Showing posts with label mideast. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mideast. Show all posts

Friday, December 17, 2010

Lots Of Talk, No Action: The Current Impotency and Lack Of Leverage Of America Foreign Policy

This blog has often talked about the American political class inability to get anything accomplished relative to the major issues facing Americans today. These major issues include the failed war on drugs, failing public schools, the lack of a national energy policy, a non-existent immigration plan and strategy, and the failure to solve the problem of escalating health care costs in this country.

However, this inability apparently is not restricted to the domestic side of political class responsibilities. If you look at our country's foreign policy recently you see very few successes (recent trade agreement with South Korea) and a whole lot of failures:

- There was a recent conference in Geneva that involved Iran and the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France, and Germany [Associated Press - December 7, 2010]. The conference was supposed to find a way to allow Iran to develop a peaceful nuclear energy program while preventing them from developing nuclear weapons. The talks ended with a promise of all countries to get together again in 2011. State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley went so far to say that: "We are encouraged that there will be a follow-on meeting [in 2011].

Sound familiar? It seems this dance has been going on for a long time, with Iran skillfully sitting down for talks with the over eager other six nations and hinting at enough progress to not kill future talks but never agreeing to anything either. This has been going on for years, with no concessions from Iran but serving as their delaying tactic for their continued developed of a nuclear weapon capability. Lots of talk, no action.

- The never ending search for peace between the Palestinians and Israel also has recently been in the news. The United States, for years, has tried to mediate talks between the two factions, with a recent agreement stipulating that Israel would not do any more settlement construction in Jerusalem for 90 days. This agreement was necessary to prevent the Palestinians from walking out of the peace talks. The Obama administration was so desperate for the 90 day window that they agreed to get billions of dollars of weaponry to Israel and made other diplomatic commitments for their moratorium on construction, all for a mere 90 day freeze on construction.

However, shortly afterward, Israel declared that the U.S. was too consumed by the Wikileaks fiasco to talk peace (Associated press - December 7, 2010) and that the U.S. had stopped the peace talk process. The State Department denied that this was the case and the talks were still on. However, it appears that the Israelis are using the weak excuse of Wikileaks to get the military hardware and diplomatic air cover that the U.S. committed to but never wanted to continue the peace talks anyway. Thus, all of the United States' plans to keep both sides happy and talking are likely to fail. Lots of talk, no action. 

- Every time that North Korea acts up, the United States goes begging to China to please, please intervene and keep the North Koreans in check. However, China apparently has very little motivation to keep the North Koreans in check according to recent news reports and documents:
  • China likes having a buffer between itself and U.S. ally South Korea. If the North government should collapse, then South Korean, and possibly U.S. troops, could be sitting on the Chinese border, something they probably do not want.
  • If the North Korean government should collapse, there is a very high probability that millions of starving North Korean citizens would flee to the more prosperous China in search of food and shelter, an event that the Chinese definitely do not want to cope with.
  • The North Koreans intermittently act aggressively towards Japan, a military and economic competitor of nearby China. With North Korea as a wild card, it distracts Japan in its affairs and confrontations with China.
As with the Mideast peace talks and hopes and the delaying Iranians nuclear meetings, lots of talk, no action when it comes to North Korea.

What do all of these situations have in common? Namely, the United States no longer has the leverage to make/convince others to do what it wants. Without leverage, other parties will do what the want and is best for them, not what is best for U.S. interests. Especially today, with a fragile economy, the United States has lost the leverage of economic power. China's economy has grown so much and made us so dependent on it that we can do nothing but go to the Chinese and beg for them to do something about North Korea.

The Israelis are living in a prosperous economic environment that is relatively secure. The Palestinian leaders exist and continue in power because of the hatred it sows among its citizens towards Israel. None of the parties involved, Israeli and Palestinians citizens and leaders really want peace as defined by the United States. We have no leverage to make them change their minds from the status quo but we are gullible enough to sign short term and costly agreements that the Israelis abide by or ignore at their will. Again, no leverage to make them do what we want, they have more to lose than to gain.

What leverage do we have with the Iranians? Obviously, the five or six rounds of sanctions that have been imposed on them have had insufficient leverage to make them stand down from their nuclear weapon ambitions. Plus, we are dealing with some very irrational and possibly insane rulers, both in Iran and North Korea. Without leverage to apply to their irrational interests, the United States is relegated to diplomatic beggar again and sits at these meetings with no power or leverage to enact anything effective. As a result, the Iranians play us for fools as they delay and delay as they develop and develop nuclear weaponry.

A wise old business saying goes as follows: "Never be so in love with a business deal that you cannot walk away from the negotiating table." Our political class and politicians have become so in love with these "deals," a nuclear free Iran, a well behaved North Korea, and a lasting a stable Middle East peace accord that they cannot walk away from the table. We continue to sit at the table and talk and talk because we have diplomatically, militarily, and economically no leverage to do anything else, looking diplomatically impotent in every case. Without leverage or the creativity to create leverage, you get played for a fool, which is exactly the position that our politicians have put is in today.

Which should not surprise us. The meager efforts of the political class to domestically improve life for Americans have almost always been a failure (e.g. Cash For Clunkers, TARP, etc.). And usually the root cause of these failures is that the meager and ill-thought out programs from our politicians usually have no leverage. Without leverage, plans usually fail miserably.

But that discussion is worthy of another post in the near future but before then, think about some of these recent failures and try to identify what leverage was inherent in the thought process of the programs. I will bet that you will find that there were none. As a result they failed as miserably as the foreign affairs fiascos above.




Our recent book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at www.loathemygovernment.com. It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.


Please visit the following sites for freedom:

http://www.cato.org/
http://www.robertringer.com
http://realpolichick.blogspot.com
http://www.flipcongress2010.com/
http://www.reason.com/


Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Who's On First, What's On Second and Just About Everybody is on Third

I have always loved the classic Abbott and Costello baseball routine, "Who's On First, What's On Second, I Don't Know Is On Third." It came to mind today after reading some recent articles regarding how the D.C. political class tries, and fails, to solve problems. It reminds of the old saying, "If everyone is in charge then no one is responsible." Consider the following political class comedy acts:

1) At the heart of the recent economic disaster and recession were the highly interrelated housing and banking industries. Think about how many government entities currently touch the housing and banking markets in this country:
  • Housing and Urban Development
  • Federal Housing Authority
  • Fannie Mae
  • Freddie Mac
  • Ginnie Mae
  • FDIC
  • Federal Reserve Board
  • Treasury Department
  • House of Representatives banking and housing committees and subcommittees
  • Senate banking and housing committees and subcommittees
  • Probably other Federal entities that I do not even know about and not including the similar type government entities at the state level.
All of these organizations involved in the banking and housing industries and not one of them saw the impending biggest financial disaster since the Depression until it hit them all in the face. Everyone was in charge but no one was responsible.

2) Vice President Joe Biden has been in the Mideast the past few days trying to get the Israelis and Palestinians back to the peace negotiation table. With the announcement that Israel is going ahead with more settlement construction in East Jerusalem, the visit is not going well. However, besides this recent event, consider the number of government organizations attacking this problem:
  • Secretary Hilary Clinton and the State Department
  • Special White House Envoy/Czar George Mitchell and his staff
  • Vice President Joe Biden and his staff
Should not have Hillary been in the Mideast with Biden on this trip? If she is, she is getting no press which is so unlike her. Again, everyone is in charge and no one is responsible for what is a seriously deteriorating situation.

3) The March 15, 2010 issue of Business Week had an interview by Charlie Rose of Elizabeth Warren. Ms. Warren is chairwoman of the Congressional Oversight Panel which was created to oversee the bailout of the banks and review the regulation of financial markets. We have reported her views in the past which always seemed honest, grounded and well reasoned. In this interview, Mr. Rose asked her where a proposed financial consumer protection agency should be based. Her response: "There are seven bureaucracies in Washington right now that each own a piece of consumer financial protection. Bloated, inefficient, and either ignored or ineffective or captured by the large financial institutions." Doe not sound as if the job is being done well now if it is bloated, inefficient, or ignored. Again, so many people in charge and no one is responsible, according to Ms. Warren.

Imagine how much better things would be if we just started over with a zero based, ground up approach to defining what government should do and how it should do it. We would save valuable tax payer dollars by getting rid of redundancy and make everything more efficient, both domestically and internationally. Much of this is proposed in Step 1 of "Love My Country, Loath My Government," see page five for details. Hopefully, we could then streamline government functions, make one person and one organization both in charge AND responsible. Right now, we have Who's on First, What's on Second, and a whole bunch of "I Am In Charge, Not Responsible and Yet Clueless" on third when it comes to the political class.



Our new book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at www.loathemygovernment.com. It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble.