Showing posts with label bloomberg. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bloomberg. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 2, 2025

By The Numbers, Part 1 - “Escape From New York - The Mamdani Documentary"

 On a regular basis we do  a series of posts labeled, “By The Numbers.” In these posts we  look at real life numbers and discuss them relative to  the fantasies, lies, incompetence, and stupidity of the American  political class. As we have always said, “politicians lie but the numbers do not.”


A note before we begin: this blog post practically wrote itself given the stupidity and insanity of the current Democratic Party nominee for mayor of New York, Zohran Mamdani. His views and plans for the city and  its residents if elected will surely result in chaos, rampaging crime and exodus from the city. His ignorance of basic economics and human nature is astounding.


Let’s start with Mamdani’s view of the world and what he thinks of others:


  • He is anti-Israel and anti-Jewish.

  • He does not like the New York City Police Department and is a “defund the police” advocate.

  • He wants lenient sentencing and no cash bail for criminals in the city.

  • He wants to raise the minimum wage to $30 in the city.

  • He wants to provide free child care, free bus transportation, and free health care for city residents.

  • He wants the city government to develop and operate grocery stores in the city.

  • He wants to pay for all of these free services and perks by increasing the taxation of people living in “wealthy white neighborhoods” and city businesses.

  • He wants to freeze rents.

  • He wants to become the biggest sanctuary city in the country for illegal  immigrants.

  • He wants to destroy the Constitution by completely voiding the Second Amendment.


Again, his economic and human nature ignorance is astounding. We could go through each one of these points and point out the dire consequences to the city’s financials and citizen safety but that is time for another post. Today we look at the numbers only and how the above ideas will make a bad situation worse.

Let’s start with some recent New York City statistics:


  • In the middle of the year 2020, the population of New York City was about 8.8 million people.

  • According to the latest available  population statistics, the current population of the city is 8.26 million people.

  • This is roughly equivalent to the city of Baltimore and its entire half a million population moving out of New York City.

  • Thus, in a few short years, the city lost over half a million residents, about 6% of its residential population and probably about the same amount of its business tax base.

  • Between July, 2022 and July, 2023, about 78,000 residents moved out of the state, or about 214 residents, on average, moved out of the state in that one year EVERY DAY.

  • According to news reports, as of the middle of 2023, 158 Wall  Street businesses had left the city, taking almost a trillion dollars of managed assets with them.

  • One has to  assume that many smaller businesses also left the  city during the past few years also, taking their taxable assets with them.


Two conclusions from these numbers: First, due to a higher and higher taxation burden, over regulation, failing schools, and high crime rates, many residents and businesses have  already had enough and are taking their tax dollars elsewhere where the quality of life and financial burden is less. 


Second, once this trend is underway, the out migration of residents and businesses, it is very difficult to stop  since the mindset of those that have left and those that have watched the out migration from afar now believe that the city is not a worthwhile place to live and do business.


Let’s explore another set of numbers relative the ultra wealthy that live in “wealthy white neighborhoods,” the people most likely to take the brunt of Mamdani’s tax  the  rich strategy:


  • There are 123 billionaires living in New York City.

  • The total net worth of those 123 billionaires is estimated at $759 billion.

  • However, the top five wealthiest billionaires in the city are worth about $277 billion so if they take their wealth out of the city like thousands of others before them then he is left with only $482 billion left with the remaining billionaires, assuming they do not leave also.

  • If Mamdani taxes their WEALTH at 1% of their total WEALTH, then each resident of the city could theoretically get about $580 per person. 

  • That translates to about $11 a week, or about $1.60 a day, not enough for a Starbucks stopover.

  • And they would probably not get that much since this example is a 1% tax on WEALTH, not INCOME, which means that $1.60 would be lowered even  further.


But consider some numbers from the billionaires living in  NYC:


  • Michael  Bloomberg is the  richest of the billionaires with an estimated  total wealth of $105 billion.

  • Let’s assume and take a wild  guess that his home in the city is worth, say, $10 million.

  • Thus, his home is worth about .9% of his total wealth, not 9%, .9%.

  • He could very easily donate his home to a charity, get a huge charity donation tax deduction and be living in Miami very quickly without a major hit to his financial situation and not have to pay the current and increased Mamdani white neighborhood additional city taxes.

  • Even Rupert Murdoch, only the fifth wealthiest billionaire at about $21 billion could escape from New York with minimal financial hit since if he was  living in a $10 million city home, that would be less than 5% of his total wealth.

  • Again, he could donate his home to charity, take the tax  deduction, and move to get out from current and future Mamdani tax burdens.


The wealthy can leave New York quite easily without a major financial hit, something that cannot be said of the city government.


The numbers show that taxing the wealthy white folks would not translate to very much per every other New York City resident but would likely drive many of these white wealthy folks out of the city, further reducing the tax base lower than what it is today.


So in summary of the numbers:


  • The multi-year out migration trend continues to be steep for city residents.

  • Billionaires and millionaires are likely to continue to leave the city if Mamdani raises taxes on these folks even more.

  • Jewish folks are likely to accelerate their exodus, given the anti-Israel and anti-Jewish views of Mamdani.

  • Law-abiding folks are likely to accelerate their exodus, given the anti-police and pro-criminal views of Mamdani.

  • Businesses are likely to accelerate their exodus, given that they could not afford the $30 minimum wage Mamdani would impose.

  • Supermarkets are likely to accelerate their exodus, given that Mamdani’s city government-run grocery stores would undercut the prices and profits of real  grocery stores.

  • Rental property owners are likely to accelerate their exodus, given that Mamdani will not let them raise rents to be profitable and take care of and provide maintenance to their properties.


You get it, the numbers are pretty stark. No way that he can maintain the current tax base, never mind milking the current base for incremental taxes for his fantasies listed above. Again, his economic and human nature ignorance is amazing.


 Cue the new film: “Escape From New York - The Mamdani Documentary."


**********************

If you agree that we need to deseat every member of Congress for their lack of success and accomplishment, then please consider going to the following petition link to help the cause:


https://www.change.org/p/deseat-congress-reset-freedom



**********************


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

Thursday, November 17, 2016

November, 2016, Part 3, The Unfolding Disaster That Is Obama Care: Higher Costs, Less Choice, and Obama's Alternative Reality

Every month for years now we have had to discuss how bad Obama Care is turning out to be under the continuing theme, “the unfolding disaster that is Obama Care.” This month is no different. As the legislation continues to march through America, driving up health care and health insurance prices as it serves as dead weight on economic growth, it cements its rightful place as the worst piece of legislation Washington has ever produced.

It never had a chance to be successful since it really never addressed the underlying root causes of our ever increasing health costs in the country:
  • Americans eat too much of the wrong kind of food, resulting in obscenely high obesity rates for the country.
  • Our food chain is infested with overdoses of high fructose corn syrup, salt, and other unhealthy additives.
  • Americans smoke too much.
  • Americans do not exercise enough.
  • The country is in serious need of health care tort reform.
  • Barriers to insurance company competition across state lines need to come down.
  • Obama Care never “followed the money” to find out who is actually profiting from the ever escalating healthcare costs in this country and how to get those factors under control.
  • Obama Care never got the immense amount of fraud and abuse in current government healthcare programs, Medicare and Medicaid, under control in order to save money to efficiently fund other government health care initiatives.
  • Obama Care never put serious research money towards curing the major diseases that drive high healthcare costs such as high frequency cancers and dementia type diseases.
You cannot resolve any problem unless you understand and address the underlying root causes. No difference here: Obama Care legislation never addressed these listed root causes and thus, has no chance of ever being successful.

But it is not just missing the root causes of our healthcare costs that makes Obama Care so horrible. It resulted in millions of Americans losing access to their favored doctors, hospitals, and insurance policies. It has caused insurance premiums, deductibles and co-pays to escalate substantially. It will likely add trillions of dollars to the national debt. It has exposed millions of Americans to higher than necessary identity theft chances. It has created government bureaucracies that are wastefully spending taxpayer wealth and being exploited by criminal elements. It has stifled economic growth and job creation.

These are just a sample of the types of idiocy that we have been reviewing for the past several years in this blog relative to Obama Care., To read those past posts, just enter the phrase, “the unfolding disaster,” in the search box above.

This week we will be reviewing the latest unfolding disasters from the worst piece of legislation ever written by Washington:

1) A recent article by the Bloomberg news service reinforced how bad things are imploding for the entire Obama Care process:
  • At least 1.4 million Americans will likely lose their Obama Care policies since so many insurance companies are leaving the Obama Care market.
  • And that 1.4 million estimate covers only 32 states since data for the other 18 states was not available or not provided by state insurance agencies.
  • This is about 14% of the entire population covered by Obama Care policies, an incredible churn rate.
  • The loss of Obama Care competitors in insurance markets across the country will result in fewer insurance options being available and those that are still available will be more expensive and likely to not include the same doctor and hospital networks.
  • S&P Global Ratings sees negative or very little positive growth in the number of people covered by Obama Care policies in 2017.
  • In Minnesota, 20,000 people will be losing their Obama Care insurance coverage since the Blue Cross Blue Shield insurer in that state is getting out of the Minnesota market, forcing those 20,000 people to look at the remaining Obama Care policy plans that will be increasing in cost by at least 50% in 2017.
  • Charles Gaba, who tracks the impact of the Obama Care legislation at ACASignups.net, estimates that it is not 1.4 million people who will lose access to their Obama Care insurance policies but that 2 to 2.5 million will lose access to their current policies in 2017.
  • The Kaiser Family Foundation estimates that more than 19% of people in the Obama Care insurance market will have only one insurer to chose from in 2017.
  • In North Carolina, only one Obama Care insurer will be available in the state’s 95 out of 100 counties since Aetna and UnitedHealthcare have dropped out of the Obama Care market in that state.
  • Those dropouts will cause 284,000 North Carolina residents to seek a new insurance plan but be left with only one Obama Care provider to choose from.
  • 117,000 residents in Tennessee will lose access to their current Obama Care plans since UnitedHealthcare and Blue Cross Blue Shield have pulled out of the Obama Care market in that state.
As we have said many times before, we do not think that you could have tried to design a plan for failure any better than the failure that is Obama Care.

2) Randy Weiss, writing for the Minutemen News website on November 6, 2016, reviewed what is either a bald faced lie by the President or a delusional President that is completely out of touch with reality. At a recent Hillary Clinton rally, the President boldly proclaimed that relative to Obama Care, “Because premiums are going up, it’s true premiums are going up for a handful of people that don’t get tax credits.”

“Are going up for am handful of people?” Let’s try and figure out what his definition of “a handful of people” are:
  • Earlier this week we cited numerous sources that agree that 23% of those Americans currently under Obama Care policies do not receive tax credits to help offset Obama Care insurance premium increases.
  • If we use the standard estimate that about 10 million Americans are now covered by Obama Care insurance policies, than about 2.3 million Americans are what Obama calls a “handful of people.”
  • A city of 2.3 Americans would make it the fourth largest city in the country, trailing only New York City, LA, and Chicago in population.
  • It would be a city bigger than Houston, Phoenix, Philadelphia, San Antonio, and San Diego.
  • It would have a population bigger than the population of Dallas and San Jose COMBINED.
  • It would have a population bigger than the population of Seattle, Charlotte, and Fort Worth COMBINED.
  • Its 2.3 million population would have more people than the population of fifteen states’ entire population.
  • It would have more people than the population of Alaska, Wyoming, and Vermont COMBINED.
And as we said before, while 77% of Obama Care policy owners will not pay for the entire amount of their premium increases, they all will pay some part of that increase and the American taxpayer will pay the remainder; those premium cost increases do not magically go away, they are paid for by other taxpayers and increase in the overwhelming national debt load. In no way did Obama fulfill his promise of “bending the cost curve” of health care costs in this country, all he did was camouflage where those costs were being paid.

And of course, his smugness does not address the increase in deductible levels. Even if 77% of Obama Care policy holders are getting some relief from the large premium increases, many times those policies are not usable since the deductible levels have gone up so high, often above $10,000 a year for bronze plans or family plans.

Delusional or lying? You decide but your answer does not change the reality that Obama Care continues to fail in keeping costs down in the health care industry.

3) The Tampa Bay Times on October 30, 2016 did a Politifact check on the assertion by Democratic Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz that “It’s four or five states where the number of insurance options has narrowed.” Politifact rated this assertion as False as they should have since according to their analysis, and the numbers we have been talking about this week, the number of states seeing less insurance company policy options is at least 29 states.

So, technically Wasserman Schultz is correct when she says four or five states are seeing their “insurance options narrow.” It is just she neglected to point out that at least 24 other states were in the same boat. Another politician’s lie or deception, much like Obama’s alternative reality where just a handful of people will see their policy costs go up. Tell a lie enough times and it eventually becomes the truth. Definitely in an alternative reality.

More of the same today: higher costs, less choice and competition, and lying politicians. More of the same types of disasters tomorrow.


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:


www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:


http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org

http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w






Tuesday, May 24, 2016

May, 2016, Part 1, The Unfolding Disaster That Is Obama Care: Death Spiral In The Market and Defeat In The Court

Every month for years now we have had to discuss how bad Obama Care is turning out to be under the continuing theme, “the unfolding disaster that is Obama Care.” This month is no different. As the legislation continues to march through America, driving up health care and health insurance prices as it serves as dead weight on economic growth, it cements its rightful place as the worst piece of legislation Washington has ever produced.

It never had a chance to be successful since it really never addressed the underlying root causes of our ever increasing health costs in the country:
  • Americans eat too much of the wrong kind of food, resulting in obscenely high obesity rates for the country.
  • Our food chain is infested with overdoses of high fructose corn syrup, salt, and other unhealthy additives.
  • Americans smoke too much.
  • Americans do not exercise enough.
  • The country is in serious need of health care tort reform.
  • Barriers to insurance company competition across state lines need to come down.
  • Obama Care never “followed the money” to find out who is actually profiting from the ever escalating healthcare costs in this country and how to get those factors under control.
  • Obama Care never got the immense amount of fraud and abuse in current government healthcare programs, Medicare and Medicaid, under control in order to save money to efficiently fund other government health care initiatives.
  • Obama Care never put serious research money towards curing the major diseases that drive high healthcare costs such as high frequency cancers and dementia type diseases.
You cannot resolve any problem unless you understand and address the underlying root causes. No difference here: Obama Care legislation never addressed these listed root causes and thus, has no chance of ever being successful.

But it is not just missing the root causes of our healthcare costs that makes Obama Care so horrible. It resulted in millions of Americans losing access to their favored doctors, hospitals, and insurance policies. It has caused insurance premiums, deductibles and co-pays to escalate substantially. It will likely add trillions of dollars to the national debt. It has exposed millions of Americans to higher than necessary identity theft chances. It has created government bureaucracies that are wastefully spending taxpayer wealth and being exploited by criminal elements. It has stifled economic growth and job creation.

These are just a sample of the types of idiocy that we have been reviewing for the past several years in this blog relative to Obama Care., To read those past posts, just enter the phrase, “the unfolding disaster,” in the search box above.

For the next few days we will be reviewing the latest unfolding disasters from the worst piece of legislation ever written by Washington:

1) We have often talked about the Obama Care “death spiral” scenario. As fewer than expected younger and healthier people sign up for Obama Care policies and the insurance companies pay out more than expected for their older and less healthy Obama Care customers, their financial results start to sink and they are forced to raise the premium rates on Obama Care policies. The higher rates further discourage younger and healthier people from signing up which increases insurance company costs which means they have to raise their rates more, etc.

And that is exactly what appears to be happening, at least in New York state. According to a Washington Free Beacon report on May 20, 2016 by Ali Meyer, New York insurance companies are expected to ask for average rate increases of 17.3% for individual Obama Care policies beginning in 2017. 

According to the New York Daily News: “The proposed increases, which must still be approved by the state’s Department of Financial Services, range from 6.1% sought by MVP Health Plan Inc. and HealthNow New York Inc., to a whopping 89% requested by Crystal Run Health Plan LLC.” 

The article also cites Bloomberg reporting which states that: “Oscar Insurance Corp., is planning to increase individual rates by 18.4 percent, CareConnect Insurance is asking for an increase of 29.2 percent and UnitedHealth Group Inc. is looking to boost premiums in New York by 45.6 percent.”

Oscar Insurance explained what is going on, which looks like suspiciously like the death spiral we have been talking about: “Medical costs have gone up, government programs that helped cover our costs are ending, and our members needed more care than we expected.” So much for the Obama promise that his approach would “bend the cost curve” downward and that Americans families would save up to $2,500 a year on the health insurance costs. Tough to save $2,500 a year when the premiums are going up as high as 89% in a single year.

2) An alternative to insurance companies raising their rates is for them to get out of the Obama Care insurance policy business altogether. Unitedhealthcare is already going down the road since they have already decided not to offer Obama Care policies in at least 26 of the 34 states that they were active in in 2016. And that withdrawal strategy could be repeated by other companies going forward, as identified in a paper and analysis by Heritage Foundation senior research fellow Ed Haislmaier, Mercatus Center senior research fellow Brian Blase, and Galen Institute senior fellow Doug Badger.

They analyzed enrollment and financial data and results of 289 Obama Care insurance companies’ Obama Care plans and found that:
  • In total, they found that insurance companies have suffered substantial losses on their Obama Care policies so far.
  • These large losses were incurred even though they were receiving subsidies (reinsurance) for the first couple of years as laid out in the Obama Care legislation. Otherwise, their losses would have been much worse.
  • The companies lost an aggregate $2.2 billion, which would have really been $8.9 billion since their losses were offset by payments of $6.7 billion from the reinsurance process.
  • The Obama Care policies of the insurance companies would have had to be 26% higher from the start just to break even financially. But that would have started the death spiral, according to the authors: “If premiums had been 26 percent higher, on average, enrollment would have been lower and adverse selection would have increased. Relatively healthy people and higher income enrollees, who qualify for smaller subsidies if they qualify for any subsidies, would have been deterred to a greater degree than people who expected to use more health care services. As a result of this dynamic effect, the premium increase would likely have needed to be substantially greater than 26 percent for insurers to break even on their Qualified Health Plans in 2014.”
  • But the reinsurance programs go away in 2017, likely meaning that the companies will have to jack up their rates to cover the lack of subsidies, much like we just saw what is going on in the New York state.
Looks like New York may be a foreshadowing of the Obama Care death spiral to come starting in 2017.

3) Staying with this death spiral theme, Ali Meyer, again writing for the Washington Free Beacon, on May 4, 2016 discussed the news that Humana, one of the largest health insurers in the nation, is considering existing some of the Obama Care markets in 2017.

Besides exiting some states, the company recently announced that it is in the process at looking at what other changes it needs to make to make a profit in the Obama Care world: “Humana is in the process of finalizing plans for its ACA-compliant individual commercial medical market offerings in 2017.Humana anticipates proposing a number of changes to retain a viable product for individual consumers, where feasible, and address persistent risk selection challenges. Such changes may include certain statewide market and product exits both on and off exchange, service area reductions and pricing commensurate with anticipated levels of risk by state.” 

This is particularly important for Humana since they also reported that their commercial insurance enrollment figures dropped by 233,200 putting additional financial pressure on the company. The company anticipates this business will finish in negative financial results in 2016. The same Meyer article reminds readers that the Unitedhealthcare’s CEO recently reported that his company may lose more than $1 billion in 2016 serving Obama Care customers.

Death spiral anyone?

4) As if the market setbacks were not enough, Obama Care recently lost a vital decision in the courtroom. According to a Heritage Foundation article by Hans von Spakovsky and Elizabeth Slattery on May 12, 2016:
  • A Federal district court in Washington, D.C. recently ruled in favor of a U.S. House of Representatives’ challenge to the Obama administration’s implementation of part of Obama Care.
  • Specifically, the suit brought by the House wanted the court to force the Obama administration to stop using general Treasury funds to subsidize insurance companies that were offering Obama Care insurance policies since the Congress, in passing the original legislation, forbid that kind of subsidies to exist.
  • The court found the Obama administration in violation of the Constitution’s Article I, Section 9,Clause 7, which states that “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law.”
  • Since Congress passed no law approving the use of taxpayer funds in this manner, the court and judge had no choice but to stop the process.
  • The judge was quite sarcastic in her ruling finding this misuse of funds was “a most curious and convoluted argument whose mother was undoubtedly necessity.” In other words, the insurance companies are getting killed financially by Obama Care policies and Obama, out of necessity to save his landmark legislation, had to get very convoluted to get around the law and Constitution.
  • She also got funny in her comment that the Obama administration was trying to “squeeze the elephant of Section 1402 reimbursements into the mousehole of Section 1401(d)(1).”
The article goes on to show the many other ways the administration was trying to call black white and up down to find a way, any way, to save the insurance companies money and help them decide to stay in the Obama Care market, even if it meant massive, illegal taxpayer bailouts. The decision is sure to be appealed but at least one judge got it right from a common sense, straightforward reading of the law. 

That’s a good start for this month’s discussion of the unfolding disaster that is Obama Care. It showed again how Obama missed the root causes of the high healthcare costs in this country, how he put forth a (bad) insurance remedy for an ailment that needed a public health remedy. The underlying causes of our high health care costs are still the same, or possibly worse, than when this legislation was passed in 2010: bad American eating habits, bad American smoking habits, bad American exercising habits, an aging population, etc. Coming up with a Rube Goldberg insurance process that is falling apart at the seams (e.g. higher than expected medical costs to insurance companies, rising premiums, rising deductibles, etc.) was totally expected and are now coming true in a classic death spiral way. 

More disasters this week.


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:

Term Limits Now: http://www.howmuchworsecoulditget.com
http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org

http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w