January, 2025, Part 10, Political Class Insanity: New Jersey Senator Goes To Prison, Condoms For Gaza, Americans Are Struggling Financially and More

 Every month we devote posts to just general political class insanity that is running rampant through the country. The members of the American political class continue to show that they are incapable of efficiently operating any level of government in this country.

Even their best efforts are almost always ineffective at resolving any problem facing Americans. They spend a great amount of time not trying to improve the lives of their citizens but continually ensuring their reelection and enriching themselves, their families, and their friends in the process, all at taxpayer expense.

1)We have talked about this political corruption before but this episode has finally came to an end:

• Bob Menendez was once a long term U.S. Senator from New Jersey.

• He was convicted of 16 counts of corruption and bribery for shady dealings with the Egyptian government which led to the FBI finding almost half a million dollars in cash and many gold bars in his home.

• As a result of his conviction, a judge recently sent him off for 11 years in prison.

• He claimed he was innocent and blamed Biden for political lawfare.

Whatever happened, for the first time in a long time a corrupt politician is facing real penalties for his corruption. It’s a good day but many more crooked politicians also need to meet the same fate.

2)We have talked about absolutely stupid wastes of taxpayer dollars over the years including some real disgusting wastes during the Biden Presidency. Taxpayer money was sent overseas to support LGBTQ+ programs around the world. He sent about $200 billion to the Ukranains to fight the Russians, 50% of which has been possibly lost to corruption.

But the latest news out of the Biden administration may be the most inane and disgusting waste of taxpayer money:

• This waste of taxpayer money involved Biden allocating $50,000,000 that was focused on condom distribution in Gaza.

• Let me say that again so it really sinks in: with millions of Americans homeless, hungry, in need of medical care, and struggling to survive, Biden wanted to spend $50 million on condoms for Gaza.

• Not only was this a stupid effort, condoms for Gaza, but apparently the terrorist group running Gaza, Hamas,, repurposed the condoms to help deliver IED devices that they then floated into Israel where the IEDs did extensive and expensive damage to schools, farmland, and infrastructure.

Thus, the program was not only a stupid waste of taxpayer dollars but it caused millions of dollars in damage to a U.S. ally.

3)More data became available recently which shows how devastating Biden’s failed economic policies were and still are:

• A news survey from Bankrate found that 59% of respondents could not afford an unexpected $1,000 expense.

• Think about the precarious situation these folks are in: if they need major car repairs, a new kitchen appliance, a medical  emergency, they are in dire financial straits.

• In other words, given Biden’s inflation policies the majority of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck.

• Since Biden took office, egg prices are up 182%.

• Since Biden took office, ground beef prices are up 41%.

• Since Biden took office, chicken prices are up 30%.

• Since Biden took office, milk prices are up 18%.

Thus, it is no surprise 59% of Americans are struggling financially.

4)So, up above we talked about how the Federal government squandered $50 million on condoms for Gaza. While that is horrific, it doesn't compare to the ineptness and waste of the following Federal government project:

• The Federal government is working on building a new Air Force One jet for Presidential travel.

• The  delivery date for the new jet has been  pushed back  to 2029  despite the fact that this effort began way back  in 2018.

• The jet was supposed to be delivered by 2024 at a cost of $3.9 billion but the date has obviously slipped five years and the price tag is already up to $5.3 billion.

• Boeing, the contractor for the jet, has already absorbed over $2 billion in cost overruns.

• Since the plane has not been  totally built yet and the delivery is four years away, you know that that $5.3 billion cost is going to go even higher.

Wow, who would have expected it, a major government project that will not meet both its delivery schedule and its budget? Everyone.

5)Wasteful spending and non-delivery is not restricted to Federal government projects:

• Six years ago, in  2019, the city of Albuquerque, New Mexico spent $4 million on solar panels.

• The plan was to install these solar panels on seven municipal government buildings.

• However, six years later many of these 1,000 solar panels have not been installed and are just laying about.

• Even  worse, the panels that were actually installed on two buildings have never worked.

• Panels on  another building are functioning only 6% of their capacity.

• The original plan in 2019 was to have ALL of Albuquerque’s government buildings being powered by 100% renewable energy by 2025.

Another government project that cost a lot and never got fully implemented, great.

In summary: an  American politician is going to jail for a long time, the “Condoms For Gaza” program was stupid to begin with and was just a wasteful, inane idea, Americans are struggling to survive and pay basic expenses, and government projects never seem to be on schedule and on budget, be it a new Presidential plane or a few solar panels in New Mexico.

**********************

If you agree that we need to deseat every member of Congress for their lack of success and accomplishment, then please consider going to the following petition link to help the cause:

https://www.change.org/p/deseat-congress-reset-freedom

**********************

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

https://www.amazon.com/Love-My-Country-Loathe-Government/dp/1604942789/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=love+my+country%2C+loathe+my+government&qid=1607716020&sr=8-1

Please visit the following sites for freedom:

http://www.reason.com

http://www.cato.org

http://www.openthebooks.com

http://www.conventionofstates.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w

 

August,2017, Part 1, I Am A Global Warming Doubter and A Believer In Science: The Ecological Benefits of Global Warming and Al Gore's Intense Carbon Footprint

Every month we have enough material to return to a continuing theme in this blog, namely that “I am a global warming doubter AND a believer in science.” This became of interest because of people like Al Gore who fanatically and verbosely claimed that you had to be an idiot to not believe in manmade global warming. It has been my life belief that anyone that is that loud and that obnoxious is hiding something, that rather than argue facts and reality it is better to beat down and insult anyone who disagrees

As we have dove into the whole issue of manmade global warming, or its new rebranded title of climate change, we found that Al Gore and people like him were guilty of a number of things:

• Ignoring science and realities that did not support their opinions and positions.
• Rather than have an adult conversation about climate, these types of advocates like Gore sank to the level of insulting those who dared look at ALL science by calling them a variety of names including racists, homophobes, terrorists, flat earth believers, and other slanderous names.
• Continuing to insist that politicians step up their intrusions into our lives with higher taxes, more regulations, and more control of our freedoms and standards of living based on a shaky theory at best.

To see the past posts and the multitude of evidence that we have compiled that showed it is perfectly okay to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, enter the phrase "global warming doubter” in the search box above or go through the monthly historical posts listed on the right side of this page.

Thus, let’s see the latest facts and science that prove you can be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, regardless of what Al Gore proclaims.

1) We have often discussed the reality that for almost 20 years the Earth’s temperature has been about constant. This is in direct contrast to the myriad of global warming models that predicted that global warming would march ever upwards with no hesitation, never mind a nearly 20 year pause. This reality more than any other that we have discussed has so destroyed the global warming hysteria that the movement had to rebrand itself as the more nebulous “climate change”movement.

But up until about 20 years, the Earth did indeed get warmer as more carbon dioxide went into the air. And despite what Al Gore says about this long ago warming, it was not necessarily a bad thing. Consider some statistics and thoughts from a recent Heritage Foundation article written by Texas Congressman Lamar Smith:

• This higher concentration and presence of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere has helped plants with their photosynthesis process.
• This improvement in photosynthesis leads to greater and higher quality food production.
• The Congressman claims that research studies have found that as plants get more efficient from the presence of more carbon dioxide they use less water, a good thing.
• Although global warming stopped almost 20 years ago, the warming up until that point in time allowed farm belts around the world to experience longer growing seasons.
• This “carbon enrichment” process from global warming helps farmers grow more resilient crops of maize, soybeans, wheat, and rice.
• More carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has made “The world’s vegetated areas are becoming 25-50 percent greener, according to satellite images. Seventy percent of this greening is due to a rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide.”
• This greater vegetation helps reduce water runoff, improves animal habitats, and as vegetation volume increases, it helps actually remove the carbon dioxide from the air, which should make Al Gore happy.

To my knowledge, the Congressman is not scientist. But these ideas are not new, we have talked about them before via other scientific research and reality. He just puts those realities together in a short, concise and easy to understand summary. 

Shouldn’t his ideas and the realities of what carbon dioxide has done for the planet’s flora and fauna along with the improvements in the food supply for humans be part of any “climate change” discussion?

2) One thing that makes me crazy probably more than any other trait is that of hypocrisy. I hate being preached to on a subject when that preacher does not adhere to what they are advocating. According to a recent Independent Journal Review article by Benny Johnson, Al Gore, the all time preacher and screamer about man made global warming and climate change, would appear to be just that type of person:

• Al Gore’s net worth is now about $200 million, a level he did not attain by being a politician in office, much of his wealth has been gathered since he left politics and got paid handsomely for advocating for global warming via huge speaking fees, book deals, and movie deals.
• New research by the National Center for Public Policy Research has found that Gore is quite the hypocrite from a personal carbon footprint perspective.
• I believe he is no longer married, having gotten a divorce from his wife Tipper a number of years ago and has only grown children, but he owns three different homes, all of which contribute to his carbon footprint.
• His Nashville home/mansion alone has 20 rooms:

• His Nashville mansion is over 10,000 square feet in size and sits in the eighth wealthiest neighborhood in the country.
• He also owns at least two other homes in addition to this 10,000 square foot monster, one in San Francisco and a farmhouse in Carthage, Tennessee.
• The research obtained the public records of Gore’s electricity usage and the numbers are staggering, especially when you consider there is no wife or kids involved in the living arrangements.
• Gore’s electricity usage averages 19,241 kilowatt hours (KWh) every month while the average U.S.household uses 901 kWh a month.
• Thus, he uses about 20 times the amount of electricity in a month than the average U.S household uses in a month.
• In September, 2016 Gore’s mansion used 30,993 kWh in that single month, more than what the typical household burns in 34 months.
• In one year, Gore spent almost $22,000 on just electricity bills.
• Which is amazing since as you can see from the above pictures, Gore has 33 solar panels on his roof so his electricity usage is even greater than what he is paying in utility bills.
• Less than 6% of his monthly electricity use comes from those solar panels.
• In the past 12 months Gore used 66,159 kWh just heating his pool, enough energy to power six average households for a whole year.

Look, the guy is rich and it is understandable that he would use more electricity than the average American. But really, how large of a carbon footprint does this global warming preacher-type use every month. a carbon footprint that dwarfs what the average American uses? And he has the nerve to preach to us when his unmarried lifestyle is creating a carbon footprint in multiple locations that is far and away out of control? Give me a break from a hypocrisy perspective.

That will get us started for this month;s discussion under the theme, “I am a global warming doubter and a believer in science.” An interesting discussion on the good side of global warming from an ecology and food production standpoint and the hypocrisy of Al Gore and his daily and mega carbon footprint.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:


http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org
http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w

July, 2017, Part 4, I Am A Global Warming Doubter and A Believer In Science: Solar Panels = Bad, Cold Up North and More

Every month we have enough material to return to a continuing theme in this blog, namely that “I am a global warming doubter AND a believer in science.” This became of interest because of people like Al Gore who fanatically and verbosely claimed that you had to be an idiot to not believe in manmade global warming. It has been my life belief that anyone that is that loud and that obnoxious is hiding something, that rather than argue facts and reality it is better to beat down and insult anyone who disagrees

As we have dove into the whole issue of manmade global warming, or its new rebranded title of climate change, we found that Al Gore and people like him were guilty of a number of things:

• Ignoring science and realities that did not support their opinions and positions.
• Rather than have an adult conversation about climate, these types of advocates like Gore sank to the level of insulting those who dared look at ALL science by calling them a variety of names including racists, homophobes, terrorists, flat earth believers, and other slanderous names.
• Continuing to insist that politicians step up their intrusions into our lives with higher taxes, more regulations, and more control of our freedoms and standards of living based on a shaky theory at best.

To see the past posts and the multitude of evidence that we have compiled that showed it is perfectly okay to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, enter the phrase "global warming doubter” in the search box above or go through the monthly historical posts listed on the right side of this page.

Thus, let’s see the latest facts and science that prove you can be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, regardless of what Al Gore proclaims.

1) Earlier this week we discussed a research report that re-examined government data that had shown an upward trend in global warming of the Earth. The research study was done by a statistician and two climate scientists and had been peer reviewed and approved. 

Their bottom line is that the government had adjusted raw temperature data over the years in a biased manner to show a warming trend that did not exist in the raw data. I was able to find the abstract for their study that summarized their results and have listed it below. As you will see, it is a serious indictment of false science and research that government workers have perpetrated in the field of climate science:

In this research report, the most important surface data adjustment issues are identified and past changes in the previously reported historical data are quantified. It was found that each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history. And, it was nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern. This was true for all three entities providing GAST data measurement, NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU.

As a result, this research sought to validate the current estimates of GAST using the best available relevant data. This included the best documented and understood data sets from the U.S. and elsewhere as well as global data from satellites that provide far more extensive global coverage and are not contaminated by bad siting and urbanization impacts. Satellite data integrity also benefits from having cross checks with Balloon data.

The conclusive findings of this research are that the three GAST data sets are not a valid representation of reality. In fact, the magnitude of their historical data adjustments, that removed their cyclical temperature patterns, are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data. Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever –despite current claims of record setting warming.

Finally, since GAST data set validity is a necessary condition for EPA’s GHG/CO2 Endangerment Finding, it too is invalidated by these research findings.

“The conclusive findings of this research are that the three GAST data sets are not a valid representation of reality.” Let me say it again, “not a valid representation of reality.” Seems to be a trend among many climate change/global warming advocates. And while man made global warming may actually be a reality, it is not proven by this government data, the reports and predictions based on this falsely adjusted government data are invalid, and the theory takes another hit from a scientific integrity perspective.

2) In light of this previous point that proved that falsely adjusted government data seriously undermines the theory of manmade global warming, let's take a look at some other data that does the same thing. We have previously talked about this scientific research from Denmark but in light of the fake government data we just discussed, let’s look at some other real data, as reported on the Federalist Papers website:

• The analysis comes from research done by the Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI) and was reported in by England’s Telegraph newspaper.
• Since December, temps in the Arctic have been consistently lower than minus 20 C.
• In April, the Arctic sea ice coverage was back to where it was in 2004.
• While the ice had been on the thin side for a number of years, this year it is back to being two meters thick.
• The Greenland ice mass increased in volume this past winter faster than any time in years.
• While 2016 was a very warm year, with the dissipation of the strong El NIno from last year, satellite records show that in recent months temperatures have quickly dropped more than .06 degrees C, the exact same thing that happened 17 years ago when a similarly strong El Nino dissipated.
• Global temperatures have been more or less constant for 19 years running, totally blowing away the accuracy of most if not all primary global warming forecast models.

Colder than expected, another global warming forecast myth rattled. But things might be getting worse from a cooling climate according to a recent Daily Wire article:

• Some climate research is predicting that a natural cooling cycle of the Earth happens every 230 years or so and that the next cooling cycle actually began taking hold in 2014.
• By 2019, we should see a significant drop in temperatures if this climate research is correct.
• Some scientists are expecting a big drop in solar activity between 2020 and 2053 which will cause the next ice age.
• If new ice age if it happens, would devastate crop yields and lead to food shortages around the world.

Given that some climate scientists grossly missed their global warming forecasts, it is entirely possible that other scientists will grossly miss their ice age and cooling forecasts. But the bottom line is to say that the “science is settled” or that 97% of all climate scientists agree with the theory of global warming is simply wrong.

3) A few days ago we reviewed research that showed that the end of the life cycle of solar panels is really bad for the environment:

https://loathemygovernment.blogspot.com/2017/07/july-2017-part-3-i-am-global-warming.html

Well, it seems that other research shows that the the manufacturing of solar panels at the beginning of their life cycle is not that great for the environment either:

• A recent research study by scientists at Utrecht University in the Netherlands found that if you take into account the amount of CO2 produced from the mining of materials used in solar panels and the output of factories that produce solar panels, then the total amount of CO2 produced in the total manufacturing process of solar panels is generally greater than the amount of CO2 saved by using solar panels.
• The raw data for the study and research spanned 40 years worth of solar panel manufacturing and CO2 output.
• The researchers found that it would take decades for solar panels to be friendlier to the environment than burning fossil fuels but since most solar panels do not last decades, the net benefit to solar panels is negative relative to CO2.
• The research was funded by the Technology Foundation STW which is a government agency of the European Commission, hardly a fossil fuels front.

Again, when looking to solve a problem, look at all layers of the problem because unless you know the root causes, you will never be successful in resolving any problem, climate or other wise.

One more post in the next few days that continues to prove it is perfectly sane and rational to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:


http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org
http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w

July, 2017, Part 3, I Am A Global Warming Doubter and A Believer In Science: NOAA Says No To More Storms, More Failed Predictions, and Solar Panels Are Bad,

Every month we have enough material to return to a continuing theme in this blog, namely that “I am a global warming doubter AND a believer in science.” This became of interest because of people like Al Gore who fanatically and verbosely claimed that you had to be an idiot to not believe in manmade global warming. It has been my life belief that anyone that is that loud and that obnoxious is hiding something, that rather than argue facts and reality it is better to beat down and insult anyone who disagrees

As we have dove into the whole issue of manmade global warming, or its new rebranded title of climate change, we found that Al Gore and people like him were guilty of a number of things:

• Ignoring science and realities that did not support their opinions and positions.
• Rather than have an adult conversation about climate, these types of advocates like Gore sank to the level of insulting those who dared look at ALL science by calling them a variety of names including racists, homophobes, terrorists, flat earth believers, and other slanderous names.
• Continuing to insist that politicians step up their intrusions into our lives with higher taxes, more regulations, and more control of our freedoms and standards of living based on a shaky theory at best.

To see the past posts and the multitude of evidence that we have compiled that showed it is perfectly okay to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, enter the phrase "global warming doubter” in the search box above or go through the monthly historical posts listed on the right side of this page.

Thus, let’s see the latest facts and science that prove you can be a global warming doubter and a believer in science, regardless of what Al Gore proclaims.

1) Al Gore, Barack Obama, and other global warming advocates like to claim that man made global warming and climate change are causing all kinds of havoc with the environment. But we have shown that actual government data shows that hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, and such are at historical rates or even at lower than historical rates.

And the latest government data from NOAA confirms that this reality still probably holds true:

• Kimberly J. Smith, writing for the Conservative Tribune website on April 5, 2017, discussed the reality that NOAA has officially come out to state that it is premature to link human activity to stronger storms, specifically hurricanes.
• The NOAA report and research concluded: “It is premature to conclude that human activities — and particularly greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming — have already had a detectable impact on Atlantic hurricane or global tropical cyclone activity,” the NOAA’s Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory report said.
• This finding supports the conclusions back in March, 2017 from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC - the primary United Nations climate change advoate organization) reported “no significant observed trends in global tropical cyclone frequency over the past century.”

Real data proving again that it is perfectly sane to be a global warming doubter and a believer in science. Especially when science and real data show that global warming should be doubted.

2) A June 29, 2017 article on the CSC Media Group's website by Michael Luckette gave a short but nice summary of some of the failed predictions that global warming advocates are produced over the years:

• Al Gore predicted back in 2006 that within ten years there would be a “true planetary emergency: “Unless we act boldly and quickly to deal with the underlying causes of global warming, our world will undergo a string of terrible catastrophes,” 
• Eleven years later that “true planetary emergency” is nowhere in sight.
• In 2010, the Guardian newspaper of Britain reported that the United Nations was warning that humanity had as little as 8 years to avoid seeing a dangerous 2 degree Centigrade rise in the Earth’s temperature, a rise that never happened.
• Three years ago and over 1,000 days ago France’s Foreign Minister, Laurent Fabius, warned everyone that: “we have 500 days to avoid climate chaos.”

At some point a sane person has to realize that when your theory on anything is ALWAYS wrong, maybe your theory is wrong, as illustrated in just the three examples listed above. 

But maybe that day of reckoning is finally dawning on global warming advocates, as illustrated in a research paper from a recent article in Nature Geoscience that admitted there have been: “differences in model and satellite tropospheric warming rates. In the early twenty-first century, satellite-derived tropospheric warming trends were generally smaller than trends estimated from a large multi-model ensemble.”

Maybe just maybe global warming advocates are having reality settle in and now we can have an adult conversation on global warming that looks at ALL of the science and ALL of the research and ALL of the data to try and figure out what is really going on, if anything.

3) One of the great options that is supposed to save humanity and the planet from global warming is solar energy. I am sure that all hard core global warming advocates are also big supporters of solar energy, their view likely being that solar is clean and non-polluting and not a contributor to CO2 levels in the atmosphere that cause global warming. Solar energy has a rep for being clean and safe, not like the use of those nasty fossil fuels.

But is solar energy really the savior of the environment and so pure and wonderful? Julie Kelly, writing for the National Review on June 28 2017, has a somewhat different view on solar energy:

• A new research study by Environmental Progress (EP) warns that toxic waste from discarded solar panels now poses a global environmental threat. 
• The Berkeley, California-based group, a geographic area certainly not famous for its conservative tenets, found that solar panels create 300 times more toxic waste per unit of energy than nuclear power plants. 
• They also concluded that discarded solar panels, panels that contain high levels of dangerous elements such as lead, chromium, and cadmium, are piling up around the world, and that nothing is being done to limit their potential danger to the environment. 
• Michael Shellenberger is the founder of EP: “We talk a lot about the dangers of nuclear waste, but that waste is carefully monitored, regulated, and disposed of. But we had no idea there would be so many panels — an enormous amount — that could cause this much ecological damage.”
• EP researchers Jemin Desai and Mark Nelson found that scavengers in countries like India and China “burn the e-waste in order to salvage the valuable copper wires for resale. Since this process requires burning off plastic, the resulting smoke contains toxic fumes that are carcinogenic and teratogenic (birth defect-causing) when inhaled.” 
• Japan is already scrambling for ways to reuse its mounting inventory of solar-panel waste, which is expected to exceed 10,000 tons by 2020 and grow by 700,000 to 800,000 tons per year by 2040.
• There is a similar problem brewing in this country where we have more than 1.4 million solar energy installations, many of which are nearing the end of their life cycle.

So fixing one perceived environmental hazard might actually be creating another environmental hazard. 

Now, in the interest of balanced discussion, a spokesperson for the Solar Energy Industries Association, Dan Whitten, has come out to dispute EP’s research findings, claiming that solar panels are : “mainly made up of easy-to-recycle materials that can be successfully recovered and reused at the end of their useful life.” 

Mr. Whitten is not only fighting against these findings and pollution estimates about the end of solar panels, he also has to fight some estimates of the pollution caused by the creation of solar panels, as estimated from an Associated press investigation in 2013 that found:

• From 2007 to 2011, solar panel manufacturing just in the state of California created more than 46.5 million pounds of sludge and contaminated water.
• About 97% of this polluted sludge and water was stored in waste storage locations within the state but more than 1.4 million pounds were taken to 9 other states which required additional energy to be burned in the transportation of said sludge and water.
• As the article concludes correctly, “There is nothing environmentally friendly about creating mountains of hazardous waste in an effort to reduce CO2 emissions.”

When analyzing a problem, you must look at the entire problem to fully understand not only the magnitude of the problem but the potential consequences of any solution you propose. Otherwise, you end up with the above situation, where the potential solution of one problem, man made global warming (assuming that is even a reality), creates another, equally bad or worst problem, massive environmental damage.

Three more examples proving that being a global warming doubter and a believer in sciences is a sane, rational person to be.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:

www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:


http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org
http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w