As we have dove into the whole issue of manmade global warming, or its new rebranded title of climate change, we found that Al Gore and people like him were guilty of a number of things:
- Ignoring science and realities that did not support their opinions and positions.
- Rather than have an adult conversation about climate, these types of advocates like Gore sank to the level of insulting those who dared look at ALL science by calling them a variety of names including racists, homophobes, terrorists, flat earth believers, and other slanderous names.
- Continuing to insist that politicians step up their intrusions into our lives with higher taxes, more regulations, and more control on our freedoms and standards of living based on a shaky theory at best.
Thus, let’s see the latest facts and science that prove you can be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, regardless of what Al Gore proclaims.
1) Global warming/climate change advocates blame a lot of different things for their fears. Beavers build too many dams which causes global warming. Front lawns in front of our homes cause global warming; Leaky gas stoves in our kitchens cause global warming.
And now the fatalistic global warming advocates have brought back that old myth and fear: overpopulation:
- In an interview on CBS News recently, Canadian teenager Emma Lim said that she is not going to have any children since more babies and more people are causing this “climate crisis.”
- Lim and a friend run a website that advocates for not having any more babies which, in their minds, would save the Earth.
- Specifically: “… even though I want to have children more than almost anything, what kind of mother would I be if I brought a baby into a world where I couldn’t make sure they were safe?”
- Over 900 people have signed up on the website to forego having children.
Second, to reiterate, all global warming/climate change forecasts have been so wrong in so many ways. Why would anyone deny themselves at least the option to have kids when there is still no solid evidence that humanity is the driver of climate change, something that has happened long before mankind had so many members.
2) We have often been told that 97% of all climate scientists support the theory that humanity’s carbon footprint is causing drastic rises in the Earth’s temperature. We have discussed the idiocy of this figure many times and how corrupt it is. And recently a large group of scientists got together to show how incorrect that 97% number is:
- 500 climate scientists recently signed and sent a petition to the United Nations and demanded an “open, honest, and transparent” debate on climate change.
- As you know from this blog, the United Nations has been a big advocate for the global warming theory in an attempt to control more of our freedoms and rights.
- Also, we now know that every United Nations global warming forecast over the past few decades has been wrong and came nowhere close to correctly forecasting climate changes over time.
- These scientists’ “European Climate Declaration” contends that there is no climate crisis, the end of the world is not near, and the entire notion has been politicized.
- As always with the biased mainstream media, who all support the global warming/climate change myth, there was no coverage of this major climate news, 500 scientists telling the UN to respect science more than they respect politics: “Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific,” the European Climate Declaration reportedly states. “Scientists should openly address the uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming.”
- This effort was in line with another effort to bring sanity to the whole climate change discussion, led by Fred Singer, founder of the Science and Environmental Policy Project: “I would like to see the public look upon global warming as just another scientific controversy and oppose any public policies until the major issues are settled, such as the cause. If mostly natural, as NIPCC concludes, then the public policies currently discussed are pointless, hugely expensive, and wasteful of resources that could better be applied to real societal problems.”
- The European Climate Declaration also contends that, “There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts, and such like natural disasters, or making them more frequent. There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.”
- In fact, these scientists went even further than just challenging the global warming/climate change view, they actually contend that the efforts to mitigate carbon footprints actually damage the environment: “However, CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly. For instance, wind turbines kill birds and bats, and palm-oil plantations destroy the biodiversity of the rainforests.”
- In addition, forest lands are being levelled and replaced with solar panels as are farms when farmers realize that they can make more money renting their land out for solar panels than actually using the land to farm.
- In summary: “Therefore, it is cruel as well as imprudent to advocate the squandering of trillions on the basis of results from such immature models. We urge you to follow a climate policy based on sound science, realistic economics, and genuine concern for those harmed by costly but unnecessary attempts at mitigation.”
3) 500 scientists present a coherent logical argument that global warming/climate change is a myth and the mainstream media ignores their expertise and viewpoint. Climate advocates hysterically stage marches around the country and the mainstream is all over the story that has no scientific basis.
But it is tough to take these advocates seriously given the mess they left behind after their protests. According to the New York Post: “Their love for the Earth is so real, they couldn’t even use a trash can, tweeted a disgusted @chelsea_elisa, along with a photo of an overflowing trash can in Manhattan, after tens of thousands of marchers invaded the city on fleets of smog-producing buses.”
David Kreutzer of the Heritage Foundation had a similar observation: “The hypocrisy varies from person to person. The ones that fly in on private jets [e.g. Leo DiCaprio and Mark Ruffalo] are the most hypocritical.”
So these folks want to save the Earth but leave piles of garbage, used paper, and plastic containers and...gasp...plastic straws strewn all over the ground. Kind of takes away from their message.
Another set of reasons why it is perfectly logical to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science: the hypocrisy of the believers, the idiocy of dumping gas stoves, and the reality that 500 scientists are on my side.
Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:
It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.
Please visit the following sites for freedom:
http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org
http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w
No comments:
Post a Comment