Wednesday, April 1, 2026

The Race To Bankruptcy Court: New Jersey Has Structural Budget Problems, Money Magazine's Most Expensive States, and Even CNN Sees Disaster For Blue Cities

 It seems we are in a little bit of a rut in that we seem to be getting overwhelmed with news about our choice for states and major cities that are likely to go bankrupt relatively soon. As always, our top state governments that we think are nearing bankruptcy include New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and California. Our top major cities we think are rapidly approaching bankruptcy include New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco.


Before reviewing the latest news and seeing which state or city is making the best progress towards government bankruptcy, let’s review how these cities and states got themselves into this financial death spiral position to begin with:


  • A government entity keeps expanding its budget, eventually putting pressure on the tax revenue stream it receives.

  • At some point, rather than cut government spending or make its programs more efficient financially, the politicians in charge raise taxes to meet the ever growing government expenditures.

  • The raising of taxes causes some residents and businesses to leave the city or state for less tax burdensome areas, reducing the tax base and reducing the revenue stream.

  • Rather than cut expenses and become more efficient to match the reduced tax revenue stream, politicians in the above cities or states raise the tax burden even more.

  • This causes more residents and businesses to flee the city or state, further reducing the tax base and tax revenue stream.

  • At some point politicians panic and raise taxes more and start cutting vital government services (e.g. police, fire, education) in order to try and balance government spending against the shrinking tax base and revenue stream.

  • The reduction in quality of government services in particular and quality of life in general drives more residents and businesses out of the area.

  • Eventually, the expenses, costs and financial liabilities outstrip the reduced tax stream and bankruptcy occurs.


Okay that’s the process, now lets specifically check the progress on how some of the above listed government entities are making to achieve this bankruptcy goal  against this process:


1)Do not believe that states and cities are approaching bankruptcy? Consider the opinion of a CNN personality:


  • In a recent speech, CNN’s Fareed Zakaria put forth the proposition that certain liberal cities across the country have become prime examples of high taxes, runaway spending, inefficient government services, and quality of life issues.

  • His candidates for getting into deep financial trouble include New York City, Los Angeles, and Chicago, some of the same cities we have proposed are in a financial death spiral.

  • Specifically: “New York is really a prime example of a problem Democrats seem unwilling to confront. Blue cities are out of control, promising more, spending more, delivering less, and pushing off the fiscal problems to some future day.”

  • As an example, he pointed out that the city’s budget amount for rental assistance subsidies went from $263 million in 2020 to $1.34 billion in 2025, a five fold increase in five short years.

  • Los Angeles did not escape from his wrath since he pointed out that the city has spent billions of dollars on their massive homelessness problem and yet the  city’s homeless  population has grown 70% between 2015 and  2024.

  • He then moved to another favorite city of ours to go bankrupt, Chicago, where he pointed out that the city is run by a horribly unpopular mayor and the city's massive pension burden will bankrupt the city “sooner or later.”

  • His overall point is that the politicians operating these cities somehow constantly raise their city government budgets which require higher taxation but never resolve any problems which constantly grow despite  higher spending on  those problems.


Thus, the tax burden  goes up, the quality of city life goes down and the migration of residents and businesses out of these cities accelerates which means they take their taxable  income and wealth with them.


2)As we reviewed above, city and  state politicians always think that raising taxes will resolve everything. Rather than make government programs more efficient or downsize them, they allow the bloated government bureaucracies to  continue along with no changes and instead they raise taxes. As taxes get higher and  higher, residents and businesses flee to less burdensome locales.


Given that it is our opinion that New York,  New Jersey, California and Illinois are the states most likely to go bankrupt, a recent article by Money magazine showed why we might be on the money with those predictions:


  • Money magazine analyzed the average tax and living expense burden in each of the 50 states.

  • Not surprisingly New York was named as the fifth most expensive state to live in with high taxes across the board.

  • New Jersey was ranked as the fourth most expensive state to live in with high property and estate taxes.

  • And  not surprisingly, California was seen as the  most expensive state to live in with high  housing costs, high gasoline prices that include high state gas taxes, and high income taxes.

  • The only surprise was that Illinois did not make the  top ten of most expensive states to live in.


More  proof and  evidence of why people are moving out of these expensive  high tax states and why unless the size of government is reduced or made more efficient, these cities and states will continue to see their tax base dwindle and their financial death spiral  accelerate.


3)Speaking  of making government more efficient,  consider a case in  point for one of our candidates to go  bankrupt:


  • Phil Murphy is the  former governor of New Jersey.

  • In eight years he managed to increase  the state government  budget by a whopping 57% without really resolving any  issues facing the state’s taxpayers.

  • When  Murphy came into the office the state government budget was $37.4 billion but when he  left office eight years later the budget was $58.8  billion.

  • The new governor, Mikie Sherrill, recently had to go in front of the state legislature and explain that Murphy left her and the state with a $3 billion structural deficit and that the state government surplus will be gone within two years.

  • The New Jersey Business and Industry Association reported it clearly: Murphy's seven government budgets added a cumulative $5.5 billion in spending above his own initial budget proposals, ie. in underestimate what he needed to spend to keep the state government running.

  • Senate Republican  Michael Testa appears to understand the problem: "We have a $4 billion structural deficit. I don't envy Gov.-elect Sherrill at all. Eventually, we have to stop kicking the can down the road. Someone is going to have to tighten the belt."

  • Pew Charitable Trusts analysis shows that new jersey has the worst long term structural deficit of any state in the union with expected state government tax revenue to  cover only 95.6% of anticipated expanse over the next 15 years,

  • In other words, the bills that are coming due for the state government cannot be  covered with the current tax structure unless other spending is reduced.

  • But as always it seems, Democrats in the  state government never learn, they want to raise taxes on millionaires, a move that has proven catastrophic when other states did the same thing: millionaires move to other less taxing areas and take their taxable income with them.

  • As another example of how the  state government  spending has exploded without a sound financial underpinning: over the past 20 years the state government budget has grown almost 140% while the annual state economic growth has been only 1% annually on  average.


While we have not  talked a lot about New Jersey lately, my home state by the way, as you see from  the above analyses, it has a serious economic and financial situation. And that situation is getting worse: massive government spending that will be hard to  politically reduce, given what voting blocs will be  against any reduction  in  their share of the taxpayer pie. Many of the economically ignorant politicians want to raise taxes on  the wealthy which we have  proven time and  time again that actually reduces the tax stream since millionaires move to  other states. 


That will  do it  for today: New York State and New York City are still our favored candidates to  go bankrupt first but New Jersey, California, and Illinois along with Chicago and Los Angeles are still  worthy race  opponents.


**********************

If you agree that we need to deseat every member of Congress for their lack of success and accomplishment, then please consider going to the following petition link to help the cause:


https://www.change.org/p/deseat-congress-reset-freedom



**********************


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:


Monday, March 30, 2026

March, 2026, Part 4, Political Class Insanity: Maryland Politicians' Fixation On Tampons, A Potential/Likely Ukrainian Money Laundering Scheme. and Yamaha Escapes From California

 We have  spent a lot of time recently talking about which city or state will go bankrupt first. That race to  bankruptcy court seems to be accelerating as politicians in these vulnerable cities and states are starting to realize that their policies and ignorance are causing financial crises across the country.


However, we will step back from that theme for a few days since political class insanity in other areas has continued unabated and needs to  be discussed and ridiculed.


1)We do not often talk about the state of  Maryland from a political class insanity perspective but that is our lead piece of insanity today. But first, consider:


  • Maryland has about 7,000 homeless folks in the state.

  • About 556,000 or 9.1% of the state residents are considered poor.

  • 1,315 state residents died from drug overdoses in 2025.

  • State residents suffer from the 15th highest crime rate in the country.

  • The state government  is facing a  $1.5 billion budget shortfall.


Yes, there are some very important issues and crises facing Maryland residents that involve poverty, crime, and homelessness. But that did not stop state government politicians from  devoting time, resources, and what little brain power they have  on the following ridiculous issue:


  •  A proposed legislation by Democratic Delegate Terri Hill, and  co-sponsored by ten other Democrats, would require EVERY government/public building in the state to stock tampons and feminine hygiene products in  public restrooms.

  • This requirement extends not just to  women’s restrooms but also men’s restrooms.

  • EVERY restroom in every public/government building.

  • Further idiocy is  that the  proposed legislation explicitly makes it clear  that the stocked tampons would have to be  "appropriately  sized tampons,”  whatever that means.

  • When pressed, the sponsors of the legislation could not provide an estimate of  what it would cost or what an appropriate sized tampon is.

  • Republican Delegate, Kathy Szeliga, saw the stupidity of this requirement when she questioned the sponsors of the legislation: "What are appropriately sized tampons?" I've never heard of such a thing. What do you consider appropriate?"

  • Kerr's inane answer: "Just a regular sized tampon in the bathroom."

  • Then why was the language appropriately sized tampons put into  the  legislation?

  • But Szeliga was not done  ripping this idea  apart:  "Even if they determine to shift some of the cost to the consumer, this still creates hundreds-of-thousands of dollars worth of administrative costs to put tampons in men's bathrooms – just for the administrative costs."

  • So the administrative costs would be hundreds of thousands of dollars which does not account for the cost of the actual tampons.

  • But Szeliga was not  done: "Instead of tackling actual problems like out of control spending and other real problems, electric bills that people cannot afford, they pivot to nonsense like putting tampons in men's bathrooms."


Calling this  proposed legislation  nonsense is being kind. The state does not have  enough tax money to  fund  its budget but these folks want to divert taxpayer  money to put tampons in  men’s restrooms. Maryland residents are struggling with high crime, high utility  and gas costs, addiction problems, poverty, and homelessness and yet tampons in men’s rooms apparently are a higher  priority for some of those sitting  in the state government.  True insanity.


2)Recently declassified intelligence documents reveal what has to be one of the most disgusting alleged money laundering schemes of the American political class:


  • During the Biden administration, hundreds of billions of American taxpayer dollars were sent to Ukraine,  one of the  most politically corrupt countries in the world, to help fight back the Russian invasion.

  • We have previously discussed the likely proof that upwards of half of that money never  made it to the intended purposes and was corruptly siphoned off before ever helping to fight back the Russians.

  • If that was not bad enough, in late 2022, U.S. intelligence agencies intercepted messages between Ukrainian officials.

  • Those  messages discussed a scheme to take part of that taxpayer funding that Biden had  sent them to fight the Russians and send it back to the United States to help fund Biden’s reelection campaign.

  • In other words, American taxpayers of all political leanings would be financing the Presidential  campaign expenses of Democrat Joe Biden.

  • Director  Of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, has  opened an investigation into whether the Ukrainian officials ever went through with their plan to  redirect funds back to Biden.

  • According to the released documents:  “The Ukrainian Government and unspecified U.S. Government personnel, through USAID in Kyiv, reportedly developed a plan that would provide hundreds of millions of US taxpayer dollars to fund an infrastructure project for Ukraine that would be used as a cover to send approximately 90% of funds allocated to the DNC to fund Joe Biden’s reelection campaign. They were confident the project would be funded initially, even though at some time in the future the project would be disapproved as unnecessary. At this time, the money would already be allocated and impossible to return or use for a different purpose.”

  • The funds would be funneled back into the Biden campaign using U.S. companies as subcontractors on the bogus infrastructure plan to make the  money laundering even more  difficult to track: “Additionally, contracts would be executed that would be difficult to verify. In this manner, most of the U.S. funding would be diverted to Joe Biden’s election campaign without the ability to track where exactly the funds came from.”

  • Given that Biden was very generous in giving American taxpayer  money to the Ukrainians, it  is  not surprising that a plan was discussed to get Biden four more years in office and continue to receive American tax dollars for their own benefit, personally and for the war effort.


Anyone who has followed the Biden crime family should not be surprised by this alleged and potential money laundering scheme.  Also, previous work by the DOGE folks found that many times U.S.  taxpayer dollars were used to fund NGO projects via USAID all  over the world with some of that money eventually finding its way back to Democratic politicians in his country for their use. Disgusting disregard for taxpaying Americans.


3)A continuing theme in our blog is the  discussion of what city or state will  go  bankrupt first. As these vulnerable  cities and states  constantly raise taxes and business regulation, businesses in these states leave for other states that have lower tax and regulation burdens, taking their taxable  assets with them. Some of those recent discussions include the following posts:


https://loathemygovernment.blogspot.com/2026/03/the-race-to-bankruptcy-court-clueless.html


https://loathemygovernment.blogspot.com/2026/03/the-race-to-bankruptcy-court-hochuls.html


https://loathemygovernment.blogspot.com/2026/03/the-race-to-bankruptcy-seattle-and.html


California is one of those states rapidly heading to bankruptcy court. Many state based  companies have already fled the state in total or moved  major portions of their  companies to other states for better economic and business opportunities: Toyota, Tesla, Chevron, Schwab, Oracle, Twitter/X, Palantir, Public Storage, In-N-Out, Valero,  and thousands of other, smaller businesses.


And that out migration of businesses from the state continue:


  • Yamaha has decided to pull  its headquarters out of California.

  • The company has been in California for almost 50 years.

  • They are moving across the country to Kennesaw, Georgia.

  • As reported by the California Globe:  “Another large business is leaving California. Yamaha says Sayonara to Governor Gavin Newsom after 50 years in the once-Golden State…” and this exodus “is going to hurt Gov. Newsom who has had a lot of success chasing out hundreds to thousands of California businesses or subsidiaries, which fled to business-friendly red states including Jelly Belly, Chevron, X/Twitter, Space X, Oracle, Hewlett Packard, Charles Schwab, and Toyota Motor North America.”

  • According to CBS News: “The company’s headquarters in Cypress, California, had been its home since 1979 after Yamaha acquired the land the year before….ATVs, boat engines, personal watercraft, and other motorized products had already moved its marine business to Kennesaw in 1999 and its motorsports business in 2019.”


How is it possible that California's politicians, and the  voters that continually elect them, do not understand basic economic concepts: a company will maximize its profits and thus,  will  look  for ways to minimize its costs, expenses, taxes, and business overregulation. Every company that leaves the state takes employees and their taxable income with them. And it also reduces overall state economic growth since those exiting residents and businesses do  not spend money on other state companies’ products and services (e.g.  retail stores, pizza shops, movie theaters, etc.), further reducing the state tax base.


Enough insanity for today: more taxable assets leaving California, a possible government/Biden money laundering effort for the ages, and ridiculous Maryland politicians’ priorities.


**********************

If you agree that we need to deseat every member of Congress for their lack of success and accomplishment, then please consider going to the following petition link to help the cause:


https://www.change.org/p/deseat-congress-reset-freedom



**********************


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at: