July, 2017, Part 2,I Am A Global Warming Doubter and A Believer In Science: Chelsea Is Wrong Again, Government Lies, and Cold In Greenland

Every month we have enough material to return to a continuing theme in this blog, namely that “I am a global warming doubter AND a believer in science.” This became of interest because of people like Al Gore who fanatically and verbosely claimed that you had to be an idiot to not believe in manmade global warming. It has been my life belief that anyone that is that loud and that obnoxious is hiding something, that rather than argue facts and reality it is better to beat down and insult anyone who disagrees

As we have dove into the whole issue of manmade global warming, or its new rebranded title of climate change, we found that Al Gore and people like him were guilty of a number of things:

• Ignoring science and realities that did not support their opinions and positions.
• Rather than have an adult conversation about climate, these types of advocates like Gore sank to the level of insulting those who dared look at ALL science by calling them a variety of names including racists, homophobes, terrorists, flat earth believers, and other slanderous names.
• Continuing to insist that politicians step up their intrusions into our lives with higher taxes, more regulations, and more control of our freedoms and standards of living based on a shaky theory at best.

To see the past posts and the multitude of evidence that we have compiled that showed it is perfectly okay to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, enter the phrase "global warming doubter” in the search box above or go through the monthly historical posts listed on the right side of this page.

Thus, let’s see the latest facts and science that prove you can be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, regardless of what Al Gore proclaims.

1) Obviously, science is very dependent on data to make progress in understanding the world. If the basic data underpinning scientists’ research and findings is wrong, then in almost every case, their findings and research are wrong.

Well, according to a new study, a lot of the data that is used by global warming advocates has been “adjusted,” and this new study says that the adjustments were not made accurately or in an unbiased manner:

• A recent study was completed by two climate scientists and a statistician.
• According to a recent article on the Ipatriot website, citing a Daily Caller earlier article, the purpose of their analysis was to try and validate global warming claims as presented by “global average surface temperature (GAST)” data sets managed by “NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office.”
• The study is titled "On the Validity of NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU Global Average Surface Temperature Data & The Validity of EPA's CO2 Endangerment Finding," was published in June and written by James P. Wallace III, Joseph S. D’Aleo and Craig Idso.
• These data sets are measuring temperature data as collected by aloft satellites, not surface temperatures.
• The article claims that their findings were peer reviewed by seven Phd people in the various climate related fields: Drs. Alan Carlin, Harold H. Doiron, Theodore R. Eck, Richard A. Keen, Anthony R. Lupo, Thomas P. Sheahan, and George T. Wolff.
• NASA, NOAA, and Met Office personnel had been taking the raw satellite data and “adjusting” it in ways that this study found made it look like global warming was happening to a far greater extent than the raw data showed.
• Joe D’Aleo, a study co-author has proven that, “Nearly all of the warming they are now showing is in the adjustments.”
• The government personnel adjusting the raw data, according to the study, were adjusting the raw data to make the past temperatures appear cooler than they actually were relative to current temperatures which in turn makes it look like global warming has been intensifying in the present time vs. the adjusted historical data.
• The study concluded that “These “experts” have duped the public and governments alike by “systematically removing previously existing cyclical temperature patterns.” In other words – they’ve literally scrubbed previous historical warming periods.”
• The study concluded that, “"In fact, the magnitude of their historical data adjustments, that removed their cyclical temperature patterns, are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data. Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever — despite current claims of record setting warming."

If your data is wrong or biased, your research and findings are wrong or biased, science is as simple as that. Another set of data and research that proves it is perfectly sane and logical to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science.

2) James Delingpole, writing for the Breitbart website on July 7, 2017, had some news for global warming advocates that is not good for their theories. Greenland recently experienced its coldest July day since temperature tracking began. Now, if global warming was really happening, it is doubtful that Greenland would be experiencing its coldest day ever.

In addition, the overall ice mass in Greenland is also close to all time highs. Again, not something you want to see if your prediction says that mankind is making the Earth warmer and warmer.

To see the original data sources and graphs for this “chilling” information go to:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/07/07/delingpole-record-breaking-cold-in-greenland-alarmists-look-an-arctic-squirrel/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social

3) Chelsea Clinton is not my favorite person. She has virtually no real world experience, having been raised and protected by millionaire parents and has a tendency to act like she is an expert on many different topics when she really is not. And many times she wants to appear to be an expert on climate science even though her formal education has nothing to do with science.

And every time she does speak out on science she usually makes a fool of herself. In the past she has claimed that higher rates of diabetes will occur as a direct result of climate change and/or global warming but providing not data that really supports a causality link between diabetes rates and Earth’s temperatures. 

She has also claimed that climate change/global warming is increasing the number of child brides around the world. As with most global warming advocates, anything wrong in the world can be traced back to global warming, proving that Chelsea and many others have no idea what the difference is between two events being highly correlated and two events truly having an impact on each other. i.e. causality.

But being wrong in the past has not stopped from continuing her losing streak. She recently made a reference to a single newspaper article and claimed that if humanity does not get its act together within three years, humanity is doomed because of climate change: “These experts say we have 3 years to get climate change under control. And they’re the optimists-The Washington Post”

Chelsea, please pardon us if we do not swallow this kernel of knowledge from you since:

• In the 1970s we were told a new Ice Age was coming, that did not happen.
• In the 1980s and beyond we were told that Earth’s temperatures would be rising dramatically, they did not, having been relatively flat for the past two decade.
• In 2009, Al Gore told us that there was a 75% chance that the North Pole would be totally melted by 2014, it did not melt.
• ABC News told us that coastal U.S. cities would be underwater within ten years, that did not happen.
• Famous climate alarmist James Hansen predicted that New York City would be underwater by 2018, that is not going to happen.
• Climate change/global warming advocates told us that polar bear populations were going extinct, that is not happening.

So Chelsea, given this abysmal track record you and other global warming "experts" of being wrong, please excuse us from AGAIN not taking you seriously. One article from one newspaper and you have to broadcast it as if it is gospel when these types of horrible forecasts have NEVER been close to be accurate.

As we reported earlier this week, James Hansen at least had the good sense to predict that climate disaster would happen sometime in the next “50 to 150” years, long after most of us have passed, making it impossible for him to be proven wrong...again. I would suggest you do the same thing since in three years I think that most of us will be fine, the Earth will be fine, and you would have joined a long list of people with idiotic Chicken Little forecasts on your resume/Twitter feed.

So what did we learn today: Chelsea is at it again and being wrong again, Greenland is getting cold, and government agencies lie. Some things never change. More reasons to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science to follow.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:


http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org
http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w