Showing posts with label bankruptcy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bankruptcy. Show all posts

Sunday, November 1, 2026

The Race To Bankruptcy Court: Hey, California, When Stuck In A Hole, Stop Digging

 Let’s check in with our discussion on which city or state government is going to get to bankruptcy court first. Our primary cities in the race to bankruptcy include New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and newcomer, Seattle. The state governments that we think are soon heading into bankruptcy include New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and California with Washington state a newcomer to the race.


The reason for returning to this topic in the midst of our corruption series is because there have been some significant developments in the race to bankruptcy court. However, before reviewing the latest news and seeing which state or city is making the best progress towards government bankruptcy, let’s review how these cities and states got themselves into this financial death spiral position to begin with:


  • A government entity keeps expanding its budget, eventually putting pressure on the tax revenue stream it receives.

  • At some point, rather than cut government spending or make its programs more efficient financially, the politicians in charge raise taxes to meet the ever growing government expenditures.

  • The raising of taxes causes some residents and businesses to leave the city or state for less tax burdensome areas, reducing the tax base and reducing the revenue stream.

  • Rather than cut expenses and become more efficient to match the reduced tax revenue stream, politicians in the above cities or states raise the tax burden even more.

  • This causes more residents and businesses to flee the city or state, further reducing the tax base and tax revenue stream.

  • At some point politicians panic and raise taxes more and start cutting vital government services (e.g. police, fire, education) in order to try and balance government spending against the shrinking tax base and revenue stream.

  • The reduction in quality of government services in particular and quality of life in general drives more residents and businesses out of the area.

  • Eventually, the expenses, costs and financial liabilities outstrip the reduced tax stream and bankruptcy occurs.

Okay that’s the process. Let’s see what is going on with the top candidates in the race to bankruptcy court.


1)We have  often discussed the reality that California has one of  the highest taxation burdens in the  country for both residents and businesses: high state income taxes, sales taxes, property taxes,  business taxes, etc. In fact, according to  the Tax Foundation, the state has the  third highest state tax burden in the  country. 


And depending on  what happens in a few days after the elections, the state may impose the so-called  “wealth tax” on its billionaires. Or at least on the billionaires still living in the state since many billionaires have already fled  to avoid the  wealth  tax if passed by voters.


But the rush for more taxes  by the state politicians may not stop there:


  • Xavier Becerra is  running for the governorship  of California.

  • According to reporting by the NewYork Post, Becerra has voiced his  support for a potential new tax on mail driven by state drivers.

  • Theoretically, this new tax revenue would be  used to fix the collapsing road infrastructure in the state.

  • According to Becerra, “Everything should be on the table,”  which is politicians’ code for it will happen.

  • Workers that commute  long distances to get to work because they cannot  afford to live close to their  jobs and those that drive  for  their careers, e.g. home visiting  nurses, florists, Uber drivers, etc. would probably be the hardest hit and least able to afford the  mileage tax.

  • Republican  politician, Carl  De Maio, is leading the opposition to the  mileage tax.

  • He  claims  that the mileage charge would likely be  between  6 and 9 cents  a mile.

  • Thus, a driver that travels  a moderate 15,000 miles a year would see a mileage tax charge  of between $900 and $1,350:  “Because of the extreme policies of Democrats in Sacramento, California has the highest cost of living in the nation – and now the Democrats want to make it worse by imposing a crazy new Mileage Tax on all drivers.” 


There  is an old saying:  “When  stuck in a hole, stop digging.” Good advice for any  politician  in the state: you have one of the  highest tax  burdens in the country and you want  to  add possibly two new  taxes on top  of  the  current burden? You already know that residents and businesses are fleeing  the state because of high taxes  so why feed the out migration with  new taxes?! Stop digging.


Also, one  of the reasons for their perceived lack of enough tax funds is that the state politicians have presided over one of the most corrupt and inept government  operations in the  country. The high  speed  rail line effort wasted  tens of billions of dollars with nothing  to show for it. The  Federal government came in  and  shut down almost 500 bogus, criminal, tax revenue sucking Medicaid operations in the state and  not one of  those operations complained  that they were  legitimate.  Remember,  one of those bogus Medicaid criminal enterprises had a burrito stand as its  business address  while another had a tire store as its  Medicaid  address.


Maybe if the state politicians had a  little  gumption, brain power, and initiative they would clean  up  the  misuse and  criminality of current government  programs. That would free up existing tax revenue to fix what needs to be fixed  without adding  more  taxes.


But brainpower and gumption has never been a trait  of  these politicians, much easier to just raise taxes than  fixing what is broken. And continue digging the financial hole  deeper and  deeper until the sides of that hole collapse into bankruptcy.


2)As stated above, the traits of a  city or state going bankrupt  is the inability of that government entity to protect the lives of those that they serve, a basic tenet of any government entity. And of course, Chicago, a prime candidate to go bankrupt,  fails not only along the lines of  high taxation and the impending  financial collapse, but the city also continues the inability to protect its  citizens:


  • As of mid-October, 319 residents of Chicago had been shot and  killed by the rampant violence in the city.

  • This comes out  to about  one murder a day in the city this year.

  • Another 47 residents had been killed by non-shooting means.

  • An additional 1,292 residents had  been shot and wounded, about four  wounded every day.

  • These murder and wounded numbers are about the same as  the same  period in  2025.


Just a reminder that Chicago is not just financially suffering but also suffering from a quality of life perspective. Thus, there is no reason to think that Chicago is not still headed towards bankruptcy as businesses and residents not only flee because  of financial stress but also because  of safety stress.


3)Let’s finish today with some more stats that continue to show why people  are leaving some states and heading for other states, leaving the original states in a  financial bind of a shrinking tax base:


  • According to the Tax Foundation’s latest analysis, Florida, Texas and Tennessee, three prime states where tax weary residents and businesses are heading towards, rank as the 5th, 7th, and  8th best states from a tax burden  perspective,i.e. lesser taxation  burdens.

  • However, the four states that we believe are hurtling towards bankruptcy court, Illinois, California, New Jersey, and New York, rank  as the 38th, 48th, 49th,  and  50th worst states from a  taxation perspective.

  • These rankings are based on four broad tax categories: corporate taxes,  individual income tax, sales tax, property tax, and unemployment  insurance tax  so it  is a  comprehensive picture of the  overall taxation picture.


So it is no surprise that tech companies and talent  are fleeing  California and financial types are fleeing New York, the tax burden in these states are high and not  likely to  ease anytime soon. But given that the political class in these states are addicted to taxation as a way to  resolve inept government and  unnecessary government  programs,  that addiction  will eventually drag  their state governments into  bankruptcy court.


**********************

If you agree that we need to deseat every member of Congress for their lack of success and accomplishment, then please consider going to the following petition link to help the cause:


https://www.change.org/p/deseat-congress-reset-freedom



**********************


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:


Thursday, October 8, 2026

The Race To Bankruptcy Court: Mayor Katie Wilson Keeps Seattle In The Lead

 Let’s check in with our discussion on which  city or state government is going to  get to bankruptcy court first. Our primary cities in the race to bankruptcy include New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and newcomer, Seattle. The state governments that we think are soon heading into bankruptcy include New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and California with Washington state a newcomer to the race.


The reason for returning to this topic is because there have been some significant developments in the race to bankruptcy court, specifically Seattle. However, before reviewing the latest news, let’s review how these cities and states got themselves into this financial death spiral position to begin with:


  • A government entity keeps expanding its budget, eventually putting pressure on the tax revenue stream it receives. 

  • At some point, rather than cut government spending or make its programs more efficient financially, the politicians in charge raise taxes to meet the ever growing government expenditures.

  • The raising of taxes causes some residents and businesses to leave the city or state for less tax burdensome areas, reducing the tax base and reducing the revenue stream.

  • Rather than cut expenses and become more efficient to match the reduced tax revenue stream, politicians in the above cities or states raise the tax burden even more.

  • This causes more residents and businesses to flee the city or state, further reducing the tax base and tax revenue stream.

  • At some point politicians panic and raise taxes more and start cutting vital government services (e.g. police, fire, education) in order to try and balance government spending against the shrinking tax base and revenue stream.

  • The reduction in quality of government services in particular and quality of life in general drives more residents and businesses out of the area.

  • Eventually, the expenses, costs and financial liabilities outstrip the reduced tax stream and bankruptcy occurs.


Okay that’s the process. Let’s see  what is going on  in the newest and possibly the  our strongest contender for bankruptcy court,  Seattle.


1)As we have recently often discussed, it  is our view that Seattle  is now the leader in the race to bankruptcy court:


  • The  downtown  area  business office vacancy rate is around 35%,  the  highest in the  country as businesses abandon the city because of sky high taxes, high  homelessness  rate, and high violent crime rate.

  • As businesses and residents  leave the city, the tax base shrinks and tax  revenue steadily declines,  further damaging the quality of  life in the city.

  • The mayor, Katie Wilson, always  seems to be overwhelmed  and useless  as crises  after crises  erupts.

  • Top business leaders in the city grew so frustrated that they all signed  a letter  that was sent  to Wilson, basically telling her to  get her act together from a public safety and quality of life perspective.

  • The  city recently raised the  minimum wage rate for people working in the city, a move that is sure to drive out small, middle  and larger sized companies as the labor component of their business becomes too large, all of which  will result in fewer  jobs for the  citizens of  the  city and even lower tax collections.

But this economic ignorance on Wilson’s part and other city politicians should not come as a surprise, given what they already did to wages  and the severe economic negative fallout from their actions:

  • In  2024, Seattle doubled the base delivery pay for so-called gig-workers.

  • Overnight, the salary line went from $5.37 to $12.52 per gigwork task.

  • Under the old rate, delivery folks got  their base salary plus any tips  for their service.

  • But quite  quickly that plan  did not  hold economic water.

  • Total driver  earnings over the following  months barely moved. Despite the more than doubling  of the base wage rate.

  • DoorDash reported a  delivery volume drop  of  30,000 deliveries and a loss of $1 million within two weeks  of the new wage rate taking effect.

  • The negative effects were multifold: delivery driver earnings barely changed, tips got smaller because the cost of delivery got higher as a result of the  higher minimum wage getting bigger, and customers ordered less because the higher cost of  delivery further  drove down  demand  and wages.

  • This was because DoorDash added  a  so-call “regulator fee”  of $4.99 per delivery while Uber added a $5 "local operating fee” to account for their higher  labor costs.

  • These fees drove down demand which in turn limited any upside to delivery folks.

  • Uber Eats reported similar demand drops akin to  the 30,000 fewer  orders DoorDash incurred.

  • Seattle politicians still defended the rule in the face of these economic demand downturns.

  • Analysis by the National Bureau of  Economic Research in conjunction  with Carnegie Mellon University tracked the economic impacts on individual drivers.

  • They tracked  specific delivery drivers earnings before and after the law went into effect and concluded based on their tracking  analysis that the  law did little to increase the take home pay of gig workers for DoorDash and Uber Eats.

  • A Fortune analysis  reached  the same conclusion that while base pay more  than doubled total take  home pay barely moved because of fewer orders and lower tips.

We have  discussed this  economic ignorance of mostly liberal politicians for years in situations  like this like this: businesses raise prices into order  to stay viable and cope with their much higher labor cost, customers pull back  their demand  because of the higher cost, and  the people the law was  supposed to help never get that bump they were  promised. “The good news is that your base wage just doubled, the bad news is that you no longer have a job” or “The good news is that your base  wage  doubled, the bad news  is your take home pay will likely not change.”

And  with the new minimum wage that Seattle just passed getting  ready to be implemented, there will similar types of economic fallout: less hours worked, benefits stripped out so that business owners can cope with the higher  labor  cost, and fewer hours allocated to the higher paid workers, all of which result in little  or no  economic gain. But it will  continue to drive businesses and residents out of the city and the continued  dwindling to the tax  base and tax revenue.

2)So  let's do a Seattle and Mayor Katie Wilson  review:

  • The gig worker base pay increase failed and likely drove businesses out of the city.

  • The new, higher minimum wage will  likely do  the same thing.

  • Businesses have  been fleeing the city  to avoid the Jumpstart tax and other  onerous city taxes, talking employees and their  tax base with  them.

  • Wealthy folks have  also left the city for Florida,  Texas, and Nevada to  avoid the higher and higher taxation.

  • Seattle has one of the highest levels of homelessness and drug addiction in the country.

  • Crime and gang violence is rampant  as  witnessed by the  failed and embarrassing reaction to the shootings during the Bite Of Seattle event.

It is a city in crisis: rampant crime and homelessness, a dwindling tax base, lower lower quality of life, high taxation, etc. One  would hope that Katie Wilson and other city politicians were laser  focused on fixing these horrible problems.  But, alas, as what always happens with politicians, hope is never realized:

  • Rather than  focusing all of  her energy on the city problems and  the stressed out residents, Wilson  recently hosted, not attended, hosted, a panel  discussion and meeting featuring anti-Israel and  anti-capitalist discussions.

  • These two  hateful  positions  were subtopics  under the overall theme of fascism.

  • She hosted a panel that had two  non-citizens  with  her from Canada.

  • It seems that the underlying theory goes something like the following: Christian Zionists (whatever that means) are in cahoots with Silicon Valley billionaires to trigger a nuclear Armageddon so that Jews can build luxury condos in Gaza and build a Third Temple in Jerusalem.

  • According to  the description of this meeting  reported by the Post Millennial, these three characters never provided any proof that this  was going on, just wild and unfounded theories.

  • Wilson used the  panel to put forth her theories on why Seattle is disintegrating  on her watch, deflecting her  inability to govern to “fascism always emerges in moments of systemic crisis to protect elites from the threats of redistribution and accountability.”

  • In other words, it is not her fault Seattle is in trouble, it is the  elites who refuse to give up their wealth.

  • Also involved  in their ridiculous discussion was , of course, climate change, Hurricane Katrina, and red heifers, whatever that means, somehow connecting  all of these things together in  a mishmash of idiocy.

Even if she believes this nonsense, given the sad state of her city, should she not be  worried  about theoretical nonsense and  be laser focused on fixing the everyday problems of her  residents and businesses? Discussing climate change red  heifers,  the Third Temple, Christian  Zionists (again I  have no idea  how that is possible), does nothing  to get  the  homeless city drug addicts treatment, it does nothing to get economic relief to  the beleaguered businesses that are still in her city, it does nothing to reduce the violence of crime in her  city.

She is spending time  hosting  a panel that has no relationship to the everyday problems of her  city. But possibly, maybe she has no idea how to fix her city and  this  theoretical nonsense gives her a comfortable feeling that she  is mastering something even if it has  no positive impact on  anyone  else in Seattle.

As a result  of her  track record of failure and now  this distraction, a focus  on  something totally unrelated  to  the  city's problems, our contention that Seattle will be the next major  city to  go bankrupt looks stronger  everyday.


Saturday, September 5, 2026

The Race To Bankruptcy Court: Hey California, When Stuck In A Hole, Stop Digging

 Let’s check in with our discussion on which  city or state government is going to  get to bankruptcy court first. Our primary cities in the race to bankruptcy include New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and newcomer, Seattle. The state governments that we think are soon heading into bankruptcy include New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and California with Washington state a newcomer to the race.


The reason for returning to this topic in the midst of our corruption series is because there have been some significant developments in the race to bankruptcy court. However, before reviewing the latest news and seeing which state or city is making the best progress towards government bankruptcy, let’s review how these cities and states got themselves into this financial death spiral position to begin with:


  • A government entity keeps expanding its budget, eventually putting pressure on the tax revenue stream it receives. 

  • At some point, rather than cut government spending or make its programs more efficient financially, the politicians in charge raise taxes to meet the ever growing government expenditures.

  • The raising of taxes causes some residents and businesses to leave the city or state for less tax burdensome areas, reducing the tax base and reducing the revenue stream.

  • Rather than cut expenses and become more efficient to match the reduced tax revenue stream, politicians in the above cities or states raise the tax burden even more.

  • This causes more residents and businesses to flee the city or state, further reducing the tax base and tax revenue stream.

  • At some point politicians panic and raise taxes more and start cutting vital government services (e.g. police, fire, education) in order to try and balance government spending against the shrinking tax base and revenue stream.

  • The reduction in quality of government services in particular and quality of life in general drives more residents and businesses out of the area.

  • Eventually, the expenses, costs and financial liabilities outstrip the reduced tax stream and bankruptcy occurs.


Okay that’s the process. Let’s see  what is going on  in the newest and possibly the  strongest contender  for bankruptcy court.


1)An old saying goes as  follows: "When stuck in  a hole, stop digging." When  businesses and residents  are fleeing your  city or  state because of high  taxes, probably the best first step is to stop increasing  current taxes or introducing new  taxes. 


Apparently, that message has not gotten through the thick  skulls of California politicians, a prime state to go bankrupt as residents and businesses  leave the state,  diminishing the state government tax revenue  stream:


  • California motorists currently suffer from the highest gas tax  burden in the country and  sky high  DMV registration fees while driving  on  some of the worst maintained  roads in the  country.

  • On  top of those burdens, the California Energy Commission has suggested that new  rules be adopted for replacement tires that would  make  about 70% of  the current  vehicle tires on the market ineligible to be sold in the  state.

  • Drivers would have to purchase  tires that are more expensive under  the proposed guidelines.

  • Theoretically, the tires that would be  required would be more fuel-efficient and  better from a safety perspective. 

  • However, how much more those  tires would cost and how much  fuel  they would save is open to debate among  parties involved in the tire  business.


Of  all the problems the state is facing, out-migration of businesses and residents, high crime rates, high homeless rates, massive fraud in government programs, bad roads, bad education system, unfunded  financial liabilities, etc., why is reducing the  variety and increasing the cost of replacement tires even on  politicians' agenda  and priority list?


So the state government will go bankrupt but  at  least the  drivers  left in the  state will have fuel efficient  tires.  Great.


2)But the motor vehicle tax revenue insanity in the  state gets even worse:


  • A recent state government budget item quietly allocates  motor  vehicle  registration money to be used to pay for  security details for state politicians long AFTER they have left office.

  • California taxpayer motorists have already funded Kamala Harris’  security staff during  her  book tour last spring.

  • Once Gavin Newsom  leaves office and starts his Presidential campaign, California drivers will be subsidizing his  security details also even though he  will be a  private citizen  worth tens of millions  of  dollars and who can easily afford to fund his own security arrangements.

  • According  to the  budget line  item, this cost to protect  former politicians will run  about $20 million  a year.

  • California Highway Patrol officers would be taken  off their duties to protect the citizens  and businesses of the state and be used to staff security details for former politicians.


More expensive tires  and more  expensive vehicle  registration fees being  used  to protect wealthy former politicians on top of high  gas taxes and high DMV registration fees. The taxes just keep  on coming  and the residents and businesses who no longer want to live under such heavy tax  burdens keep on  leaving.


3)Thank  goodness there are no other  ways to gouge California motorists out of their  money. But wait,  maybe  there  is another way to get blood out of  a rock:


  • California  Democrats in the state government want California drivers to pay a so-called “mileage tax.”

  • Thus,  in addition  to sky high  gas taxes, high motor vehicle  registration fees, more expensive tires, and  the diverting  of registration  fees to pay for security for former politicians, the  new tax would  assess a per mile tax  for state drivers.

  • Their  new tax would likely be between six and nine cents  a mile driven.

  • Thus, a new annual fee for drivers  could range from $900 to  $1,350 if  a driver drove 15,000  miles  a year.

  • The Reform California  organization estimates  that a typical California family with  two cars could end up paying over $4,000 in mileage fees  a year.

  • This would be on top of the $.90 a gallon in taxes and fees California drivers pay for  every gallon of gas they use.

  • The amount  billed for mileage would be calculated in one of two ways.

  • Drivers could  agree  to have  a GPS tracking unit in their car that would report their mileage or  every year they could  go to a state DMV location  to have their odometer read.

  • And the  other  scary part of this planned new  tax is that Democrats have a  super majority in the  state government which means  that taxpayers will have no say in whether  or not this new tax  gets implemented, Democrats in the legislature can do it without permission of those that will be impacted.


The impact of this  fiasco  is not  just that drivers will pay more. The visiting nurse  that visits sick and shut-in customers will see  her costs go up over $1,000  a year, an increased  cost she will likely pass  onto her customers.  The Door Dash and Uber Eats drivers will see their operating costs go up and will pass those increased costs  on  to their customers. The ripple effect will affect everyone  that is still in  the state, 

whether  they drive a car or not.


So, folks are fleeing California because  of high  costs of living and taxation  and what do California politicians do: they layer on three new  taxation  schemes, more expensive tires, diverting  motor vehicle  registration  fees to protect bygone politicians, and taxing every driver in the  state on mileage. 


Hey, state politicians,  listen up: “when you are in a hole stop digging.” When excessive taxation  is drying  up your tax revenue  steam, at least stop  with the new taxes. 


All  of which confirms that the state government of California hasn't learned any lessons and will continue  to be a  strong  contender  for the first state government to go bankrupt.


********************

Vote Now!!!! Go to to the following link and vote  on which state  or city government you think  will go bankrupt first:


https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61592458935721


**********************

If you agree that we need to deseat every member of Congress for their lack of success and accomplishment, then please consider going to the following petition link to help the cause:


https://www.change.org/p/deseat-congress-reset-freedom



**********************


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at: