On January 4, 2012, the Obama administration released the list of names of contributors of Obama’s 2013 inauguration. According to the Sunlight Foundation Reporting Group in 2009 Obama's inauguration planning committee did not accept corporate contributions, restricted personal donations to $50,000 or less and more than a month before the inauguration, published a searchable list of all donors. That list that included who the contributors worked for, where they lived and how much they donated.
In contrast, the 2013 Presidential Inaugural Committee had a dearth of contributors, including only a link at the bottom of its website with a list of only the names of the individuals and corporations that have contributed. The list did not include the amount that was contributed, who they worked for where they lived, etc.
The Sunlight Foundation spokesperson, Keenan Steiner, also reported on the following aspects of the inauguration funding effort:
- There are no limits on how much a company, organization, or person could contribute this time.
- In fact, when the request for funding was sent out in early December, potential contributors were actually encouraged to contribute put to a $1 million if the contributor was a company and $250,000 if the contributor was an individual.
- Mr. Steiner also pointed out that the committee was aware that this was a pretty shady and sleazy fund raising operation since they did not issue a press release or make a splashy announcement, preferring instead of a low key, late Friday, discrete addition to their website.
- The Sunlight Foundation report was able to get their hands on a copy of the email which outlined what contributors would get for their donations, with the magnitude of their access and benefits contingent on how much was contributed.
- For example, an individual contributing $250,000 and a corporation contributing $1 million would be given the “Washington Premium Partner Access.”
- That level of financial support includes two tickets to a “Benefactors Reception” held two or three days before the inauguration, an invitation to an event called “The Finance Committee ‘Road Ahead’ meeting,” two tickets to The Children’s Concert, two tickets to the “Co-Chairs Reception,” four tickets to a candlelight reception at the National Building Museum, at invitation to the VIP reception at prior to this reception, two reserved seats in the bleachers at the inaugural parade and four tickets to the inaugural.
- The Sunlight Foundation reported that current corporate donors include AT&T, Centene Corporation, Genentech, Financial Innovations Inc., Microsoft, Stream Line Circle LLC, and the Whittier Trust Co but as discussed above, Obama’s people did not list how much each company donated.
- Stream Line Circle is operated by billionaire Obama backer Jon Stryker.
- Centene Corporation is a major Medicaid administration company that just happens to be one of the major beneficiaries of the Obama’s health-care law.
- Financial Innovations is a maker of promotional products that, surprise, surprise, got $1.8 million in business from Obama's 2012 Presidential campaign.
- According to election campaign records, AT&T and its chairman were heavy contributors to Romney’s campaign. Is the AT&T donation for the inauguration an attempt to buy their way back into the good graces of this administration? If that is so, then it also speaks volumes of how influence is bought and sold in D.C.
But the bad news goes on. According to the Washington Post article, ABC News reported in 2009 that the initial Obama inauguration cost $170 million, most of which was paid for by American taxpayers, the vast majority of which could not attend the festivities because they did not have the money, they actually had a mob to go to, or they were one of the millions and millions of Americans who were unemployed.
Which leads to a few questions relative to bad priorities and celebrating what is going to be the second part of a Presidency whose first half has been a failure on so many levels:
- Assuming that another $170 million or so of taxpayer money will be spent this year, would it have not been a better priority to divert at least some of the costs for the inauguration to the people still suffering as a result of Hurricane Sandy? Seems like Washington is more interested in getting ready for a taxpayer financed party and rewarding their financial supporters than taking care of Hurricane Sandy victims from a storm that hit over two months ago.
- Given that 23 million Americans are unemployed, under employed, or have become so discouraged that they have stopped looking for a job, would it not have been a better priority to divert at least some of the cost for the inauguration to the food banks around the country who support the food needs of many of those 23 million Americans rather than politicians partying with their financial supporters?
- Given the school shooting slaughter in Newtown, Connecticut, would it not have been a better priority to divert some of the cost of the inauguration to counseling and other needs of the grieving citizens and families?
- Given the shooting slaughter in Newtown, would it not have been a better priority to divert some of the cost of the inauguration to providing police protection in some schools to prevent future Newtown-like shootings? $170 million could put trained police officers in over 3,000 schools for one year, certainly a better priority than political receptions, political meetings, Presidential balls, etc.
- Is it so important to Washington politicians that they continue to take in money from moneyed interests and wealthy Americans while millions of Americans are unable to find a job or pressed to feed themselves and their families?
America is, indeed, for sale with incumbent politicians doing the selling and buying. Several steps from “Love My Country, Loathe My Government” would help restrict the selling and buying of America:
- Step 6 would allow only individual Americans to contribute to political campaigns. Unions, corporations, PACs, and lobbyist organizations would be barred from making any contributions at all.
- Step 7 would allow campaign donations from citizens to campaigns that directly affect their lives. For example, someone in Kansas could not contribute to a political campaign in New Jersey.
- Step 39 would impose term limit on all Federal politicians, “one and done.” This would eliminate the practice of incumbent politicians selling their votes and offices for their reelection campaign since reelection campaigns would be relics of the past.
- Step 44 would prohibit the use of Federal taxpayer dollars on any program or project unless that project or program had a substantial impact on a significant amount of citizens from at least five states. This would eliminate the practice of politicians granting earmarks to the businesses and interests of their friends and family. This would also eliminate the practice of having the Federal government finance local bike trails, local road repairs, etc.
Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:
www.loathemygovernment.com
It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.
Please visit the following sites for freedom:
http://www.reason.com/
http://www.cato.org/
http://www.robertringer.com/
http://realpolichick.blogspot.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w
No comments:
Post a Comment