Thursday, December 31, 2020

The 2020 Election, Part 12: The First Invalid Election In Our History?

I have voted in every Presidential election for a lot of decades. I have never voted for a Republican for President and thus, I did not vote for Donald Trump either time. 

Thus, I think I can say without much bias that this just completed Presidential election is shaping up to be a disgrace to democracy given the highly likely ways it was corrupted, manipulated, and outright fixed by so many people and entities across the country. Ballots were lost, ballots were found in garbage cans, computers were hacked, computers suspiciously moved votes from one candidate to another, ballots showed up in polling places with no chain of command security protocols followed. Politicians announced results days before the voting took place

I am sure some of the potential incidents of voter fraud and cheating were incorrect. But I am sitting on almost 200 news reports of, call them, “voting irregularities,” enough to convince me that this was the most dishonest, poorly handled, and obscene election that abuses the First Amendment rights and the “one person, one vote” tenet that is basic to our democracy.

Over the past month I have pulled out a lot of those news reports and briefly discussed what allegedly happened. I can not say all of these news reports are true and I cannot say all of these news reports are false. 

But when people are arrested, when people admit on video that they cheated, when there are videos made of people delivering box loads of videos in the middle of the night, I think the evidence is pretty clear that the corruption in this election was real and widespread.

I am not to drawing any conclusions but consider the following reality: the voting locales where most of the corruption occurred was almost ALL in Democratic party controlled areas: Democratically controlled cities, Democratically controlled counties, and Democratically controlled states and happened only in states that were considered “swing state” in the election, in other words, the states that could go either way and a nudge here or a nudge there, from a voting corruption perspective could make all the difference.

The first 132 documented incidents of voting irregularities can be found at:












Each of these incidents are sourced by the organization that reported the voting fraud. I am not going to do a deep dive into each story but by providing the source, you can follow up and decide for yourself whether or not the voting fraud and corruption allegation is legit.

This will be the last post under this theme. It is not as if the proof of voting corruption has dried up, there are news reports every day, it is simply I am tired of reporting such news. The country has survived bad Presidents, Nixon, Obama, Carter, but it will not survive a corrupted voting process. And I truly believe that is what we are witnessing today.

133) Political Animal News - One of the most blatant irregularities was up in Antrim County in Michigan. The initial voting machine tabulation showed that Biden had won the county by about 3,000 votes. But an alert poll worker thought something was amiss and a rerun of the voting machines showed that Trump had not lost the county by 3,000 votes but had actually won the county by 4,000 votes.

This reality has confirmed when a comprehensive hand count was done of the ballots:
  • The recount found that Trump actually had 9,759 votes in the county.
  • That left only 5,959 votes for Biden.
  • The machine count first said that Biden had won by about 3,000 votes and thus, the manual recount shows that there was a 7,000 vote swing in a county that had only 16,000 votes cast.
Now it could be that this was the only county among hundreds across the country that use the same voting software, that “accidentally” moved votes from Trump to Biden. Could be but I doubt it.

133) Tediumedia - Articia Bomer worked in the infamous Detroit TCF voting center on election day and the day after. She recently, under oath, testified to what she saw as far as voting “irregularities:” In sworn testimony, under oath in front of the a Michigan legislative hearing, this is what she testified she saw with her own eyes:
  • Hearing an announcement of 50 boxes arriving at the voting center at 4:00 am.
  • Hearing that those 50 boxes of ballots were counted and processed in an impossibly short amount of time.
  • Witnessing officials tampering with tabulators at the TCF Center.
  • Ballot harvesting operations being done by a local Church.
  • Poll workers overriding the actual votes, and changing Trump votes to Biden.
  • Poll workers refusing to count Trump votes.
  • Poll workers bringing in luggage and boxes that could have contained illegal ballots
  • Poll Workers using deceitful tactics and colluding with Democrats to try and expel Republican poll watchers.
  • Republican being ejected from observing the vote count.
  • Republican poll watchers having their challenges to illegal ballots being ignored.
  • Suspicious meetings of the poll workers.
Is she lying, is she credible, is she just trying to get 15 minutes of fame? Could be but she is not the only one who saw shady doings at the center in Detroit and she is willing to testify under oath to what she saw and endure the death threats to herself and her family that have ensued. So, I think she is credible.

Her testimony can be viewed at the following link:


134) Street Wise Politics - Politicians Georgia along with many of its voting officials have claimed that there was nothing shady about the election processes in the state. But Gabriel Sterling, Georgia’s voting implementation systems manager, recently announced that there are currently 132 voting irregularity investigations underway related to the general election involving 23 investigators in the state. Not sure you can claim that nothing went wrong in your state when your state has opened up 132 investigations to voting issues.

135) American Patriots Unite - White House official, Peter Navarro, recently issued a report that highlighted what he claims are voting irregularities and corruption across the country:
  • His analysis claims that there are more than 379,000 votes counted in Michigan alone that were illegal or invalid.
  • This is more than double the purported size of Biden’s victory in the state.
  • His analysis also found that at least 100,000 illegal votes in Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin should also be invalidated.
  • Navarro cited the data work done by Richard Baris of Big Data Poll which found that about 9,500 Michigan voters were confirmed already dead by the Social Security Death Index prior to the election.
  • Another 2,000 Michigan voters were listed as being over 100 years old but who are not listed as “living centenarians” in the state.
  • In Wayne County, Michigan, 174,384 absentee ballots were counted that did not have individual voter registration numbers, making them illegal and not valid for inclusion.
  • He also pointed out that Trump had a large lead in the state late on election night and then 200,000 votes for Biden and only 10,000 votes for Trump miraculously showed up by early the next morning.
  • He has rationally called for an investigation into six facets of voting fraud suspicious: outright voter fraud, ballot mishandling, contestable process fouls, equal protection clause violations, voting machine irregularities, and significant statistical anomalies.
Whether intentional or not, the voting process in at least Michigan was severely corrupted, dead people voting, mysterious old people voting, ballots showing up out of nowhere, the process was corrupted.

136) Red Right Daily - Following up on the above point that there was no voter fraud in Georgia but there are over 100 investigations underway into voter fraud consider:
  • Brad Raffensperger is the Georgia Secretary of State.
  • Thus, he is in charge of the state’s voting processes and insisted that when he validated the state’s voting results there was no fraud involved.
  • He then turned around and said that there needed to be an end to allowing voters to submit absentee ballots without reason because, wait for it, it causes voter fraud: “The no-excuse system voted into law in 2005 — long before most of you, if not all of you, long before I was in the General Assembly — it makes no sense when we have three weeks of in-person early voting available. It opens the door to potential illegal voting, especially in light of the federal rules that deny us the ability to keep voter lists, registration files, clean.”
So only a politician and government bureaucrat can come up with this in his mind and justify that he is not an idiot: there is no voter fraud but we have to change the laws because there is voter fraud. Right out of Orwell’s “1984” doublespeak affliction.

Oh, by the way, although most pre-election polls and most election results across the country had Trump and Biden roughly split in both in person and mail voting, in Georgia, a state Biden “won” by only 12,00 votes, Biden received 850,000 mail-in/absentee ballots while Trump received only 450,000 of the same. Thus, this is either a major statistical outlier or outright voter fraud and Biden ballot stuffing via the mail in voting process.

President Trump lost the state by 12,000 votes, Raffensberger ran to CNN declaring it was a fair and free election and now he admits voter fraud occurred and the laws need to be changed. In the State of Georgia Biden received 850,000 votes by absentee ballots compared to 450,000 for Trump.

137) Steadfast Clash - More statistical improbabilities from the election:
  • Somehow we are to believe that Biden got 81 million votes, the most of any Presidential candidate in history.
  • But he won lonely 477 counties across the country which was only 16% of the counties.
  • So Trump won 84% of the counties and still lost to a candidate that supposedly got more votes than any other President ever.
  • Compare these numbers to Obama’s landslide win in 2008 where he got 69 million votes while winning 873 counties.
  • So we are to believe that Biden got 17% more votes than Obama did in 2008 and got those 17% more votes by winning 45% fewer counties.
  • If we divide the number of votes by the number of counties won for Biden we get 170,000 votes per winning county.
  • If we do the same for Obama we get 79,000 votes per winning county.
  • Thus, as measure of efficiency, Biden was twice as efficient than Obama when it comes to number of votes received and number of counties won, not going to happen.
Don’t like those statistical realities? Consider another set:
  • There are 213.8 million registered voters in the country.
  • 141.5 million voters supposedly voting in November, a voter turnout of 66.2%.
  • Trump received 74 million votes, five million more than Obama received in 2008.
  • 141.5 million voters minus the 74 million votes Trump supposedly received, a number that no Democrat has questioned, and you end up with 67.5 million votes left over for Biden and other third party candidates.
  • 67.5 million votes is not equal to the 81 million votes that Biden supposedly received.
As always. So the math to understand reality.

138) Steadfast Daily - Although it is unlikely to change results, at least one Pennsylvania, has stepped to indicate there may be some fraud involved in the state from a voting perspective: “A Pennsylvania state court issued an injunction Wednesday blocking any potential further certification of election results in the state, pending a hearing to be held Friday. The order from Judge Patricia McCullough comes in the case brought by Pennsylvania voters including Rep. Mike Kelly, R-Pa., in which they allege that a state law allowing for no-excuse absentee voting violated the Pennsylvania constitution, which outlines specific cases where absentee voting is allowed. [T]o the extent that there remains any further action to perfect the certification of the results of the 2020 General Election … for the office of President and Vice President of the United States of America, Respondents are preliminarily enjoined from doing so, pending an evidentiary hearing[,].’” 

139) Big League Politics - For those that claim there was no voter fraud in the election, consider a recent development in Arizona:
  • A grand jury in Yuma, Arizona, a state with its own shady voting irregularities, have been indicted for voter fraud.
  • The indictment accuses them of voter fraud and participating in illegal “ballot harvesting” of mail in ballots.
  • Guillermina Fuentes and Alma Yadira Juarez were both charged with one count of ballot abuse which is a felony in the state. 
  • The charges allege that Fuentes and Yadira possessed and delivered four mail-in ballots to a voting precinct at one time in contravention of state law. 
  • One of the accused is a local school board member.
140) Back across the country a Pennsylvania has been arrested and charged with unlawful voting charges. In this case the accused is charged with allegedly trying to vote using his dead mother’s name via the state’s mail in ballot voting process.

Bruce Bartman was caught casting a vote under his dead mother’s name, Elizabeth Bartman. Given that Mr. Bartman is 70 years old it is probably a good bet that his mom was not recently deceased. He has been charged with perjury and unlawful voting.

In addition, he was caught trying to obtain a ballot in the name of his mother-in-law, Elizabeth Weihan. Unfortunately, the vote cast in the name of his mother was included in the state’s voting totals.

Delaware County, Pennsylvania, district Attorney, Jack Stollsteimer, has said that this was not the “only known case of a ‘dead person’ voting” in his county, but did not comment on the fact that hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots were accepted without proper scrutiny from poll watchers.

Yes, the Arizona arrests and this arrest for only a few ballots, But if amateurs can game and defraud the system this easily, imagine how a focused, organized and well financed effort could corrupt the entire voting system.

141) Freedom Headlines - An official with the Michigan State Department has been caught on video telling voting center workers who wanted to challenge ballots that obviously had the same identical signatures as others that they couldn't do so: “We need to do the counts because if we don’t have the counts, then we can’t move forward. And we understand that there is a concern with this precinct—but this is not a time for you to be investigating right now.”

When pressed by a counter about the duplicate signatures and how it wold be a good idea to put suspicious ballots, (“We’ll go ahead and count the ballots moving forward, but we will separate out, and count those— there’s going to be an asterisk, saying ‘these ballots have the same signature.’”) the counter is again told to ignore the obvious fraudulent ballots (“And again, we know that you have a concern with this precinct.That’s not your role at this very moment. What I need you to do right now is finish the audit.”)

Obviously, the point of the audit was to get a true count of the valid ballots and ferret out any invalid ballots, a basic premise that seems to be lost on this bureaucrat. The actual video can be sen at:


142) United Patriot News - We know that Republican poll watchers and others were kicked out of a Georgia ballot counting process because of a probable fictitious water leak. Once everyone had left, remaining people took suitcases out from desks and took out ballots for counting even though the announcement had been made that ballot counting was over for the day.

Now, additional video has arisen which shows one of those who remained behind to count what was likely false ballots also ran the same stack of ballots through the voting tabulator multiple times, a clearly illegal and suspicious action.:

The video of the fraud can be viewed at:


143) Steadfast Clash - Smartmatic Systems, a voting machine company that is entangled with the Dominion Voting systems company, has been at the center of some of the fraud accusations. But Antonio Mugica, the Director Of Smartmatic, allegedly admitted in 2017 that its machines and software created one million “phantom votes” for election in Venezuela: "We estimate the difference between the actual participation and the one announced by the authorities is at least one million votes. It is important to point out that this would not have occurred if auditors of all political parties would had been present at every stage of the election."

His admission can be viewed at:


144) Neon Nettle - A voter fraud ring of people was recently busted down in Texas:
  • The four arrested were all women and are charged with running a voting fraud operation that was the benefit of Democrats.
  • They were arrested on Federal felony charges.
  • The fraud involved mail in ballots sent in ahead of the 2016 primary election in Texas that took advantage of elderly voters in the Fort Worth area.
  • The four face 30 felony counts of voter fraud.
  • According to reporting from the Star-Telegram, the four were paid to target older voters “in a scheme to generate a large number of mail ballots and then harvest those ballots for specific candidates in 2016.” 
  • The fraud was done by forging signatures, changing information on the applications, and resubmitting them without the knowledge of the senior citizen voters.
  • The alleged actions of these four included marking a voter’s ballot without his consent in March 2016, altering and submitting applications in January and February 2016, requesting ballots by mail for 13 people who had made no such requests, providing forged signatures for three people on applications, forging signatures on ballot applications, and providing false information on an application for a mail ballot.
And no one in the past two months has accused Texas of having a severe voter fraud problem and yet they continue to find and prosecute those that commit such a crime. Imagine how bad it is in areas such as Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Georgia (among others) where there is far more evidence of voter fraud.

That is the end of this stream of voting fraud reviews. It is not that we have not covered every instance of credible fraud accusations, we probably could get to 200 instances of such if we wanted. But at this point, the trends are pretty well established:
  • High unlikely statistical possibilities that Biden won fair and square.
  • Video evidence both inside and outside voting centers where voting fraud was occurring.
  • Unsecured ballots being delivered in the middle of the night to voting centers.
  • Massive swings in vote totals in the early morning hours after election day, vote totals that were totally skewed to Biden.
  • Whistle blowers across the country stepping up, under oath, to tell what they saw from a fraud perspective, endangering themselves and their families.
  • Voting laws in many states being clearly violated when voting counters are told to include ballots that are clearly not legal from any number of perspectives (no signature on a mail in ballot, a false signature, missing information, multiple ballots with the same signature, ballots from people that died long ago, etc.).
  • Secret video from folks like Project Veritas where people openly admit that they are either professional or amateur voting fraud instigators.
Again, Biden could have won honestly and all of these voting irregularities, though statistically improbable, could have miraculously come together to give him the win. But let’s face it, the realities of ballots secretly getting delivered in the middle of the night, voting machines taking Trump votes and switching them to Biden votes, suitcases of ballots being counted after the poll watchers were sent home, whistle blowers coming forward all over the country, etc., etc., etc., certainly line up more his victory being statistically impossible than a legal and legit victory. 

The 144 cases we have discussed in this series are pretty good evidence that massive corruption did occur. Again, some may not be true. But it is highly unlikely that all of them are empty, sour grapes of the losing side. The corruption is too wide, too consistent, too focused, and too overwhelming, as previous posts have shown. 

And if true, many bad people have corrupted and damaged a fundamental right of freedom, the ability to have their vote counted and counted equally with other legally cast votes. Anything short of this high standard is wrong, dangerous, and treasonous. The country has survived bad Presidents in the past, e.g. Nixon, Carter, and Obama, but it will not survive a corrupting voting process.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

Please visit the following sites for freedom:

No comments: