Showing posts with label atlanta. Show all posts
Showing posts with label atlanta. Show all posts

Sunday, February 27, 2022

February, 2022, Part 5, Political Class Insanity: Homeless Failure In LA, Hypocrisy From Shalwell, And Defund the Police Failures in Atlanta and NYC

 It is the beginning of another month which means it is time again to review the latest political class insanity from the American political class. Each month it takes us multiple posts to cover the wasteful spending, incompetent government organizations and employees, government programs that usually make a problem worse than resolving it, inane and idiotic politician comments, etc.

To review past posts on this insanity and idiocy, just click on the first few posts in each month listed to the right of this page. After reviewing just a handful of these insanity posts we think you will agree that we are currently being served by the worst set of American politicians ever to hold office in our entire history. 

1) There is no doubt that the country is facing a homeless problem and the problem is most acute in the state of California and the county of Los Angeles, both home to the largest state and city homeless populations in the country. It is so sad that American politicians have not been able to come up with any viable solutions to this problem despite spending untold billions and billions of dollars on it. The problem just keeps getting worse.


But maybe these are not the right people to think can resolve the problem, as witnessed by this disaster out in LA:


  • Proposition HHH is an LA  project that was going to spend $1.2 billion to provide housing for the city’s homeless population.

  • But according to the Associated Press, so far it has cost the city over $700,000 on average to provide one unit of housing for the homeless.

  • One of the project's efforts  cost a whopping $837,000 a piece.

  • This finding was the result of a city audit of the program and was found by LA City Controller, Ron Galpern, to be “wholly inadequate.”

  • According to the audit: “While future plans have not been finalized, building tens of thousands of additional units using the same model will likely cost billions of dollars and will take far too long to match the urgency of the ongoing homeless emergency.” 

  • In addition, the audit concluded that the city must “find new ways to scale up faster and cheaper projects.”


Another failure of the political class to fix anything efficiently, effectively, and on time. Given that the city budget to address the homeless population has gone from about $10 million in 2013 to $1 billion nine years later supports the notion that city and state politicians have no idea how to fix the problem but have spent and wasted billions of dollars in their failed attempt to do so.


2) Politicians are also very good at being hypocrites. The most glaring, recent example of such hypocrisy was their behavior during the bad days of the covid crisis. Too many politicians set forth draconian restrictions on their constituents’ social behavior but then went and ignored those very restrictions that they insisted their citizens follow. 


Consider some of the latest political class hypocrisy:


  • Eric Swalwell is a California Democrat in Congress.

  • He was an active advocate for the false proposition that Donald Trump was in cahoots with Russia, a proposition that has been proven to be total fiction.

  • But we now know that Swalwell has been the recipient of campaign election donations from a high level lobbyist for a Russian pipeline company.

  • He got $2,900 from Vincent Roberti of the Roberti Global lobbyist group in 2021.

  • He also got $5,400 from Roberti in 2018 as reported by the Washington Free Beacon.

  • Ths company received $2.4 million from the pipeline company, Nord Stream 2 AG, which Biden supported prior to the invasion of Ukraine.

  • Compare his eagerness to take money from a lobbyist tied to vital Russian energy interests vs. what he had to say about Trump: “Not only does his [Trump] past and current team have ties to Russia, but the President himself also does. He has traveled to Russia extensively, done business there often, and has ties to Russian interests. . . Why is America’s leader and his team so close to Russia? This is either due to poor judgement or a deeper personal, financial, or political link between President Trump and Russia. It is not normal for the leader of our country to be so extensively tied to a foreign government that has sought to undermine democracies across the globe, and connections like these should be concerning to American citizens everywhere.”

  • Oh, by the way, Roberti has also contributed to other Democrats including Pelosi, Schumer, and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, all of whom falsely accused Trump of having corrupt ties to Russia.


As often the case of American politicians, follow the money not their words to find out what is truly going on. Swalwell is no exception.


3) We have all too often discussed the reality that “defunding the police” movement has been a total and often fatal disaster. Large, liberal, Democratic controlled cities got on the defund the police bandwagon over the past couple of years, stripping budget and personnel resources from their city police forces. And without exception, those cities, Chicago, NewYork, LA and others, have seen dramatic rises in violent crime within their city borders.


And while most of our previous discussions of this political failure of been in cities like Chicago and NYC, apparently Atlanta is also a victim of its own defund the police initiative:


  • Murders in Atlanta are already up 43% this year.

  • At this rate the city will break last year’s mark of 153 homicides, a number that was a 30 year high for the city.

  • Rapes are up 236%, burglaries are up 1%, and shopliftng cases are up 4%.

  • One of the more ridiculous excuses for poor performance by a politician, former mayor Kesha Lance Bottoms blamed the relaxing of covid restrictions for the increase in crime, not her failed policies and administration.

  • In her opinion, prematurely lifting covid restrictions caused people to come to her city to party in bars and then go out and rape and murder others, nonsense.

  • The new mayor has a more realistic approach to stopping crime including installing thousands of cameras and hiring hundreds of more police officers.


A very, very basic function of government is to protect the lives and property of citizens. If a government entity, and the politicians that operate it, cannot provide this basic service, then they are a failure regardless of whatever else they think they  accomplished. Thus, the former mayor is a failure under this very simple but important tenet.


4) Besides Atlanta, NYC continues to victimize its citizens after it defunded its police department:


  • At least six people were recently stabbed in the city’s subway as violence continues to grow in the city.

  • The first of these latest attacks occurred less than 24 hours after the mayor announced his new plan to combat subway violence.

  • Subway attacks are up over 65% this year vs. last year.

  • These attacks include assault, stabbing, and pushing people into oncoming trains.

  • Many of the attacks have been caused by homeless people and drug addicts, many of whom have serious mental problems.


Too early to tell if the mayor’s new program will help curtail the violence. We hope it works. But given the track record of politicians protecting the lives and property of citizens, the trend is not good.  


That will do it for today but more of the same failed behavior of our politicians: failure to protect the safety of citizens, the continued and fatal failure of the defund the police movement,  and hypocrisy continues to be a standard behavior of the American politician.


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

Please visit the following sites for freedom:


Monday, March 11, 2013

How About Some Hate Control Before More Gun Control, Part 5: MOre Americans Saving Lives With Their Legal Gun Possession

We recently completed a four part series relative to gun control themed, “How About More Hate Control Before More Gun Control.” The first of that series can be accessed at the following link:

http://loathemygovernment.blogspot.com/2013/01/how-about-more-hate-control-before-more.html

The four posts explored various aspects of the current gun control debate in light of the Newtown, Connecticut school shooting. Included in those discussions was an inventory of the instances where legal gun possession of law abiding citizens resulted in the saving of the lives of innocent people at the hands of criminals and thugs.

The point made at that time was that lives are saved everyday by citizens exercising their rights to bear arms. To arbitrarily remove that right is likely to result in a loss of life that gun control advocates refuse to acknowledge. Yes, Newtown was tragic. But you have to look at both sides of the equation, how many lives to legally owned guns SAVE everyday?

Australia found out that when they removed their citizens’ rights to bear arms, violent crime increased substantially. Chicago has some of the stiffest gun control laws in the world and they are becoming known as the murder capital or the world, over 500 homicides a year.

To continue with that point, consider the real life examples that have come to the forefront since we listed out those previous gun bearing, self defense examples:

1) TV news reports from an Atlanta television story recently carried the story of a gentleman named Mark Sikes. Mr. Sikes is a disabled, wheel chair bound Army veteran whose home was broken into by a burglar. Fortunately, Mr. Sikes was resting in bed and had a legal handgun in a nightstand next to the bed that he accessed and pointed at the man who had broken into his home. Mr. Sikes announced that he was armed and that was enough to scare off the intruder. Who knows what violence and other crimes may have happened without the gun, given Mr. Sikes' limited mobility and limited ability to physically defend himself.

2) A Washington Times article from January 23, 2013 reported on a pit bull incident that could have been fatal for an 11 year old boy who was just out riding his bike in his neighborhood. During that ride, three roaming, unattended pit bull dogs took the boy down off of his bike and starting attacking and biting him.

A neighbor saw what was happening, ran back into his house to get his gun, and started firing at the dogs to stop the attack. His actions resulted in the death of one of the dogs. His gunfire attracted the attention of a police officer on duty who hurried over to the attack and shot and killed the other two dogs.

The neighbor’s actions prevented very serious injuries to the boy and given pit bulls’ strength and disposition, the neighbor possibly saved his life. A great story, a young child’s life saved. Well, almost a great story.

The police are conducting an investigation into the neighbor’s behavior regarding whether or not 1) he had a permit to legally possess his firearm and 2) whether he took his firearm beyond his home’s property line to save the young boy. Violation of either of these conditions could land the hero neighbor in jail and have him face a hefty fine.

My kudos to the neighbor regardless if he followed the law or not. If he hid the fact that he had an illegal gun or he refused to take the gun beyond his property line as the law requires, a young boy would probably be dead today. Let’s hope the law and prosecutors are fair in this case even if the gun was owned illegally (confiscate it) or he left his property boundaries (give him a stern warning). A life was saved by a compassionate person using a gun.

3) On January 24, 2013, WHAM-TV in Rochester, New York reported on a apartment invasion that was thwarted by the resident having a legal AR-15 weapon in his room. Two students sharing an apartment woke one morning to find two intruders in their living room at the bottom of their apartment’s stairs.

One of the students, Christopher Boise, retreated to his room where he took out his legally owned AR-15 weapon, a weapon politicians like Diane Feinstein want to make illegal for Americans to own. He set himself up in a defensive position within his room and shortly thereafter, one of the intruders began to open the room’s door, only to be confronted with an AR-15 barrel pointed at him.

That was enough for both intruders to leave the premises immediately without harming the occupants and without stealing any possessions. Police reported that the resident, a student at Rochester Institute of Technology, was legally sanctioned to possess the weapon. Violence thwarted.

4) Consider a KHOU-TV report from June, 2010 as it relates to self defense in Houston:
  • The teenage son of a county deputy was home alone one afternoon with his 12 year old sister when two thugs tried to execute a home invasion, trying to get into the front and back doors before breaking a back window.
  • The teenage boy grabbed his father's assault rifle and knew what to do with it, arming the rifle and shooting at the two intruders.
  • The home invaders fled, leaving a trail of blood.
  • Shortly afterwards, two people showed up at Tomball hospital for treatment of gunshot wounds.
  • One was an adult who was hit at least three times. He and his partner, a juvenile are considered the suspects in the attempted home invasion.
  • Neighbors of the boy and sister said burglars had recently struck the two houses next door.
Thus, a trained American with a legally possessed weapon not only saved his life and the life of his sister and protected his home, he may have stopped a crime wave single-handedly.

5) The Oklahoman News reported a local shooting incident on January 18, 2013:
  • Local police reported that five people were trying to burglarize a home in Okalahoma City when the female homeowner shot one of them with her gun.
  • A visiting friend of the homeowner, a man, shot another burglar with the homeowner's gun, police report.
  • These defensive gunshots forced burglars to flee the scene but they were shortly apprehended by police.
  • The shooting victims were taken to a hospital and were in serious to critical condition, police said.
Another home invasion prevented.

6) An NBC television affiliate WOIA in San Antonio reported on a thwarted home invasion on January 20, 2013. In middle of the morning, a mother and her son were at home when they realized someone was trying to kick down their front door in a home invasion attempt.

While the mother called 911, her son retrieved their gun and fired one shot through the door. After returning fire, the would be home invader took off without ever gaining access to the home and the residents.

7) Staying in San Antonio, on January 21, 2013, television station KSAT reported that a customer with a legal concealed weapons permit was in a liquor store when two would-be thieves entered the store and attempted to steal some beer. The customer reportedly followed the thieves out of the store and shot at their truck as they drove away, preventing the robbery. Police said they did not expect to file charges against the customer, but were searching for the alleged beer bandits.

8) KSAT also reported on another valid use of a citizen with a legal firearm, this story was reported on January 17, 2013 from Canyon Lake, Texas. According to police, a man used his legal shotgun to defend his female neighbor’s home against her ex-boyfriend who was brandishing a baseball bat and trying to break into her home.

The neighbor heard the sound of breaking glass and decided to investigate with his shotgun. He found the ex-boyfriend trying to break into his neighbor’s trailer and confronted him when the ex-boyfriend staring walking towards the neighbor despite being told numerous times to stop. The neighbor shot the suspect in self-defense.

The female homeowner had thrown her ex-boyfriend out of the house in November, but he had been harassing her. He showed up at the home several times and the week before the shooting he broke in and pulled a gun on her. After that, she left her trailer and thankfully, was not there the night he appeared with the baseball bat.

Thank goodness that there are gun laws in place that allow private citizens to defend their homes, their neighbors and themselves from the violent criminal elements that would harass, harm, or kill them. And note that the vast majority of our examples have happened in a limited number of locations in just the past month or so. Imagine how many lives are saved, home invasions prevented, and assets and properties protected over a year's time because of the Second Amendment.

Yes, there is a need for rational gun laws that allow law abiding, responsible citizens to arm themselves. Yes, there is a need to prevent in what ever way possible the mentally deranged or upset from getting their hands on weapons. Yes, there is a need to protect our kids in whatever way possible from future shootings.

But there is no need to ban guns altogether, there is no need to restrict most of the types of weapons, like the AR-15, that politicians like Senator Diane Feinstein want to restrict. Criminals will always be able to get their hands on any type of weapon they want, be it an assault rifle, a pistol, a baseball bat, a knife, etc. The way to protect ourselves against their weapons are weapons for ourselves.

One final thing to keep in mind as we observe all of this political posturing by Washington politicians on gun control. Months after the Newtown shootings, our schools are just as vulnerable as they were on that day in December. Shouldn’t the immediate concern be securing our schools and not trying to make political points?

We pointed out how easy that would be to do in the following post, without raising anyone’s taxes, if the political class would make a few simple changes in their spending priorities:

http://loathemygovernment.blogspot.com/2013/01/how-about-more-hate-control-before-more_18.html

This mostly inane gun control debate is likely to drag on for months and years without resolution and without the needed protection being put in place to prevent another Newtown incident. Shouldn’t that be the immediate priority of Washington and not the shredding of the Second Amendment for no purpose at all?

Note: tomorrow we will continue this series with a look at how the gun control debate and result actions could quickly spiral out of control since many local state and local government entities are threatening not to comply with any Federal directive that shreds citizens’ Second Amendment rights.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:

http://www.reason.com/
http://www.cato.org/
http://www.robertringer.com/
http://realpolichick.blogspot.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w