesis for this series was that I just got tired of people like Al Gore screaming and insulting people who may have a different take than theirs when it comes to global warming. That led to in-depth reviews and searches of scientific efforts and analyses to see if Al was right, namely that ALL scientists supported his theory of man made global warming.

Well, it did not take long to find that not ALL scientists believed in global warming., In fact, we found numerous SCIENTIFIC papers and analyses that were the polar opposite of Gore’s obnoxious rantings and proceeded to compile and discuss them on a regular basis. The last five part review started at the following link:

http://loathemygovernment.blogspot.com/2013/11/i-am-global-warming-doubter-and.html

Also at that post you can directly access all of the previous posts where we show quite convincingly that Al may not even be close to being right on global warming, or its rebranded marketing name, climate change.

General findings from those previous discussion include the following facts and analyses:

• The average temperatures around the world, according to government tracking, has been flat for about fifteen years now.
• The ice caps have been growing in size over the past few years.
• All of the climate change forecasting models that global warming advocates have produced have severely overestimated the anticipated increase in temperatures over the years, indicating that their models and assumptions are seriously flawed.
• Different groups of global warming believing scientists were caught secretly discussing how to manipulate and hide their raw experimental data in their studies since it was not supporting their hypotheses and models of global warming.
• Some scientists are actually forecasting a global cooling period in the near future, the exact opposite of what Al Gore is yelling about.
• Depending on what and how carbon emissions are measured, the U.S. has reduced its carbon footprint over the past decade or so by anywhere from 10-20%, without massive government intervention, a reduction that dwarfs the reduction in carbon emissions of the rest of the world.
• Even if the U.S. was to take drastic steps to reduce its carbon footprint, it would have virtually no impact on global warming, assuming it exists, since the carbon footprint of China, India, and other parts of the world is growing at a much faster rate, making any domestic only global warming action a hardship on Americans which would have minimal impact on the global environment.
• The preeminent physic establishment in the world, the CERN Institute, showed a number of years ago via lab experiments that solar activity was the major factor in global warming historically, not man made activities.
• In case global warming is actually a reality, we provided a strategy that could be deployed to keep everyone happy with a minimal cost and disruption to Americans’ lives and financial well being.

Since we published that last post, additional global warming news has occurred, news that we will review below:

1) We have pointed out this presentation before but every discussion about global warming should start out with this excellent analysis by physicist Gordon Fulks. Mr. Fulks meticulously goes through a mountain of data to prove that global warming, based on scientific research, is most likely be a myth. He uses real data and cites quotes from other scientists who are in agreement with his conclusions. A video of him presenting his findings and conclusions and an associated slide show of his presentation can be accessed at:

http://epaabuse.com/5051/news/physicist-exposes-global-warming-hoax/

2) Early December, 2013 marked the five year anniversary of Al Gore making the following statement: 

“Some of the models suggest that there is a 75 percent chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during some of the summer months, could be completely ice-free within the next five to seven years.” 

Five years later, December 2013, we are faced with the following realities:

• Both ice caps have been growing, not shrinking over the past few years.
• A global warming advocate Chris Turney, a professor of climate change at Australia’s University of New South Wales, and his expedition that went up to South Pole late last year and got stuck when their ship was caught in ice, requiring extension rescue efforts to save the people from their iced in ship.
• According to the Gateway Pundit website, which was discussing the Al Gore disappearing North Pole ice cap forecast on the five year anniversary, it snowed in Cairo exactly on the five year anniversary day, the first time that had happened it 100 years.
• Shortly after the anniversary of his disappearing North Pole ice cap forecast, the northern part of the United States was launched into a prolonged and record setting wave of frigid temperatures nicknamed the Polar Vortex which had swung down form the still ice laden North Pole.

The video of Al Gore making what turns out to be a tremendously incorrect forecast can be viewed at:

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/12/five-years-ago-today-al-gore-predicted-the-north-pole-will-be-ice-free-in-5-years/#!

Another global warming forecast that turned to to be so wrong.

3) Here is another video clip of interest from someone who obviously believes in the scientific method but who also is a global warming doubter:

http://epaabuse.com/14258/videos/founder-weather-channel-sticks-al-gore/

This interview of a gentleman named John Coleman touches on many of the topics we have already discussed. The thing that makes Mr. Coleman important is that he is the founder of the Weather Channel so it is probably a safe assumption that he knows something about the weather and climate. The topics he touches on include the following:

• The North Pole is reversing its shrinkage and has grown considerably over the past few years.
• The average earth temperature has not increased in sixteen years.
• He cites scientific, peer reviewed research showing that we may be on the cusp of a new ice age.
• Global warming hysteria may actually be causing the loss of life around the world as government’s try to reduce carbon emissions by diluting gas with corn based ethanol, a move that raises the price of food around the world and causes the level and intensity of starvation to rise without having much of a net effect, if any, on the environment.

Mr. Coleman presents a rational, well presented anti-global warming case based on science and facts.

4) The Personal Liberty Digest on January 7, 2014 had an interesting picture that was reputedly taken in January, 1912, long before anyone on any side of the global warming argument state that temps were rising do to mankind’s behavior.

The picture was of Commonwealth Bay, Antarctica. It was taken in 1912 and as you can see, the bay is free of ice and you actually can see some non-snow covered terrain in the background.

This is apparently the same area where the recent global warming expedition’s ship that we discussed above, the Akademik Shokalskiy, and where it got stuck, dead in the water, where it got ensnared by ice. The article containing this picture contends that the whole continent’s ice has increased to its highest level in 35 years.

5) In late 2013, the Obama administration issued an executive order to better prepare the country for global warming impacts, including issuing the following warning:

“The impacts of climate change — including an increase in prolonged periods of excessively high temperatures, more heavy downpours, an increase in wildfires, more severe droughts, permafrost thawing, ocean acidification, and sea-level rise — are already affecting communities, natural resources, ecosystems, economies, and public health across the Nation. These impacts are often most significant for communities that already face economic or health-related challenges, and for species and habitats that are already facing other pressures…. Managing these risks requires deliberate preparation, close cooperation, and coordinated planning by the Federal Government, as well as by stakeholders, to facilitate Federal, State, local, tribal, private-sector, and nonprofit-sector efforts to improve climate preparedness and resilience; help safeguard our economy, infrastructure, environment, and natural resources; and provide for the continuity of executive department and agency operations, services, and programs.”

However, just like many other President Obama assertions, e.g. “if you like your insurance plan you can keep your insurance plan, “if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor,” and many other deceptions or lies, this executive order relies on a false premise: we are not witnessing “an increase in prolonged periods of excessively high temperatures.” Earth temperatures have not increased at all for at least the past fifteen years. 

This makes the premise and basis for this executive order totally bogus. But bogus is something we have learned to accept from this administration.

That will do it for today. We will finish our global warming doubter update series over the next few days. Our strategy and plan that should be implemented that makes humankind a winner whether or not global warming is a myth or reality can be accessed at:

http://loathemygovernment.blogspot.com/2012/06/retro-20-united-states-of-purple.html

In other words, there is a plan to cover all of the bases with minimal impacts on Americans, even if it does come from global warming doubters.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:

Term Limits Now: http://www.howmuchworsecoulditget.com
http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.robertringer.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w