Showing posts with label pope francis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pope francis. Show all posts

Friday, September 22, 2017

September, 2017, Part 2, Why I Am A Global A Warming Doubter and A Believer In Science: More Bogus Forecasts and Destroying The First Amendment For A Likely Myth

Every month we have enough material to return to a continuing theme in this blog, namely that “I am a global warming doubter AND a believer in science.” This became of interest because of people like Al Gore who fanatically and verbosely claimed that you had to be an idiot to not believe in manmade global warming. It has been my life belief that anyone that is that loud and that obnoxious is hiding something, that rather than argue facts and reality it is better to beat down and insult anyone who disagrees.

As we have dove into the whole issue of manmade global warming, or its new rebranded title of climate change, we found that Al Gore and people like him were guilty of a number of things:

  • Ignoring science and realities that did not support their opinions and positions.
  • Rather than have an adult conversation about climate, these types of advocates like Gore sank to the level of insulting those who dared look at ALL science by calling them a variety of names including racists, homophobes, terrorists, flat earth believers, and other slanderous names.
  • Continuing to insist that politicians step up their intrusions into our lives with higher taxes, more regulations, and more control of our freedoms and standards of living based on a shaky theory at best.
To see the past posts and the multitude of evidence that we have compiled that showed it is perfectly okay to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, enter the phrase "global warming doubter” in the search box above or go through the monthly historical posts listed on the right side of this page.

Thus, let’s see the latest facts and science that prove you can be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, regardless of what Al Gore proclaims.

1) William F. Buckley once said: “Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views.” Never was this more true when you see what global warming advocates, who typically would classify themselves as liberals, say and do to people like myself that want to have a discussion using ALL of the available research, data, and science rather than just cherry picking such research that only supports their position. 

Julie Kelly, writing for the National Review website on September 13, 2017, listed out the attacks that global warming/climate change advocates have launched against those of us that dare to desire a more comprehensive discussion of all climate data and research in her article, “Climate McCarthyism Is On The Rise.” These are the types of attacks and antics that small thinking people use when they cannot refute your claims and defend their claims with real science, a mature discussion, and logic:

  • Liberal California Senator Kamala Harris grilled Trump nominee for the CIUA director job, Mike Pompeo, about his views on climate change during his confirmation hearing as if the CIA director had any control over climate policy even given Harris’s silly assertion and belief that somehow climate change leads to rising instability in the world. Somehow the nut cases running North Korea and Syria, Islamic radicalism, and Putin’s ego are less important than “climate change” relative to the CIA director’s job.
  • Homeland Security advisor Tom Bossert, during a press briefing on Hurricane Irma, was asked by CNN reporter Jim Acosta about climate change even though that was the totally inappropriate time to ask about the more global issue of climate change during a briefing on a very active hurricane. Acosta added to his idiocy by falsely claiming that big storms are more frequent (they are not - Florida had not been hit with a major hurricane since 2014, 13 years ago). Ms. Kelly accurately assesses Acosta’s statement: “This is your average grade-school understanding of science.”
  • Congressman Jim Bridenstine, Trump’s pick to head NASA, is under fire because he correctly asserted a few years ago a factual reality that global warming had ceased rising over ten years ago. In this case being right based on actual data is being wrong in liberals’ minds. Besides being right about leveling off temps, Bridenstine is a member of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, he is a decorated naval aviator, and staunch supporter of space exploration, and yet that is not enough to overcome his fault of telling the truth.
  • Newsweek got into the Bridenstine bashing act by running an article called, “Who is Jim Bridenstine, the climate-change denier Trump picked to head NASA?” In their view, Bridenstine had the audacity to correct point out that “the climate has always changed,” a correct statement.
  • Sam Clovis, a nominee for a scientific post in the Department of Agriculture, a post that has little to do with researching, affecting, or analyzing climate change, has been attacked by a whole host of global warming advocates for being a so-called climate skeptic including the Union of Concerned Scientists (whoever they are), Senator Chuck Schumer, and Senator Brian Schatz with the two Senators claiming that Clovis is “wildly unqualified for the position of USDA Chief Scientists” simply because he is a climate skeptic.
  • But it is not just political appointees and government workers who face the wrath of global warming advocates. Talk show host Bill Maher hates those that dare to have a difference of opinion with him and other liberals: “These places that got flooded, like Texas, okay, they have a low tax base. So the federal government bails them out. Their governors, their legislators they don’t believe in climate science.” Two questions for Mr. Maher: 1) In your view, fellow Americans and human beings should be made to suffer because their views do not align with yours and 2) by the way, Texas is the second largest contribution to the Federal government tax stream so do not talk about “low tax base” nonsense.
  • Even Pope Francis, who I believe has NO scientific training or background, got into the act recently during a flight on his Papal jumbo jet (can you say huge carbon footprint?) by stating that, “I am reminded of a phrase from the Old Testament, from the Psalm: ‘Man is stupid. When you don’t want to see, you don’t see.’” While he was directing this passage to those of us that are global warming doubters, it could just as easily been directed to global warming advocates who only choose to see data, research, and science that supports their one sided views. Thus, the statement is useless in deciding what is really going on climate wise.
We have gone down a very dangerous path relative to the First Amendment and scientific accuracy when those of us with a different, fact-based opinion are attacked for those positions, denied access to jobs that have nothing to do with climate, and told to suffer just for having an informed opinion.

2) We have often pointed out the reality that global warming alarmist forecasts of flooding, savage storms, extensive wildfires, and other climate calamities would engulf the Earth by 2017 have always been wrong and wrong to an incredible degree. And thus, at some point when the Chicken Little forecasts never come true you really should take a step back and regard any climate forecast with a huge grain of salt.

Andrew West writing for the Constitution.com website on September 19, 2017, summarized the latest findings regarding failed global warming forecasts:

  • A landmark piece of research, that was recently published in the publication Nature Geoscience, concluded that computer models by global warming advocate scientists and the impact of carbon dioxide on the Earth’s climate were dead out wrong and the planet is warming much more slowly that forecasted.
  • According to the Mr. West, “The paper – titled Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C – concedes that it is now almost impossible that the doomsday predictions made in the last IPCC Assessment Report of 1.5 degrees C warming above pre-industrial levels by 2022 will come true. In order for that to happen, temperatures would have to rise by a massive 0.5 degrees C in five years.”
  • Since the planet’s temperature rarely has risen as much as .25 degrees in a DECADE, this means that based on historical data and trends, the Earth’s temperature at best would have to do 20 years worth of warming in the next five years.
  • Mr. West accurately concludes that, “This, the scientists admit, is next to impossible. Which means their ‘carbon budget’ – the amount of CO2 they say is needed to increase global warming by a certain degree – is wrong. This in turn means that the computer models they’ve been using to scare the world with tales of man-made climate doom are wrong too.”
The best test of a forecast model’s accuracy is to see how closely that model actually predicts reality. In this case, it has failed miserably as have every other global warming doomsday forecast models. At some point, you just want Chicken Little-like science to just go away.

That will do it for this month’s discussion on “why I am a global warming doubter and a believer in science.” The destruction of the First Amendment and the scientific method and the reality that every global warming model has been wrong, sounds about right and reinforces the notion that it is perfectly sane to be a global warming, and man made climate change, doubter.


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:


www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:


http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org

http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w







Tuesday, March 29, 2016

How "Hope and Change" Became "Dysfunction and Surrender"

It is pretty obvious to anyone who follows current events that the Obama administration’s record on foreign affairs has been pretty abysmal:
  • It has allowed North Korea and Iran to get much closer to having ICBM capabilities of delivering nuclear weapons a far distance.
  • It has allowed Russia to re-establish itself on the world stage, becoming a force against Europe and a force throughout the Middle East.
  • It has allowed ISIS to become the most terrifying and wealthiest terrorist force of all time.
  • It has constantly failed to lead when it comes to fighting terrorism, with Obama not attending the world summit that occurred as a result of the Paris terror attacks while attending a baseball game, learning to tango, and playing golf as Brussels with still cleaning up the carnage of the latest European terrorist attack.
  • When a Middle East summit was called by the White House, leaders of many Middle Eastern countries declined to attend or sent secondary representatives.
  • The administration ticked off many, many allies when it came to light that the administration was using the NSA to spy on other countries and their leaders, with the Brazilian prime minister cancelling a Washington state dinner in protest.
  • It has more or less created the reality where "our friends do not trust us and our enemies do not fear us."
The infamous list goes on and on. This administration and the President that heads it has failed time after time to be the leader that the world expects from the President of the United States. Just yesterday, we reviewed how this President failed to have ”good optics” in the aftermath of the Brussels terrorist bombings, looking unconcerned and uncaring, attending a meaningless baseball game, learning to dance the tango, and playing golf as body bags were being used and wounded were being cared for as a result of the Brussels bombings.

And to add insult to injury, today we review a recent analysis from Forbes magazine which put together its annual list of the 50 greatest leaders in the world today, leaders from all walks of life, politics, sports, business, show business, etc. The 2016 list reads as follows:
  • Jeff Bezos – CEO, Amazon
  • Angela Merkel – Chancellor, Germany
  • Aung San Suu Kyi – Leader, National League for Democracy
  • Pope Francis – Pontiff, Roman Catholic Church
  • Tim Cook – CEO, Apple
  • John Legend – Recording artist and activist, The Show Me Campaign
  • Christiana Figueres – Executive Secretary, UN Framework Convention on Climate Change
  • Paul Ryan – Speaker, U.S. House of Representatives
  • Ruth Bader Ginsburg – Associate Justice, U.S. Supreme Court
  • Sheikh Hasina – Prime Minister, Bangladesh
  • Nick Saban – Head football coach, The University of Alabama
  • Huateng “Pony” Ma – Chairman and CEO, Tencent
  • Sergio Moro – Federal Judge, Brazil
  • Bono – Lead singer & Co-Founder, U2 & One
  • Stephen Curry & Steve Kerr – Point guard & head coach, Golden State Warriors
  • Bryan Stevenson – Founder, Equal Justice Initiative
  • Nikki Haley – Governor, South Carolina
  • Lin-Manuel Miranda – Composer, lyricist & author, “Hamilton”
  • Marvin Ellison – CEO, J.C. Penney
  • Reshma Saujani – Founder & CEO, Girls Who Code
  • Larry Fink – CEO, BlackRock
  • Scott Kelly & Mikhail Kornienko – Crew members, International Space Station
  • David Miliband – CEO, International Rescue Committee
  • Anna Maria Chávez – CEO, Girl Scouts of the USA
  • Carla Hayden – Nominee, Library of Congress
  • Maurizio Macri – President, Argentina
  • Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors & Opal Tometi – Co-founders, Black Lives Matter
  • Chai Jing – Freelance journalist, China
  • Moncef Slaoui – Chairman of Vaccines, GlaxoSmithKline
  • John Oliver – Host & Executive Producer, “Last Week Tonight”
  • Marc Edwards – Professor, Virginia Tech
  • Arthur Brooks – President, American Enterprise Institute
  • Rosie Batty – Founder, Luke Batty Foundation
  • Kristen Griest & Shayne Haver – Rangers, U.S. Army
  • Denis Mukwege – Founder, Panzi Hospital
  • Christine Legarde – Managing Director, IMF
  • Marc Benioff – CEO, Salesforce
  • Gina Raimondo – Governor, Rhode Island
  • Amina Mohammed – Minister of Environment, Nigeria
  • Domenica Lucano – Mayor, Riace, Italy
  • Melinda Gates & Susan Desmond-Hellman – Co-chair & CEO, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Arvind Kejriwal – Chief Minister, New Delhi
  • Jorge Ramos – Journalist, Univision
  • Michael Froman – U.S. Trade Representative, Executive Office of the President
  • Mina Guli – CEO, Thirst
  • Ramón Mendéz – Head of Climate Change Policy, Uruguay
  • Bright Simons – President & Founder, Mpedigree
  • Justin Trudeau – Prime Minister, Canada
  • Clare Rewcastle Brown – Editor & Founder, Sarawak Report
  • Tshering Tobgay – Prime Minister, Bhutan
As you see, the list of leaders includes a university football coach but does not include President Obama. It includes a couple of NBA basketball players but does not include President Obama. It includes two governors from two of the smaller states, South Carolina and Rhode Island, but does not include President Obama. It includes a music composer but does not include President Obama.

You get the idea. The head of the most powerful country in the world, the country with the largest economy and largest military, the country that is probably still the single superpower left in the world today, did not make the Forbes list of the top 50 leaders throughout the world in 2016. 

Now, one might question the criteria and analysis that Forbes used to arrive at a list of leaders that omits the President of the United States and that would be a fair question. But consider what Fortune editor Alan Murray explained why he left out the ‘Leader of the Free World’:

“I voted for Barack Obama in 2008 largely because of his call to unite blue states and red states behind a politics of hope. But it hasn’t happened. At home our politics are as divided—and our federal government is as dysfunctional—as they were when he took office.

Abroad, the record is worse. Many wise foreign-policy analysts believe the President’s public waffling on Syria not only fed the terrorism of the Islamic State, but also emboldened thugs around the world— notably Vladimir Putin. The President has dismissed their criticism by saying he is “less concerned about style points.” But when it comes to leadership, style matters...In his book On Becoming a Leader, the late Warren Bennis said the differences between leaders and managers are “the differences between those who master the context and those who surrender to it.” It’s a good distinction. Faced with difficult circumstances, President Obama has surrendered.”

“President Obama has surrendered….the Federal government is as dysfunctional.” Harsh but nevertheless true. Every month in our political class insanity posts we review how dysfunctional the Federal government still is and in fact, is probably more dysfunctional than it was back in 2009 when Obama took office. We listed the foreign affairs blunders up above which Mr. Murray correctly characterizes as surrender on behalf of the President.

The motto of “hope and change” is now been reduced to “dysfunctional and surrender.” So much so, that the leader of the most powerful country in the world might not even make the top 50 of the most influential leaders in the world, regardless of how the selection is made. So sad, just another American political class sham and failure.


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:

Term Limits Now: http://www.howmuchworsecoulditget.com
http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org

http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w







Wednesday, July 15, 2015

July, 2015, I Am A Global Warming Doubter and A Believer In Science: Ice Age Predictionsand More Scientists Who Doubt Global Warming

Every month we have enough material to return to a continuing theme in this blog, namely that “I am a global warming doubter AND a believer in science.” This became of interest because of people like Al Gore who fanatically and verbosely claimed that you had to be an idiot to not believe in manmade global warming. It has been my life belief that anyone that is that loud and that obnoxious is hiding something, that rather than argue facts and reality it is better to beat down and insult anyone who disagrees.

As we have dove into the whole issue of manmade global warming, or its new rebranded title of climate change, we found that Al Gore and people like him were guilty of a number of things:
  • Ignoring science and realities that did not support their opinions and positions.
  • Rather than have an adult conversation about climate, these types of advocates like Gore sank to the level of insulting those who dared look at ALL science by calling them a variety of names including racists, homophobes, terrorists, flat earth believers, and other slanderous names.
  • Continuing to insist that politicians step up their intrusions into our lives with higher taxes, more regulations, and more control on our freedoms and standards of living based on a shaky theory at best.
To see the past posts and the multitude of evidence that we have compiled that showed it is perfectly okay to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, enter the phrase "global warming doubter” in the search box above or go through the monthly historical post listed on the right side of this page.

Thus, let’s see the latest facts and science that prove you can be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, regardless of what Al Gore proclaims.

1) One thing that Al Gore types like to do is to scare us global warming doubters and believers in science types with catastrophic predictions of what will happen if we do not follow their advice NOW. Everything has to be done now from more carbon taxes to less freedom to more dictatorial powers for the political class. 

But are these people ever right? Often we have looked back on their dire predictions and every time they have been wrong, really wrong. Such is the case when ABC News reported back in 2008, seven years ago, that New York City would be under water because of global warming by 2015. That’s right, by now, NYC should be the new Venice of North America.

Details of their terribly wrong predictive news report include the following hilarious predictions:
  • On Good Morning America on June 12, 2015, Bob Woodruff not only predicted that NYC would be under water by 2015 but by this year gas would cost over $9 a gallon and a carton of milk would cost over $13. In other words, if you are going to predict disaster, go big and bold....and wrong.
  • The ABC News report included predicted prophetic videos, such as a teenager declaring, "It's June 8th, 2015. One carton of milk is $12.99." At the store today, barely a month after June 8, 2015, I purchased a gallon of milk for $3.59, about one third the price predicted.
  • Another clip featured this prediction for the current year: "Gas reached over $9 a gallon." Today, barely a month after June 8, 2015, I paid $2.64 for a gallon of gas, about one third the predicted costs.
  • One expert on that Good Morning America show in 2008 warns that in 2015 the sea level will rise quickly, a prediction that is accompanied by a video shows New York City being engulfed by water. 
  • The video montage includes another unidentified person predicting that "flames cover hundreds of miles." 
Missed it by that much. NYC is still afloat, gas and milk costs a fraction of what was predicted, and Al Gore types expect us to panic whenever they predict disaster even though EVERY disaster they have predicted for the past twenty years relative to global warming has not happened.

The original video clip can be seen at:


2) One thing that global warming/climate change advocates hate is to include in the discussion anyone, any scientist, any economist, or any politician that does not align with their views. Because if they did, then much, if not all, of their global warming/climate change theories would collapse from the weight of science, realities, and statistics. Seems that even the Pope is following this approach of denying the possibility that intelligent people have a different view than Al Gore.

According to a June 21, 2015 article by Greg Richter, writing for the NewsMax website:
  • French climate change skeptic Philippe de Larminat says he was denied a spot at April's summit sponsored by the Vatican’s Pontifical Academy of Sciences, according to the Washington Post.
  • De Larminat wanted to attend the meeting ahead Pope Francis' recent encyclical on climate change. 
  • He was told he would be allowed if space permitted, but just days before the event was set to begin he was told there wasn't an open spot.
  • But the Post reported that de Larminat was actually denied space because other scientists and the Vatican executive who heads up the academy didn't want him there, likely because De Larminat has written a book proving that the sun, and not human activity, is the primary driver of climate change. 
  • "They did not want to hear an off note," de Larminat correctly  told the paper.
That is why the advocates for global warming have not a leg to stand on when it comes to science and scientific methods. They ignore reality in order to get their grants and their way, abusing science for their own personal benefit rather than the good of humanity. 

3) Let’s take this theme another step further. Melanie Batley, also writing for NewsMax, had an article on July 7, 2015 that discussed the Nobel Laureate that says that Obama is “dead wrong” when it comes to his pro global warming stance: "I would say that basically global warming is a non-problem," Dr. Ivar Giaever announced during a speech at the 65th Nobel Laureate Conference in Lindau, Germany, last week.

Additional quotes from this distinguished scientist included:
  • Quoting Obama's warning that "no challenge poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change," Giaever said it was a "ridiculous statement:"I say this to Obama: Excuse me, Mr. President, but you're wrong. Dead wrong," 
  • "Obama said last year that 2014 is [the] hottest year ever. But it's not true. It's not the hottest."
  • Giaever, who was awarded the Nobel Prize in physics in 1973, questioned the theory behind fears about rising carbon dioxide levels and said that the theory is not supported by scientific evidence: "Global warming really has become a new religion. Because you cannot discuss it. It's not proper. It is like the Catholic Church."
Giaever was one of more than 100 co-signers in a letter to the President in March 2009 that was critical of his stance on global warming, saying, "We the undersigned scientists, maintain that the case for alarm regarding climate change is grossly overstated."

So I guess that the “science is settled” argument of Al Gore, Barack Obama and others is just another lie in a long string of lies from this administration and the political class. Because, really, who would you believe on a scientific matter, politicians and lawyers like Gore and Obama or a Nobel Prize winner? If you answer is Gore et al, then please leave, we have nothing to talk about when it comes to science.

4) One last doubt for global warming believers for this month. A group of scientists in England have claimed they have come up with a predictive model that forecasts the earth will enter a mini-ice age by 2020 which could last for up to ten years. Details of their findings include the following:
  • Their scientific research claims to be able to correctly predict solar cycles, a factor that many scientists,including those at the CERN Institute in Europe, claim affects the earth’s weather and climate for more than humanity.
  • Their modeling predicts that between 2020 and 2030 solar cycles will cancel each other out, leading to a phenomenon known as the 'Maunder minimum.'
  • When this happens the sun goes very calm from a solar flare and other solar activity perspective.
  • The Maunder minimum was last observed a few hundred years ago when it coincided with the mini ice age that hit between 1646 and 1715.
  • This Ice age resulted in even London's River Thames freezing over. 
  • According to news reports,t his new predictive model of the Sun's solar cycle is producing very accurate predictions of irregularities within the Sun's 11-year heartbeat.
  • The model suggests that solar activity will fall by 60% during the 2030s to conditions last seen during the 'mini ice age' that began in 1645, according to the results presented by Professor Valentina Zharkova at the National Astronomy Meeting in Llandudno.
Are these scientists any better at predicting climate than ABC News was back in 2008? I have no idea. But they deserve a seat at the table when discussing the potential for man made climate impacts rather than being called racists, homophobes, flat earth believers and other slurs for having science that does not line up with Al Gore’s views. 

That will do it for this month where we again prove that being a global warming doubter and a believer in science is a perfectly sane, rational, and science-based view. It would be good to have an adult conversation about the whole area but that is doubtful, given the hysteria of global warming advocates in the past.



Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:


www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:

Term Limits Now: http://www.howmuchworsecoulditget.com
http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org

http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w