Showing posts with label wealth tax. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wealth tax. Show all posts

Sunday, November 1, 2026

The Race To Bankruptcy Court: Hey, California, When Stuck In A Hole, Stop Digging

 Let’s check in with our discussion on which city or state government is going to get to bankruptcy court first. Our primary cities in the race to bankruptcy include New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and newcomer, Seattle. The state governments that we think are soon heading into bankruptcy include New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and California with Washington state a newcomer to the race.


The reason for returning to this topic in the midst of our corruption series is because there have been some significant developments in the race to bankruptcy court. However, before reviewing the latest news and seeing which state or city is making the best progress towards government bankruptcy, let’s review how these cities and states got themselves into this financial death spiral position to begin with:


  • A government entity keeps expanding its budget, eventually putting pressure on the tax revenue stream it receives.

  • At some point, rather than cut government spending or make its programs more efficient financially, the politicians in charge raise taxes to meet the ever growing government expenditures.

  • The raising of taxes causes some residents and businesses to leave the city or state for less tax burdensome areas, reducing the tax base and reducing the revenue stream.

  • Rather than cut expenses and become more efficient to match the reduced tax revenue stream, politicians in the above cities or states raise the tax burden even more.

  • This causes more residents and businesses to flee the city or state, further reducing the tax base and tax revenue stream.

  • At some point politicians panic and raise taxes more and start cutting vital government services (e.g. police, fire, education) in order to try and balance government spending against the shrinking tax base and revenue stream.

  • The reduction in quality of government services in particular and quality of life in general drives more residents and businesses out of the area.

  • Eventually, the expenses, costs and financial liabilities outstrip the reduced tax stream and bankruptcy occurs.

Okay that’s the process. Let’s see what is going on with the top candidates in the race to bankruptcy court.


1)We have  often discussed the reality that California has one of  the highest taxation burdens in the  country for both residents and businesses: high state income taxes, sales taxes, property taxes,  business taxes, etc. In fact, according to  the Tax Foundation, the state has the  third highest state tax burden in the  country. 


And depending on  what happens in a few days after the elections, the state may impose the so-called  “wealth tax” on its billionaires. Or at least on the billionaires still living in the state since many billionaires have already fled  to avoid the  wealth  tax if passed by voters.


But the rush for more taxes  by the state politicians may not stop there:


  • Xavier Becerra is  running for the governorship  of California.

  • According to reporting by the NewYork Post, Becerra has voiced his  support for a potential new tax on mail driven by state drivers.

  • Theoretically, this new tax revenue would be  used to fix the collapsing road infrastructure in the state.

  • According to Becerra, “Everything should be on the table,”  which is politicians’ code for it will happen.

  • Workers that commute  long distances to get to work because they cannot  afford to live close to their  jobs and those that drive  for  their careers, e.g. home visiting  nurses, florists, Uber drivers, etc. would probably be the hardest hit and least able to afford the  mileage tax.

  • Republican  politician, Carl  De Maio, is leading the opposition to the  mileage tax.

  • He  claims  that the mileage charge would likely be  between  6 and 9 cents  a mile.

  • Thus, a driver that travels  a moderate 15,000 miles a year would see a mileage tax charge  of between $900 and $1,350:  “Because of the extreme policies of Democrats in Sacramento, California has the highest cost of living in the nation – and now the Democrats want to make it worse by imposing a crazy new Mileage Tax on all drivers.” 


There  is an old saying:  “When  stuck in a hole, stop digging.” Good advice for any  politician  in the state: you have one of the  highest tax  burdens in the country and you want  to  add possibly two new  taxes on top  of  the  current burden? You already know that residents and businesses are fleeing  the state because of high taxes  so why feed the out migration with  new taxes?! Stop digging.


Also, one  of the reasons for their perceived lack of enough tax funds is that the state politicians have presided over one of the most corrupt and inept government  operations in the  country. The high  speed  rail line effort wasted  tens of billions of dollars with nothing  to show for it. The  Federal government came in  and  shut down almost 500 bogus, criminal, tax revenue sucking Medicaid operations in the state and  not one of  those operations complained  that they were  legitimate.  Remember,  one of those bogus Medicaid criminal enterprises had a burrito stand as its  business address  while another had a tire store as its  Medicaid  address.


Maybe if the state politicians had a  little  gumption, brain power, and initiative they would clean  up  the  misuse and  criminality of current government  programs. That would free up existing tax revenue to fix what needs to be fixed  without adding  more  taxes.


But brainpower and gumption has never been a trait  of  these politicians, much easier to just raise taxes than  fixing what is broken. And continue digging the financial hole  deeper and  deeper until the sides of that hole collapse into bankruptcy.


2)As stated above, the traits of a  city or state going bankrupt  is the inability of that government entity to protect the lives of those that they serve, a basic tenet of any government entity. And of course, Chicago, a prime candidate to go bankrupt,  fails not only along the lines of  high taxation and the impending  financial collapse, but the city also continues the inability to protect its  citizens:


  • As of mid-October, 319 residents of Chicago had been shot and  killed by the rampant violence in the city.

  • This comes out  to about  one murder a day in the city this year.

  • Another 47 residents had been killed by non-shooting means.

  • An additional 1,292 residents had  been shot and wounded, about four  wounded every day.

  • These murder and wounded numbers are about the same as  the same  period in  2025.


Just a reminder that Chicago is not just financially suffering but also suffering from a quality of life perspective. Thus, there is no reason to think that Chicago is not still headed towards bankruptcy as businesses and residents not only flee because  of financial stress but also because  of safety stress.


3)Let’s finish today with some more stats that continue to show why people  are leaving some states and heading for other states, leaving the original states in a  financial bind of a shrinking tax base:


  • According to the Tax Foundation’s latest analysis, Florida, Texas and Tennessee, three prime states where tax weary residents and businesses are heading towards, rank as the 5th, 7th, and  8th best states from a tax burden  perspective,i.e. lesser taxation  burdens.

  • However, the four states that we believe are hurtling towards bankruptcy court, Illinois, California, New Jersey, and New York, rank  as the 38th, 48th, 49th,  and  50th worst states from a  taxation perspective.

  • These rankings are based on four broad tax categories: corporate taxes,  individual income tax, sales tax, property tax, and unemployment  insurance tax  so it  is a  comprehensive picture of the  overall taxation picture.


So it is no surprise that tech companies and talent  are fleeing  California and financial types are fleeing New York, the tax burden in these states are high and not  likely to  ease anytime soon. But given that the political class in these states are addicted to taxation as a way to  resolve inept government and  unnecessary government  programs,  that addiction  will eventually drag  their state governments into  bankruptcy court.


**********************

If you agree that we need to deseat every member of Congress for their lack of success and accomplishment, then please consider going to the following petition link to help the cause:


https://www.change.org/p/deseat-congress-reset-freedom



**********************


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:


Saturday, October 31, 2026

The Race To Bankruptcy Court: Seattle Still Hemorrhaging Businesses, The Freest States In the Country and The Wealth Tax Disaster In California

Let’s check in with our discussion on which city or state government is going to get to bankruptcy court first. Our primary cities in the race to bankruptcy include New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and newcomer, Seattle. The state governments that we think are soon heading into bankruptcy include New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and California with Washington state a newcomer to the race.

The reason for returning to this topic in the midst of our corruption series is because there have been some significant developments in the race to bankruptcy court. However, before reviewing the latest news and seeing which state or city is making the best progress towards government bankruptcy, let’s review how these cities and states got themselves into this financial death spiral position to begin with:

  • A government entity keeps expanding its budget, eventually putting pressure on the tax revenue stream it receives.
  • At some point, rather than cut government spending or make its programs more efficient financially, the politicians in charge raise taxes to meet the ever growing government expenditures.
  • The raising of taxes causes some residents and businesses to leave the city or state for less tax burdensome areas, reducing the tax base and reducing the revenue stream.
  • Rather than cut expenses and become more efficient to match the reduced tax revenue stream, politicians in the above cities or states raise the tax burden even more.
  • This causes more residents and businesses to flee the city or state, further reducing the tax base and tax revenue stream.
  • At some point politicians panic and raise taxes more and start cutting vital government services (e.g. police, fire, education) in order to try and balance government spending against the shrinking tax base and revenue stream.
  • The reduction in quality of government services in particular and quality of life in general drives more residents and businesses out of the area.
  • Eventually, the expenses, costs and financial liabilities outstrip the reduced tax stream and bankruptcy occurs.
Okay that’s the process. Let’s see what is going on with the top candidates in the race to bankruptcy court.

1)We have previously often discussed the many businesses that have moved and businesses out of Seattle, diminishing the tax base with each move. As we discussed above, this out migration is a very serious symptom of a city or state heading down a financial death spiral.

And it appears that the outward movement of city businesses in Seattle is not going to abate anytime soon:
  • According to a recent survey conducted by the Downtown Seattle Association and the Seattle Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce, about half of the businesses in Seattle are considering moving or downsizing their business.
  • 56% of those surveyed say the city business climate has gotten worse, 61% are pessimistic about the next 12 months, 47% considering moving jobs out of Seattle.
  • 72% say the city’s taxes, fees, and business regulation burden are not competitive.
  • Jamila Conley is the owner of WeRise Wine Bar in the city: “Now I understand why people go to Bellevue. You travel five miles over the water and your minimum wage drops, your insurance drops, your taxes drop and it’s just like, ‘oh I get it.’ I am Seattle ride or die, but it sure does look appealing.”
  • She points out that wages due to one of the highest minimum wages in the country are going to rise again next year making it even harder for a small business to be profitable.
  • Conley points out a reality that we have discussed many times before when politicians keep irrationally raising the minimum wage: the good news is you just got a raise, the bad news is that you no longer have a job since we cannot afford the higher wage rate: “I support all of that, but you can’t do that in a vacuum because all you’re doing is like, yeah, this person used to be able to have this job, but if the place they’re working can’t afford them anymore, how is this helping?”
  • Conley went on to explain that she had to put up a security gate in front of her business to keep her employees safe.
  • She often found homeless folks, drug addicts, and other shady characters hanging out at her front door.
  • 64% of those polled said that taxes and public safety.crime were the main challenges to doing business in the city.
None of this is a surprise: high taxes, high homeless rates, high crime rates, out migration of residents, businesses and tax revenue, and before you know it, bankruptcy.

2)The Cato Institute recently completed a large study and analysis where they ranked states from an economic freedom perspective. They scored each state across a series of economic indicators and then compiled those indicators into a final rating.

The final comprehensive rating was interesting:
  • States that we have discussed that are receiving many of the businesses and residents fleeing the bankruptcy trending cities and states are Texas and Florida, ranked as the 3rd and 9th best states from a freedom perspective.
  • This isn't a surprise as people flee to places where they can keep as much of their hard earned wealth as possible since the more financial freedom you have the more personal freedom you have.
  • Also, businesses and residents are fleeing Seattle and the state of Washington and moving to Idaho and Montana which ranked as the 2nd and 8th freest states in the country.
  • However, the least free states, as analyzed by Cato, tell the best part of the story.
  • We have long maintained that New Jersey, New York, California, and Illinois are the most likely state governments to go bankrupt.
  • And they just happen to rank as the 46th, 47th, 48th, and 42nd worst states from a freedom perspective.
Not a surprise: why stay in a city or state that has high taxes, high business regulations, and bad quality of life situations (high crime, high homelessness, etc.)? And it is doubtful that the politicians in cities and states that have the lowest amount of freedom are going to give up that control anytime soon. All of which just accelerates their decline into a financial death spiral as Americans and businesses head for the freest states.

3)We have often talked about the inane tax proposal in California where state billionaires would face a one time 5% tax on their wealth, not their income. This would require many state billionaires to each fork over billions of dollars to a state government that has proven time and again that it is not a good steward of taxpayer wealth, wasting it on projects that never get completed, fraud schemes that rob government programs, or kickbacks to their political allies.

And no sane person believes that this is a “one time” tax.Once politicians get their hands on any new tax source they will almost always exploit it and expand it.

As a result, state billionaires are not stupid, many of them have already left the state, taking their wealth and current and future tax liabilities with them:

  • Google co-founder, Larry Page, has moved to Florida to avoid an estimated $11 billion tax hit.
  • Google co-founder, Sergey Brin, has moved to Florida to avoid an estimated $11 billion tax hit.
  • Meta/Facebook founder, Mark Zuckerberg, has purchased a home in Florida and is threatening to move out of California.
  • Paypal/Palantir founder, Peter Thiel, has moved to Florida to avoid the wealth tax estimated to be about $1.7 billion for him.
  • Former Uber CEO, Travis Kalanick, has moved to Texas to avoid the wealth tax.
  • Tech investor of Craft Ventures, David Sacks, has moved to Texas to avoid the wealth tax.
  • Auto Finance billionaire, Don Hankey, has moved to Nevada to avoid the wealth tax estimated to be about $180 million.
As we have discussed many times, not only will the state government lose out on the potential wealth tax revenue that has now left the state, but these billionaires will no longer be paying high state income tax rates, high property tax rates and other government taxes for years and years to come. Thus, the state will lose tax revenue from these other tax streams.

Up to this point in time, we didn't have the data to estimate how much these other tax streams would be negatively affected. But a recent study and analysis from the Hoover Institute did just that:

This paper examines the revenue and migration impact of the 2026 California Billionaire Tax Act, a one-time 5 percent tax on the worldwide net worth of individuals exceeding $1 billion. Using data from the Forbes Billionaire List, news reports detailing the residential real estate holdings of California billionaires, and public announcements of billionaire departures from the state, we estimate the behavioral response and associated revenue loss to this new tax using several different methodologies. Even before accounting for reductions in other tax bases such as the income tax, we estimate that the Act will collect approximately $30 billion (range $28 to 36 billion), less than a third of the $100 billion projected by Galle et al. (2025). This range accounts for the publicly confirmed taxpayer migration that has already eliminated nearly 30 percent of the Act's wealth tax base, applies a litigation-survival discount to the remaining base, and is validated by the wealth tax base elasticity literature. We estimate that California's billionaires contribute $3.3–5.8 billion annually in state income taxes. The present value of permanently lost income tax collections from departures more than offsets the one-time wealth tax revenue, yielding a net present value of negative $38.9 billion. Across 100,000 simulated revenue and discount rate combinations, 85 percent of plausible outcomes produce a negative net present value of state revenues.

Thus, according to his extensive, professional and thorough analysis:
  • This potential wealth tax will not deliver an extra $100 billion in tax revenue.
  • In fact, the analysis estimates that only about one third of the expected $100 billion will be generated by the tax since many billionaires have already left the state, taking their potential wealth tax revenue with them.
  • Given fewer billionaires to tax, the bottom line is that the wealth tax, if enacted, will not generate an additional $100 billion in tax revenue but will suppress the entire state government tax revenue stream by almost $39 billion.
So a state with serious financial difficulties already, and a prime candidate of ours to go bankrupt, will dig a deeper financial hole if the wealth tax is enacted. And even if not enacted, the fear of the tax drove out high paying tax residents already, suppressing future tax revenue even if the wealth tax is not enacted.

Thus, as discussed above Seattle, New York, New Jersey, California, and Illinois still appear to still be in the running to become the next major city or first state government to go bankrupt as politicians in those government entities do not understand the relationship between freedom, over taxation and regulation, and elementary economic principles

**********************

If you agree that we need to deseat every member of Congress for their lack of success and accomplishment, then please consider going to the following petition link to help the cause:


https://www.change.org/p/deseat-congress-reset-freedom



**********************


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

Sunday, October 25, 2026

October, 2016, Political Class Insanity, Part 6: More FBI Corruption, More Poor Education Results, More Proof Biden Blew the Afghanistan Withdrawal and More

 The incompetence and mismanagement of taxpayer dollars and government programs, be it Covid, voting, or over staffing continue to waste taxpayer dollars while never resolving any major issue facing the country. We call it political class insanity  so here is  today's dose of  recent insanity:

1)We have often discussed the  reality that the Biden administration illegally and morally weaponized the Federal government to go after their enemies and those with a different position on issues of the time.  They went after Trump, they illegally spied on dozens of Republicans in Congress, they tracked hundreds of thousands of Americans who bought MAGA hats, they sent FBI agents and sometimes FBI SWAT teams to the homes of anti-abotion advocates who did nothing illegal, they forced banks to not do business with conservative and Republican organizations and businesses, etc.

And unfortunately, they took one of the few Federal government  agencies that had a reputation for integrity and turned it into a political weapon, the FBI. And the  ramifications of that abuse of power were recently in the news again:

  • Two former FBI high  ranking officials  were recently arrested on charges of  lying  to Congress while under oath.

  • Nikki  Cole Floirs was  a  deputy assistant director in the FBI in charge  of the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force.

  • Bradley Benavides was section  chief  of that task force.

  • Their  alleged lies to Congress revolved around the Hunter Biden investigations.

  • Both testified in front  of Congress that themselves and the task force were not involved in the Hunter Biden situation.

  • But according to FBI Director, Kash Patel: “Documentary evidence, contemporaneous communications, and witness accounts contradict their testimony.”

  • Recent declassified government documents allegedly show that the task  force and the former  agents had worked hard to protect Hunter Biden from the allegations involving corruption in  Ukraine.

  • Those documents also allegedly show Floria bragging about how she was “running a shadow government” inside the FBI.

“Running a shadow government,”  chilling words to be said by a high ranking law  enforcement  officer that had  sworn to  uphold the laws and Constitution of  the country. And the integrity of the FBI, and the  government in general, takes another hit as far as being unbiased and free from political  hanky panky.

2)The Federal Department  of Education has been around since the Carter administration in 1980, over 45 years ago. Since the current 2026 budget for  the Department  is $79 billion, it is probably a safe bet that the American taxpayer has paid over a trillion dollars into the Department over the past four and a half decades.

Unfortunately, even with spending a  trillion dollars, the education  of our kids has  gotten worse over time:

  • In testing the education achievement levels of kids across different countries, there are usually about two dozen or so countries that educate  their kids better than we educate ours and they usually do  it at a lower cost.

  • We have  previously discussed the reality at a Baltimore inner city high school  where 70% of the graduating seniors were reading at a third grade level or below.

  • We have  also previously discussed the  reality that in  Chicago there were dozens of schools that did not have a single kid that was proficient at grade  level testing for math and reading.

And recent  reports out of California confirm that the situation, despite a trillion dollars, is not getting any better:

  • Across the entire University of California university system almost  20% of freshment students enrolled in  introductory math classes failed  to pass  those classes.

  • This is double the failure rate from just five years ago.

  • This  is  obviously a black eye to the  high  school and elementary education  attainment of these failing freshmen.

  • One of the state universities, UC Merced, had a whopping 36.4% of their  freshmen failing to  pass introductory math classes.

  • This  failure rate was more  than double the  failure rate from five years ago.

  • UC  Riverside  saw  its  failure rate jump 150% over the  five years,  going from  about 8% to  about 20%.

  • Joel Hass, a math professor at UC Davis had  these insights: “There is a wider range of interest and preparedness. We still have a good number of highly qualified students, but also many who are unprepared for college. The preparedness gap between these groups is large.”

  • But this should not surprise us since California grammar and high school students are not doing well  with  only 49.3%  meeting or beating English arts standard testing and  only 38.4% being  proficient in math  in standard testing.

  • And  yet, the state taxpayers via the state government spent $134 billion on K-12 education in  2025-2026 or about a whopping $26,450 per  student, certainly not  a good investment.

  • Given that California state universities do not use SAT or ACT scores  when considering admission, it should not be surprising  that kids getting into  these colleges are not ready for college level learning  since their poor SAT and ACT scores would have shown that reality.

Einstein once said  that doing the same thing over  and over and  expecting different results is the definition of insanity. Spending billions and billions of dollars every year and expecting different  education  results  without changing  the  approach  to education  is  a  prime example of Einstein’s observation.

3)Biden’s Presidency was marked with numerous failures that we will not go into today. Previous  posts examined the failed economic, Constitutional, military, immigration, and diplomatic failures. One of his most prominent failures was the disastrous  withdrawal  from  Afghanistan where  his evacuation plan resulted in the unnecessary death  and wounding of dozens of American service  people.

A recent book by Azadeh  Moavani, which was  excerpted in a recent Vanity Fair article, shows how panicky Jill  Biden's staff was  because  of her  husband's botched Afghanistan withdrawal:

  • As  the withdrawal disaster proceeded, there was an emergency call  where Jill Biden’s staff scrambled to protect the First  Lady’s exposure to the  disaster.

  • The call included discussions about suspending Jill Biden’s “Joining Forces”  initiative  for military families so that she would not face tough questions  or anger from military families.

  • They also discussed curtailing her  public activity for the same reason.

  • According to the article:  “They had a huge fear of doing anything at bases, they were just petrified. Even though this was when military communities needed support.” 

  • While she did visit one military base during  this timeframe, her staff forbade the press from accompanying her, probably to  make sure  there  would not  be negative press.

Another and  unexpected proof that Biden really put together a fatally flawed and  fatal plan to withdraw from  Afghanistan.

4)We have  previously discussed the ridiculously stupid plan out in  California that would impose a  5%  “wealth tax” on  billionaires living in the state. The  plan  is on the ballot for  next month’s elections.  As a result of just the thought  of such a tax, many billionaires and other  wealthy California people  have fled the state to  avoid the potential tax on wealth, not income.

This out migration  will reduce the  expected  take from a wealth tax  if it  is  passed since a lot of the billionaires that were  assumed to be liable to the tax have left the state already to avoid it. Also, not only will  the  wealth  tax not deliver what has been promised but other tax revenue streams will also  suffer.  

Billionaires who left the state because of the wealth tax idea will no  longer be paying state  income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes, etc. so that the entire state government tax stream has  already taken a hit. Thus, the wealth tax may not happen but the  threat of it has had major negative effects on tax revenue.

An unforeseen  negative impact of such a tax has recently arisen as it concerns  Mark Zuckerberg the  CEO  of Meta/Facebook:

  • Zuckerberg lives and  works in California and is a billionaire many times over.

  • If the wealth tax becomes reality,  there are estimates that he would have to pay over $12 billion.

  • As a result, he  has publicly stated that he may move his residence out  of the state to  avoid  the tax.

  • But high ranking Meta executives and the board  of directors want to keep him in the state and close  to the  Meta  operations.

  • So  they have  come up with  a plan  to shield his personal wealth and  keep him in the state because they feel that having  Zuckerberg  close to  the  Meta operations in  California is “critically important” to the company's  future success.

  • Thus, the board has  approved a new class  of nonvoting stock shares that they would create and give to  Zuckerberg who  could then sell to  cover his personal  wealth  tax amount.

  • As a result, Zuckerberg has committed  to staying in the state for eight more years since his wealth tax liability is now covered by the gift  of nonvoting  shares that he  can now sell  to cover the tax liability.

However, while Zuckerberg suffers no financial downside,  millions  of Americans that own Meta shares will take a financial hit.  It is a simple  matter of basic economics: with the creation  of news shares,  current shares are less valuable since the value of the  company did not increase, but the value is now spread out  over more shares in the market  when Zuckerberg sells his  nonvoting shares.

A simple matter  of supply and demand: increase the supply (stock shares) and  the demand, and the resulting price, goes  down. Thus, an unintended bad consequence of the ridiculous wealth  tax idea is that average Americans will see a decrease in their wealth via Meta share  ownership while Zuckerberg pays  nothing in additional taxes. 

A  stupid  idea gets even more  stupid. But kudos to Zuckerberg on  avoiding the wealth tax  impact on his financials.

Enough insanity for today: more negative wealth  tax fallout, more  proof that Biden blew the Afghanistan withdrawal,  more failing education results in the  country  and  more  FBI corruption and loss of integrity.

**********************

If you agree that we need to deseat every member of Congress for their lack of success and accomplishment, then please consider going to the following petition link to help the cause:


https://www.change.org/p/deseat-congress-reset-freedom



**********************


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:


Tuesday, May 5, 2026

The Race To Bankruptcy Court: California Still Losing, Florida Still Winning, Washington State Making a Move

 We are going to take a little break from  the past several posts which showed the disgusting waste of taxpayer wealth that is  criminally siphoned off from Medicaid,  Covid, and other government programs.  Instead, we will update some of the latest news and probabilities on what states and  cities are likely to  go bankrupt first.

As always, our top state governments that we think are nearing bankruptcy include New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and California. Our top major cities we think are rapidly approaching bankruptcy include New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco.

Before reviewing the latest news and seeing which state or city is making the best progress towards government bankruptcy, let’s review how these cities and states got themselves into this financial death spiral position to begin with:


  • A government entity keeps expanding its budget, eventually putting pressure on the tax revenue stream it receives.

  • At some point, rather than cut government spending or make its programs more efficient financially, the politicians in charge raise taxes to meet the ever growing government expenditures.

  • The raising of taxes causes some residents and businesses to leave the city or state for less tax burdensome areas, reducing the tax base and reducing the revenue stream.

  • Rather than cut expenses and become more efficient to match the reduced tax revenue stream, politicians in the above cities or states raise the tax burden even more.

  • This causes more residents and businesses to flee the city or state, further reducing the tax base and tax revenue stream.

  • At some point politicians panic and raise taxes more and start cutting vital government services (e.g. police, fire, education) in order to try and balance government spending against the shrinking tax base and revenue stream.

  • The reduction in quality of government services in particular and quality of life in general drives more residents and businesses out of the area.

  • Eventually, the expenses, costs and financial liabilities outstrip the reduced tax stream and bankruptcy occurs.


Okay, that's the process, let's look at the mounting evidence across the country on how this is playing out.

1)We have previously discussed the insanity of the “one time” “billionaire tax”  that California politicians want  to impose on their richest and highest tax paying residents. In theory, this one time tax of  5% on  any wealth valued at over $1  million would be hit.  This tax is insane from a couple of different perspectives:


  • What is wealth and  how will it be  defined, e.g. does it include the equity in  one’s  house, does it include stock shares  that have  not been  sold, etc.? It  is not  like a 1099 or other IRS tax  form is going to nicely categorize wealth.

  • The proponents of the tax say it  is necessary to fill a one time budget gap. But won’t that budget gap happen year in and year out if faulty, stupid, and inefficient government spending and programs are not fixed?

  • Apparently  the voters have to  approve the tax assessment per California law in the  November election. But hidden in the draft of the law is the availability to future California politicians is the sneaky ability to adjust that $1 billion threshold in the future. Thus, it could be  a billion dollar  threshold today but a lower level  in the future and changing it to a  lower level would not require voter  approval, given the hidden clause in the initial roll out  of the  legislation.

  • And the real proof of  the  insanity of this concept  is the reality that many California billionaires have already moved out of the state to  avoid this wealth tax, taking their other tax dollars and  their economic power with them to low tax states like Texas and Florida.  Thus, whatever  money the creators of this tax thought they were going to get gets lower  and lower every day every time a billionaire leaves the state.


A recent article from the Steadfast Daily website puts some of this insanity into  perspective:


  • A new analysis by the Stop The Squeeze campaign has quantified some of the severe downsides  of this wealth tax.

  • The analysis predicts that  as billionaires  leave the state they will be taking their businesses  with them along with the jobs those businesses create.

  • They estimate that this out migration  of billionaires and  jobs will  total over 108,000  lost California based jobs.

  • Those jobs will be taking  about $28 billion in lost wages with them, wages that other California tax platforms can no  longer tax.

  • The analysis goes on to  predict if  the  legislation is passed, at least 40 billionaires will  leave the state, taking $2 TRILLION in wealth with them.

  • According to the Steadfast Daily article: “When high-net-worth individuals relocate, the report argues, companies often follow or scale back operations, leading to fewer jobs, reduced consumer spending, and diminished investment in future growth.”

  • The report predicts that this out-migration  of billionaires and the employees  and companies they take  with them will reduce the state government personal income tax  base by about $12 billion annually by 2046  or about $122 billion over the next 20 years.

  • So whatever the state government  gets from the wealth  tax has to be  reduced by the taxation dollars it will lose from other taxes simply because the tax base has shrunk.


Is this a valid  analysis, are these valid  predictions? Who  knows, but the  reality is that many billionaires have already left the state before knowing if the tax  will be  passed and  put in place so  the damage from just talking about the tax is already done and cannot be undone.


Thus, our  continued view that California continues to  lead the  way of all state governments in the race to bankruptcy court.


2)In a recent  post we listed out many of the  companies that have moved  major portions  of their  operations and  employees or all of  their operations and employees out of the state of California to Texas. That post can  be  reviewed at:


https://loathemygovernment.blogspot.com/2026/05/the-race-to-bankruptcy-court-mamdani.html


The list of companies is impressive: Yamaha, Chevron, Toyota, Tesla, Charles Schwab, Hewlett Packard  Enterprise,  and  a host of  other  large,medium and  small  sized businesses that have already taken their  company employees, and tax base to Texas.


But Florida has also been a  haven for businesses  fleeing New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and California. Given their non-existent personal income  tax, lower business  taxes and  business regulations, and better quality of  life,  Florida  has been absorbing a large number of  people and companies. Recently, Florida announced another big fish that it has reeled into residence in the Sunshine State:


  • D-Wave Quantum is leaving Silicon Valley in California and heading to  Florida.

  • They will be bringing hundreds of high  paying jobs to Boca Raton,  Florida.

  • According to D`Wave CEO, Dr. Alan  Baratz:“Florida represents one of the fastest growing technology ecosystems in the United States, and as such it was the ideal choice for our new corporate headquarters and U.S. R&D facility. The state offers a rich scientific and educational environment, a growing pool of highly skilled people.  With our new headquarters in Boca Raton, D-Wave will bring to South Florida incredible  opportunities for advanced research, talent recruitment, and high-impact technology development that is shaping the future of computing.”


What is critical to  the bankruptcy financial death spiral that at least California finds itself in, as  more and more tech companies leave California, the need for people in the tech  industry to  work  in California diminishes. As Dr.  Baratz pointed out, Florida “offers a rich scientific and educational environment, a  growing pool  of  highly skilled people.” 


In other words,  Silicon Valley  and California are losing their near monopoly on tech  businesses and tech talent. Thus, new and existing companies now have options that will allow them  to more easily compete and possibly beat California tech companies, a reality that did not exist until recently.


3)And  if two billionaires have  their way,  D-Wave  will  not be  the last company to leave California, New York, New Jersey, or Illinois  and head to Florida:


  • Ken Griffin  and Stephen Ross are two U.S. billionaires living in Florida.

  • Apparently they like living in  Florida since they recently put $10 million  into an  effort called Ambition Accelerated.

  • The sole purpose of this effort is  to convince CEOs and  business leaders  to move their operations to Florida.

  • At a recent  conference in  West Palm Beach, Florida they were selling the reasons for companies and  people to move  to Florida’s Gold Coast, a stretch  from  Palm Beach to  Miami.

  • They touted the state’s  low taxes,  business-friendly policies, and great quality of life.

  •  Griffin  started his company in  Chicago  and Ross started his in  New York City, two states and two cities that are at the top of  our list for more likely to  go  bankrupt first but they eventually moved their operations to Florida.

  • According to  Mr. Ross’ comments at the conference:  “Florida really answers all those things that people are looking for. I think this is a place that is about to explode.”

  • Their  effort offers  consultations  with people either looking to  move  an existing  business to Florida or  starting a new business  in the  state, highlighting the reality that employees would not  have to pay a state income tax.

  • Since moving to Florida, Mr. Griffin has personally donated millions of dollars  to healthcare and education  efforts in Florida.

  • The  host of the conference referenced  above was the Wall Street Journal and  its  CEO, Almar Latour, said  it  was not a  random  act that the conference  was held  in  Florida: “So many captains of industry have set up shop in this region. Private equity, venture capital, banking, hedge funds, wealth management, crypto. At least 115 billionaires now call Florida home.”


More proof that Florida  is  the big winner as the favored states continue to drive their states to financial ruin with high taxes,  excessive business  regulations, lower quality of life, and out-migration  of residents and businesses.


4)While New York, California, New  Jersey, and Illinois  along with New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, and  San  Francisco  have always been our favorite picks to  go bankrupt first, the state of Washington and the city of Seattle are also in the running for bankruptcy:


  • Washington state government politicians  have recently violated their own  state constitution by passing legislation that will assess a new tax on  million  dollar earners.

  • Billionaire and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos has  already moved out of the state to  lower taxation state Florida, just one  of many wealthy folks that have left.

  • Seattle already has one  of the  highest city tax burdens of most other cities.

  • The Seattle  mayor, Katie Wilson, recently insulted millionaire taxpayers in the city when she  was  asked  if millionaires were leaving Seattle she offhandedly and  condescendingly said “Bye.”


And a recent  announcement by the  city’s largest  employer makes  the situation  worse for both the city and  the state:


  • Rather than expand business operations in Seattle, Starbucks recently announced that a major expansion of its corporate footprint will be  in lower cost Tennessee.

  • The Washington Policy Council estimates that the state government will lose $750 million in tax revenue  over the next twenty years as a  result of the  Tennessee  move.

  • Starbucks expects to  invest  $100 million  in its Tennessee operation which will place  2,000  jobs in Nashville, not  in  Seattle.

  • The real kicker is that Starbucks  estimates that it will save a staggering $12,000 per employee a year by going to Tennessee.


Starbucks has called Seattle  home since its funding in 1971. And yet, that history and  tradition  took a back seat to economics and business  profitability when it  came  time  to expand operations. Thus,Washington state and the city of Seattle  are  still viable candidates to go bankrupt due  to the economic and business ignorance of  their politicians.  They are viable but at this  point long shots given  the  insanity of the politicians  in the cities and states listed above.


California is still losing, Florida is still winning,  and Washington is making a move in the race to bankruptcy.


**********************

If you agree that we need to deseat every member of Congress for their lack of success and accomplishment, then please consider going to the following petition link to help the cause:


https://www.change.org/p/deseat-congress-reset-freedom



**********************


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at: