Showing posts with label goebbels. Show all posts
Showing posts with label goebbels. Show all posts

Saturday, October 19, 2024

October, 2024, Political Class Insanity, Part 1 - No One Trusts The Mainstream Media, Kamala The Plagiarist, Liz Cheney Cheated and More

 Every month we devote posts to just general political class insanity that is running rampant through the country. The members of the American political class continue to show that they are incapable of efficiently operating any level of government in this country. 

Even their best efforts are almost always ineffective at resolving any problem facing Americans. They spend a great amount of time not trying to improve the lives of their citizens but continually ensuring their reelection and enriching themselves, their families, and their friends in the process, all at taxpayer expense.


1)We have always claimed that America has and will survive bad Presidents (e.g.  Nixon, Carter, Obama, Biden) but that it will not survive a corrupted journalism industry. Once those that report the news begin to be biased, slanted, and out of integrity then those “journalists” become propagandists. And unfortunately, a lot of Americans already believe that is where the industry sits today:


  • According to a recent Gallup poll, a record low 31% of Americans say they have a great deal or a fair amount of confidence in the media to report the news “fully, accurately, and fairly.”

  • This is down from an also putrid level of 32% from last year.

  • In fact, the poll found that mass media is the least trusted group among 10 U.S. civic and political institutions.

  • Congress did not fare much better with only 34% expressing some type of confidence.

  • Independent voters and Republicans have the worst view of the media’s integrity with only 12% of self declared Republicans saying they have any level of confidence in the mass  media.

Back in the early 1970s when Gallup first began asking about trust in the media, results usually showed between  68% and 72% of those polled had some level of trust in the media. 

  • 50 years later, those trust levels have dropped by over 50%.


When journalism loses its independence and integrity then it is no longer journalism, it is propaganda, much like Goebbels during the Nazi era and Pravda during the Soviet Union era. The trend in integrity is not good here.


2)Long ago, Joe Biden had to drop out of the Presidential race to become the Democratic nominee for President when it came to light that he was a plagiarist. Seems his Vice President, Kamala Harris, did  not learn from that long ago embarrassment:


  • Researchers have found large sections of Kamala Harris’ book have been lifted word for word from other publications without credit being shown to the original authors.

  • It appears she clearly copied passages from such diverse sources including media reports, academic papers, Wikipedia, the Associated Press, the Urban Institute, and  the U.S. Bureau of Justice Assistance without citing the sources in the book.

  • And apparently these stolen words were not just a sentence or two that she lifted and inserted in her book but long passages from sources other people had written.


Plagiarism is worse when a public official and politician allegedly does it, their whole credibility is brought into question. But this is just another example of what we have talked about over the years, politicians and credibility do not often go together.


3)But Harris’s tarnished reputation does not stop with her alleged plagiarism:


  • Harris’s husband is named Doug Emhoff.

  • He recently came under fire when allegations arose that he physically assaulted his former girlfriend at a public gathering in 2012.

  • The New York Post reported that the alleged assault took place at the Cannes Film Festival where he supposedly hit his girlfriend with such force that she spun around while waiting in a valet line.

  • Three friends of the former girlfriend have spoken out and supported the details of the assault.


If true, just another example of the political elite thinking that laws and rules of decency  do not apply to them. 


4)Liz Cheney is a former Congresswoman from Wyoming. She is no longer in office but has continued to spew her hatred for Trump. She was the Republican vice chairwoman on the Congressional committee investigating the January 6 riot.


But  it appears that she may have misbehaved in her quest to put Trump in jail:


  • Investigators have possibly found out the reality that Cheney may have used the encrypted app Signal to secretly communicate with a committee witness, Cassidy Hutchinson.

  • She may have  also secretly communicated with a Hutchinson friend, Alyssa Farah Griffin.

  • These alleged secret communications could be serious legal ethical violations.

  • The D.C. Bar  rules make it very clear that a lawyer, Cheney, may not communicate with a person who is represented by another attorney without that attorney’s consent.

  • Congressman Barry Loudermilk summed up this alleged infraction: “Our investigation has uncovered unethical back-channel communications between former Rep. Liz Cheney and Cassidy Hutchinson just before Hutchinson changed her sworn testimony. Not only is communicating with a witness without their attorney present unethical, it undermines the integrity of an investigation.”

  • According to Congressional testimony, Hutchinson fired her current attorney shortly after the secret communications and hired new lawyers that Cheney recommended and then changed her testimony for the January 6 committee.

  • The new attorneys did not charge for their services.


These ethics violations and the influencing of testimony in front of a Congressional committee are despicable. But as always with the American political class, Cheney will  not face any criminal or ethics penalties, because those in power are always above the law.


That will do it for today: Cheney is allegedly unethical, Kamala’s husband is allegedly violent, Kamala is allegedly a plagiarist, and the mainstream price is definitely viewed as unethical.


**********************

If you agree that we need to deseat every member of Congress for their lack of success and accomplishment, then please consider going to the following petition link to help the cause:


https://www.change.org/p/deseat-congress-reset-freedom



**********************


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:


Sunday, August 30, 2015

Why Today's Democratic Politicians Suck - Part 1

Before my liberal and Democratic friends and readers go crazy about the title of this post, take a breath and read the following realities:
  • I am over 60 years old and have never voted for a Republican for President in my life.
  • Up until 2010, I had never voted for a Republican for national office in my life.
  • I wrote and published my book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government," based on my disgust and frustrations with the Bush administration.
  • Thus, I am not a diehard, or even lukewarm, Republican, conservative, or neocon.

I also have great respect for the accomplishments of previous Democratic Presidents:


  • Democrat FDR led the country through the worse economic downturn in our history in addition to leading the country through the second World War and eventual victory over the Nazis and Japanese.
  • Democrat Harry Truman  finished up the work of FDR by successfully bringing the war to a close and leading the country into a prosperous post war economy.
  • Democrat John Kennedy energized the country with his youth, vision, and energy and prevented the next world war by leading the country through the Cuban missile crisis.
  • Democrat Lyndon Baines Johnson guided the country into a new age of racial equality by leading the country with the passage of the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts.
The commonality of these Democrats is that they all had leadership skills that applied to ALL Americans and just not their voting blocs or political supporters and financiers. There are none of that leadership traits or skills with today's Democrats, a hypothesis we intend to prove over the next two days. 

Today, we will re-present the dozens of examples of Democrats dividing the country vs. leading and uniting the country that we have discussed in previous blogs. These examples are not pretty. Democratic politicians today call their political opponents or anyone who dares to disagree with their views a whole host of childish and obscene names and then wonder why those people have hard feelings against them. 

This is not leadership, this is rank immaturity on the part of the Washington political class, especially Democrats, that has never been experienced in this country before. It divides the country, decimates freedoms, and reduces the quality of life of every American.

And the most immature, leadership deficient politician today is President Obama. As we go through the obscenities and insults that people in his party and his supporters have said to slander and demean other Americans, keep in mind that at no time did this President speak up and object to the vilification of these Americans. By remaining silent, he condoned and encouraged the verbal attacks, attacks that divide the country to no one's benefit.

So decide for yourself. Do the following Democratic quotes foster understanding, joint resolution of problems, and the celebration of diversity within our society or are they blatant attempts to slander and demean political opponents in the most crass and despicable manner:
  • Democrat Speaker Of The House Nancy Pelosi called citizen opponents to Obama Care unpatriotic for simply having a difference of opinion with many politicians in Washington.
  • Democrat Charles Rangel slandered millions of Americans who opposed Obama Care by calling them racists for simply having an honest difference of opinion with many politicians in Washington.
  • Democrat Shelia Jordan Lee slandered millions of Americans who opposed Obama Care by associating them with the Ku Klux Klan.
  • Union boss and Democratic supporter Jimmy Hoffa, Jr. stated that his union was at war with the Republicans and Tea Party citizens and that these people "need to be taken out."
  • Democratic Congressmen Mike Doyle and Henry Waxman and Democratic Vice President Joe Biden slandered American citizens opposed to unfettered and destructive government spending and debt by calling them terrorists (those people that bomb and kill innocent civilians).
  • When ordinary Americans objected to the building of an Islamic mosque near the World Trade Center property because of the sad memories of 9-11, Democrat Nancy Pelosi said THEY should be investigated for simply having a passionate opinion on the mosque.
  • Democratic Congresswoman Maxine Walters said all Tea Party American citizens can go to hell simply for having a difference of opinion with her.
  • The campaign manager of Democrat’s Gerry Brown’s gubernatorial campaign called his Republican opponent, Meg Whitman, a whore.
  • Democratic White House czar Van Jones publicly called all Republicans a**h****s.
  • Democrat Alan Grayson called all Republicans knuckle dragging Neanderthals.
  • Liberal TV host Montel Williams publicly hoped that Republican Congresswoman Michele Bachman would commit suicide by decapitating herself.
  • Ed Schultz, an on air commentator for the Democratic enforcers at the MSNBC news channel, called Laura Ingraham of Fox News a slut.
  • Liberal HBO TV host Bill Maher, a major donor to Obama’s 2012 Presidential Super PAC (a $1 million donor), said on air that Republican Sarah Palin “would f*** Rick Perry if he was black.”
  • Liberal Bill Maher called Republican Sarah Palin disgusting and derogatory body part names that I will not repeat here
  • Playboy magazine’s online website offered a detailed analysis on why and how each of ten Republican women in politics should be hate raped.
  • Democratic Congressman Steve Cohen likened Republican critics of Obama Care to the Nazis and their propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels.
  • A liberal rap artist gave a Minnesota concert that was billed as the “F*** Michelle Bachman” concert (spelling out the entire f-word), a Republican Congresswoman from Minnesota.
  • A Democratic operative insulted Ann Romney, and millions of other American women, by slandering and demeaning her as a stay at home mother.
  • Martin Bashier of MSNBC News showed a video of Mitt Romney’s campaign bus that was interspersed with video clips of buses blowing up in balls of fire, explicitly wishing that the Romney bus also blow up and those inside die a fiery death.
  • Liberal Professor Richard Parncutt of the University of Graz wants to execute other human beings that are global warming deniers for simply having a different opinion than his.
  • Liberal newspaper columnist Donald Kaul wrote an article for the Des Moines Register where he called for the killing of gun owners and “dragging legislators who disagree with gun control behind pickup trucks until they get the message.”
  • Liberal Erik Loomis, PhD, assistant professor of history at the University of Rhode Island decided that he wanted the death of National Rifle Association (NRA) CEO Wayne LaPierre, branding the gun rights group he heads as a terrorist organization: "[I] want Wayne LaPierre's head on a stick."
  • Liberal Karen Lewis, head of the Chicago Teachers’ Union had some violent rhetoric of her own to share: “Do not think for a minute that the wealthy are ever going to allow you to legislate their riches away from them. Please understand that. However, we are in a moment where the wealth disparity in this country is very reminiscent of the robber baron ages. The labor leaders of that time, though, were ready to kill. They were. They were just – off with their heads. They were seriously talking about that.”
  • Liberal Elizabeth Ashack, an economist at the Department of Labor, thinks that all Christians are Nazis.
  • Democratic Indiana state representative Vanessa Summers publicly stated that a fellow legislator’s 18 month old son is a racist.
  • If you believe the reality of the sad state of the Social Security Administration’s dire financial straits, you are a liar according to liberal leaning U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders.
  • Republican Senators are too stupid to understand the multi-syllable words I am using, according to Democratic White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest.
  • All men should die or get f**ked, according to Democratic activist Sarah Noble.
I am not saying that Obama should have responded to all of these degradations. However, it would be nice if once in a while he would publicly reprimand a liberal or fellow Democrat for calling other Americans a**h***s, Neanderthals, terrorists, racists, Nazis, etc. Also, he certainly cannot claim he is working hard for all of the women in the country when he allows half of them, those with a differing political view, to be called sluts, whores, worthy of hate rapes, and other terms too graphic too repeat here.

He should be a leader, he should be setting the tone of civil political dialog, not remaining silent. He is not a leader or a defender of women's rights when he does not represent the good name and integrity of women who are not Democrats. I cannot remember any time in my life when politicians had such a low regard for law abiding American citizens of a different political stripe, a time when citizens have been so degraded by those in government and their political supporters.


Even worse, recently the President has joined into this parade of mudslinging and degradation. We will cover his entry into this morass tomorrow along with other, more recent quotes from Democrats and liberals against anyone who dares to have a difference of opinion. 

You cannot expect to have a united nation, one that attacks the current set of problems facing Americans, when one side of the political spectrum is mudslinging and cursing out the other side of the political spectrum. And when the mudslinging is led by and committed by those elected to public office, then is there any wonder why not a single major, or minor issue, has been resolved in the past decade or so? 

Democrats are no longer the leadership, trailblazing party of FDR, Truman, Kennedy, or LBJ. They are the party of haters, childish name calling and temper tantrums when they do not get their way, with their words and actions leaving the country divided and bitter.


Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at:


www.loathemygovernment.com

It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:

Term Limits Now: http://www.howmuchworsecoulditget.com
http://www.reason.com
http://www.cato.org
http://www.bankruptingamerica.org

http://www.conventionofstates.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08j0sYUOb5w



Tuesday, March 6, 2012

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy" Winston Churchill

I was getting tired of listening to President Obama's constant rants about "fairness" the other day, how he intends to end all of his perceived injustices in the world by taxing many Americans even more than how they are taxed now. His "tax the rich" class warfare rhetoric seems to be just one component of his reelection campaign, a campaign that apparently now takes precedence over leading the country.

But we have already covered the many reasons why his belligerence, soak the rich, and "taxation is good" beliefs are not good for the country:

- We have previously and easily identified how the Federal government wastes over $500 billion a year via criminal activity, fraud, wasteful spending and inefficiencies, taxpayer wealth that could be better used to grow the economy, reduce taxes, and take care of those truly less fortunate in our society without raising taxes. If Obama really cared about EVERY American, he would focus on this dreadful waste of existing taxpayer resources rather than demonize certain members of society who already pay the lion's share of the Federal government's expenses.

He could do all the perceived good that he says he wants to do by just cleaning up his act and the act of Washington today. He could warm the cold, feed the hungry, shelter the homeless many times over if only he would lead the country and stop the waste rather than divide the country.

- We have previously shown that even if you tax those Americans earning over a million dollars a year at 100%, i.e. you took every cent they earned, you would add only about half a TRILLION dollars to the Federal coffers in a one calendar year. This 100% obscene confiscation would be about only one third of the overspending and budget deficit that this administration indulged in during 2012.

You could obviously only do this once since no sane person would ever again earn a million dollars a year if all of it was forcefully taken by the government. Thus, if taxing the rich at 100% would have only a one time, relatively minor effect, taxing the rich at far less than 100% would have minimal effect on the economics of government. We have a gross overspending problem in this country, not an under taxation problem.

- We have previously shown that if you confiscated the total net worth of the richest Americans (i.e. you took their real estate, their cars, their boats, their cash, their investments, etc.), you would only only come up with about $2.4 TRILLION. This would not cover the last two years' worth of budget deficits that the Obama administration has rung up.

As with the above example where we took every cent of every millionaire's earnings, you could only confiscate the wealthy's total assets once since no sane person would ever work hard again. Since the wealthy pay for the lion's share of taxes in this country, bankrupting them with 100% confiscation of their possessions makes no since since everyone else would now have to start paying for the taxes that the wealthy used to pay.

Let's be honest, Obama is a socialist at heart and apparently in practice since it is now obvious that he wants all power, all wealth, all freedom, and all personal decisions to pass through a ruling political class, a strategy that our above and previous analyses prove will undoubedtly end in failure. Which leads me to the following set of quotes on socialism. A few observations before you read them:
  • I have only included quotes where the speaker was eloquent enough to capsulize his or her thoughts in a few sentences. I did not include long, rambling quotes since it is obvious the speaker was trying too hard to get their point across, a point that is lost in their tangle of words and sentences.
  • All of the quotes come from online quote websites that you can also access if you want to see which ones I omitted or to check the accuracy of the ones I selected. Just search for "socialism quotes" and a long list of quote websites will pop up.
  • What I found is that famous, positively impactful people (e.g. Winston Churchill, Thomas Jefferson, etc.) were 100% against socialism for the reasons you can see in their quotes. There are also excellent anti-socialism quotes from many non-famous people included below.
  • What I also found is that famous people that were in support of socialism (and by extension communism) tended to be negatively impactful people (Karl Marx, Nikita Khrushchev, Joseph Goebbels). As you will see, these quotes on socialism was much closer to the quotes of Obama and Hillary Clinton which are also included below.
  • From this compilation of pro and anti-socialism quotes, it becomes quite obvious that socialism and liberty cannot co-exist, they are relatively mutually exclusive. Since America was founded and has thrived on freedom, socialism and Obama's policies and attitude are not conducive to the long term viability of liberty in this country.
Those are my conclusions from the following quotes drawn from the famous and the unknown, where the famous consist of the good, the bad, and the ugly.


"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill

"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings, the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries." Winston Churchill

"Socialism is workable only in heaven where it isn't needed and in hell where they already have it." Cecil Palmer

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

“Socialism values equality more than liberty.” Dennis Prager

"For socialists, not just the wealth, but the guilt, must be redistributed." Andrew Sandlin

“All socialism involves slavery” Herbert Spenser

"Socialism is Bolshevism with a shave." Unknown

"As with the Christian religion, the worst advertisement for Socialism is its adherents." George Orwell


"The historical experience of socialist countries has sadly demonstrated that collectivism does not do away with alienation but rather increases it, adding to it a lack of basic necessities and economic inefficiency." Pope John Paul II

"Socialists cry "Power to the people", and raise the clenched fist as they say it. We all know what they really mean — power over people, power to the State." Margaret Thatcher

"Political corruption, social greed, and Americanized quasi-socialism can ruin even the most wonderful places. California proved that."  Tiffany Madison

"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money to spend." Margaret Thatcher

"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." Thomas Jefferson

“I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” Thomas Jefferson

"Democracy extends the sphere of individual freedom; socialism restricts it. Democracy attaches all possible value to each man; socialism makes each man a mere agent, a mere number. Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word: equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude."  Alexis de Rocqueville 

"Collectivism doesn’t work because it’s based on a faulty economic premise. There is no such thing as a person’s ‘fair share’ of wealth. The gross national product is not a pizza that must be carefully divided because if I get too many slices, you have to eat the box. The economy is expandable and, in any practical sense, limitless." P. J. O'Rourke 

"No matter how worthy the cause, it is robbery, theft, and injustice to confiscate the property of one person and give it to another to whome it does not belong." Walter Williams

"There is nothing more arrogant than a self-righteous income redistributor." Dick Arney 

"I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." Thomas Jefferson

"Every time that we try to lift a problem from our own shoulders, and shift that problem to the hands of the government, to the same extent we are sacrificing the liberties of our people." John F. Kennedy

"A society that puts equality – in the sense of equality of outcome – ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality or freedom."
Milton Friedman

"Since this is an era when many people are concerned about “fairness” and “social justice,” what is your “fair share” of what someone else has worked for?" Thomas Sowell

"The theory seems to be that as long as a man is a failure, he is one of God’s children, but that as soon as he succeeds he is taken over by the Devil."  H. L. Mencken

"Don’t expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong."
Calvin Coolidge

"To take from one, because it is thought that his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare others, who, or whose fathers have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, 'the guarantee to every one of a free exercise of his industry, and the fruits acquired by it.'" Thomas Jefferson
 
"You cannot bring prosperity by discouraging thrift.
You cannot help small men by tearing down big men.
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
You cannot lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer.
You cannot help the poor man by destroying the rich.
You cannot keep out of trouble by spending more than your income.
You cannot further brotherhood of men by inciting class hatred.
You cannot establish security on borrowed money.
You cannot build character and courage by taking away man's initiative and independence.
You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves." Rev. William J. H. Boetcker

"The best way to put more money in people's pockets is to leave it there in the first place." Edwin Fuelner

"When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." Unknown

"Repeal that [welfare] law, and you will soon see a change in their manners. ... Six days shalt thou labor, though one of the old commandments long treated as out of date, will again be looked upon as a respectable precept; industry will increase, and with it plenty among the lower people; their circumstances will mend, and more will be done for their happiness by inuring them to provide for themselves, than could be done by dividing all your estates among them." Ben Franklin

Now, compare these positive quotes above about freedom and against socialism to the following negative quotes from negative people regarding freedom and liberty:


"Comrades! We must abolish the cult of the individual decisively, once and for all."  Soviet Premier Nikita S. Khrushchev


"We need to stop worrying about the rights of the individual and start worrying about what is best for society." Hillary Clinton


"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton


"To be a socialist is to submit the I to the thou; socialism is sacrificing the individual to the whole." Joseph Goebbels, Minister of Propaganda, National Socialist German Workers' ("Nazi") Party


"My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world. I hope you'll join with me, as we try to change it." Barack Obama

If Obama really, really believes this last statement, then how much upside is there by changing the greatest nation in the HISTORY of the world by the radical, ill-founded, idiotic, and socialistic ways that he wants to implement? Makes no sense, especially when you consider the positive advice listed above from Churchill, Jefferson, Franklin, and other great leaders as compared to the negative advice from people like Goebbels, Marx, and Khrushchev (and Hillary Clinton).

Thus, every day, especially in this ongoing political season I urge every true American to avoid the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy that is socialism. Remember the following simple advice and keep freedom and liberty alive:


1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity, by legislating the wealth out of prosperity.

2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.

3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.


4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.


5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them; and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work, because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.

 Unfortunately, most voters don't know or understand these five points and the good advice above and that is the biggest danger facing our democracy today.

We invite all readers of this blog to visit our new website, "The United States Of Purple," at:

http://www.unitedstatesofpurple.com/

The United States of Purple is a new grass roots approach to filling the office of President of The United States by focusing on the restoration of freedom in the United States, focusing on problem solving skills and results vs. personal political enrichment, and imposing term limits on all future Federal politicians. No more red states, no more blue states, just one United States Of America under the banner of Purple.

The United States Of Purple's website also provides you the formal opportunity to sign a petition to begin the process of implementing a Constitutional amendment to impose fixed term limits on all Federally elected politicians. Only by turning out the existing political class can we have a chance of addressing and finally resolving the major issues of or times.

Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available at www.loathemygovernment.com. It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday.

Please visit the following sites for freedom:

http://www.cato.org/
http://www.robertringer.com/
http://realpolichick.blogspot.com/
http://www.flipcongress2010.com/
http://www.reason.com/
http://www.repealamendment/





Friday, September 9, 2011

Obama, Orwell, and Goebbels - The Triumvirate Of Language Control

Consider two famous quotes, one from a famous author and one from a famous and heinous tyrant:

"War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength." George Orwell, author of "1984"

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State." Joseph Goebbels, Adolph Hitler's propaganda minister.

Both of these quotes keep coming to mind as I watch the Obama administration try to control the country, and its freedoms, by controlling and distorting the language. Consider:

1) The latest language control initiative from the Obama administration was on display during the Hurricane Irene aftermath. The Federal government was not coming to the aid of those affected by the hurricane, raining, and resultant flooding. According to the Obama administration, the "Federal family" was mobilizing to help people.

I guess the Federal government thinks that "Federal family" will make us feel more warm and fuzzy about government functions if we consider them part of our "family."  I am assuming that the political class thinks if they tell this lie and phrase often enough and maybe we will actually want more of the "Federal family" in our lives.

Little does the "Federal family" know that many of us want less of our families in our lives many times so why would we want a bigger family of people we never met or heard of? Many times having more family in our lives results in less money in our lives and our wallets. "Federal family" really starts to sound very much like the Big Brother idea from Orwell's "1984" which was not a good concept from a freedom perspective. Eventually, Big Brother became the center of every citizen's life at the expense of family, privacy, liberty and freedom.

2) Another recent perversion of language is this government and political class insistence that government has a "revenue" stream. Governments collect taxes and fees, they do not generate revenue streams. Consider the standard definition of revenue that exists in the real world outside of Washington:

"Revenue - income that comes into a business as a result of selling a product or service."

Government does not sell a product or service. Theoretically, a democratic government only does certain things for citizens because it is more efficient for government to do it centrally than for citizens to do it for themselves (a whole other blog post could be done on how far we have drifted from this definition of democratic government). Comedian Chris Rock went one step further, once saying that we do not pay taxes, they (the political class) take taxes.

Revenue should be associated with individuals acting in their own best interests and giving some of their wealth voluntarily to a business in return for a product or service we desire. This could not be any further from what taxes are, the mandatory confiscation of our wealth by a central government for uses that we do not always agree with.

By trying to reposition the government tax process from a confiscation process to a voluntary process by renaming "taxes" as "revenue," the political class hopes that we will be more likely to give up our personal wealth in the future in order to support the government's revenue stream rather than its tax stream.

Abe Lincoln once said: "If you called a tail a leg, how many legs would a dog have? Answer: Four, just because you call it a leg does not make it a leg." Same thing here, just because you call it government revenue does not change the fact that is confiscatory tax.

3) One of the earliest perversions of the language and reality from the Obama administration was its insistence that we not refer to "Islamic" terrorism. Whether it was in reference to the 9-11 attacks or the Ft Hood massacre, the Obama administration insisted that the word "Islamic" not be used to describe these and other Islamic terrorist attacks.

I assume that the reasoning was that by denying the obvious, Obama would endear himself to those in the Muslim world that were not terrorists. I really do not know what his motives were but the simple reality was that they were Islamic terrorists. If they were Christian terrorists, we should call them Christian terrorists. If they were Martian terrorists we should call them Martian terrorists.

By denying the reality who and what was the source of the 9-11 attacks and other terror actions, we are further away from understanding the root causes of terror. Old joke: "A wife walks into the living room and sees her husband crawling around on the floor. She asks him what he is doing and he says he is looking for something he dropped on the floor in the bedroom. When she asks why isn't he looking for it in the bedroom he says the light is better for searching in the living room."

By denying and suppressing the root causes of many terror attacks and perverting the description from "Islamic" to a more generic description, we end up looking for root causes of terrorism in the living room when we really should be looking in the place where the problem is, the bedroom. Why the President elected to search in the living room, especially after how much terrorism suffering the country has lived through, is beyond me.

4) The all time great lie and perversion of language has to be the "Social Security Trust Fund." This name implies that we give up some of our wealth every pay check to the government who holds in "trust,", i.e. keeps it save for us until we need it back when we retire.

However, that "trust" is severely misplaced. That money that the political class and Federal government was supposed to hold in trust for us is long gone. It has been paid out over the years to current retirees during those years. There is no pot of money or wealth, with our name on it, sitting somewhere for use to use in our golden years. The only pile waiting for is a set of IOUs that track how much of our payments have been made to other Americans. It is quite simply a giant Ponzi scheme where those that gave their money to the scheme first are most likely to get the highest return back over time.

Now, some people, like Harry Reid, would declare that there is indeed $2.6 TRILLION sitting somewhere in the Social Security Administration building or elsewhere for all of us. What he is too ignorant too understand is that there is $2.6 TRILLION of accounting entries sitting somewhere in the Social Security Administration. Accounting entries are not wealth and they are not money. You cannot take an accounting entry to the store and buy something with it. 

When you retire, the Social Security Administration will have to take some of those IOUs over to the Treasury Department for redemption. Since the Treasury Department is currently running an annual deficit of over a TRILLION dollars, it does not have any money laying around and will have to go out and tax existing workers to cover your retirement check.

Don't believe me still? Think back to last month when it was possible that the debt ceiling would not be raised. What was the first scare tactic out of Obama's bag of demagoguery? Social Security recipients might not get their checks if the debt ceiling was not raised. Why would he say that if there was $2.6 TRILLION sitting in the Social Security"trust"  fund?  Why couldn't he just take some of that money out to cover the short term shortfall?

Because it is not money, it is accounting ledger entries. Social Security is now a negative cash flow operation, money coming in from workers is not enough to cover the money that has been promised to be paid out to retirees. Your trust that the political class would hold your Social Security pay check deductions in trust could not be trusted.

[Note: We will do a lot on Social Security next week since it will be a hot topic up until the November, 2012 elections.]

5) I am not a bankruptcy expert but I am pretty sure I know what happens when a company goes bankrupt but still wants to continue on as a business after cleaning up its financials via a court supervised bankruptcy proceeding:
  • The company gets to get all or much of its debt forgiven.
  • The company gets to break distribution contracts with existing dealers of its products if needed to get solvent again.
  • The company gets to break contracts with its unions and workers if needed to get solvent again.
  • The company gets to make changes to its arrangements with its stock holders and debt holders including turning their investments into junk if needed to get solvent.
It is a pretty straightforward process. Small to large businesses have been doing it for hundreds of years under the watchful eye of a judicial branch. The vast, vast majority of these bankruptcies have been done without government input and interference and certainly without wasting tens of billions of dollars of taxpayer wealth.

Until Obama bailed out two of the big three domestic auto makers. We are constantly told the big lie that Obama "saved the auto industry." Which is totally a lie being told so many times. If General Motors and Chrysler had been forced into bankruptcy proceedings without any government involvement, all of the above bankruptcy steps would have still been executed but without the loss of billions of taxpayer dollars.

Both companies would have shed debt, broke contracts with dealers they did not want to deal with any more, reworked their union contracts to a more favorable pay scale, and probably greatly diminished the wealth that stock holders and debt holders had given the company. The end result might have looked different but there were enough valuable assets in both companies that they would have emerged out of bankruptcy as smaller, but stronger competitors. They did not need Obama's or our politicians' intervention.

But Obama wanted to intervene in order to leverage a political goal: protect as many union jobs and union voters as possible. He did not intervene to save the auto industry, he intervened, using taxpayer money as collateral, to protect his political interests.

To prove this, let's look at an extreme case. The American car market sells about 16 million cars a year. General Motors has about a 25% share of that market. Let's assume that General Motors never emerged from bankruptcy, i.e. Obama had not intervened to "save" the car industry in America.

What would be the size of the car market if that had happened? No, not 12 million, it would still be about 16 million. The market did not change, that market demand would still have been there, for the most part, with or without General Motors being a competitor. About 16 million buyers of cars would still have needed cars, the absence of General Motors would have forced them to buy Fords or American made Hondas, or American made Toyotas or foreign cars.

The auto industry would still have been intact, with many of those 16 million cars still being made in American factories, some of them owned by America companies and some of them not. But the Obama administration wants you to believe the lie that it saved the American car industry. It did not, the American car industry would have survived nicely, with a revamped General Motors and Chrysler and without billions of dollars wasted.

So what do we know for sure:
  1. There is no "Federal family," there are only Federal government agencies, run by an incompetent and wasteful political class, that should be seen and not heard until they are needed. Much like we do want Big Brother at our dinner table, we do not need or want this Federal family around our family dinner table either.
  2. The government does not generate revenue like viable businesses do, the collect taxes. By the way, did you ever notice that when you put the words, "The IRS" together, it spells THEIRS? That is confiscating taxes, not generating revenue.
  3. There truly are Islamic terrorists in the world.
  4. It is too late now but we never should have trusted the government and political class to put our wealth in a Social Security Trust fund.
  5. The political class and Obama did not save the auto industry, it would have been fine without taxpayer bailouts.
As agent Mulder used to say on X-Files, "The truth is out there." Unfortunately, entities like Orwell's Big Brother, Goebbels propaganda machine, and the political class spin doctors and politicians would rather you believe their lies and will keep telling them, hoping that their lies become your reality, a reality that is usually more restrictive when it comes to freedom and liberty.

Never forget the warning from the past: "The truth is the mortal enemy of the lie and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."  And, if I may add, the State is usually the mortal enemy of freedom.



Our book, "Love My Country, Loathe My Government - Fifty First Steps To Restoring Our Freedom And Destroying The American Political Class" is now available, at http://www.loathemygovernment.com/. It is also available online at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Please pass our message of freedom onward. Let your friends and family know about our websites and blogs, ask your library to carry the book, and respect freedom for both yourselves and others everyday


Please visit the following sites for freedom:
http://www.loathemygovernment.com/
http://www.cato.org/
http://www.robertringer.com/
http://realpolichick.blogspot.com/
http://www.flipcongress2010.com/
http://www.reason.com/
http://www.repealamendment.com/